Reviews

3 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
Wow
16 March 2003
I just finished seeing this movie for the first time. I'll begin by saying that it's been some time since a film got the reaction out of me this one did. For the first 45 minutes, I was convinced this movie was intent on trying to be the most depressing story ever told. For the next 45 minutes, I was still interested, but my overall opinion was hanging on the ending..of which I was very skeptical, as I knew what was left to be revealed. Then, it was over. Boy, they just don't make enough of 'em that good, folks.

When you see a movie for the first time after it's already won mad Oscars, you end up judging performances based on that. Most times, it doesn't help their cause. Kim Basinger in LA Confidential (another movie I love) springs to mind. Up to the last 10 minutes of this movie, my opinion was that Halle had done a real nice job...it was an interesting character, and she certainly hadn't done anything to screw it up. Then, came that moment on the back steps...and that look...and that immediate realization that sometimes we're just along for the damn ride, and there ain't a whole lot anybody can do about it but try and hang on and not get run over. That five seconds defines this movie...if it doesn't work, the whole thing crashes. I applaud her craft--she totally nailed it.

This is definitely Billy Bob's best performance since Sling Blade...a movie so good, it almost becomes cliche in your memory. There are times here when he carries himself with a beaten-down grace that is just brilliantly complex. Who knows where this character would end up in the hands of another actor, but I can't think of one that would have left me feeling the same way.

For those of you who don't get this movie--be it for the lack of attention to certain strings of logic in what appears to be a real small town; or for its refusal to spell out for you what somebody may be thinking from moment to moment, let alone from day to day...well, I'm sure the next Matrix is gonna be real good, too. I'm just glad that there are still folks out there making movies that can totally exist on a back porch with a pint of ice cream.

I give this film a 9.
12 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Jimi Hendrix (1973)
10/10
One of the premier rock god documentaries ever.
3 September 2000
This documentary will give you the heart and soul of James M Hendrix, from the people who loved him to the thoughts and performances of the man himself. The performances are predominately taken from The Monterey Pop Festival, widely regarded as the best set Jimi ever played. Unlike most music biopics that seem to be afraid of the music they chronicle, this one gives you nice long stretches of performance, never cutting off a solo to give some little pearl of wisdom. Songs are played in their entirety.

The interviews are engaging and sometimes enlightening; such as The Who's Pete Townshend explaining how the appearance order at Monterey was decided, and Jimi's long-time girlfriend Fayne Pridgon retelling tales of Jimi turning her on to such new experiences as LSD and a strange little folk singer named Bob Dylan.

I HIGHLY recommend this movie to anyone who loved Hendrix for his amazing contributions to the halls of rock history. He truly was the impresario of his generation, and maybe all others, before and since. Turn the speakers way up, sit back, and ENJOY! You will not be disappointed.
23 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
***SPOILER***
28 April 2000
Warning: Spoilers
Alright, I have watched this twice now and I must admit, an ending has never done more to shatter my illusion that I can't be completely fooled for 110 minutes. My hat is off to not only the director, but every friend I have that could have innocently spoiled this movie but didn't. I knew not of a surprise ending going in, and it definitely makes viewing #1 thoroughly enjoyable.

OK, now to the holes. Most of them really are covered pretty nicely. And if they're not, well, as Howard Stern once said, "For this movie, ya gotta suspend disbelief!"

Let's begin with the seemingly random use of extreme cold. This is the big, stinking, glarer of the whole film. It's used arbitrarily for effect, and omitted during scenes where had it been used, the surprise would have been wrecked early. I admit it's a bit of a cheat, so I won't use space defending it. If logic dictated all, Superman would never have gotten away with a pair of glasses and a comb-over for a suitable disguise. Forgive and forget.

Now, for the lack of a bullet hole. Cole does say that "they only see what they want to see." That explains Malcolm's not noticing he had a gaping exit wound in his lower back. As far as Cole not seeing it, well...the entrance wound was below the belt, and I never saw Cole standing behind Malcolm sans sportcoat. Shaky, I know...but how does Jimmy Stewart not notice Kim Novak #2 for God's sake! My point is, even the classics falter under the weight of heavy scrutiny.

The performances here neutral out any shortcuts taken to sustain the film. Bruce plays a low-key role with the same Everyman Having a Really Lousy Day quality he's brought to saving the world, a building, an airport, etc. Say what you want about the guy, but if the Martians showed up with space lasers cocked for real, who would you call? I really believed this character and it's a testament to his skills that he never appears to be condescending onscreen to his co-star, a common trap in adult-child pairings.

That brings me to little Forrest Gump, Jr. (Yes, THAT'S where you saw that kid before!) This was a big-time ACTING role, not a throw a cute kid into a harrowing situation and film his "horrified" reactions in cut-away shots. There were a couple of occasions where you could see him "act", but mostly, he handled quite a few different emotions with startling accuracy. I look forward to watching his career unfold. He's gonna be a good one, as long as he never, ever, ever finds himself left "Home Alone".

It's impossible to review this film without coming eventually to "The Usual Suspects." I've never cared for that film, because the ending never raises any valid questions that had never been considered before the surprise was revealed. On that count, this movie comes through in spades. After the first viewing, my head swirled with "But, wait a minute..."'s, which began overlapping into each other as pieces fell together. The number of user comments on this film supports this point: This movie COMMANDS discussion, and that is no small feat.

One more thing WHAT THE HECK IS UP WITH MOM'S SOUP? What possible back-story would motivate a woman to feed soup to her child made from Winona Ryder's "Heathers" recipe book? That was a VERY CHILLING scene, and was an interesting way to confirm to Malcolm and the audience that this ghost business was for real...but talk about coming out of nowhere!!

I give this movie an 8 out of 10.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed