Reviews

19 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
What a joke...
4 June 2004
I admit I LOVED the first movie and rumors of a sequel had my blood pumping. But this movie was absolutely dreadful. Sony really milked suckers like me into getting this one.

The movie opens and ends with propaganda videos and it really sets the tone in a bad way. The music and announcer were either too over the top or just plain bad, probably the latter. Remember the terrific score by Basil Poledouris in the first movie? That got cut and in came the campy "video game style" music that went out in the early 90s.

Gone are the "greats" of the original like Clancy Brown and Michael Ironside. Or the likes of Casper Van Dien and Denise Richards which were attractive and likable. In are B-list actors who are flat, boring, and incredibly bad. Instead of that "wink of the eye" style you got from Jake Busey you get a motley looking crew that's as fun as a wet sock.

The effects are good but obscured by the "storm" for most of the movie. Well, I should say the CGI effects are good. The SET (all one of them) was a joke. And remember those awesome rifle/shotgun combo weapons from the original that really tested your surround sound? Ha I guess that's too expensive. Instead the weapons flash with a wimpy sound reminiscent of Star Wars.

Now comes the worst part - the plot. The first 30 minutes consists of a bunch of running around and the occasional weapon "blast". Boring, but coherent. But the real circus starts at the hour mark. What was a battle turns into a soap opera. I couldn't believe it when the soldiers started kissing each other and two male soldiers made homosexual remarks and moves towards each other. Topping this off is the random black soldier who pops in and says something to the effect of "who are you sleeping with tonight sergeant?" (with a goofy grin of course). Welcome to the "New Age Federation", oh you DON'T want to know more! A nude scene is thrown which really ends any attempt to take the movie seriously. The whole homosexual scene was bizarre and out of place. At least the love triangle in the original was plausible and interesting. Instead an odd series of relationships develops that are more apt for Jerry Springer.

As the movie winds down you feel like a real fool for taking the bait. Instead of the heroic and heart pounding "Klendeathu Drop", "Whiskey Outpost", and "Brainbug" sequences you have power ranger style fights that last for seconds at most. The laughable closing propaganda sequence ends this ridiculous chapter of the Troopers series. I loved Heinlein's works and the original Starship Troopers but this is an insult both of the above. I hope another movie will be made that does justice to the originals.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A decent movie marred by mistakes
5 October 2003
Warning: Spoilers
Contains spoiler Cold Creek Manor had promise. True, the plot was very predictable but I really liked the beginning of this movie. The novelty quickly wears off however. This movie had two major problems: (1) a rambling plot full of holes (2) technical errors/bad directing.

Let's start with the first point. The plot is a very tried and true formula that is pretty hard to mess up. However, the movie starts adding its own elements into it and all we end up with is one big mess. I guess it really starts when the father allows an ex-con (and the previous owner), who happens to barge into his old house, to work for him. Honestly, is anybody this stupid? The plot goes in all sorts of directions from here - if it had focused on one element it might have been an excellent movie. The plots run the gammit from the wife sleeping with her boss, the evil house, the history of the family, local cults, on and on and on it goes until nobody knows what the hell is happening. We are introduced to a fellow "normal" family but they are never seen again in the movie? And how exactly is the family paying for this gigantic house and living expenses, seeing as neither parent has a job? The plot is full of holes and loose ends that go nowhere. Now that I think of it more then half of the characters in the story weren't necessary. Also, why was child pornography even introduced to the plot? And all the small town citizens are portrayed as morons or drunks?

Then there was the infamous "snake scene" - that was positively the WORST action I have ever seen in a big budget film. You'll laugh out loud as the family runs from one room to the other and runs into snakes. Then a snake falls from the ceiling and they all go berserk! The crowd was roaring at this scene. I cannot believe such a ridiculous sequence ever made it past editing.

For a horror film this movie also left out an important element: TERROR! Come to think of it, this movie didn't excite me until the last 10 minutes.

Onward to the second point! I have to say the director had his good moments, but he had more then his share of bad ones as well! What was up with the ridiculous cuts and fade outs? The one liners were terrible: "how about some iced tea" (fade out) "I'll give you a good deal on the truck...' yeah you better' " (cuts out) Could they think of no better way to end these scenes?

The MUSIC, they must have used all of 2-3 clips for the duration of the movie. The thrill music would suddenly cut in at random times: the main character goes to get a beer or gets in his car and suddenly action music begins playing. Also there was a HIGHLY annoying ticking sound that played for the last 10 minutes. A pointless chase scene is thrown in that merely ends with the main character driving off....how exciting?? Then somehow he is blamed for killing his daughters horse....Whhaaa...how did it get in the pool...wouldn't it damage...etc. etc. Then slow motion is thrown in at the end for no real purpose? The camera cuts to different members of the family and then the credits suddenly pop-up. Simply terrible.

I could go on but you get the idea. The movie had potential. Who knows, maybe if they make a sequel this will be looked upon as a brilliant film (okay, lets not go that far). But frankly, as a big budget film this movie fails. There are too many errors, too little plot, and not enough terror. And as everybody else says, the trailer and the movie have almost nothing in common!
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Last Race (2002)
Low Budget + Bad Acting = Good Movie!?
21 May 2003
After the recent release of "The Fast and the Furious" my faith has been slipping in car movies. "Gone in 60 seconds" had good cars but not enough action. Like most people, I also have little faith in the upcoming movie "2 Fast 2 FURIOUS". The Last Race combines the racing of The Fast and the Furious with the realism of homemade movie street racing.

The main problem with the movie is its low budget - invariably this also leads to a lack of acting skills. The acting by Stephen Sullivan (the main character) is satisfactory but seems forced. The scene between him and his girlfriend is boring and poorly played out. Luis Villalta (Arman) does a better job of portraying the nemesis in the movie but could still use some work. Unfortunately, the character of Jason is very poorly acted. With ridiculous lines like "Hey Barbie, I got a little sumthin'-sumthin' for you" and "you crash my ride bitch! you crash my ride!" it is clear he had little to work with.

Along with some mediocre acting the plot suffers as well. Does anybody actually believe that this group of 30-year-old actors is fresh out of high school and about to enter college? It also looks very ridiculous when the "police bust" consists of a single police car chasing several hundred street racers.

Did anybody else notice the similarity between "The Fast and the Furious" scenes in this movie? Both racing scenes are similar: (1) Person A challenges person B (2) Crowd of mechanics suddenly appears around two racers cheering and yelling "ohhhhhh" (3) Person B refuses to race (4) Person A makes witty comment (5) Mechanics laugh and nod their heads in agreement (6) Challenge accepted. The getaway scene is also very similar to The Fast and the Furious with people screaming, throwing their hands up into the air, and peeling out.

So what makes this movie so good? For me it is the realism of how the races were setup. The crew actually invited street racers to be the crowd and arranged several races before and during the filming. This is exactly how races happen in many areas. The last race between the asian racer and Rob is true to the randomness of real street racing. Not the best, but better than Fast and the FURIOUS. I hear there are plans for a sequel, I look forward to seeing what they can do.
5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Better than the other two, but still stupid
20 January 2003
I am proud to say that somebody finally produced a U.S. Seal movie (there have been 3 of them now!) that was actually worth anything. The first one was a complete sham and the second movie was absolutely the worst movie I have ever seen. But don't kid yourself, this is still a terrible movie.

The fascination with beginning the movie with a LONG underwater scene has apparently not changed. The underwater fighting was bad in many ways, so lets go ahead and get it out: the audio was obnoxious at best, and was obviously the same clip of "I've got him!!! I need help!! (grunt, grunt)" on a loop for about a minute. You also couldn't tell who was on what side nor was the action particularly interesting - characteristics VERY COMMON with the original two. Pay close attention and you'll notice they go into the same hatch they went in the second movie! The whole reason the team fought underwater was because they were spotted from shore, well here's an idea - next time don't use a HUGE boat with 5 motors to "silently" approach the target.

Somehow they end up in Albania and shoot a few UN soldiers (you would think that might anger the UN) and steal their truck. They then decide to raid a camp using the worst tactics - instead of attacking at night, they wait until broad daylight and about half the team dies. I won't bore you with the rest of the plot but honestly this movie had the LAMEST ending of all 3 movies. It is HILARIOUS to watch a small rubber boat blow up an entire tanker (akin to the jeep blowing up half the port in the second movie, or the car exploding in midair in the first).

More problems:

-The whole "Senators Son" plot simply did not work, not to mention it is hardly original.

-When the head SEAL tells his commander he won't take the Senators son, he keep lowering his head between his shoulders until he looks like a complete moron, and he keeps saying "suh. no suh, I won't take him suuuuhhh.) VERY ANNOYING.

-A problem this movie shared with the second one was VERY POOR DVD quality. Everytime a truck goes by it JERKS by, you can clearly see it go frame by frame in an unrealistic manner. The dubbing was also poor and frankly most of them had annoying voices in the first place.

At least the second one was funny - this was just stupid. DO NOT WATCH
6 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
U.S. Seals II (2001 Video)
Worse than the original (is that possible??)
8 January 2003
Warning: Spoilers
After seeing the first U.S. Seals, which was an atrocious movie, I figured I would see U.S. Seals II just for laughs. Well it certainly didn't let me down in that department, but for all the wrong reasons.

You can tell any movie is going to be bad when it opens up with the main character cocking his pistol, staring directly at the camera, and giving this RIDICULOUS grin. Then his commander says, "Good Luck, and Godspeed!". Even if he was a good actor (rest assured, he is not), it is still a very corny line.

The action starts up pretty quickly, and just like in the original, it goes down hill even quicker. Even the average viewer will notice that the "weapons" (are they even real guns??) change several times in the battle. I almost burst out laughing when the SEALS start shooting the bad guys and one of them runs out WITHOUT A GUN and jumps over some crates like he was hit. Then a bad guy is shot and flies through a wooden door and flips around several times until he decides he is dead. It is also enlightening when a SEAL says, "Hey Amigo" and shoots the guy who promptly flies 30 feet onto the ground, the rolls around a few times. I was rolling on the floor when a jeep on fire plunges in a lake (you can see the fire go out) and then boom!, BOOM!, BOOOOOOOOOOM! and half the port blows up!! Then, after the bad guy in the tower is shot for the 5th time, a SEAL pulls a bazooka out of nowhere and blows up the tower and the bad guy flies (extremely fake).

The worst part about this is the first 30 minutes of the movie have ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to do with the rest of the movie. I'll spare you the horror of the rest of the movie but I'll briefly discuss the other bad parts:

-Everytime anybody moves their hand, head, body, gun, or whatever it makes this retarded WHOOSH sound - just like the first movie.

-About every 30 seconds the movie starts playing this ridiculous, and very tiring, chinese music.

-One of the bad guys uses his DEADLY SCARF to fight a SEAL - he whips it around and knocks the SEAL down, eventually killing him with a SCARF.

-The army major is wearing absolutely no army patches on his uniform, and also has an Australian accent.

-Not a single US weapon is used in the movie.

-The rest of the movie is set on an island NORTH of Siberia, yet everybody is wearing shorts and t-shirts?

-The head SEAL is also apparently quite adept at operating a submarine.

-(SPOILER) The whole plot basically revolves around 2 nuclear missiles on an island that is permeated with methane gas - precluding the use of guns. Now you would think that the whole grand scheme of LAUNCHING A MISSILE off the island would set off the methane. The head bad guy is also smoking a cigar the whole time, but a tiny spark in the end blows up the whole island??
0 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Racist and sterotypical
20 December 2002
Is it just me or did anybody find this movie racist? I think we overact today when anybody says the word 'racist' but this movie was just ridiculous for both blacks and whites!

I turned on half way through the movie to see a bunch of blacks planning some evil scheme to kill all the white people (?!). They all have afro's and look like a motley crew. This group has also somehow procured a massive underground facility and it is hilarious to watch the black bodyguard to talk with his ridiculous accent and fill the stereotypical black role.

I came back 10 minutes later to see the exact opposite - a bunch of "redneck" cops and park rangers! One of the cops has a ridiculous accent and acts so stupid that frankly I found it offensive. Then we see his "brother" (or was it cousin?), who is incidentally a park ranger, polishing up his brand new speed boat (maybe thats the business I need to get in??). Predictably, bond steals the boat and a boat chase ensues.

I switched back to the movie about 10 minutes later to see a bunch of blacks dancing around like savages and performing odd ceremonies. Anybody else find it odd that there are 100 of these dancers and bond shoots one of them and they all suddenly back off? Then the black god rises out of his grave by an elevator (!!?) and bond shoots him and the movie is over! Of course, nobody asks questions about the stolen boats or the cars they destroyed.

Some of the bond movies have been less than stellar (Tomorrow never dies, the world is not enough) but this one is a definite miss. Relatively poor acting and unbelievable plot make this one to miss.
0 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Rollerball (2002)
3/10
To Ridiculous and Beyond!
10 February 2002
As soon as I saw the previews I knew this movie was going to be bad, but I never, NEVER, imagined it would be this bad.

Let me start with the plot: unless you've seen the original you're left to guess what the plot is (if anything?). The plot is given no date, one could assume it happened 20 years ago, and it appears the old Soviet Union is still alive and kicking although the movie is supposed to be set in the future. The whole point of the movie (or at least the original) is supposed to be about individuality, happiness, and control. Forget about any of that because it's not in the movie. In fact, the entire movie would seem to suggest "if it feels good, do it" and "follow the crowd and you get these nice cars and women". The movie even ends on a ridiculous quote about having sex - it seems the writers didn't care about a moral or even writing a story.

One might assume that since there is no plot it must be all action? Yes, it is action and No, it's not good. You know the action is going to be poor when the players come out in ridiculous costumes and helmets that look like bears or cats - at least the original version took itself seriously. Don't try to keep track of the action either - the track is so badly put together it is impossible. With the original version you could keep track of the action, but with this version all you see it motorcycles and people flying and hitting each other.

Its a real shame what this remake did to the name of Rollerball. I highly recommend you see the original if you want to know what the plot and action is really supposed to be like. One might note that the very thing this movie is SUPPOSED to go against is the very thing it relies on for its success.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
U.S. Seals (2000 Video)
Rent for the laughs!
27 December 2001
Warning: Spoilers
***SPOILERS***

MOST MEMORABLE SCENE- Car flying into air and exploding for no reason - and you can even see the ramp they launched it off!

MOST LAUGHABLE SCENE- SEALs drinking it up in a bar after one of the SEALs loses his wife.

WORST QUOTE- "Let's go home son" with goofy smile and ridiculous look on face.

WORST INACCURACY- SEAL hitting a steel rope several hundred meters away and breaking it.

WORST PORTION OF PLOT- attacking an oil rig for no reason - Oil rig also happens to have .50 caliber machine guns on top.

WORST THING ABOUT MOVIE- They made a sequel (how the hell?!?). Blockbuster advertises sequel as way to "show your patriotism".

If you rent this movie it rent it for the laughs - it's actually more fun than Def comedy jam!
5 out of 46 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Rat Race (2001)
10/10
Wow! Pleasantly suprised
11 August 2001
Warning: Spoilers
I personally did not think that rat race would be much going into the movie, and my suspicion seemed confirmed by the first part of the movie. The movie starts rather dull and the jokes don't fly to well...was I in for a surprise! As soon as the "race" begins this movie becomes non-stop laughter for the whole 2 hours.

The subplots are not only hilarious but are easy to keep track of despite having 6 "teams". (*****Possible spoiler*****) One of the sub-plots, involving the Pear family accidentally going to a Nazi museum and driving off with Hitler's car - only to end up crashing into a World War II veteran reunion, is absolutely hilarious and is the best scene I have ever seen in a movie so far (*****End spoiler*****). I was also not expecting much from the rather ho-hum casting and I thought it would be disaster when I saw Whoopi Goldberg. The entire cast, even Whoopi, was top notch and flowed seamlessly into the comedy.

The comedy in this movie also took laughter to a new level: in the theatre I went to the entire audience burst out into laughter at most of the jokes. Some of you may think this silly comedy (which it is) is ridiculous or "Cable Guy - Jim Carrey" type. As silly as this movie is you won't find yourself saying "this isn't funny, there's no way that could ever happen", even in the stuff which is beyond fantasy you won't stop laughing. Even the ending, which seems kind of lame at first will have you clapping for by the end of the movie with an appearance by Smashmouth.

Overall this movie get's 5 out of 5, two thumbs up, %100 or whatever you want to call it. I could easily see this movie getting multiple "Comedy of the Year" Awards
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Base (1999 Video)
10/10
What did you expect?
3 March 2001
There are many idiotic comments from people here who obviously expect a Titanic type movie from a movie that was made for video only. What the heck did you expect? A high class movie with second to none visual effects? Considering this is a low budget film that was NEVER advertised it was a very good film.

Personally I though the acting by Mark Decascos was pretty good- not top notch but B-rating. A few of the supporting actors showed talent although the character Lieutenant Kelly Andrews (Paula Trickey) was played terribly.

True there are also countless sterotypes about the military and drug dealers, but it did make the movie seem more cool than real life (yea! let's watch them run a 5 mile PT). The plot also became very predictable towards the end, but at least the action is a bunch of CGI unrealistic Cr*p. I'm not sure how many mistake there were about the uniforms for the army because I wasn't watching that closely but obviously most of the commenters (if any) have never been to a military base. Yes you can drive up to a military base on a motorcyle and in blue jeans (of course you have to have your military ID), all the MP or security forces person will care about is if you have a little sticker on your car which says the base name etc.

What was fake was when the tank chase occured and nobody, NOBODY did anything even though moments ago Mark Decascos had just shot the base commander.

Overall this a good movie and does not deserve it's 4 or so rating from viewers who wanted a high budget film. I give it *** and a 1/2 out of *****, it is worth the money to watch and a little bit more
3 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Scary Movie (2000)
One sex joke after another
14 January 2001
Take Airplane, smash it together with some XXX movie, take any of the good jokes from airplane and make them bad, and you've got scary movie. Any of the good jokes in the movie (very very few) were basically in the ads on tv. There were a countless number (no i'm serious...countless) of sex jokes which seemed to come out of nowhere...not to mention they weren't funny. Some of the funniest moments in the movie were not related to any movie they were trying to spoof, in fact most of the stupid jokes came from the movies they WERE TRYING to spoof. Basically that's what ruined this movie...too many attempts to joke at the other movies...maybe they ran out of time to write the jokes...maybe the actors were incompetent (more likely)...but either way this movie gets 2 out of 10.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Jerry Springer Show (1991–2018)
If you don't have something stupid to say, don't go to the Jerry Springer show
28 December 2000
I can't imagine why anybody would want to watch this fake trash. It's sad enough that they recently changed to an even more trampy set but it's pathetic to see the assistants on the show telling people to clap or cheer.

Sometimes it can be funny...like the videos they show that are wild ("Honey, I'm a sex slave") but it really shows how bad our society is when somebody is crying because they learned there husband is cheating on them and then the crowd starts to cheer...oh yeah it's a barrel full of monkeys isn't it!

Then we have the "questions from the audience"...but if you have anything intelligent to say you better not stand up because you will get booed down (that sometimes can be funny too). Usually they aren't really questions but more like insults such as "Where do you and your trailer trash friend hook up, the garbage dump?" Then of course the audience member acts like he's actually gonna go down there and beat the guy up (yeah right) or the person getting insulted jumps into the crowd to give the ratings a boost.

Then we have the final thought where jerry shows how well he can read the telescripter and act like he cares (or he has some intelligence).

If you actually believe the show is real then look carefully....you can see the people on the side waving there hands telling the crowd to cheer or shout "jerry".
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
U-571 (2000)
Not "historically accurate" but still an excellent movie
9 December 2000
If you want to go to this movie to see a "historically accurate" film you might want to leave, but if you want to see a movie that shows patriotism, leadership, sacrifice and then is finished off with heart pounding action then this is the movie for you. This isn't one of those "Rambo" movies where the ship can dodge around 20 salvos of gunfire or the "John Wayne" type where they spend half the time with the girls and the rest is a mixed bag, this is a movie which should go in a class of it's own. I was most amazed that this movie wasn't based around the latest "special effects" that required a gazillion dollars, although the scenes were very realistic. The plot was also impressive because it didn't revolve around a "revenge" or "save the hostage" theme.

Because this movie didn't fall into any of the above pitfalls of the most "modern" movies then I give it a 9 out of 10.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Looks like the philosophy and the "plot" had a train wreck
27 September 2000
I can see where this movie had alot of potential...and I went into the movie not expecting alot of action or alot of philosophy, but a good mix between the two...I came out sensing neither. It looks like the philosophy was there in the beginning, and then the plot was added, but the two didn't seem to mix together and since they probably ran out of time (and money) they had to cram the two together....they did a very TERRIBLE job at that. Now i'm not sure if it was the acting or the bad plot (or "taglines") but what came out from the actors was bad either way. Character development was also very weak...I was left wondering if we were supposed to know anything other than they are astronauts....often times when the referred to places or people I was left wondering what they hell they were talking about. Was the ending supposed to make you excited wanting to see the movie again???? I certainly hope not because it was very weak. I personally thought the movie could have ended right about when they leave the white building...but the "escape" sequence put the icing on the (terrible) cake.

The only good thing about this movie was the graphic sequences, but since the sometimes the underlying physics laws were ignored the graphics scenes could seem some what off-balance.

Don't rent this movie expecting some philosophical wonder or any great (or at LEAST mediocre) action scenes. This movie gets and F+ on my scale.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Strange Movie, Good acting
13 September 2000
This was a REALLY werid movie....definatly not one for the kids to see. I've seen alot of strange movies that have plots somewhat similar to this...and they were all *rap. But this movie combined good acting a good storyline to make a very suspensful film. The acting was excellent especially when Keanu Reeves "wife" goes crazy...sometimes you find yourself wanting to say "shut the crazy up!". However this movie was too long...after awhile you start to wonder when they're going to get to the end. The end was...well...alittle bit strange (just like the rest of the movie) and frankly I could have thought of some better ways to end it...but nonetheless it was a fairly good ending.

I would put it on my to-see list but definatly not top priority.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Speed (1994)
Action was great, acting was not
11 September 2000
The action in this movie was indeed very intense. The general plot that if the bus goes below 50 mph it will blow up was not only original but gave the story lots of room for plot turns. However Sandra Bullock ruined the action scenes whenever she was anywhere near them....one second we see the most amazing action and then the next second we hear her whining and making some other cheesy comment. The last few minutes where she was "trapped" in the speeding train were terribly acted....she did a terrible job of saying "jump, jump while you can"...no wonder why he didn't jump. Keanu Reeves however acted very well...and his "partner" in the movie (who is killed) did some pretty good acting (especially in his last scene...the look on his face was very well done).

A few things about the movie didn't make sense: (1) How come the "access" panels for the elevator happen to be on every floor, right in front of the door....shouldn't that be where the real door is not "access" panels. (2) I didn't know there were access panels on the bottom of every bus (3) If Jack (Keanu Reeves) can speed up the train, why couldn't he have simply deaccelerated it?

Overall a good action movie...Sandra Bullock wasn't very good at acting but Keanu Reeves was. Don't bother renting this movie though (you can watch it on TV nowdays) but if you feel the need for speed (and a good action film) rent this movie.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
One of the best, next to ST:First Contact
23 August 2000
This is undoubtedly one of the best Star Trek films next to First contact. The special FX were superb, the plot was excellent, acting was excellent, and one of the most striking things about the film was the beautiful filming locations.

The beginning started off a little weak but towards the middle of the film the movie began to strut it's stuff. Once the plot forms after the destruction of a Federation science station the movie will not fail you. The Enterprise-Klingon battle scene was excellent, and the factor which allows the Enterprise to win is also very interesting. Although the part on the planets surface where Picard tries to stop Soran (Malcolm McDowell) was a little weak, especially where Picard magically escapes Soran's 3 disruptor blasts unharmed, the scenes after that were spectacular. After entering the Nexus and realizing he must go back to save the crew of the Enterprise (and the Solar System they are in) Picard seeks Kirk's help (William Shatner). I was truly amazed by the filming locations, they were downright beautiful! Kirk and Picard fit very nicely into it, and it is easy to see why Kirk would not want to leave "the Nexus". The ending fight between Soran and the Kirk-Picard team was a bit sub-par compared to other ST movies, but none-the-less it put a very nice touch to the end of the movie. The way that they leave the story open to a another movie is very well done, and I have to say it fits in very nice with ST: First Contact.

I would definitely recommend renting or buying this movie, and if you watched it on TV then I have to tell you to go rent the movie, because many scenes were "edited" out to fit the movie in a 2-hour timeslot.
8 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
WarGames (1983)
The only good part of the movie was the end
19 August 2000
This movie was designed for neither the young or the old...the acting and dialogue made this movie look like a movie targeted at teens, and yet the message they were trying to convey was obviously for adults.

I won't comment on the computers, as obviously this movie was made 17 years and we have made great technological strides in the computer industry. However, the military was represented very poorly in this movie. In some scenes the rank insignia was on the WRONG arm....whoops I guess they forgot to check that out. In other scenes you would see the "general" wearing ribbons one second, and the next second he wasn't wearing any. In another scene we see a "secretary" at NORAD "guarding" a detention cell the main character is in, I find it hard to believe that they would have a civilian secretary doing work in a detention area.

Besides some obvious flaws in the movie, acting, and story the final moment was extremely well done: when the computer runs the simulation of nuclear war, it cannot find a solution and comes up with this, "Interesting game. The only way to win is not to play". This was defiantly the best part of the movie, and if you have any reason to see this movie the moments leading up to the quote and the quote itself make it worth it. I don't think I'd recommend renting this movie (heck I watched the movie on TV!), and I doubt your local video store would even carry anymore, but if it does I think I'd steer clear of it.
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A title change is in order
13 August 2000
At the end of the movie I wondered why they hadn't name this movie "Everybody but Romeo must die".

I never completely understood the plot, which tried to combine too many elements to make the movie seem special. From what we know Jet Li was in prison at Hong Kong, he manages to escape to America and fall in love with this black girl, who is the daughter of leader of the Jet Li's family's rival gang. From there the plot didn't make much sense other than they want to build a football stadium in the middle of the harbor.

Naturally the two rival gangs are at war with each other, so Jet Li has to get involved for whatever reason. Unfourtunatley it seemed that Jet Li's true martial art ability was lost because the director/producer wanted to make the movie a matrix knock-off. I was amazed at how Jet Li could kick 4 guys, flip around in the air and kick another 2 guys before even landing. In another scene Jet Li, who is playing football, manages to kick 2 guys, jump 30 feet across the football field and tackle another 2 guys and then kick another 2 guys without ever touching the ground. The reason the Matrix was so popular was because the wire effects were used at just the right time, unfourtunatley there wasn't a single fight scene in this movie which didn't involve wires. In almost all of the scenes the wire was used the scene seemed so fake I just couldn't help but laughing.....even a fool could realize that this stuff was fake. The final jump in the final battle was especially lame, and it seemed that's just about where the movie ended.

I never really figured out what the plot was, and frankly I didn't care after awhile. The overuse of the wires ruined the fighting scenes, and the acting was for the most part horrible. I'd give this movie a 6 out of 10, it's worth renting, but I wouldn't place it high on my priority list.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed