Reviews

4 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
CSI: Miami: Spring Breakdown (2010)
Season 8, Episode 19
3/10
The most boring Spring Break!
10 January 2011
Warning: Spoilers
Ah, the joy of the spring break! This episode is the most boring one I've ever seen, it's just bored and nothing new in it! Let us recall: 11 seasons of "CSI," 9 seasons of "CSI NY," 7 seasons of "CSI: Miami," this is really the most boring spring break! Talk about spring break and many episodes have been shown, so many murders occurred, murderers, and in this episode we got three bodies, at last for the CSI Team eventually found related the three of them. Three people died, for what? Because of the fat girl were humiliated, she lost weight, maybe had some cosmetic surgeries, changed name and moved for one's only: revenge!

Hmmm...let us recall that in: "CSI: NY" S4:E19, "Personal Foul", removed the time: spring break, and the scenes with beach front hotel, isn't the plot very familiar? BINGO! Moreover, the set of New York, the creativity and ingenuity of murder, the detection of story line, and way the story had been told, all were far more better than Miami: this spring break episode. The fat girl got revenge in NY is much more interesting, ingenuity than the fat girl in Miami!

Seekingrevenge for the three original "partners in crime/victims" while they were getting mellow with drink, the girl came forward to them and showed her true face, then sent them to the death, to get even. A young women as a cheerleader, under the thousands of watching eyes of the court, who kissed the "lucky guy" and then the audiences saw that the poison "lucky guy" he fell dead. Which one is more innovative and attractive? Which path of puzzle solving is more interesting and fascinating? Which key to a puzzle was revealed that would make people think: OH! That is CSI! The original CSI style!

And the problem, needless to say, "three bodies in a day" and the team amazingly broke the whole case just in the same very day: finding facts, analyzing evidences/DNA/sources, searching warrants...etc., it is meant to fool the audiences again, saying that CSI team is a group of supermen/superwomen, it only take one day and they can immediately solve the cases? YAWN...it's a really boring spring break in Miami! Hah!
4 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Lie to Me: Beat the Devil (2010)
Season 2, Episode 11
10/10
What a DEVIL!
5 November 2010
Warning: Spoilers
WOW! What a DEVIL! Jason Dohring really did a great job! This sociopath really scared me to death.

His face told almost nothing. Well, I'm not Dr. Lightman after all. Jason Dohring made his character, either he felt pleased but not show it or he was provoked, these differences of emotions are almost invisible.

Jason Dohring is brilliant in this episode. His performance let me think of Edward Norton, his early years of performance in "Primal Fear."

When Edward Norton played the seemingly guiltless young altar boy, his performance did make me fell trembling with fear. Especially at the end, when he confessed to the lawyer after the whole trial, the smile/or seemingly smile showed everything.

To both of these two actors who challenge the acting of psychosis, BRAVO!
14 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Pacific (2010)
7/10
I feel more disappointed...
17 April 2010
I feel a little bit disappointed. This mini-series, I have watched four episodes so far. Except the title "The Pacific," as the map at the beginning, the scene showed Oceania islands and shifted its tints every moment, and I really do not get the point of the theme in addition to the "The Pacific," is there anything else the show want to expose? According to the commentary this show was based on three main star biographers: Robert Leckie, John Basilone, and Eugene Sledge. In EpisodeⅢ, Basilone received medals, then returned to the US to help sell War Bonds. And then we saw Leckie in Australia, met a Greek woman, Stella Karamanlis, and the romance between him and her. After they were unconventional and uninhibited, then what? Episode IV, under the title "Gloucester / Pavuvu / Banika," the non-stop jumping mediation and shift location, but all I can follow with the set is Leckie himself: his brief romance in Australia, his downhearted thoughts in the jungle and non-stop raining forest, and he showed a brief breakdown because of all what happened from the previous episodes?! I have watched four Episodes, and I have to thank the brief previous episodes antecedent summary before the show begins, otherwise I would always confused about who is who, what is the situation now, what happened before then. Because all the narration of the course of the battle and the stories that everyone carried... they are just too confused, unclear, and loose. The whole story line, it makes me have no sympathy with its complicated plot but only a pile of silly ideas. So far, I think the only best, most essential part of the mini-series, probably would be the three minutes opening at the beginning: producers' brief introductions, the real people/ authors and actors giving a demonstration in person, and technique of expression with the voice instructions. After the three minutes opening, all I can say is the beginning of chaos. Maybe the whole chaos was as confusion as the way it should be at that time then. Perhaps this is what the producers of the same group "Band of Brothers" what to present the performance that we watch?! Ha! Really, what I can only say so far, is that I am only getting more and more disappointed. The original rating of 9/10, with an episode after another episode, it is slowly going down to only 6/10 now! SIGH~~
4 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
I like the original version better!
14 September 2008
In fact, I like the original version "Klatretøsen (2002)" better. I first saw the story played on the screen which was "Klatretøsen (2002)" on TV couple years ago. And I saw the USA version last year on TV. To tell the truth, I don't think the USA version is better than the original "Klatretøsen." Some ideas of the movie or mode of stealing method were changed, maybe more technological and electronic on the equipments....the kids' gears and outfits were more fancy....IDK....but there are just something that can't reason me down. I recommend whoever are or aren't Kristen Stewart fans (actually I delight in Kristen Stewart's performance) to see the original version "Klatretøsen (2002)" if u can.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed