3 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
2/10
For those of you wondering what the bit players do.....
7 May 2006
Warning: Spoilers
I can't even explain how angry I was while watching this movie. I had been drinking which probably made it more tolerable. The ending seems to take 20 minutes. I even fell asleep at the very end and time still could not pass fast enough. 84 minutes is normally tolerable for a comedy but not this one. Death by fart and having a penis were not as entertaining as one might think (imagine that). Thank goodness someone got iced believably by the end. I have a hard time imagining that everyone could hear Wee-man speaking over a loudspeaker....yet all the characters sent to slaughter were in on the plan to convince the lead character she was crazy and killing all the models........odd. While looking at the box at the video store, I thought it could be good. After realizing that the bit players from Shallow Hal, Girl Next Door, Bio-Dome, and Fast Times at Ridgemont High couldn't even carry the weight of supporting roles on their shoulders, I apologize to my friend that I made sit through this movie.
4 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Saw II (2005)
2/10
I like movies that set up sequels.
28 April 2006
Warning: Spoilers
I am of course being sarcastic. This movie was gore for the sake of gore. When I first made that complaint, my friend told me that it was supposed to be a psychological thriller. Well I failed to see the psychology in it......either I didn't get it as he said......or I did and that the movie was only an extremely long prologue to set up the end. That of course meaning there is going to be a Saw III. That being the case I'm glad I paid to watch a 100 minute trailer for a movie that have no desire to see, and furthermore will instantly refuse to see the moment someone drags me away to see it despite any reviews. I saw good luck to those in the movie that were trying to build careers and use it as a stepping stone. And Donnie Wahlberg, I'm sorry you made such a horrible mistake as being in this franchise.
14 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
How many movies can make you this angry for taking 90 minutes of your time?
28 April 2006
I foolishly read the back of the DVD cover of this movie in Best Buy about a year ago, and said to myself, "Seems funny, plus it has Michael Clarke Duncan, how can I lose!" I proceeded to pay $15.99 plus tax for it. I took it over to a friends house and we both stood aghast at how poorly it was written and acted. Wooden performances abound. All the "hilarious" and "outstanding" performances promised never seemed to arrive. After 90 minutes I hung my head in shame, knowing that I could never get that 90 minutes or $15.99 back. I literally almost cried as well, because if that was what could be considered "comedy" I didn't want to believe in movies anymore. My friend and I constantly informed a friend of ours of the horror of this movie to the point that he needed to see it just to understand how bad it was. Over the holiday season this year I watched it with him because he didn't want to watch it alone. This was my next horrible mistake, because as I watched I just became angry. I began to yell at the movie, and I'm not one to talk to movies period. Everyone I know that has even glimpsed this movie has agreed its the worst they've ever seen. My sense of humor is sick and twisted and often offends my friends, but that could not save this movie even. The fact that this movie is not on the bottom 100 list on IMDb is astounding. The fact that its rating (at the time of this writing) is 3.6 is a crime against humanity.
25 out of 30 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed