6 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
Tár (2022)
5/10
Dreadfully boring
28 January 2023
I am grateful for two things regarding my viewing experience of this film: that my ticket was free, and that I drank a coffee right before. I can't remember the last time I was so utterly bored by a film, just wishing it would end.

"Tár" begins with a long introduction from an interviewer explaining what makes Lydia Tár a fascinating person. It sounds like she has broken a lot of barriers in her career, yet we don't get to see any of this. The plot summary gave me the impression I was going to watch a film about a woman smashing glass ceilings and overcoming stereotypes. What we're instead treated to over nearly three hours is a downfall, because it seems that in Hollywood, women can never have it all.

So much of the dialogue is centred around the decomposition and analysis of classical music that feels completely inaccessible to anyone who isn't an expert. Cate Blanchett is a highlight of this torturous experience, if only because she manages to flawlessly deliver long monologues about subjects that are foreign to the casual viewer. Other than her performance, the only bit of enjoyment I got out of this film was noticing when the German subtitles didn't match what was actually being said.
4 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Getting a bit predictable
20 May 2022
Warning: Spoilers
Downton Abbey was a great series, developing strong characters and compelling storylines over several hour-long episodes in a season, with the occasional Christmas special to add a bit more action and drama. The problem with ending such a character-driven series, and then following up with two films, is that the writers feel a need to wrap things up tidily. And while that's fine once at the end of the series, and maybe again in the first film, it starts to wear thin at the third go.

One of the main plots in "Downton Abbey: A New Era", about a film being shot at the estate, is a fresh story that ties in nicely with Downton's progression through the decades. The plot in the French Riviera provides a beautiful new backdrop but ultimately feels like filler. It's the subplots that regularly repeat themselves, to the point where you can predict them: someone will die or announce they are dying; a couple will get engaged; Mr Moseley will be offered a job unrelated to his current position; a gay man will enter Downton and immediately recognise that Thomas is interested in him; and there will be an unexpected pregnancy (I actually laughed when someone in the cinema loudly gasped at this scene). In the pursuit of a happy ending for everyone, some subplots simply don't make sense (Mr Carson was forced to retire due to illness, yet now he can suddenly return to his former duties when the position becomes available again?). The format of a film simply doesn't allow the kind of plot and character development you would see over the course of several episodes, and so stories feel rushed and a bit *too* perfect.

As nice as it is to see these characters again and get a glimpse of what has happened to them in the breaks between films, I hope this is the last reiteration. To me it feels like this film existed to finally give Thomas the closest thing to happiness that he could achieve in a society that treats him as a criminal, and to ensure that Sybbie has a bright future even after her father's marriage. Now everyone has truly achieved a happy ending.

I do want to recognize one of my favourite scenes in the film, when Mary firmly but politely declines Jack's (equally polite) advances towards her. Mary really shone as a strong character in this film and this scene in particular managed to veer away from predictability.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Hamilton (2020)
9/10
A blessing in these theatre-less times
22 October 2020
I saw Hamilton on London's West End in November 2019. The production took my breath away. Since then I have listened to the soundtrack endlessly to the point of memorization, and I long to go back to watch it again now that I clearly understand the story and lyrics.

Sadly, in our pandemic world I don't know when that will be possible. I hummed and hawed about whether or not I should watch this film version, worrying that it would replace the memories of the live performance in my mind. Eventually the lack of live theatre in my life drove me to watch it, and I don't regret it at all. After so much time spent listening to the soundtrack, it was great to see the original cast, and the costumes and set design are as beautiful as ever.

Of course, nothing compares to the live event. Sat up in the stalls of the Victoria Palace Theatre, I had an amazing view from above of the absolutely stunning choreography that is an integral part of this show; unfortunately, the constantly changing camera angles in the film version focus more on the expressions of the actors at the expense of some of the wider shots of dancing. There were also some small differences in the London performance I saw that I actually preferred.

I am so glad this film exists to be able to bring the magic of this musical to a wider audience. But if you ever find yourself with the opportunity to see it in person - it doesn't have to be on Broadway! - please take it. You won't regret it!
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Soul (2020)
9/10
One of Pixar's best
22 October 2020
I was lucky enough to see this at the London Film Festival, where the film was preceded by a (Zoom) interview with the co-directors and producer. It gave some background information, including the score, new animation techniques, and the challenges posed by the pandemic, that really helped to appreciate the film more. (Seriously, there are some amazing things done with animation.)

Pixar has once again done a beautiful job bringing to life a world that exists only in our imaginations, this time showing their interpretation of what our souls are really like. I actually regularly forgot this was a film for children as it is packed full of jokes for adults (especially millennials, who will be taking their own kids to see this) and poignant, thought-provoking moments. It's been ages since I laughed so heartily at a film. And yet it also brought me to tears at one point - it is Pixar after all!

I've taken off one star because the ending had me feeling like there would be a post-credits scene. But I can understand why they ended the film the way they did, and it was probably more realistic that way.

After so many sequels and prequels over the years, some better than others, it's nice to see a really fresh concept from Pixar again. It is beautifully executed and I highly encourage everyone to go see it. And support your local cinema if you can!
183 out of 260 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
...and Jerry Bruckheimer locks us in a torture chamber for another year.
16 July 2006
Warning: Spoilers
Both times I went to see this film, I was intensely excited as soon as the title showed up. Pirates 2 is entertaining, funny, and knows how to keep you at the edge of your seat.

The first time I watched this movie, it was difficult to understand the storyline, especially amongst the pirate talk. Seeing it again, you begin to notice the subtle hints to Davy Jones' crew and search for Jack.

The writers know how to play with your emotions the entire two and a half hours. There was a lot of laughter and some tears around me. The tension keeps building (unfortunately sometimes to the point where the scene becomes predictable) until you think you're going to burst with anticipation of what is going to happen next.

Overall, I think the movie was very well done. The actors were phenomenal, and the script was just as well-written as in The Curse of the Black Pearl. I can't wait for the next movie to come out, and I'm pretty sure I will be standing in line to pre-order tickets a month before.
2 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
I suppose I set my expectations too high.
19 May 2006
Warning: Spoilers
I only finished reading The Da Vinci Code in April, and was really pumped for the movie. The trailers were thrilling, and Tom Hanks and Ian McKellen sounded perfect as Langdon and Teabing. Unfortunately, I never liked the choice of actress for Sophie Neveu, because she wasn't even remotely how I pictured her. I suppose I was sort of determined not to like Audrey Tautou during the movie, but she did a good job despite my judgment that she wouldn't.

I guess I just thought the movie would be better. A lot of important details in the book were changed, like the fact that Jacques Saunière was not Sophie's grandfather at all, but only assigned to protect her. A large amount of excellent bits from the novel were cut out, including the intense code breaking of the first cryptex on the plane, which hinted at Sophie's bloodline.

Of course, there is only so much you can take from the novel to put into the movie. Almost 500 pages of reading are hard to fit into a two and a half hour film. Will I buy it when it comes out on DVD? Most likely. It was enjoyable, and I always tend to be analytical of books turned to movies when I see them first (which is why I hated the third Harry Potter movie for some time).
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed