Reviews

8 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
Ultraviolet (2006)
1/10
Possibly the worst movie ever made
14 July 2022
Just Awful. Terrible story, horrible CGI and an overuse of it, and bad acting from people I know can act. I always make sure to give every movie I pay for a chance, and thus will always see it through to the end, but I really wish I'd walked out and demanded my money back. It was like someone vomited in my eyes.
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Gay Purr-ee (1962)
6/10
An interesting mix
14 July 2022
Chuck Jones is possibly the greatest animation director that ever lived, for this he doesn't direct, but instead tried his hand at writing with mixed results. The story isn't bad overall, but as a whole the execution just isn't there. The music and voice acting is great, can't go wrong with Judy Garland, and the backgrounds are absolutely gorgeous, just phenomenal to look at. The character design isn't bad, very Chuck Jonesy in design, but the animation isn't great, it just doesn't fit with the elaborate backgrounds. UPA was known for their limited animation, and they didn't bother to up their effort much for a feature. The characters seem to hover over the ground when they walk, there's just no feeling of weight to them, they have no depth or texture and they cast no shadows. It's the equivalent of cutting out a character from a coloring book and pasting it over a Monet painting. If you're a fan of classic film it's worth a watch but I doubt the modern child would even make it past the opening credits.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Not terrible
6 July 2022
I had no expectations when I decided to finally sit down and watch this. All I had heard was how terrible it was. But, I was actually pretty entertained. At no point did I groan or wish I wasn't watching it. I got to see some of my favorite comic characters portrayed pretty well on screen by great actors. Could the story be better? Of course! But overall it was a fun, short, little flick that I'm not mad I watched.
10 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Klaus (2019)
10/10
A beautiful return to hand drawn animation.
26 November 2021
This movie is fantastic! The story is great, the voice acting is superb, but most importantly we get to see what amazing things you can still do with hand drawn animation in the era of cgi. Using computer lighting techniques over traditional animation is a brilliant way to win over the Pixar or nothing crowd by blending traditional animation with modern computer wizardry. But most importantly it's hand drawn... by actual human hands... the way the nine old men would have done it! You get that personal touch that you only get when someone is actually producing artwork and not just connecting vector dots on a computer screen. It's a special kind of warm fuzzy magic that just isn't common place in American animated films anymore. Of course this film isn't American, Sergio Pablos took what he learned working on films like Hercules and The Hunchback of Notre Dame and created his own studio in Spain to create this masterpiece. This film is a Christmas classic, a great Santa origin story, but it's much more than that, it's a true marvel of modern artistry seemlesly blending the old with the new to create something incredible.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Nostalgic Goodness.
25 November 2021
This movie is basically A Christmas Story for people that grew up in the 80's and that's not a bad thing. It's a lot of fun with good acting and a good Christmas message. For the people that pointed out historical inaccuracies, they obviously missed the part where the narrator explained he couldn't remember exactly what year it was and he would routinely embellish parts of the story as he was telling it to his daughter. I think that gave the film makers a bit more freedom and that's perfectly fine. Definitely check this one out with the family, it's worth a watch.
6 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Stop calling it a remake!
15 November 2021
Warning: Spoilers
This is not a remake, in fact with the inclusion of Buzz McAlister and references to Kevin and the first two movies it's very solidly a separate story in the same universe. Your kids will love it, mine did. If you love Hallmark movies, the acting in this will blow your mind and you'll probably think this should win best picture in comparison. For everyone else, it's just ok. The kid is a jerk, there are no actual villains, and the adults are all idiots. But, it is mildly entertaining, once.
3 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Superman: Red Son (2020 Video)
3/10
They left off the mind-blowing ending!!!
11 October 2021
Warning: Spoilers
The animation was great as was the voice acting, but it was not a great adaptation of the book. Mainly because, as seems to be the case with a lot of these DC adaptations, they changed the ending! Although with this they didn't so much change it as just not include it. The ending of the book is mind blowing, one of the best endings to any graphic novel I've ever read, and for some unknown reason they chose to just not include it. They just stop the movie before the story ends. Why make a movie adaptation of something and not include the ending!?! I can overlook minor character and storyline changes to fit the directors narrative, but to stop the story short and leave off the phenomenal ending? Absolutely absurd!!
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Migraine inducing.
3 October 2021
I'm the type that gives anything a chance. I actually enjoyed Jellystone, yes the character designs were different but it worked and it didn't take anything away from the originals. This show however is horrible just based on the animation alone. I generally don't want to review something unless I've seen all of it, but my brain could only make it through 1 1/4 episodes. The stories could be groundbreaking, but I'll never know because the animation is so jumpy and stilted my eyes and brain strained trying to process it. The best I can tell is that they were working with maybe 8 to 10 frames per second rather than the standard 15 to 24. I've seen cheap amateur YouTube animations with better production value. Skip this unless you like migraines.
3 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed