Reviews

3 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
1/10
Richesse d'embarras
25 July 2008
This is an abominable film whose premise is a vile attempt to link the inhumanity of the holocaust with the inhumanity of corporate business.

Only a pretentious left wing French pseudo-intellectual neo-feminist could conflate the behaviour of men in suits with that of men in Nazi uniforms. Elisabeth Perceval (whoever she is) has come up with a richesse d'embarras which has to be suffered to be believed.

What is ironically amusing is that the film is set in France, where the power of the unions has cosseted the workforce to levels undreamed of in the rest of the Western World. With their protected 35 hour maximum working week, job security, pension and health-care privileges, impromptu blockades and strikes, the French worker can feel himself perhaps a little more empowered than the average internee in Nazi Germany.

Finally as to the semiotic rubbish which reaches its portentous climax at the closing blank screen voice-over, I would point out that we live in an age where we agonise endlessly to find appropriate signifiers which will not offend or dehumanise the hoi polloi. You won't find "janitors" any more, they are "site managers". There are hospital wards for "older people" (not "Geriatric" or "old") and the oppressive servitude implied by "personnel manager" has been replaced with the touchy feely "human resources executive". Personally, I think it would be quite fun to be called a "Unit".

Having said all that though, a French film totally devoid of any wit or humour whatsoever for its entire 140 minute duration deserves some kind of recognition.
13 out of 40 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Lust, Caution (2007)
5/10
This film should be consigned to the south quarry.
14 January 2008
Warning: Spoilers
I can't understand why everyone is so enthusiastic about Lust Caution; perhaps it's some kind of reflex response to a new release from a revered auteur.

Sure the film looks great and the sets are marvellous, but any film suggesting that even if you are an irredeemable sadistic bitch-slapping psychopath, buy a girl some bling and she will sacrifice herself and her friends to save you, belongs with its victims in the south quarry.

If you want to see a film about a symbiotic sadomasochistic relationship which is actually believable, check out the vastly superior Secretary.
17 out of 33 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Atonement (2007)
3/10
Great book shame about the film.
24 October 2007
There are so many glaring flaws in this film it is hard to know where to begin. It is disjointed and lacks any sense of organic development. It fails because it tries to cram an expansive novel into a two-hour film. The romantic connection between the lead characters seems to be based on little more than a tacky and frankly uncomfortable looking shag against a bookcase. There is not enough time to flesh out their relationship and we are left with James McEvoy's cheeky but lovable Scottish lad shtick and Keira Knightley's flawless skin and Merchant Ivory method acting routine.

The action lurches to France for an inexplicably drawn out scene showing that war really isn't very nice. Laughably, Robbie ruefully explains that he couldn't be an officer because he has been in prison. So let me get this right; war is horrible, but only so far as it imperils a cheeky but lovable Scottish lad who deserves better than those hundreds of thousands of unwashed grunts dying in the service of their country!

For the pièce de résistance, they wheel out the trusty Vanessa Redgrave for another dial-a-cameo performance. Sorry, but even the great VR needs more time to create suspension of disbelief. Before you can say, "look it's what's 'er name Vanessa Redgrave" she's blasted her way through the clip-on denouement and we're into the credits. And not before time.
11 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed