Reviews

10 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
10/10
Amityville's End Game
1 January 2023
I understand that this film was created solely to make a point, through the medium of comedy. But this could actually be the quintessential and most Amityville-ish Amityville movie there is yet.

This film was created by Michael Stone (whose moviemaking career I will be watching VERY closely from here on), as a parody of the low-budget in-name-only surfeit of Amityville titles. But in parodying all the Amityville titles, it acts as a focus of all the Amityville titles before it. Where most of the Amityville movies do not acknowledge the events of the other titles, this is the film that ties together all the other titles by recognising them, and in doing so, affirming a shared Amityville universe. No other Amityville title builds the canon so effectively. It is the End Game of Amityville movies.

Also, let's discuss the comedy aspect. There have been plenty of movies that rely on fart jokes, but this title sets itself above all the others in its dedication to the fart joke - does any other movie not just pivot on fart humour, but can claim to be nothing but a one long fart joke? A one hour twenty plus minute fart joke? That takes commitment and dedication to the art of the fart. It succeeds where "Sausage Party" and other double-entendre movies fail.

If I may be permitted some spoilers (although after the first 15 seconds of this film where Stone opens the focal paperback book which is, very appropriately, the novel "The Amityville Horror" - there is little more of the movie beyond this that can be spoiled), the plot of the movie is Stone reading a paperback copy of the book that started it all - the foundation stone of the entire franchise. It could easily be passed off as another attempt at a self-indulgent arthouse movie, in the same vein as Warhol's "Sleep" (1964). But this is so much more than that. Without speaking a single word, Stone gives us an insightful and contemplative perspective of independent film, while simultaneously laughing along with the audience through fart comedy. "Amityville: Gas Chamber" is one of the few films that directly converses with the audience, and it does this through ingenious Pop-Up Video style discourse and factoids. The factoids not only break the fourth wall by engaging the audience through one-way conversation, but also teach the audience interesting facts relating to the Amityville ouevre, as well as other quite random information. You will walk away knowing more about camel's milk and burrito existentialism than you ever anticipated. It also introduces secondary characters Sylas and Styx, introduced so briefly and, with the same brevity, so quickly forgotten, much like Claudette's cancer diagnosis in "The Room." Many viewers will be expecting a follow-up Amityville movie with a greater performance from Sylas and Styx.

This is not just recommended viewing, it is essential viewing. It encompasses the Amityville universe, and provides the audience with a succinct and fitting metaphor for that universe by way of 80+ minutes of fart sounds. And it does it on a budget of less than what I spent on all the alcoholic beverages I drank while watching the film. Move over Lynch, go away Spielberg, get lost Cameron, because Michael Stone is the next big actor/writer/director/producer/film editor, and I hope that there are many more titles from this legend in the future.
2 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Metamorphosis (I) (2007)
8/10
Better than Twilight
14 May 2022
Cheesy story about a group of kids looking for the Castle of Bathory, meet a vampire along the way (not that they are aware of it), one of them falls in love with the vampire. It felt like a bit of a throwback to many old Hammer Horror films and gothic vampire films of the 60s and 70s, but with a modern cast (and a similarly low budget).

It's not a bad production for such a cheesy tale. The sort of movie you can play in the background and peek up at from time to time and still know what's going on, which means it's simple enough to follow with just a modicum of attention.

The acting wasn't bad either, for what they had to work with. I felt the main stars had chemistry, even if they did have to recite some pretty cheesy lines.

This won't appeal to anyone who wants a high-production spectacle, but the low budget connoisseurs should appreciate it.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Hansel & Gretel (2013 Video)
8/10
Not that bad ... actually rather creative
20 September 2020
Warning: Spoilers
I fully understand that this is an Asylum mockbuster. I actually think this movie is more inventive than its inspiration, it's more like Texas Chainsaw Massacre than Hansel & Gretel: Witch Hunters. It's the typical "victims trapped in cannibal's house and must escape" horror movie, except with a witch that uses candy and food as her magic. What's not to love about that? And it's full of nods to fairy tales; there's a stepmother, she wears a red hood, victims are 'fattened up' to be cooked, the witch is killed in her own oven, the bakery is called The Gingerbread House. It's clever. In this way it's more clever than Witch Hunters, that just used the fairy tale as an anchor for a mindless action movie.

The acting isn't that bad (I have seen much, much worse), and I could never hate a performance by Dee Wallace. There may be some silliness but it is subsumed by the campy fun - just laugh along. With a bigger budget and some artistic competence it could have been much more, but who cares? This is fine just as it is.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A few plot holes but generally fun to watch
20 June 2020
Warning: Spoilers
At the time of writing this review, we're in the midst of the covid-19 pandemic and this movie - released a year earlier - perfectly portrayed the very different ways people have reacted to the current pandemic; some people are climbing the walls because their routine has come to a screeching halt, others are just happy they can hang around the house and not wear pants. A year ago I would've thought this movie to be unrealistic, but today I'm not so sure.

This is definitely a refreshing change from the usual zombie apocalypse movies. I'm guessing this had a minuscule budget, and if so then kudos for the excellent zombie cosmetics and acting. The two main stars are also great in this. My only real complaint is the story, as it had me screaming at the screen because Guy is just so dumb. Great idea with tying up the hands of the zombies to get the wine, but why are they untied later? Why carry the wine back over the fence when you can just push it through? And he was using a broom only a second ago, why not try using it to reach the wine? And finally, did Guy honestly think that he could just live in his house forever without ever needing to get more supplies? He'd run out of paint eventually, then what?

Plot holes aside, it was fun. I feel like everyone had fun making this movie, and I had fun watching it.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Midsommar (2019)
10/10
Suffering and empathy
23 May 2020
Warning: Spoilers
I was extremely affected by this movie. To me, it was about suffering and empathy. It reminded me of when I had to travel across the country to attend my father's funeral while my ex-boyfriend stayed home because he didn't care enough for me to go with me. I knew exactly how Dani felt when she was screaming on Christian's lap, while he detachedly stroked her hair, and I understood her vulnerability and fear of over-exposing him to her grief, fearing that he might stop caring for her. I understood Dani's isolation, having to excuse herself to grieve in restrooms because Christian wasn't there, even when he was. Honestly, if I were crowned the May Queen, I would have chosen Christian to be placed in the bear skin as well.

Midsommar was also a visually beautiful movie. The movie's scariest scenes took place in broad daylight, where most horror movies fear to step. The deaths were gruesome but it was mixed with beauty in the perfect ratio. Death always meant new life. Tortured bodies were adorned in the most vibrant flowers. What I loved the most: when an insider was suffering with pain - physical or emotional - everyone else screamed with pain as well, because suffering, like joy, is something to be shared.

I won't repeat what has already been said about how stunningly beautiful the cinematography is, or how amazing the acting is.
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Ice Spiders (2007 TV Movie)
6/10
I was disappointed...
7 April 2012
But I wasn't disappointed because it was a bad movie, which it was. I was expecting a lot worse, and I didn't get it. I enjoy watching movies that are so pathetic that you can only laugh at them. I watched this movie because the girl from Troll 2 is in it, although she has like one line (and no dance moves - shame).

The story is recycled garbage (secret scientific experiments, regular creature gets mutated, the head scientist wants them 'captured' but they really just need to die, etc). The acting is atrocious, however the look of fright on most of the characters was believable. Sadly, the spiders did look pretty 'gnarly' for poorly done CGI, and for that level of adequacy alone I am disappointed. There are scares and tension, which is well done considering the entire movie took place during the day. Ever notice that things are scarier at night? The props were pretty good, like the webs and the dead carcasses and the spider in the box.

In conclusion: it didn't completely fail, so I'm disappointed. I give it 7 stars, and that in my books is an insult. If you want to please me and get my coveted one-star rating, aim a lot lower next time.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
The world's laziest attempt at film-making
4 February 2010
Warning: Spoilers
'Kay, it's like this. A woman who owns the world's loudest ticking clock has a shower, then gets strangled. This has nothing whatsoever to do with the rest of the movie.

A group of scientists travel through the country with a briefcase full of pictures of the moon that other scientists are happy to shoot and kill for. Following the world's fakest shoot-out (children playing cowboys and indians could fake better gunshots, and better getting-shot-in-the-guts death scenes), Joseph Javorsky scurries off with the briefcase, to be mutated into a beast by an A-bomb blast. Nobody else seems to have noticed this blast, or have been affected.

The beast strangles a hapless couple travelling in their car, and carries the dying female to his cave. Apparently nobody in Yucca Flats ever struggles or screams while they're being strangled. Jim and Joe go in search of the couple's killer. Without anyone having seen Javorsky and survived, still a newspaper headline screams "Beast Kills Man and Wife". Jim plans to jump onto a plateau from a plane. Not only do we not see this happen, but I don't understand their logic in thinking the killer could be on the plateau when it takes them a plane to get onto it. More travellers arrive, two boys and their parents. "Boys from the city. Not yet caught up in the whirlwind of progress. Feed soda pop to thirsty pigs." The boys wander off and become embroiled in a chase between beast, Jim and Joe, and their father.

This movie is bad. It has no redeeming qualities whatsoever. You can't even laugh at it for being bad, because it's so pitiable. It makes "Plan 9" look like "Star Wars". Whenever anybody speaks, they're in a long shot, or off camera, or looking away, or covering their mouths with their hands when they shout. This is so they didn't need to synchronise the dubbing with the actors speaking. They tried to trick us and be lazy in their production, but it is glaringly obvious what they were doing. And the ineptitude continues. The narrator worsens the film by making zen-like haiku observations. "Touch a button, something happens... A scientist... becomes a beast." The only button I wanted to press was the "Eject DVD" button. But my favourite snippet of narration: "Twenty hours without rest and still no enemy. In the blistering desert heat, Jim and Joe plan another attack. Find the beast... and kill him. Kill, or be killed. Man's inhumanity... to man." So what the hell were these guys trying to do for the last twenty hours? Consult with the beast? Offer rehabilitation? And it gets worse. The beast is shot and left for dead. As he dies, he kisses a rabbit. Yes, you read that correctly. He kisses a rabbit.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Killer Mutant Carpet Dogs
2 February 2010
Warning: Spoilers
'Kay, it's like this: the captain of a yacht delivers boxes of alcohol to some nerdy scientists on a remote island. They meet him with a gun and offer him a drink. A hurricane comes and the black guy gets killed by dogs wearing carpet coz he opted to hide from them up a sapling. Back in the house everyone's having a drink. Rosco threatens to leave, so they have a drink. The Swedish doctor's daughter starts crying, so he offers her a drink. They confess their big secret about 200-300 mutant killer shrews, which is really funny coz there's only about 5 carpet dogs on the island. Rosco accepts the story about the killer shrews, and everyone has a drink. The Mexican dude wakes up Rosco because one – only one – carpet dog got in through the window and went down into the cellar. He knows this because the window and cellar door were open.

Rosco and Mexican dude go down to exterminate it, but Mexican gets bitten. He dies as if poisoned, and the carpet dog's saliva is tested positive for the same poison they put out to poison the shrews with, which seemed to be as effective as breath mints. They test the Mexican dude's blood for poison as well. What the hell for? What else could have poisoned him? Could it be possible that he might have swallowed some arsenic or something while no-one was looking? I reckon the scientists just wanted to do an autopsy for the fun of it.

Rosco has another drink. A carpet dog gets in and poisons the nerdy scientist man who spends his last moments recording his physiological symptoms on his typewriter. Meanwhile the carpet dogs are eating through the walls George Romero-style. A carpet dog manages to chew a hole through the wall and poke his head through, and instead of covering the hole with the liquor cabinet or upending the typewriter table, Rosco covers the hole with a SOFA. The carpet dogs will NEVER chew through that.

The Swedish blonde girl, who dumped Jerry coz he is an alcoholic, starts falling in love with the sailor (frying pan, fire…). Jerry resents this so he tries to kill Rosco when they go check out the yacht. Rosco almost chucks him over the wall. They start welding metal drums together. A carpet dog pokes his nose through some wooden shutters, so Rosco cleverly attacks him with the blowtorch, coz that won't cause problems when the house burns down. They use the drums like a big tank go get to the sea and swim to safety. The Swedish doctor talks about overpopulation, but Rosco tells him that he isn't worried about overpopulation at that point in time, then Rosco kisses the Swedish doctor's daughter.
3 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Gabriel (2007)
1/10
Blasphemous rubbish
7 June 2008
Warning: Spoilers
This movie was truly abysmal.

Sometimes movie synopses sound great in theory, and on paper. Sometimes a lot of effort is put into each aspect of the film, like the acting, script, art design, costumes, etc., but yet it still fails. I found this to be a monumental disappointment.

I understand that Australia produces so few movies that ever hope to achieve the popularity and standards that other nations set, and this was made on such a tight budget that one can't help but be impressed, yet it fails. Miserably.

The concept of an angelic war set in purgatory is unique but probably would fare better as a comic book series. I found it very muddled; it didn't want to contain a religious message or a moral about goodwill to our fellow man - it really just went nowhere. The dialogue had some insightful quotes, yet it came out painfully anaemic, leaving the actors with nothing to work with, and their characters had no room to develop. The stunts and fight scenes were well done, but too reminiscent of The Matrix. The set design was appropriately bleak and focus was paid on texture but all movies trying to be artistic blockbusters do this nowadays. I have no religious orientation yet I just felt this really had little to do with the subject matter it portrayed. I know that it would probably offend too many people if it contained Christian comments and morals, but the angels didn't come across as very angelic (even if they were in human form), the concept of war in purgatory didn't seem very celestial. Everything about this movie sounds so perfect, except it just doesn't work.

What ruined everything for me was the ending. So many loose ends. The supposedly shock ending with Sammael actually being Michael - What happened to Sammael? Was that ever explained?. Was Amatiel forgiven and her wings restored - Gabriel claimed that she would have them within a week, so did she? So what happened to Gabriel, did he kill himself? Why? Did that mean he had fallen as well? What was the point after having fought so hard? After spending over an hour and a half with the character it didn't seem like something he would do at all. Michael having "fallen" seemed so blasphemous to me. Okay, Michael went bad... why were all the other Fallen angels calling him Sammael and doing his bidding? Then the big talk between Michael and Gabriel was so painfully long and boring and pointless.

I finished watching this movie with the compulsion to turn my computer on and tell the world through this website how disappointed I was in this movie. This is definitely in my top ten most hated movies.
8 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Troll 2 (1990)
1/10
Brief summary ***Spoilers***
4 June 2008
'kay, it's like this... Grandpa Seth comes back from the dead to tell his grandson Joshua Waites a bedtime story about goblins, which is really lucky because Josh and his family are going to spend a vacation in the deceptively-named town of Nilbog, in some other family's house. Along the way they sing mom's favorite song "Row Row Row Your Boat" and Josh gets out to pee but ends up talking to a homeless man instead, who is Grandpa Seth in disguise. His family have no problem with this. They are also followed by Holly's boyfriend Elliott and his two mates, who sleep in the same bed without their shirts on.

Grandpa Seth stops time so Joshua can pee on their food. Sadly that's all the food left for them and they didn't bring any, so dad and Josh have to go into town the next day to buy some. Joshua accidentally stumbles into a church where the goblins look like people and try to make him eat ice-cream. Elliott's mate is pursued by goblins but because they are NOT people-shaped they can't catch him so they throw a spear at him. He enters the house of Frankenfurter's understudy Creedence Leonore Gielgud, who turns him into a tree. The other friend gets sick off vitamin A enriched milk and stumbles into Creedence's house but he can't move the pot his friend is in so she drowns him in popcorn by eating a corn cob with him. Or something - I'm going by memory and I didn't concentrate hard enough while I was watching this.

Meanwhile the townsfolk (in people suits again) stand and stare at the Waites menacingly until they barricade themselves into the house. They try coaxing them out again by throwing sandwiches on the porch in a threatening manner. Joshua takes charge by performing a séance (he must have done a few of them) which involves lighting every candle they could find. The goblins chase them into Creedence's house where a rock from Stonehenge has somehow materialized. I think I've skipped bits. Do you care? Grandpa Seth returns from the dead one last time to give Joshua a triple-decker bologna sandwich which makes the goblins scream in agony when they watch him eat it. The Waites family kill Creedence and the goblins by concentrating on Stonehenge with their hands. Elliott becomes part of the family just for being there. There's a surprise twist at the end, because nobody expects something random to happen at the end of THIS movie. Academy Award nominations, sadly, did not follow.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed