Reviews

4 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
Um, well ...
16 September 2002
There are no Oscar winning performances in this one, however, it's not too bad. If you're looking for plot, pass. If you're looking for beautiful women showing skin, watch it.

Ursula Andress, as always, looks absolutely gorgeous.
9 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Andress' performance excellent ... the rest ...
16 September 2002
Ursula's performance is definitely brilliant in this movie. She proves not only is she beautiful, but given the right role she can act the hell out of it.

Fabio Testi looks good, but isn't the greatest actor, though he does try to hold his own.

An interesting plot that keeps you interested to the end.
5 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Good laughs, good movie
16 September 2002
The performances in this are amusing and well worth the time in front of the t.v. Napolean seems like a dim-wit, but you can't help but like his character. Scaramouche has a way with the ladies that is campy but fun. And, if you're an Ursula Andress fan, watch it, you won't be disappointed, but you will wish she had more screen time.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Swashbuckling entertainment and a couple of real beauties.
26 July 2001
It's not a bad movie, but the best parts are played by the women. Ursula Andress looks absolutely incredible (like that comes as a surprise) and is very convincing as the bitchy yet extremely alluring Louise de la Vallière, mistress to King Louis. Sylvia Kristal is also very good in her role as well. If you are looking just to relax and watch a movie that you don't need to think about, this is the one. If you are a fan of women in corsets... have no fear, Ursula can satisfy that pretty well.
10 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed