Reviews

72 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
2/10
The look on her face at the end is actually my reaction to this nonsense
28 May 2024
What's with superficially bloated rating again? This movie should have not been done. If part one was somewhat watchable for the sheer epicness, this feels like a celebrity-adopted African kid. Won't elaborate more on that, pretty sure it's self explanatory to most. Anyway, there is not a single reason this movie should be rated anything more than 5, now that it exists. Even scale can't make up for that ridiculous screenwriting. At some point I started thinking if there is some sort of sitcom underneath, but on a second thought I figured I'm wrong. They were for real. From the synchronous step dance to 100 year old Christopher Walken. First time I stopped right when they first kissed. Could not bear this charade anymore. Gave it a month gap and fastforwarded through till the end, just so I can finally delete it. Guess someone was way too much into The little prince or something, whatever.
6 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3 Body Problem (2024– )
5/10
No science and pretty strange fiction
27 March 2024
Warning: Spoilers
Let me start off with one thing. The "science" part is absolute nonsense. In each and every aspect throughout the flick. The fiction part is kind of bearable, although there's so much garbage in it, it's laughable at times. Like multidimensional aliens traveling at 1% of speed of light, but instantly sending modded photons to Earth and operating with data, measured in bytes. And as that is not hilarious enough, let's do our currently popular earthling thing and mock up conspiracies, do some virtue signaling, but bring cryonics as plausible scientific method. Well, I'll be damned.

Won't even open up on the nixie tube countdown "effect", that takes 60% of one's vision as it's ridiculous. Both visually and as a concept. Also ridiculous is the digital noise used to symbolize alien communication. And the cherry on top - the VR thing. Jesus! Who even needed this in the plot in the first place? Consumer VR's been physically around for 30+ years now; the concept for few more decades. Did we just find it's few centuries futuristic?

And there's an elephant in the room I need to address. Why was Clarence's son even featured as a character if his only purpose was to tell the viewer something no one cares about. That, he, literally another random halfbrained lazy unemployed brat, is also mohoxesual. Like yeah, okay mate, whatever, doesn't make you any less useless on global scale innit? Probably they should start with your spoiled generation, for all I care.

And yet, weirdly enough, it didn't annoy me as much as I expected another lousy book adaptation would do. Still, there's this hanging question. Why did not they just blow entire population's heads remotely via them sophons, instead of going through all the hassle? Would have had a clean and perfectly eco-friendly planet to enjoy upon arrival.
31 out of 60 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Signal (2024)
2/10
Nope. Censorship won't help you.
19 March 2024
Typically, European Netflix productions are superior. Sadly, not this one. I was really disappointed by the plot. Would have made a good thriller book, Dan Brown level one, if you will, but is really bad on screen. Episodes 1 and 2 are somewhat watchable, 3 and 4 are not. So much incoherence and lack of realism, it's annoying. And this is even before we get down to the sci-fi part of things that I'm not willing to discuss at all.

And I can't help but mention the decision to choose actors that genuinely look bad. They. Look. Bad. All. Of. Them. It is not that I want fake Hollywood teeth Horatios and Barbies. I'm just mildly pushed off by the questionable motives behind this casting.
6 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Gentlemen (2024)
5/10
Passable at best
15 March 2024
Oh, look, few Guy Ritchie movies in one. After losing his mojo during his Madonna period, which is completely understandable, he has probably spent countless nights thinking how he can recycle all his movies for some buck. I guess that period was expensive and all. And this show is exactly that. Recycled material. However. Things have quite changed in the last 20 years. And as there might still be hunger for an ole British action comedy, this one comes tad short of being a success. All the cliches are in place, plus few new ones. And as you hit midseason, you realize they don't tie up very well and plot holes start growing bigger. Thus, I don't understand the bloated rating. Yes, it starts all right and is kinda fun for a while, then turns into a bloody mess with plot twists that are put there for the sake of filling up couple more episodes. The finale... I won't even bother. It was a joke, made with the only purpose to leave season two door open.
54 out of 84 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
True Detective (2014– )
5/10
Yeah, about that "getting back to its true roots" thing...
26 February 2024
Horrible. Man. I'm close to speechless. I won't lie, it started great, but by the end of episode 3 it has already crashed and started to burn. 4 and 5 were utter waste of time, but imagine my surprise when I found out that amazingly cheap plot "twist" in 6 was the actual finale. Holy hell, mate! They couldn't even write legit script to do a proper detective season of 8 series, so they resorted to an ethnic teenage lesbian story to make up for it. I just can't... It's so shallow, so repetitive, so hollow, so boring, so meaningless, I really hoped for a mind bending ending to wash it all away. Instead, I'm left with a feeling of disgust while struggling to figure out who even needed *this* reboot. I mean, how do you end up without a single likeable character on screen anyway? Holy hell.

By the way, this only gets a 5 because of the first two seasons. Fourth is a solid zero.
13 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Altered Carbon (2018–2020)
3/10
Altered cabron
14 February 2024
Typical Netflix racial and sexual mishmash that was only passable because of Joel Kinnaman. Once they replaced him with you know what guy, it became the charade it actually was underneath. Yeah, it's that mediocre even at season one. Second should have never been made. As it's a joke. And the racial motive was already exhausted in the first one. And speaking of that, man, that Quellsomething-whatever woman... the most annoyingly stereotypical character ever. I hated her appearance, her acting, her character, literally everything about her. She looks like she will be perfect fit for an extra in yet another Star Wars installment and that's all about her. Hopefully I will never see her on screen again. Then there's the Carnage guy taken straight out of Carmageddon, but grotesquely exaggerated. I'm not even going to bother talking about how ridiculous the names in the show are. It's like reading Russian science fiction novel, but worse. Both the author and Netflix failed in their attempt to paint a colorful (pun semi-intended) world by taking whatever there was left in Blade Runner, putting it on Fentanyl and multiplying it many times over. Result is a complete unmemorable mess. I watched it two times, giving it a few years break, just to make sure I can see things clearly. Well, this didn't change a thing but make me see an interesting concept - these days people seem to praise mediocrity way too much.
2 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Berlin (2023– )
1/10
Do people like these characters even exist in real life?
8 January 2024
Warning: Spoilers
Who doesn't want another Money Heist spin-off, right? Especially if Netflix does not try to push their racial-sexual brainwash for once. Seems legit, right? Well yeah, it seemed legit for 3 episodes and then it all turned into a mish-mash of absurd, hollow side quests for the sake of filling up screen time, as instead of taking entire season, the heist actually ended halfway through it. And with that, the show turned into forced visual analysis of troubled characters in situations that would happen to no one in real life. Not ever. So instead of watching a properly planned and executed heist, where there is suspense and viewer is fed details on need to know basis, we have these long explanatory narratives, that go all through a Mission Impossible robbery plot by a team of twenty-something first-time amateurs who act like seasoned robbers -- space gear, pinpoint precision, flawless execution. Nothing in this was plausible, but that's minor once you realize the heist was just a mere prologue to all kinds of weird personal drama no one wanted, nor cared about. A drama sucked out of one's thumb for the sake of having script to fill remaining episodes. It would seem the show was written by a chick lit trained AI - that's how disconnected from reality each and every character and how ridiculous everything that happens on screen is.
5 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Ahsoka (2023– )
1/10
Here we go again
8 October 2023
Title has multiple meanings here. Initial review was taken down, because that's what actual mafia looks like these days. But they won't win. Watching another Star Wars installment hurts. In many ways. Seeing this low effort hurts. Seeing lack of talent hurts. Seeing show based and created solely around certain agenda hurts. Seeing level of acceptable mediocrity hurts. But it's this absolutely fake rating that hurts most. It hurts productions that actually have value and remain severely underrated, because viewers have chosen to watch this instead. The most repulsive... thing... I've seen not just this year.
23 out of 33 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Mosquito Coast (2021– )
2/10
A spoonful of mediocrity
9 August 2023
Downloaded this out of boredom, as it seemed to be worth my while. First red flag came as I saw it is based on a book. Again. Then came the cast. Honestly, These are some of the most unpleasant people I've seen on screen. They just don't damn fit their roles. Kids included. They don't fit story either. Which probably makes for a half readable book, but screen adaptation is super mediocre. And I have to use same word over and over again -- naive. Probably after using this so many times, I should think of something more usable for shows and movies like this. Shallow seems like a better fit. In fact, everything here is shallow. From storytelling, through acting of every single character, to overall plot development. Actually, on a second thought, the book probably is equally as shallow.
1 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Silo (2023– )
4/10
Could have been better but is in fact just mediocre
4 July 2023
Warning: Spoilers
I really hate book adaptations. These are hard to make right. And sci-fi book adaptations are the worst to portray. Have not read the books, so I'm pretty unbiased here and only base my opinion on what's on screen.

I'm kind of tired of this popular trend that takes on isolated groups and illustrates crowd dynamics and control. In a dystopian kind of world. Fun fact: every world is dystopian, if you look at it under certain angle. Fun fact: there is no such thing as democracy and power to the people. Fun fact: you will deny latter just because you can't bear the thought. Fun fact: people in charge don't care about you, they are there to make sure it all works smoothly. Fun fact: that does not necessarily make them villains. Fun fact: there's always worse. Fun fact: people are best controlled with fear. That's all this flick is about. Along some uninteresting personal filler stories. It's all seemingly connected but so vaguely and so superficial. Yet it is not as unbearable, as I expected.

Ever since the first episode I suspected they poison ones that go out but I was leaning towards gas agent. But tape? That makes no sense in real world. It only makes sense if you need to hook it up to distant plot feature. And honestly, I couldn't even comprehend the hologram. Because, again, it's nothing more than a twist for the sake of having a twist, as it serves no real purpose whatsoever. Neither could I comprehend the purpose of that "truth" badge. And some other things. It's all just super naive and, unfortunately, to certain extent, shallow.
8 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Babylon Berlin (2017–2025)
4/10
It was fine for three seasons, then it all went downhill
29 June 2023
Frankly, I have no clue why season 4 exists at all. It has no point, no sense and was completely unneeded. While telling a bunch of different stories, that seemingly would be connected in the end, it failed to make sense of any of them. 12 hours of filler that should not have been filmed. Of all the plots and twists, no more than two make sense and can be used to spin another season. But after wasting time on this one, I hope there won't be fifth season. It's a shame they managed to screw otherwise promising show. It was ambitious and interesting and somewhat innovative and characters had, well, character, but 27 writers? What the hell were you thinking?
4 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Oh the br4inwash
30 May 2023
Warning: Spoilers
Contrary to what one may think for well over an hour, this flick soon proves it is neither crime, nor science fiction. Instead, it's a manifesto. And a pretty peculiar one.

Chubby, repulsive bl4ck girl is sent from the future to kill wh1te suprem4cists, because... actually it doesn't really matter. /insert random reason, pulled out of one's 4ss, it wouldn't change a thing. That's the whole plot.

The movie literally legalizes the idea that mass murdering of people who don't conform to someone's point of view, essentially if they are wh1te, is not just okay but a form of civil duty. Hell, even our protagonist got g4slighted in the final moments.

As usual, just a Netflix thing.
4 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Mother (2023)
1/10
Strong, empowered, min0rity Rambo. Not. Lol.
19 May 2023
Warning: Spoilers
The FFM screenwriter team presents yet another movie that would make zer0 sense in the real world. Starring angry, confused woman on a killing spree, who teaches 12 year old girl how to kill people for no reason at all, this way compensating leaving her to foster family long ago or whatever. The girl visually looks like a kid with subp4r IQ but figures out of thin air this is her actual mother and quickly starts acting like spo1led little br4t. Our w0man of power possesses an arsenal Ze1ensky would once more r1m B1den for and kills dozens of trained men all over the map, Cuba included. In this little international hit and run bonanza, she is assisted by another min0rity representative, who is actually an FBI agent but does not hesitate to pull the trigger just because, so it's all just a Rambo sequel with slightly fluffy fe male protagonist. And after all the B L M stuff, quotas and all, the bl4ck man dies in the middle of the movie, like in the good ole times. Splendid. Essentially, this is a movie about the power of one tr4umat1zed psych0tic woman, which extends her anger beyond applicable laws. But then again, what would you expect from Netflix.
11 out of 26 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Fear (2020)
1/10
Boring, annoying, oh-look-a-black-man shallow
19 April 2023
In contrast to new school Bulgarian directors, trying to make movies about times they haven't lived in, there are the old school directors, trying to make movies about times they wish they haven't lived in.

There's always this slow-paced melancholic vibe, often represented in black and white, weird, piss-poor characters that the director tries to pursue the viewer are beings who don't deserve their misery, but often fails so. And so it happens here. The failure, I mean. Our "heroine" is one of those unpleasant, overacting stereotypical characters you can hardly associate with, let alone like. The story becomes predictable 10 minutes in and it's not an original one. Nor it is intriguing or touching. Frankly, I could hardly care about the faith of any of the screen characters. They are completely lifeless. Soulless. Same old, same old.

Ivailo Hristov was a good theatrical actor (back in the day, when every stage act wasn't a mixture of back pain and boredom) but is not really fit for cinema director. All of his movies are based on superficially pumped but painfully cliched topics of little significance and carry the same message, the same moral dilemmas, the same confrontations and the same attempts to crack some jokes in the middle of it all. But it is the fact this movie has been deliberately funded by the National Movie Fund, just so there's Bulgarian submission for 2021 Oscars, is what really pisses me off. Oh, you insolent, selfish mðthérfúçkers.
0 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
65 (2023)
1/10
I take comfort in not having to pay for this joke
10 April 2023
Warning: Spoilers
Laughed at the trailer and thought I'll never watch this, but the lack of sci-fi is as bad, I forced myself to do so. Opening "space" animation is so cheaply and unrealistically done, it's probably AI generated. Right after, one is greeted by three actors that look so artificial and out of place, they complement the AI vibe. And to make it even less plausible, a short narrative is displayed, claiming eons before mankind was created, there is this interracial family on a distant planet, that speaks English and acts so bizarely with each other, one starts to question their general intelligence. And that is not unsubstantiated further on in the movie, as daughter's lines kind of hint she sees certain challenges, but there is no wonder, considering Adam Driver is the father. Anyway, back to the family scene, there is nothing one could qualify as sense of attachment or any kind of heartfelt emotions in pictured family. Instead, it becomes apparent in this day and age, when space travel is like taking the bus and there are pulse rifles, cryo technology and insta-cure medkits, there is no cure to certain illnesses and one needs to splash tons of money just to keep their kid alive for a little longer. Uh-huh, it would seem USA existed way before human race.

Fast forward through another hilarious animation. Ship computer talks gibberish to itself while everyone is asleep, for no reason at all. Cool. Disaster strikes *unexpectedly*, our yet nameless protagonist puts on his space suit and oh, boy, oh, boy, I've never seen a helmet this crooked in a space movie. So crooked, they had to turn its top light less than a minute later, just to fool the viewer it is not made by some illegal immigrant or child sweathouse down Asia. Rest is as fast-forwardable, as it gets and the whole movie is so bad on so many levels, one decides to have a look at writer/director team and finding out these come as a pack, resorts to thinking this screen nonsense is just another product of inclusion quota. 45 million well spent, rainbow people rejoice. Bravo.
17 out of 37 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Andor (2022– )
2/10
Pain must have been unbearable...
29 December 2022
... For my initial review, stating this ain't Rogue One, the series, to be removed by trig ger red sád cl ówns. Well, that does not change the fact the show was du ll and un compelling and not hing near the expectations pumped by the trailer. Acting was subpar, story was un interesting, there wasn't a single character one could develop liking for. The only two characters that were likeable, were Meero and B2EMO, which possessed more charisma than 90% of screen humans. Now that I have described it all again, I will also adjust my score accordingly as a c untermeasure to this bla tant cénsórshít.
6 out of 32 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Shantaram (2022)
3/10
Yet another boring book adaptation
22 December 2022
While it tries hard to prove it's something more, in reality the show struggles big time to prove it was even worth filming. Now, I know, there's hunger out there and there's this "oriental-eastern" vibe recently, especially for that special part of the audiences who will never get off their chair and travel few thousand miles just to catch a tapeworm, while trying to be spiritual and whatnot, and shows like this fill the gap between low level of curiosity and boredom. It's like chicklit for all the genders. After the first two episodes, that fail to introduce you properly to protagonist and his backstory, I took a glimpse at book author and all became so clear. Won't bother reading the book, as with many other adaptations, it's the show that renders it unattractive, but I also have certain suspicions about the quality of book content itself. Won't bother much watching the second season, if there's one either. I disliked just about everything in the first one. There wasn't a single character one can develop liking for and our protagonist, with his smug face and Horatio Caine stances is nothing more of random Brisbane beach pothead shagger. If I want to see a parade of troubled people with mediocre life stories, tied in unfortunate circumstances, I'd just go outside for a bit, won't waste 12 hours on something that doesn't deliver much.
6 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1899 (2022)
4/10
Well, it ain't Dark, that's for sure
8 December 2022
I'll tell you what happened. Dark was so amazing, Netflix decided to give Baran Bo Odar mandate for another show. But there was one specific issue with Dark. It was so complex, so complicated, it challenged general in-tel-li-gen-ce. So majority of viewers would find abstractions so deep were simply beyond what they could pro-cess. So new show needed to be ad-justed to su-it them. It starts as a mystery/suspense and proceeds as one, with certain plot twists and mind funks, but the last one minute renders the whole season plain point-less. While there are deep existential topics involved, that may even pu-sh some viewers into se-ve-re case of an-xi-e-ty, it could have as well been placed in the 70's or even pre-historic times. For in this case, setting would not mat-ter. And as the show progresses through last three episodes, screenwriting discrepancies from previous ones are more and more visible. For one thing it is Dark, though. So many scenes are so gloomy, it should be watched at night, in complete darkness, so one could see a thing.
7 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Annoyingly naive
18 November 2022
As I have already said in another review, problem with science fiction is it doesn't age well. It is a bit different with cyberpunk but in this case it would seem it did not age well either. This show watches as Russian sci-fi book reads. Make what you will out of this. Don't know if it was intentional and if that's the case in order to maintain Gibson's era setting, it's just poorly executed. Theatrical play doesn't help either. I'm simply not hooked to it. Instead, ended up ffwd-ing half the episodes. Really doubt there is potential for this to shift in the upcoming episodes. Entire look, feel and story development would not allow that. Don't even want to start just how shallow certain parts are, as I guess they sit better in the book, especially one that's been published back in... wait... it's a 2014, not a 1984 book? Oh, man. That changes everything. Okay. I was wrong. The book should have been equally as shallow. Too bad I won't get to read it after such pathetic screen representation.
17 out of 37 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Just another kitchensink cliche
6 November 2022
This is what Bulgarian cinema has been reduced to in the last 20 years. Another movie about the communism/socialism for people who have no clue what it really was, by people who have no clue what it really was, played by the same handful of actors, seen in every other Bulgarian movie. I pity the fools who have rated this with anything more than 5. These are the types that either hold an irrational grudge for the past (a very popular social behavour in modern Bulgaria), come from the target generation of confused and not that bright young people, or are part of another popular movement - lemmings who would praise anything that can be labeled as Bulgarian culture, just because there is severe lack of it. The sad reality however is this is just another shallow melodramatic cliche by mr. Makariev that suffers from the century-long technical gremlin every Bulgarian movie ever had - incoherent audio levels that make it annoying to watch.
9 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
God's Country (II) (2022)
1/10
Nope
31 October 2022
Ah, Cyberdine robots managed to subdue two pretty mild reviews, so I'm forced to use different rhetorics, just to pass by. Okay. It's a real bad movie, so saving someone from watching it is worth the effort. Trailer was done well enough to mislead one into thinking this would be a good suspense/mystery with plot twists. But one hour in, you realize there will be no suspense, no mystery, not a single plot twist, nothing whatsoever. Actually the whole plot becomes completely predictable after some 15-20 minutes, and yet, you keep hoping it would prove you wrong. But no, it does not. Actually I'm divided whether to call the whole fact that this has seen daylight terrible or pitiful.
17 out of 39 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
House of the Dragon (2022– )
3/10
Feels exactly like a Davidoff Escurio cigar
28 September 2022
Could not help but come up with this comparison, since my Escurio experience is fresh. You start with certain expectations, based on what all other Davidoffs delivered through the years, yet realizing this is something different, you keep an open mind. And it is just few puffs later, you begin to realize this would be nothing like the Davidoffs you are familiar with and most probably won't be a very enjoyable experience either. Still, you go on and about the second third things start to get better, so you think, okay, it picks up now, not bad, not bad. Then the final third kicks in, it gets way worse than it started and nothing you have hoped for. So you just throw it away without finishing and off goes the god damn disappointment. And this show ie exactly that. Illusive package, filled with contradicting content that is not worth your time, let alone money.
12 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Nope (2022)
1/10
That's what one should say when offered to watch this
13 September 2022
I rejected watching it at trailer level, it looked absurd and I'm a sci-fi/mystery fan and there's serious lack of content in these genres. But wifey got it via some torrent site, so the whole solace here is it was for free. But that's a movie you should not watch even for free. It starts with the name alone. What's this? A Gen Z magnet? Feels like the first draft M Night Shyamalawhateverman ever wrote and shot as a schoolboy, naturally with zero budget. The script. What script? There is no script here. Just a vague idea about "aliens" and a ranch. Oh, that's fresh! What follows is randomly shot scenes, like in some kind of reality, in which boring people shoot their boring life with the masterplan of becoming rich and famous and at some point the wo-man of co-lor also comes out as a les-bi-an. Why though? No one seem to care among characters anyway. Not even her brother. So it's just another bit that makes no sense at all. Lines are oh, man. It's really hard to determine whether this is some sort of mockumentary, IndieGoGo backed or university project. I mean it's easily the worst movie of the year. And that "alien" thing... man... How do you even... I really can't. And where did that 68 million go? One would think VFX have drained huge part of it, but in this movie there is hardly anything you can regard as VFX, bar final "alien" boss morph. Rest is done by a 13 year old with Pentium in the late 90's. And these ratings and hype in the sci-fi groups? That's really beyond comprehension.
5 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
It's only after watching Val, you'd realize just how sad this is
4 September 2022
I remember watching the original like it was yesterday. And the new one is pretty much the same thing, except I have moved on some 25-30 years ago, no longer live behind the iron curtain, American black ops don't fascinate me as they used to and I'm probably not as naive as I used to be back then.

That said, it was nice to watch a remake for entertainment purposes and it was all good until Val Kilmer came into play. It is only then you'd find out something is very wrong. I have only so often wondered what happened to his career and why it tanked in the second decade, but was never too curious to actually find out. And it is a week after watching Maverick, I got to watch Kilmer's own documentary on his life - Val. And that's a sad story to watch, mind you. And it is only then you'd find out there's more wrong in Cruise's 1000 carat smile that seem to not have aged a day since 1986, sitting right next to Kilmer, who looks barely alive. That comparison is grotesque in many ways.

Now, I don't pity him by any means, nor am I patronizing one of the greatest actors. But in the light of said documentary, it feels like the movie does so. So I'm confused here. Movie's entertainment value is okay, it's a nice watch. And that paycheck will probably help Kilmer tie a couple of loose ends. It just feels like a goodbye pity se... you know, can't even say a regular word these days without getting flagged.
2 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
If it triggers, it figures
31 August 2022
If there's a thing I've learned over the years, it is once you see something being bashed and debunked just because it contradicts the common narrative, there's something to it. And this makes no exception. Yes, it jumps through various topics and yes, there are outrageous claims in it. But it ain't wrong. As proven by the sheer amount of bashing reviews here. Won't go into what this means, as this will get rejected again.

Wilcock has lost credibility? There is no proof? Oh my! That's terrible!

Now, it's apparent this flick has ruined many a sleep and that's a good thing in my book. It really speaks a ton. So if you are looking for something new since Icke has turned into an old broken record few years ago, this presents certain curious topics to think about. Nothing more, nothing less, as knowing makes no difference at all.

For everyone else it would clearly be inadvisable to watch.
4 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

Recently Viewed