Reviews

I understood the journey she took, as a way to cope with her early loss of her mother. But, consuming cocaine on her own will, flirting with, and asking every man she encountered and considered to be attractive, to have se x with her, has no excuse. Like she said in the end "maybe i wanted to sleep with all those men", yet she didn't wanted to talk with her mother in the beginning about casual se x, but doing all kinds of se xual things and not talking about them is a women cliché. Of course she wanted, but i do not know what she liked more?: luring them, seeing them fell so easy, or dumping them.(maybe some, fell in love with her, or had families).

P.S. Basically, the movie tell us that a woman can fuk every man she likes, and reject those she does not like, and can do that outside the comfort zone of marriage.

I hate the main character Katya Livingston's guts, and when i detest a character so much, it doesn't matter how she/he looks. But i dislike and reject every character who socializes with this abominable Katya.Some do not have a vertical column, others are men thinking with their genitals, others are just weak people... I am strictly talking about the character and not the actress of which i do not care.I am not giving a mark to a movie, judging it by the physical attractiveness of an actress or actor. I noticed, a lot of reviews are influenced by the attraction or distaste for an actress or actor,and not the way they act. This is a one time see movie. I do not want to see it again mainly because all the movie revolves around this Katya. I gave it an 8, because of its realistic characters and events, and not because of its erotic content. Some people want to see only beautiful things in a movie, and if they don't then they mark it as a poor one. I bet that some women, after seeing this movie and realizing they behave and think a lot like the main character, and still not having all the things she has, might say that the character is not realistic. Well ladies, you were either not living in a similar society, or have not encountered all the kind of miserable people who facilitated Katya in some form, or both of the above. I do not think this movie is sexy in any way, because of its immense misery and miserable characters,although some almost naked.

First of all, lets make clear that i am OK with porn! But when i watch "Dexter" i do not care how Jamie Batista moves when she fuks!!! (see the scene, at minute 23 and 40 sec). Why did you have to show it now? WHY? Have the audience decreased so bad after 7 wonderful seasons that you considered a necessary outburst using porn stuff in this wonderful series?! I doubt about the decrease of audience! I mean why did you have to show Jamie Batista's naked ass riding technique (by the way...why did she covered her right breast with her hand? because she is embarrassed by them, or you thought that it is too much?!). I was glad(before ep1 season 8) that people who decide the scenes where not using porn in this great series. I bet that a lot of the women who appeared in this series wanted to show their naked bodies and/or their fuking techniques (maybe as a confirmation of how they have fuked their way into this series ;)). I do not like when people mix porn with other stuff. Yeah there were series, or movies where this sad thing was happening and in spite of the fact that i loved the movie in general, i gave it a lower note because of that mix. When i want to watch porn, i watch porn, not "Dexter".

I do not believe in aliens visiting earth, as i do not believe in other fictional characters that millions of people are praying and bow at, but that doesn't mean i do not respect their point of view as long as it is not used to do harm and material gain.

About the free energy device...There are a lot of powerful people, corporations and groups that benefit from NOT EXISTING a free energy device. If they are capable of creating(if not at least by occlusion) the reasons, and starting wars for the NON FREE energy(ex. petrol), do you think they will just stay relaxed and do nothing, while other are about to create something, which will get the actual rich and powerful earn a lot lot less money...you cannot be that naive...

Anyway, thanks to all the people who brings more light in how the gigantic military(but not only) complex works. When they militarily attack some country, regardless of the real reasons (could be one or more: gaining natural --and in most cases limited-- resources, just using the armament payed from the tax payers money ,destroying some very successful contender business, forcing the occupied people to pay only them for different services like constructions and other things which the military have just destroyed), there are always a FEW people, corporations and groups which are getting richer and powerful in the process. Of course the main benefit will not have some worker on the armament ,construction, bank(which have just loaned money to that poor country with the most interest possible), oil corporations, BUT THE OWNERS OF THESE BUSINESSES. Nowadays, to convince the American people that a lot of the tax payers money have to go into these few peoples pockets, they have to create a reasonable "story", which may involve even a few collateral casualties of their own people. But for these "black programs" that devour large amounts of the tax payers money, apparently they doesn't even have to bother to create some believable story...--these are just off the books-- much more easy to spend the money for OTHER INTERESTS than of the most Americans.

I have been watching the hole 7 seasons(gave it a 9 in general), till season 7 ep.10(a 6 is too much),and pretty much liked it. But from season 7 i have noticed an actress, witch is out of her role. Her name is Alona Tal playing an ex Russian operative. I have never seen her before in a movie or anything until now, and i don't know how good or bad is in general, as an actress, but in in episode 10 was the pinnacle of my patience. This actress ruined a few of the episodes in the 7'th season, and is not her fault but the people who gave(direct or indirect) this role to her. OK, she has a decent body for a woman walking in a provocative suite in the background, but Sonya's role is way too much for her.

More than 90% of the rich and powerful in Romania, who kills(by accident or not) a poor one, escape with little or no punishment from the state legislators.

I would have liked, that the people who made this film had the balls to end it otherwise than how the rich wants.

In the same pervert way, the doctor(who falsified the blood test making it without alcohol) and the chief policeman(who permitted and even suggested the rich to break the law) gained some kind of profit from the rich and powerful, the makers of this film had compromised and end it exactly how the rich wants(after all, it is they who pay for the making of the movie).

I liked most of the movie(which is pretty much in conformance with the reality in Romania), even though at the same time i felt so much disgust seeing these fake people(the rich ones) acting without honesty, dignity, empathy....

This movie is not a winner. It is a looser, unfortunately, because of the end of it.