Reviews

4 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
Sutherland fans will appreciate
7 November 2003
Being the die hard Sutherland fan that I am, I enjoyed this flick purely for his performance. The film is rather superficial and slow-moving, but there is quite a bit of power behind Sutherland's performance, which makes it worth the while of those who just need more of Kiefer. I can't say I'd watch this film again, but I appreciate the emotional investment that the actors put into it. A six out of ten.
6 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Dead Heat (2002)
7/10
Far more entertaining than it should be.
7 October 2003
Ok, so this isn't a great movie. But, it's entertaining, and the chemistry is spot-on. I admit, I dug the so-so romance between Sutherland and his estranged wife. I found the entire plot, while ill-constructed, fun enough to pass as a really well-meaning movie. It was fun, and the acting was good all around. Being the sucker for saucy fellows that I am, seeing Sutherland as such a good person was rather surprising, but he played it well all the same. I can't say I'd recommend this one for anything more than the channel surfer or the die hard Sutherland fan, but it's got some great moments and a fun little story, despite moments of obvious cheese and silliness.
6 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
I am at a loss for words...
3 January 2002
Warning: Spoilers
There are many movies that I enjoy, and I have seen movies in the theaters as many as 4 times. Admittedly, they are usually one and a half or two hours long in length. So, the most I have probably spent in a movie theater for one movie (including going more then once) is 5 hours. I have spent a grand total of 15 hours watching "The Fellowship of the Ring" and I still cannot grasp it all. Everytime I watch a new detail shows itself, whether as slight as a glint in someones eye, or entire pauses in the action that I hadn't noticed in the past. How anyone could venture to try and criticize this masterpiece is beyond me.

The acting is nothing short of perfect, superb delivery of lines and emotion. When a movie has Sir Ian McKellen, Sir Ian Holm and Christopher Lee, it can be nothing short of extraordinary, no matter how lame the script or story line. Fortunately, the script and story line weren't lame, but spectacular. The visual effects were stunning and the depth of the script was powerful.

(Perhaps a spoiler somewhere within this paragraph...not really...but I just want to be sure) Having read the books a while back, I had forgotten much of the story, leaving me with very little "extra information" to deal with. Although I remembered the characters clearly and important parts such as Moria and Lorien...many places had escaped my memory. The movie was clear and straight-forward but not choppy or hazy. It wasn't difficult to understand for the people I have seen it with, whether they had read the books or not. Unlike some recent fantasy novels-made-movie hits such as Harry Potter, it is a good movie by itself...not book references needed.

Although the battle scenes are intense at times, I was relieved to see very little gore. Even now there are times where I try not to look, but I imagine if you are above 13 you will have no problem with it. Don't get me wrong, there is no lack of violence, but it tends to be quick shots of each person. The movie is 3 hours of intensity, so prepare yourself to be pulled on an emotional rollercoaster.

Overall: The finest movie of the year, and definitely one of the finest movies ever made. A milestone in movie and fantasy history...and perhaps one of the first successful adaptions of a book to the silver screen.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Interesting, acting is great.
8 November 2001
The shows premise, although promising, leaves a bit to be desired. There is a certain "something" missing...it is witty, the story lines are well done, and the acting is (of course) incredible. The only thing that is slightly out of place is Max's consistent writing of his own life through someone elses life. The most tender and sometimes the most enjoyable moments are those that Richard Dreyfuss spends with his son Lester (Eric Ian Goldberg) the young actor seems to be the Opie of his time, with some great acting ability and a face no one could resist! Although Max has some extremely witty subplots and one liners...you have to wonder about its staying power. Although there is no doubt that all of the actors, young and old on this show have ability and have chemistry...one must wonder about the WRITERS ability to keep coming up with fresh story lines, without making it TOO soap opera-ish.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed