Reviews

Sksksks what the actual duck I just watched?))

I mean James McAvoy has done his role just great! So many characters in that small amount of time! And so believable! Bravo!

But what about the plot?)) Is this a superhuman movie? Or conspiracy theories? What is it about?) I really need an explanation!

And we still don't have a sequel? (I don't know if we are supposed to have one, but it would be so logical to actually have something after these events)

This movie is so cringe... (with some kind of philosophy of course but I didn't get much of it))) So I'm still waiting for an explanation. Text me smbd.

It is not such an interesting movie.

The previous Hitchcock's work (The Lodger) was really gripping to watch.

This movie has a kinda predictable, I would say obvious/cliche plot and the whole idea actually. Maybe it is because I was watching it in 2020s, so maybe at that time this movie was interesting, progressive and fresh. It is not now))) And of course this kind of directing looks "not enough" good even though I understand that this movie was released in 1941.

But! I think that an alternative ending by Hitchcock will be better for this movie than what we have on all this streaming platforms.

I can't even imagine how cool this movie was back in 2004)) But now... everything except for the general idea, in this movie, is bad)) especially special effects and makeup)) so if we have to say something about this movie for teens, I would say: "it's kinda cringe!".

I mean the characters are good (the idea of them)! But the plot became boring after 30 mins. And this love story line... More funny and cringe again than it supposed to be. But I cheered for them))

So my score for this movie is more for the history of cinematography and Guillermo's filmography) Because for it's time it was real good!

I'm writing this a day after I watched this movie so I think it through)

this movie is hard, strong, loud and chaotic.

Nolan likes to play with time parallels so that's the thing that confused me in some way while watching.

After watching you have a lot of questions about Oppenheimer, project, his kids life, other scientists future etc. It means you have to make a research after. And for me this is about plot holes, because I don't want this quantity of questions after watching a movie.

"Oppenheimer" isn't the best Nolan's movie, for me it's not even in top 3 (maybe even 5; incomparable with "Inception" or "Interstellar") but directing is obviously good.

The cast is AMAZING (*love Matt Damon*), well played, incredible sound work, good picture quality.

Conclusion: movie isn't that great and interesting, it's good, maybe will rewatch one more time.

Amazing animation but movie is prolonged...

The movie is about two and a half hours long and you have to understand that it doesn't have a proper ending (no denouement). So for me, this movie is kinda prolonged.

Maybe it is not for cinemas, it could be more comfortable to watch at home (from the first part, than this and then the last one), because you would have an opportunity to pause, think etc.

So I have to say that this animation work is hard to perceive and analyze at the same time (in a really good way). The animation here is indescribable, it is so amazing, different, and various!!!

This movie is cute, emotional, sensual, epic, funny, and dramatic! And all of that at the same time and in two and a half hours! I mean there is a great balance between "I would cry" and "Oh my God, how funny is that!".

The Computer-G Imagery here is pretty good and directing in general is entertaining to watch and learn from it)

So many plot holes from previous parts and gestalts were closed by this part.

In this movie, they made so many new creatures and possibilities for future films (not only Guardians of the galaxy's)! This trilogy is probably the best from the MARVEL universe!) Legendary.

I think that all time-travel movies are good) because of the theme, you know)) And especially with well-known actors/cast

this one is kinda twisted and the ending could be better, and it looks like there had to be one more part... So the ending kinda disappointed me, I excepted much more!

But the plot is ok, it missed some details but for a one-time watch is good.

And I knew that the director asked the makeup artists to make Joseph Gordon-Levitt look more like Bruce Willis... But unfortunately, I didn't see that similarity( They for sure changed Joseph's look, but he just not like himself there.

For me - better than the first part. In this part, the ending is kinda boring, but everything else - is good!

I mean first one was kinda unexpected and because of that cringe, but when you in a way get used to it - it becomes interesting. I really enjoyed the cast in this part and the plot of course.

The first part was some kind of boring too, but this is more entertaining to watch. Except for the ending, I think it is more because of the predictable ending not like bad composed.

This movie is for sure original and unique work. You should watch it to extend your perception of movies and scripts.

Really childish story.

For me this movie is a big reminder of "bicentennial man" movie, and I prefer it than this.

This one is kinda boring and predictable. I don't really relate to it compared to "bicentennial man", it wasn't emotional for me at all, just a little bit of irritation

I felt asleep twice😬 I understand the hype near it in early 2000s cause it really was some kind of breakout and progress in technologies. But not for me watching it in 2023

It's pity that this movie is more popular than "bicentennial man"😢 so I wouldn't recommend you to watch it

And what about Jude Law?))?)? I mean his look and work at all in this project.

Typical musical. And the reason why I don't like this genre.

I wasn't impressed with Butler as many of you (his singing was kinda bad), but I must say Wilson here is really unexpected and well (I liked his singing tho). For me, for some reason, was unexpected to see him like a good guy...

I think we all understand that the story is real cringe (that man wants woman to be his just to have her)... And so was the whole Gerard Butler performance for me. It is for sure not his genre and not his role. One of the worse his role I would say.

But the movie is beautiful and some songs were pleasant to hear!

I tried to watch this show years ago - so I watched the whole first episode and stopped. Cause it was a real cringe.

Now I decided to give a show second chance, 'cause you know - everyone says how good it is.

As a result - they made a really bad choice to make that episode the first one.

Generally - nice idea, I get the philosophy of how the technologies affect our life. However only emotion I get from this show - is irritation! I'm just pissed off)

The only two great things that carry this show are acting and CGI.

So I don't get why all people like it so much... But I may give it another chance.

Intriguing start, I mean I thought it's gonna be a really good movie, because of an original idea. But it turned out a little bit prolonged in the middle because it became kinda obvious and I just wanted the plot to grow, but it was kinda slow. I wanted more energy or something.

So the movie seems kinda overestimated, it gave hope and then partly smash it. But still, the idea is great! So many senses! And metaphors that time it is all we have and we have to appreciate it and do our best.

And I have to say that Justin Timberlake is not that bad in the movie, he has done a pretty good job!!!!!