Reviews

11 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
Dumbed down considerably
24 August 2004
The film Ghost in the Shell is one of my favorites of all time, and I am very eager to see Innocence, the sequel, but the TV series did not impress me much. The intellectual mystery of the original film is almost completely absent in the TV series. In the special features of the DVD, the director of this TV series admits that he prefers simple Hollywood blockbuster films; wow, great work matching this mouthbreather with Ghost in the Shell. :( The music is very good, especially that opening theme song, but every episode seems to be wrapped up too simply and perfectly, and Kusanagi seems to be wearing lingerie most of the time, which is a pretty telltale sign of how the TV series is about 50 IQ points shy of the original film. Yes, Kusanagi in lingerie is definitely easy on the eyes, but Ghost in the Shell is not supposed to be lightweight eye candy for horny male teens. The Kusanagi of the original film didn't need to resort to T&A in every shot. I was hoping for something much more substantial than this. It's just a simple cop drama with a futuristic setting. I've very disappointed.

6/10
8 out of 39 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
12 Angry Men (1957)
8/10
Decent copy of the last half of Kurosawa's Ikiru.
18 May 2004
I really enjoyed this film, but watching Akira Kurosawa's Ikiru, one of the best films I've ever seen, kind of ruined it for me. Basically, the entire film seems to be borrowed material. In the second half of Ikiru, a group of individuals argue back and forth about the intentions of a character who passes away. In 12 Angry Men, the jury argues about the guilt in a case. It's not the same situation, but it's basically the same type of storytelling. The problem is that the second half of Ikiru is so much better than 12 Angry Men, I was kind of left wondering what is so great about 12 Angry Men in the first place. I'd recommend seeing 12 Angry Men first if you haven't seen Ikiru, because it simply can't compare to Kurosawa's masterpiece. Good, but it is unquestionably outclassed by Ikiru.

I'd give 12 Angry Men about a 7.5 to 8/10, but I'd recommend you also see the far better Ikiru, easily a high 10/10.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
To Live (1994)
10/10
One of the best films I have ever seen! Outstanding!!!
10 September 2003
I was blown away by this film. I've seen most of Zhang Yimou's films, and I didn't think he could top Raise the Red Lantern. I was wrong. To Live was amazing. A perfect film. I consider Gong Li to be one of the greatest actresses in film history, and this was the best performance I've seen from her. All the actors were very good in this film, but Gong Li gives Meryl Streep's performance in Sophie's Choice a run for her money. Zhang Yimou outdid himself. I'm surprised this film isn't more popular. It's incredibly powerful. Some scenes reduced me to tears, and that doesn't happen very often with me. I'm recommending this film to everyone.

Note: Even though this is a film covers important events in recent Chinese history, the way the story is told, you don't need to be a history buff or of Chinese heritage to understand what's going on in this film. Zhang Yimou tells this story in a way that can be universally and cross-culturally understood.

10/10
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Red Cherry (1995)
10/10
Outstanding Film
1 September 2003
I watched Red Cherry for the first time of VHS. I was immediately impressed with the outstanding acting, particularly of the two main characters, but I was a bit bothered by the jumping around from one year to the next. The subtitle quality wasn't great, either, nor were the special FX and production values up to snuff. I bought it on DVD and watched it again, and I liked it considerably better the second time, and it keeps getting better and better every time I watch it. It might take some time to get adjusted to the time jumping and weak (by big bucks Hollywood standards, anyway) special FX and whatnot, but Red Cherry has quickly climbed into my top 25 films of all time, and I've seen quite a few high quality films (Lynch, Bergman, DeSica, Kubrick, Zhang Yimou, Wong Kar-Wei, Polanski, and Kurosawa are some of my favorite filmmakers). I hope to find a higher quality DVD in the future; this film deserves so much more. I'm was really surprised to discover that this film got little recognition outside of China. Too dark, I guess, but Schindler's List was quite grim and was a major hit. Oh, well, just make sure you watch it.

The stars of the film are just perfect, and there are many scenes that are very moving. You fall in love with the main characters right away, and you like them more and more as the story progresses. There were a few scenes that reduced me to tears (scenes with Nadia, the adopted Russian girl and each of the main characters' final scenes), quite an accomplishment, as few films move me that much (Grave of the Fireflies, one of the best films ever made, got me as well). The story is told in an atypical way: the stories of the two main characters are cross-sections of their lives during a 5-year period, and the film jumps to the next year after showing a bit of their current circumstances. Once I got used to it, I didn't mind the format at all. Once I got into the film, the minor technical deficiencies seemed to disappear. Highly, highly recommended.

By the way, I don't agree that there is a lot of propaganda involved in this film. The description of the treatment of Mao revolutionaries isn't exactly complimentary to the Chinese government. They executed revolutionaries by chopping them in two at the waist with a haysickle? Yeah, that really places the Chinese government in a positive light! This story is about children and war, period. And it's a very sad and powerful story.
12 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Ocean Waves (1993 TV Movie)
8/10
Why can't our TV programming be this good?
19 June 2003
TV movie or not, this was an outstanding film. Terrific direction, animation, and writing. As others have stated already, it is a film with a great deal of subtlety, so if you think great acting is Julia Roberts screaming at the top of her lungs, then you might not appreciate this film fully. It ranks among the best animated films I have watched, at least in the top 15 or 20. It's not quite in the same league as The Grave of the Fireflies, Princess Mononoke, Spirited Away, Akira, My Neighbor Totoro, Whisper of the Heart, Only Yesterday, or a few other excellent anime I have had a chance to see, but it is easily better than 99% of the rest of the animated films out there. Highly recommended. At least an 8/10.
54 out of 63 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Good movie overall, but the acting is outstanding.
13 February 2003
Meryl Streep was incredible in this film. She has an amazing knack for accents, and she shows incredible skill in this film overall. I really felt for her when Lindy was being persecuted. She was played realistically, too. She got cranky, upset, and unpleasant as the media and the government continued their unrelenting witchhunt. I didn't expect much from the film initially, but I really got interested in it, and the movie is based on a real person and real events. It turned out to be better than I had anticipated. Sam Neill was also outstanding; this is the best work I've seen from him, and I've really liked him in other movies (The Piano, for example). I gave the film a 7, but if I could rate just the acting, I'd give the it a 9.5, and a perfect 10 for Streep.
16 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Hours (2002)
7/10
Good film, but the book was much better...
31 January 2003
Warning: Spoilers
I must admit I was a bit disappointed by The Hours. The omission of one scene in particular (immediately followed the climax event in the book) really annoyed me. I thought Laura Brown's story could have been explained better. In the book, she lies to the hotel clerk, claiming that her husband would be along shortly. It made it more convincing to the reader that Brown was troubled and maybe a bit off mentally. A little more explanation in the film would have been nice.

SPOILER ALERT

And I also didn't care for the way they handled one character (and his younger self). The kid was called "Ritchie" in the book. Instead, Richard holds a picture of his mother up, a dead giveaway, and Daldry reveals this fact to the viewer even before the climax event. The book handled this much better. I was very upset he used such an obvious spoonfeeding approach; it was more like something I'd expect from Ron Howard than from Stephen Daldry. I really liked the part in the book when Brown and Vaughn meet, and Brown reveals her connection to Richard.

SPOILER ALERT END

I did NOT care for that "train station" scene. The screaming and histrionics were not present in the book, nor were they necessary.

I'm also surprised at all the acclaim for Nicole Kidman. Of the three main actresses in this film, I felt Kidman gave easily the weakest performance. The scene in which her sister is leaving and she asks her if she's getting any better was outstanding, but the train station scene and many others weren't that great. Screaming and flailing your arms around does not equal great acting.

Streep was outstanding, and gave the best performance in the film. The nervous breakdown scene reminded me of her performance in One True Thing, but that's mostly a good thing, as she was also outstanding in that film. Streep's scenes with Ed Harris, also excellent in his role, were among the best in the film.

Moore gave one of her best performances ever. I liked Moore better in The Hours than I did in Far from Heaven. She was surprisingly good, and was probably the most subtle of the three. I would have liked for the screenwriter or director to dump a few of Kidman's scenes and add scenes for Julianne Moore and Meryl Streep.

The child acting wasn't that great. Brown's kid annoyed me. His facial expressions and tone didn't always match the situation. But I guess it's tough to find a good child actor. Cute kid, but I would prefer not to see him again. I was much more impressed with Natalie Portman in Leon and Lucas Black in Sling Blade. The rest of the cast was excellent. Richardson, Janney, Danes, Daniels, Reilly, Collette, and others did a fine job in the smaller roles of the film.

The cinematography was good, although not award worthy. The score was good, I guess, but it was relentless, intrusive, and sometimes even repetitive. I wanted a break from Glass' score now and then. The editing was overdone at the beginning of the film. You get the connections between the women pounded into your head. Again, Daldry slips into giving a Ron Howard-ish treatment of the subject matter with the editing, but overall, Daldry did a pretty good job telling the story and getting excellent performances out of the cast.

I just wish he challenged his viewer a little bit and did more with Laura Brown's story. This was a difficult book to adapt, so I give the screenwriter kudos for difficulty points, but I didn't approve of the addition of a temper tantrum in the train station scene or the deletion of a key scene after the climax event. The film is filled with good performances.

I'd give The Hours about a 7.5/10.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Happiness (1998)
9/10
Terrific Movie!!!
18 September 2002
I really enjoyed "Happiness." The writing and direction from

Solondz were wonderful, and the cast was terrific, especially Dylan

Baker and Hoffman. I bet a lot of people are left aghast after

watching this movie due to the subject matter, but I thought it was

just wonderful. To "get" and enjoy the movie, you really have to be

intelligent enough to realize that many of the scenes and

characters in the movie are caricatures of common types of people

and situations in real life, just twisted or exaggerated for comedic

effect. I recently had an experience similar to Jon Lovitz's

character's experience at the beginning of the movie with a flaky,

shallow girl, and I told her off the same way he did when we broke

up, just not quite to the extent that Lovitz did ("...and for the rest of

your life, you -- not me -- will always be s____!"). I can't wait to see

what Baker does next. He was in Happiness and Requiem for a

Dream, two of the grittiest movies I've seen, and he was excellent

in Road to Perdition. I've never forgotten his "Owen" character in

Planes, Trains, and Automobiles, either. I hope he stars in

another quality movie soon. This guy is great. I wish Solondz

made movies more often, more than one every 3 or 4 years. I'll

really looking forward to more from him.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Best Acting of the Year; great movie overall
11 May 2002
In the Bedroom would definitely be in my top 5 movies of 2001. Everything is done really well, but the acting, screenplay and direction really stand out. Tom Wilkinson gave the 2nd best acting performance of the year behind Naomi Watts of Mulholland Drive and should have won an Oscar. But Oscar likes Julia Roberts' style over-the-top melodrama; subtlety and pure acting skill are rarely appreciated in American movies. Tomei should have also taken home an Oscar for this movie, and like many, I also would have liked to have seen more screen time for her. She was excellent. Sissy Spacek has been on a role lately, with Affliction, The Straight Story, and now the best of the three, her performance in this movie. I'd say she gave the 2nd best female lead performance of the year behind Naomi Watts. The screenplay was very clever and did an excellent job developing the main characters. It contained some neat symbolism, too. In the Bedroom was definitely the best movie of this genre this year. It puts A Beautiful Mind to shame, especially in the screenplay and acting departments. The camerawork is perfect for each emotion and mood of the movie. The Fowler's seemed like real people from a real family. This movie might be a bit to dark for some, but I thought it was extremely realistic and well done. I've heard a lot of ultra-liberal nonsense bashing the movie about the ending, but personally, I couldn't imagine this movie ending any other way, and thought it had a perfect ending. I didn't have any sympathy for that Strout maniac and thought he got what he deserved. The final sequence is also a bit open-ended, which drives the intellectually-challenged crazy because they have to think a bit about what the future holds for Matt and Ruth, but great for anyone with more than a mouse running around in an exercise wheel inside their skulls. It's pretty amazing that this movie was made for only $2 million dollars, especially with the superb cast and direction. I'd strongly recommend this one, and I'm usually not even into the family drama genre of movies.

9/10
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Should have won Best Picture
2 May 2002
I didn't see this movie until long after it actually came out. When I watched the Oscars, I was rooting for Saving Private Ryan to win. I had no idea how much better The Thin Red Line would be. This is one of the most realistic war movies ever, right up there with Full Metal Jacket (which is high praise indeed, as I was a US Marine myself and can vouch for FMJ's authenticity). The cinematography is probably in the top 5 or 10 EVER. Some of the shots in this movie nearly floored me. John Toll is easily one of the very best DP's in the world. Malick did an incredible job writing and directing this masterpiece. And he got an excellent performance out of all his actors, too. Nick Nolte was absolutely incredible. This has to be one of his best performances ever. He should have received an Oscar nomination. Caviezel, Penn (no surprise here), Chaplin, and Koteas were all outstanding. Cusack really did a tremendous job with the small role that he had, too. This movie had probably one of my favorite casts ever. Whoever put this cast together should get an award if they haven't already. The score was also top notch, as was the sound effects and top-notch editing job. If I was in charge of the Oscars, this movie would have swept the Oscars, not that contrived, pretentious, and poorly written Shakespeare in Love. Being a prior service member helps in appreciating how good The Thin Red Line really is; I'm not sure everyone really understands it, as evidenced by the very unrealistic and horribly written Black Hawk Down's (aka Pearl Harbor 2) undeservedly higher IMDB rating. I immediately went out and bought the DVD after watching The Thin Red Line for the first time. The poetry, philosophy, and political messages won't appeal to all, but I thought the movie was near-perfect. I've watched all the great war movies (Paths of Glory, Full Metal Jacket, Apocalypse Now, Saving Private Ryan, Bridge on the River Kwai, ect.), and am quite particular about realism and quality of movies I watch from this particular genre. And The Thin Red Line is probably my favorite.
27 out of 52 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
The best movie I have ever seen.
14 January 2002
I just can't find a single flaw with this movie. It's so perfect. The acting is fantastic, the character development is superb, the plot and script is incredible. I bought the DVD and never get tired of watching it. This movie truly belongs among the greats, such as The Godfather, Citizen Kane, and Schindler's List, and this is the only movie I would place above the others in this elite group. There is no single element that makes it such a fantastic movie; the combination of every aspect of the movie being executed perfectly makes it great. A true masterpiece.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed