Reviews

2 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
Pleasantville (1998)
10/10
One of the Best Films Ever
1 April 2023
I can only think of a few films that have so much packed into them--"Tender Mercies" comes to mind. I almost don't know where to start without seeming to be writing a doctoral dissertation.

The national obsession with the post-war period in America is rooted in the white middle class and is something I would compare, in a dissertation, to the myth of the "Gone Withe the Wind" version of the American South pre-civil war.

Tackling these issues by making this film in 1998 was a brave undertaking, IMO. Naturally, viewers like me tend to pontificate about every frame of the film (not here) and the writer, director, etc., will find this type of analysis overblown. They were on a budget, had many technical issues to overcome, and were busy "making the magic." They had internalized the story long before and were struggling with how to get it onto film on time and within budget, dealing with the actors, the locations, and all the minutia that it takes to make a film like Pleasantville.

Clearly, the film takes on that mythical period in America. I say mythical because the white, middle class enjoyed probably the most comprehensive period of positive growth and progress in our short history as a nation. Since this was the majority of the population at the time, history, as captured in film, TV, and music of the day, was mostly positive and upbeat to reflect the times and the feelings of those living in them--I was one of those children, and I was completely oblivious to the world as most children were and some still are. "Duck and cover" was about as real as the world got to us.

If you don't understand the impact of this script and the film, I don't know how to bring it to you. Either you were not there or you have not spoken to enough people to "get" the point.

The very sad part of all this is that most of the issues in the film are not only alive today, but also are front-and-center in our political players, discourse, and actions today.

Maybe if we all helped our friends and neighbors view this film again (or for the first time), we might start a more positive discussion about where we are as a nation and what kind of country we want to be.
7 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Hysterical Spoof
1 April 2023
Warning: Spoilers
The humor is somewhat subtle, but I could tell from the beginning that it would be entertaining given the people associated with this film. These days, getting ANYTHING made has to be pretty hard, and I am certain that the stars were responsible for its production being approved. To me, the funniest things about this film are the inane reviews from people who clearly did not get the joke.

As in most Cruise films, every frame had a purpose, every facial expression is dead-on, and of course, the characature nature of the roles was very well done from costumes to locations to dialogue and action.

The music was also chosen to accentuate both the humor and the overall light tone of the film. It reminds me of "Mr. Right" in many ways, and of course is in the same action-spoof genre.

Stunt-wise, the scenes, which imitated his string of action film performances (we know he does most of his own stunts by now, of course) were done with both humor and playful/over-the-top action, were just real enough, I suppose, to cause those who took the film seriously to label and criticize them as if they were serious.

A few of the wonderful bits of "small business" included June pointing to her captor after telling Roy his name once, getting his attention the second time, and pointing and using the "I'm cluing you in" expression to deliver her sotto-voiced "His name is Eduardo" line. Roy's lowering his sunglasses slightly when June tells him "I bet we could have really good sex" to meet her gaze and tell her to "hydrate" after learning she was drugged. His "macho" walk across the courtyard to kiss her in the same scene with bullets flying was hilarious.

There were so many funny bits I will run out of room here--shooting. Rodney and getting the thumbs up; the "with me, without me" gag and its accompanying hand gestures, the entire chase scene with the bulls(!), and of course Roy's parents and their scenes.

I have no idea why some viewers thought this was a serious film and reviewed it with that in mind. It is definitely one of Cruise's better jobs; he mostly plays himself, of course, but you almost have to go back to "Risky Business" to get the humorous version.; (I admit to not having seen ALL his films, but I have seen most of them over the years. He picks some very "out there" scripts, IMO, and they don't always work, but whether he can "act" or not in the classical sense is not the issue. We are working with modern entertainment, which requires a good script (usually), and a ton of money where the ROI is calculated way before the first frame is shot. TO guarantee this as much as possible, big name stars have to associated with the project.

This one is a very good "popcorn" film and for those who took it seriously, please give it another look with a different mindset. It is both entertaining and funny.
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed