Reviews

50 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
An actual review
28 October 2009
Warning: Spoilers
It is apparent that a great number of the reviewers of this movie, on this website, have not actually seen the movie.

This movie is less of an explanation/promotion of Intelligent Design than it is a movie about going against the grain of the P.C. establishment intelligentsia.

It starts by reviewing the case of a half of dozen or so academics who lost their positions after publishing research which mentioned I.D. Ben Stein then has series interviews with people in the academic community about I.D, research.

The movie is fairly slowly paced. Ben Stein is respectful and patient in each interview (despite what you may read in other reviews). The general slant of Ben Stein's presentation isn't so much that Darwin had it all wrong, and the I.D. people have it all correct, but rather there are people that have scientific criticisms of Darwin's work, and there are people that have scientific peer reviewed research on I.D. and, there is little tolerance of either in the scientific community.

The movie is a little longer than it had to have been. There are a lot of little scene transition graphics, and songs, and jokes, that I guess are there to fill out the movie and maybe add a chuckle or two, but I could have done with out them and gone with a shorter movie.

I was entertained. It isn't a subject that I typically spend much time thinking about one way or the other.
38 out of 78 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
All style, no substance
26 February 2005
Warning: Spoilers
It is very stylish to sit around and have long discussions with someone you are about to try and kill... not very practical, but stylish. It is very stylish to research what kind of snake to use to kill someone with, and then to sit down calmly and explain to the dying victim why you chose that particular kind of snake... not very practical, not very believable, but very very stylish. It is not very practical to bury someone alive, and quite impossible to dig yourself out once buried... but, very very very stylish. Of course master Pai teaches no one the secret 5 pressure point punch... was there anyone watching the movie that didn't know exactly how Bill was going to die at that point? I could have wrote the last scene right then, right down to him dropping on his fifth step. How nice they had a few moments to express their admiration for one another before Bill took his last walk.

I guess QT is an acquired taste, and I haven't got it yet. How wonderful for those fans of his that can be entertained by virtually no plot, and no drama. Even after he splits one movie into two movies and uses the clips off the cutting room floor. Maybe for his next movie, he won't have any plot at all. Just some random scenes of people being really cool... yeah... I smell an Oscar!
5 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Windtalkers (2002)
4/10
Not about the "Windtalkers"
20 January 2003
The movie advertises itself to be about Native American Navahos using their Navaho language as an unbreakable code in WWII. However, I didn't find the movie to be about that at all. There were a couple of "Windtalker" characters in the movie. But, they were just there as a plot point to give give Cage the excuse to have a mission of protecting the code... not the person, but the code. That means he can't let the "Windtalkers" fall into enemy hands at any cost. So, naturally, they immediately run the "Windtalkers" to the front lines where they run randomly around in circles while Cage follows along with a machine gun mowing down dozens of enemy soldiers at a time. And since they really want to protect the code, they do things like putting one of them in a Japanese uniform so he can walk right into the enemy camp... Of course cage goes along. Machine guns blaze, and Rambo, er rather Cage, racks up huge body counts mostly in slow motion. There is a tremendous amount of close up fighting. Lots of hand to hand combat, lots of hand gernades... and none of it seemed realistic to me. Apparently both the Japanese and US armies believed in having a few soldiers constantly yelling and running out into the open where they could be shot easily.

Did the US army really use the windtalkers on the front lines to give coordinates for artillery? Once they sent in the coordinates the shelling started almost immediately, what difference would it have made if they gave the coordinates in English? Maybe this is historically accurate, but I have a feeling the "windtalkers" were probably used more to coordinate the date of attacks, help coordinate meeting points, and probably not on the front lines fighting hand to hand.

I found the movie unrealistic, unentertaining, and unwatchable.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
xXx (2002)
4/10
Dialog is just something to fill in the gaps between explosions
3 January 2003
This movie reminded me of a Gen-X version of James Bond. The plot seemed to be an homage to the Bond series of movies, including a line by Xander "The things I do for my country" said into the camera, just before getting into bed with one of the villain's girls was almost a copy of a scene from a James Bond movie. Also, the arch criminal has a ridiculously complicated, and expensive plot he is developing. (Almost Austin Powers-esque) He has dozens of people working for him, extremely high tech equipment, security, contacts etc. The old "One of the worlds most successful businessmen wants to wreck havoc on the world." However in this case the US government has already lost too many agents trying to crack this one, so they just kidnap a 1/2 criminal, 1/2 gonzo journalist, 1/2 extreme athlete, Xander, and pretty much force him to infiltrate the bad guys. Xander is famous enough to be recognized by the bad guys for his extreme exploits, but doesn't raise in other suspicions as he begins to investigate what they are up to. Naturally Xander is able to do things that none of the regular spys could hope to accomplish. Using his extreme sports skills he can jump mini bikes 40 feet into the air, while firing a gun, can operate the host of high tech weapons given to him by 'M'... oops I mean another agent, can parachute, out race an avalanche on a snowboard , and can do it all while making smug comments dodging bullets, and almost constant explosions.

The movie is definitely for action junkies. If you like lots of actions, lots of fire power, cruel villains and powerful heros then this is for you.
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Entertaining Drama/Comedy
2 January 2003
I found the movie to be top notch entertainment. The acting was great, and the story was paced in a way that it didn't have any slow spots for me. There were enough laughs to make the movie seem quite light hearted. But, there was also a dramatic element of the movie where you realize that Frank (DiCaprio) is committing crimes, and he is being tracked down.

Frank leaves home as a 16 year old and begins a "successful" career as a con man who uses the cover of a pilot, lawer, doctor, etc to help him to a life of riches as he uses his counterfit identifications to help him pass bad checks. The FBI is always a step behind. Frank seems to be able to get away with anything, and seems quite the clever con man. But, you begin to realize that he is really just a very young man, who despite the adventures, is really quite lonely.

Yes, he is a criminal and you do have to kind of root for "bad guy" to get away to enjoy some of the drama in the movie. However, I don't think I'll be giving away too much to say that he does eventually have to pay for his crimes.

I had just finished the book just prior to seeing the movie. And I do think the movie captures the spirit of the book. However, I found a couple of things curious about the transformation to the screen. Apparently the book is embelished. Probably several things in the book are presented more "grand" than they actually occured, or just made up entirely. But, there were a couple of events in the book that might have been interesting in the move. While the movie also adds some elements that weren't in the book at all. Oh well, I enjoyed the book also, and it was a pretty easy read, so if you enjoyed the movie, you may want to consider reading the book also.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Terrible
29 December 2002
I didn't find any redeeming qualities in this movie. I knew going in the movie was kind of based on the sophomoric premise that a sexually active young man was giving up sex for Lent. The movie also purports to be a comedy. So, almost all of the humor of the film revolves around Matt's (Josh Hartnett) attempt at celibacy, while apparently in his world every woman is young beautiful, and willing to have sex with him. So, you get lots of scenes of him gasping in frustration running away from women while putting ice down his pants. I found the humor witless, and below the standards of "Porky's" or typical teenage drive-in type movies.

Also, in this world were Matt lives, everyone knows about everyone else's sex lifes, they are freely discussed, and in Matt's case becomes the subject of world wide betting on the internet. While Matt seems to view this as an unfortunate turn of events, apparently he harbours no ill will towards his "friends" for publishing his plight. Or doesn't seem to be upset with them as they go out of their way to make him break is vow for Lent.

There is more to the "plot" of the movie, he meets a girl and falls in love but the movie screams the question "HOW CAN THEY BE IN LOVE IF THEY AREN'T HAVING SEX?" I'm not sure what the movie answered... it doesn't matter. The movie is absurd, the ending is meaningless.
81 out of 150 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
From Hell (2001)
6/10
Suspense and Horror from Jack the Ripper
29 December 2002
The movie is a violent, suspenseful retelling of the Jack the Ripper killings. The acting is good, and the story is told as a murder mystery where you as viewer get to attempt to solve the crimes along with Fred Abberline (Depp). The story has a few new twists in that Fred seems to be something of a psychic, who gets some of his clues from drug induced visions. Also, all of the victims are acquaintances, who seem to have something in common with their pasts. The movie does have some clues that you can pick up along the way where you may actually be able to make some guesses as to who the killer really is.

The movie is quite gorey in a few scenes. There is a enough mystery and suspense to keep you guessing until the end.
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Analyze That (2002)
5/10
Very Average
26 December 2002
I think I might have chuckled a couple of times. A pretty tame film that tries to draw laughs from getting the straight laced Ben Sobel (Billy Crystal) mixed up in the "Mobs" business as he seems to be trying to help someone, that he also knows doesn't need the help. The situations were ridiculous, and unrealistic, which would be ok if it were a hilarious "screw-ball" comedy, but it falls way short on the comedy.
5 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Solid, entertaining.
17 December 2002
I was kind of expecting a version of Crimson Tide from a Russian point of view, and it almost was.

This film starts off by setting up a conflict between the Captain, and first officer. Polenin (Neeson) is the designated captain of a sub that Russia wants to put to sea well before it is ready. Polenin is concerened with his men on the boat. The higher ups, not nearly so concerned with people, put Vostrikov (Ford) in charge of the sub to make sure the mission is carried out regardless of the risk.

Of course there is conflict between Polenin and Vostrikov. The submarine begins to experience some significant malfunctions.

I found the movie suspenseful, and the conclusion entertaining.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Didn't connect with me
17 December 2002
The movie focuses on Judy (Hunter) dealing with her post divorce life. I think Judy was supposed have some problems/complexities to her that would make the audience feel some sympathy for her. But, for me I just found her to be unlikeable. The movie crawls in spots, seeming to have no point to the actions on the screen. I was looking at my watch before the movie was 1/2 over, hoping as each scene wound down, the credits would start to roll.
2 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Frenzy (1972)
5/10
Entertaining, but not a classic.
17 December 2002
The first thought I had after watching the movie was how dated it seemed. I could have almost believed this move was made in the '50's rather than the early '70's.

Some of the humor was good as it popped up sometimes in unexpected places.

I found some of the plot points to kind of stretch credibility. Could a convicted murderer walk out of a prision hospital, hop in a car, and drive away. I don't think so.

The main plot of the movie was compelling, a somewhat unlikeable man's ex-wife is killed, and he was seen leaving the scene, as he tries to figure out the crime, he continues to make himself look more guilty. There is suspense, and I think everyone will cringe a little as Blaney becomes more deeply tangled in the murders, that as we the viewer know, he has nothing to do with.
3 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Watch the orginal again, instead of this.
6 December 2002
After watching MIIB, I had the feeling that the film makers thought that the orginal movie was so successful because of the special effects. So, when making a sequel, they should just put in more special effects; And they did. If you thought the "weird aliens" were funny in the first, there are more here. If you thought a talking dog was funny in the first, lots more of him here. If you liked the car that is part spaceship, lots more of it here. If you thought the alien getting his head shot off and it growing back was fun, it happens about 5 more times here. Of course while putting in all the extra fun stuff, a few minor things like the the characters and the plot had to be squeezed out.

The first movie developed a little background Smith's and Jones' characters, and let you sense a bond between them. No time for that here. They were mostly just typical buddy cop characters. Setting out to save the world, always a 1/2 step ahead of the villains.

There are a couple of clever jokes, a chuckle here and there, but there was too few for the humor to save the movie, and there was too little development of the characters or the plot for me to be concerned about resolution of the story.
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Mildly interesting.
25 November 2002
A great deal of the movie had the feel of a family getting together for a wedding, with someone just filming the mundane goings on around the family house. Of course, there was a lot going on! But a great deal of wasn't particularly dramatic, but rather ordinary conflicts. The wedding is hectic, the guests are arriving... the plans have to be finalized... things cost more than expected... A few minor squables break out that are resolved quickly.

I found the sideline story of the infatuation of the event planner, Dubey, with the kitchen helper, Alice, to be the most interesting part of the movie. Dubey got to show several sides of his personality, and when you noticed the fast talking event planner showing an interest in Alice you see that while he wasn't at a loss for words in his business dealings, that the words were a struggle around the attractive Alice.

All in all the story seemed pretty routine. It was satisfying, but not particularly dramatic, as things went pretty much according to plan. This movie was kind of an Indian version of "Father of the Bride", with a little less comedy, and more drama.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8 Mile (2002)
5/10
Not much there.
17 November 2002
Warning: Spoilers
I will qualify my review by saying I'm in my 40's, lived in the suburbs my whole life, and I tend to avoid rap music. However, I have heard a few Eminem songs that I like, and I had heard the movie wasn't really featuring a lot of rap music. So, I had an expectation of a movie about a guy using his talent to pursue his music career. And, that is kind of what the movie was about... kind of.

The movie certainly portrays people in dire circumstances. They drive cars that barely run. they live in places that are barely inhabitable. I don't know how realistic it is, but it is certainly gritty. "Bunny" (Eminem) is seeking a better life through his music career. He has an interesting band of friends that all seem close, and supportive. One character was impossibly dim-witted. But, the others came across as decent people, with distinct personalities and life goals. They are are depending on Bunny to be a big hit as a rapper.

The acting was varied. I thought Eminem was a little wooden, he would go from very kind and sensitive, to quite hostile and violent with not too much in between. His gang of friends were all good, with Mekhi Phifer's character being the most interesting. Brittany Murphy's character Alex seemed kind of out of place. I'm not sure that the "love interest" really did much for the story. The rival "rap gang", were kind of one dimensional also, but they weren't given a lot to do.

As Bunny pursues his rap career we see a dismal failure early in the movie when he "chokes" and has to walk off stage. He seems to now have a stage fright, and he is determined to purse a rap career, without rapping in public. It would seem like there would be a chance for a big climatic conclusion in the movie with with him making a triumphant return to the stage, and winning over the crowd...

*** spoilers follow ***

This does kind of happen. However, the big rap contest at the end turns out to be a "rapping out insults" contest. So, rather than get Eminim's big smash hit song for the movie, you get a couple of episodes of him insulting people better than they insulted him. With each witty zinger, the crowd ooo's and aaah's its approval. But, while mildly entertaining, it wasn't as much fun as listening to one of his real songs, and the conclusion was no more dramatic than the ending of Sly Stalone's "Over the Top" movie where he tried to make arm wrestling even less interesting than it already is. The conclusion wasn't particularly satisfying for me. The story was a little slow with out too much really happening.
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Close, but not quite
12 November 2002
I was looking forward to a b-movie, with a few chills, and a few giggles, but, got very few of either. The movie is setup to have a classic b-movie plot. Some toxic waste has been accidentally dumped in a local water way. This happens to be the same water way where the guy that owns the local "spider-farm" gets crickets to feed to his spiders. The toxic crickets cause the spiders to grow out of control.

The spiders and the violence they caused reminded me a great deal of "Stormship Troopers". The spiders weren't so creepy, as being huge over powering beasts. If you could shoot them a few times, then they could be killed. Much like the creatures in "Stormship Troopers".

The humor was also a little off the mark for my tastes. There were a few attempts to have the movie make fun of itself, and to have some other tongue in cheek humor. But, I thought the laughs were off the mark.

So, the movie didn't quite deliver the laughs, didn't quite deliver the chills. It did have some good special effects, and some good actions scenes.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Contender (2000)
5/10
Interesting story if you can ignore the polictics
10 November 2002
Warning: Spoilers
The movie shows a struggle over the nomination for a vice-president to replace one who has past-away while in office. The nomination means different things to people in the movie, a chance for a legacy for the president, retribution for a senator who wants to deny the nomination to get back at the president, career advancement for others, etc.

I thought the acting was good, I particularly liked Bridges as the president, who had kind of a running gag in the movie of trying to order something for lunch the white house kitchen couldn't prepare.

** spoilers **

There is something of a twist in the movie as it is winding down. However, I thought it was well telegraphed in advanced. I didn't find the twist to be much of a surprise.

Also, since I do follow US politics, I found the political rants to be unrealistic. The President's nomination is getting charged with some sexual misconduct from her college days. She refuses to discuss that matter at all. Later on in the movie we learn she could have easily proved the charges false, but chose not to. Yikes. That won't happen in reality.

The vp candidate had supposedly once been a Republican, but gives her positions on several issues, and they were so wildly liberal they would have caused Democrats to blush. Her positions were farther left than would be tolerated from a vp. She called her self a atheist who considered government her church. Yikes. Don't see too many candidates running on that. I don't know if there has ever been a movie made that shows Republicans in a more favorable light than Democrats. I imagine the liberal actors in CA would have their tongues leaping out of their heads and running away if they tried.
0 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Grandpa's Excellent Adventure
10 November 2002
I couldn't get past Robert Redford being the leading man while looking to be in his mid 60's. Annie MacLean (Kristin Scott Thomas) looked to be someone who was approaching middle-age, mid 30's perhaps, looking young and vibrant. Going to great lengths to help her young daughter. She obviously loves her daughter and her family. She takes a trip from the city, leaving a loving husband back at home to wait for her. Then she finds "The Horse Whisperer" a wrinkled, stoop shoulder old man living in the middle of no where. He looked like he could have been in his 70's. So, what happens when a mother in her 30's takes a trip from the city, leaving her loving husband behind, to find help in the country... Obviously she will fall in love with a wrinkled up 80 year old toad who walks around in cowboy boots and hats while grunting through his meals prepared by the women folk, and eaten off of checkerboard table cloths.

There probably was an interesting story in there somewhere, I just couldn't see past the "fish out of water" city girl, falling in love with some 90 year old guy that seemingly had absolutely nothing in common with her.
19 out of 48 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Dismal
6 November 2002
Warning: Spoilers
This movie advertises itself as not being based on the gospels, and I had expected it to a fictionalized account of Jesus's life in events that weren't dealt with in the gospels, (which could have been interesting). However, this isn't the case. The movie covers the span of Jesus' life from just before his baptism, to his crucifixion. The movie deals with several well known events from the gospels, and kind of knits together a story that is partially from the gospels and partially not. Clearly the story is "based" on the gospels.

The film plods along at a snails pace (you'll want to keep your finger on the fast forward button). Some have commented on the nice score in the film. I would recommend hitting the fast forward button when the music is playing. With about 30 minutes of interesting content packed into 2 1/2 hours, you aren't going to want to spend any more time watching this than you have to.

A weak, and tormented Jesus unsure of seemingly everything he is doing, manages to work himself through the events of the new testament. *Yawn* I think I have seen that story told about a dozen different ways now, all of the others have been better than this one.
66 out of 148 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Scotland, Pa. (2001)
6/10
Probably better if you are familiar with MacBeth
5 November 2002
I'm not familiar with the Shakespeare's MacBeth. I would imagine some of the events of the movie, mirror events from the original play. If you were familiar with original, then perhaps you could fully appreciate this film.

The movie revolves around a couple, who are kind of down and out, and both working at small diner. They know they could do a better job of running the place, but are stuck in menial jobs. If only they had the chance...

Of course through a couple of devious acts they get the chance, but they have to live a life of worry and regret. They improve the business have success, but have to continue to hide their past misdeeds.

There were parts of the movie that I really enjoyed. I thought the "Greek chorus was funny, and a nice touch. But, over all I thought the movie's pace was a bit too slow. Several scenes kind of dragged for me. The ending was hardly a shocker, but still kind of satisfying. All in all, a bit better than average from my point of view.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Spider-Man (2002)
8/10
A lot of fun
3 November 2002
A great adaptation of a comic book for the big screen. The movie gives you a feel for Peter Parker's awkwardness as a teen, and the transformation he makes to become Spiderman. The love story between Parker/Spiderman and M.J. will remind you of the relationship between Superman and Lois Lane. Where you the viewer are in on the secret, and kind of hoping that M.J can figure it out. The special effects were mostly great. But, some of the scenes of Spiderman flying through the streets on his web looked a little fake. But, did remind me a great deal of the animation from the comic books.

I think fans of comic book style action adventure will find the movie to be a lot fun.

I thought all of the acting performances were great. Particularly, Defoe was memorable in a difficult role of the nice guy/ruthless business man, transforming into the arch villain.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Lucky Break (2001)
6/10
Predictable British Comedy
2 November 2002
The pace and style reminded me of the "Full Monty", but the story didn't seem quite as satisfying.

A couple of "wanna be" bank robbers end up in an English prison, with a population of mostly decent people who are missing their lives outside of the prison. An opportunity comes along to stage a prison play, and a couple of the prisoners see an opportunity for an escape. The escape plot is complicated by a rather unlikely romance between one of the prisoners Jimmy (Nesbitt) and the only female that works in the prison, Annabell (Williams).

Olivia Williams, and Christopher Plummer gave good performances, and the movie was more interesting when they were on the screen. A decent film, but not particularly memorable.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
October Sky (1999)
9/10
A movie you can watch with your parents, grandparents, children, and all will enjoy.
31 October 2002
An inspirational story based on a true story. The movie focuses mostly on a high school student in the early 1950's, who lives in a small, poor mining town, trying to pursue a personal interest in model rockets.

The story is sweet, uplifting, inspirational, and mostly predictable. We do know it is based on a true life story after all, and they don't base too many stories on people pursuing an interest and failing horribly.

I felt the real focus of the movie was the father, John played by Chris Cooper. He clearly was a "responsible" typical middle American person. I think it showed a person struggling with the responsibilities of his job, and his family and trying to make the best choices possible. His job was dangerous, but he was up every day working hard. He tried to channel his son's interests into areas that he (the father) was comfortable with, but the son was resistant to.

The movie captures the conflict of a father trying to guide his son, while still allowing him to grow into his own. Ultimately he allows his son some freedom to pursue his own interests, despite the feeling as if his son may be growing apart from him. In one of the touching moments of the movie, the son lets him know that, that could not happen, when the father says mockingly "So, you met your hero, and didn't even know it." and the son responds "He is not my hero." leaving the implied "you are" hanging on the air.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Halloween (1978)
8/10
"Don't Open That Door"
31 October 2002
In some ways Halloween deserves some blame for starting the "slasher" horror movie genre'. However, I personally don't consider this movie a "slasher" film. There is a monster on the loose, and there is a body count. But, the movie is suspenseful, with several scenes that will have you peeking through your fingers at the screen.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Big Trouble (2002)
7/10
Funny!
29 October 2002
I think the thing that struck me first about the movie was how great the cast was. I think all off the actors were well suited for their rolls. Dave Berry wrote the book that the movie was based on, and his style of humor was evident through out the movie. There weren't any huge belly laughs, but there was almost a constant stream of chuckles. The plot of a Russian arms trader working out of a small Miami bar gives the opportunity for a group of characters including a drifter, a maid, few high school kids, a couple of hit men, the fbi, the local police, a corrupt business exec, a couple of small time crooks and an ad man to all become entangled in the same search for a stolen weapon. The story is told in kind of a merry-go-round fashion, with no one really stealing the show. You get to know a little about each character, when another story line comes along to merge with the one before it. I enjoyed the light hearted nature of the film and the humor.
5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Ring (2002)
8/10
Top notch horror movie
27 October 2002
The ring delivers plenty of chills with out being a slasher movie and having "buckets-o-blood". The movie is actually kind of a combination mystery/horror movie. The rumor of a mysterious video tape that people watch and then die 7 days later, is investigated by Rachel (Watts)when she investigates the mysterious death of a teenage relative of hers. There are a couple of "fright scenes" but the majority of the movie revolves around the investigation into the mystery of the tape. People in the movie (and the audiance) do see video, which sets us up for a 7 day deadline to get to the bottom of the tape, and try and solve the mystery to put an end to the curse.

I found the mystery and the investigation to be interesting, and helped set a dramatic tension in the movie with the race against time. Top notch thriller that I think will have a wide audiance appeal.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

Recently Viewed