Change Your Image
CraigLazlo-90697
Reviews
Hellhound (2024)
A meandering mess
Movies are story. Story is king. Story is paramount. If you don't have story. You don't have jack.
Writing story is a craft. Writing takes time. Screenplay writing is even more difficult than writing short-form or long-form prose. But it can be done. And the benefits of a patient writer who hones their script until they have a well balanced screenplay with clear characters with clear arcs, are multiple. We, the audience are the recipients of said benefits.
Hellhound has neither clear character arcs nor a proper storyline. Sure - it trundles out hackneyed old tropes and cliche after cliche; no doubt the creators were laboring under the misapprehension that cliche's are cliche's because cliches are good. In the hands of a skilled writer, cliche's CAN be very useful - tactical weapons deployed with precision to create a desired effect. Not so in this case.
There were so many rookie mistakes in this film that it makes it very painful if not frustrating to watch. A classic being bringing in a new character in the last but final scene of the film. It matters not that this character was the one who ordered the hit - that aspect was so badly communicated that we had no idea.
The protagonist was one that we didn't care about. Just because he shoots a pedophile priest in the opening scene (a character who could have been played by a really interesting actor - but was farmed out to someone who didn't know how to act and sounded like he had just learned his lines) is simply not enough to make us care about him.
He then goes on to do "one last job" - we catch him going out in the tropical jungle to meet an old firiend CHOPPING WOOD (badly) - for God knows what reason - aint nobody lighting fires and burning logs in the jungles of Thailand.... and from there it's a garbled mess of tedious exposition and excessively pointless direction - we don't need to see people getting in and out of cars and walking for miles etc - just get on with the story. - oh yes - I forgot - you dont have one.
We're in Bangkok - so of course - al the women are stereotypes - hell - everyone is a stereotype - it's women, guns, kickboxing, drinking and hunting down the baddie - who in this case is a bisexual thug.
The storyline is pointless.
The positives are few - but strong. It seems the writer is also a DOP (director of photography) and he is clearly good at this job. The establishing shots of Bangkok are great - and he clearly knows how to shoot action. That's as far as his talent goes. He should stick to that.
The fight scenes were well directed by whoever was the fight director. There were a few nifty fight scenes, but they were few and far between and certainly not enough to cut through the dire dialogue masquerading as some kind of deep philosophical theorizing. Scenes are hampered by pointless musings on God, death and mortality - to what end?
Pick a lane and stick in it. This film COULD have been a real classic Thai kickboxing or revenge film. But it wasn't.
The director knows how to handle a film set - but he doesn't really know how to direct. The score for the film seemed to have been churned out by a composer who couldn't be bothered to find any musical ID for the film. There was way too much orchestral scoring for a film that didn't require it. It was also intrusive at points - the hallmark of a great score is that you only notice it when you need to notice it.
Final thoughts - it seems like this movie was made by a bunch of people who said 'I really wanna make a movie" but they didnt have a proper script. Making a good movie is difficult - and that's probably the best thing that this movie communicated.