Reviews

21 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
Cannon: Devil's Playground (1972)
Season 1, Episode 15
7/10
Martin Sheen Shined
9 May 2021
Warning: Spoilers
Contrary to another reviewer's opinion I think that Martin Sheen did his usual excellent job acting in this episode. He elevated it beyond the usual fare. And although I also was frustrated with the actions of the bad guy's girlfriend, the point they were trying to make is that like his so called friends had been, she was taken in by her boyfriend's lies and believed him to be wrongfully persecuted. Once she sees that he's not who she thought he was, she changes her view of him and acts accordingly. A fine episode in my opinion.
10 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Not with a bang but a whimper
19 April 2021
At one point in this episode Karl Malden's Mike Stone turns to his partner with a disgusted "Are you kidding me?" expression on his face at the bad joke he'd just told and says something like "Let's get outta here." I found it a more appropriate epitaph for this often incredible show than this episode as a whole. Unfortunately in this case they didn't save the best for last and as my review title states they go out with a whimper rather than a bang. Considering the plot of this particular episode you might even say that the show had truly gone to the dogs by this point although the final season itself did have some amazing highlights including the first time ever 2 parter in the season opener and Ned Beatty's Emmy deserving episode. I'm watching "Back to the Streets of San Francisco" (Google where to watch it) that I apparently missed from 1992 (When it came out) until now but what can I say? This show that I'd never watched an episode of prior to this just completed binge has become one of my all time favorite television series. Great characters, interesting plots, and talented people will always be in style.

Thanks for the memories Streets of San Francisco and thank you to the late great Karl Malden (who I still think might have played a better Mickey than even Burgess Meredith did in the Rocky films) who was the very heart & soul of this amazing show.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Streets of San Francisco: Hang Tough (1977)
Season 5, Episode 16
8/10
Ned Beatty MAKES this episode!
18 April 2021
Just as I've noted in reviews for previous episodes in this great series where Meg Foster and Don Johnson among others made their individual episodes with what should have been Emmy winning performances, the great Ned Beatty does so here. His conflicted performance is, in a word, REAL. Every scene that he's in is authentic and the viewer can even feel his tension and empathize because of how well he pulls you into the performance. Kudos all around.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Streets of San Francisco: Hot Dog (1976)
Season 5, Episode 9
8/10
DON JOHNSON MAKES THIS EPISODE!
15 April 2021
This episode features Don Johnson at the height of his charm and talent and makes one wonder if it would have been he rather than Richard Hatch (Nothing against Hatch, who Johnson ALMOST costarred with in the original Battlestar Galactica a few years after this when Johnson was almost cast as Starbuck alongside Hatch's Apollo. Dirk Benedict won the role instead.) if the course of the show would have changed? I know this, if Johnson would have been the new partner NOBODY would have been comparing him unfavorably to Michael Douglas who left the show at the season's opener. As is the 2 shows that the unfortunately now departed Hatch was known for, namely this and Battlestar Galactica, lasted only one season with him as the star. I'm not saying that it's his fault but while he was talented actors like Johnson are MAGNETIC. It's impossible to not watch someone like that. Very few have that kind of "X Factor" and that's the secret of their incredible success. There have been many. Elvis Presley, Bruce Lee, The Rock, just to name a few. And of course, Don Johnson who as I say in my MAKES this episode as the titular "Hot Dog".
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Meg Foster MAKES this episode!
31 March 2021
Even though this episode is of the same almost uniformly excellent quality that fans of this show have come to expect, it's truly Meg Foster (She with the ethereal eyes) who really makes this episode come to life. Her natural style, improvisational manner of acting, and of course her stunning beauty all combine to make you root for her in spite of anything contrary that she says or does in the episode. In point of fact I found myself wondering during it what The Bionic Woman would have been like if Meg Foster had starred in it! What a unique and unsung actress!
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
A Memorable performance in a Memorable story
27 March 2021
Dorothy Fontana, best known to classic Star Trek fans as "D. C. Fontana" wrote this episode and in it she gave the audience a 3 dimensional female character who, in the space of this one tale manages to not only capture our imaginations but evoke our sympathy as well.

Unlike the other review mine will contain no spoilers.

I will only say what my headline does, that here you'll find a memorable performance (Emmy worthy in my opinion) in a memorable story and both Fontana and actress Carol Eve Rossen should be commended highly. Each episode of this show is of great quality but those two pros elevated it even more in this episode. BRAVO!
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
More twists and turns than many modern movies!
5 March 2021
I won't spoil anything for anyone but what I will do is praise the creativity and imaginations of the writers who here have created a layered edge of your seat thriller with several unexpected twists. The cast of the show is excellent as always and the guest stars are uniformly impressive as well as is usually the case with this fine show. Having been 4 years old when it first came out I'm just now seeing these shows for the very first time and when I see something impressive even by modern standards I HAVE to speak out! Check it out for yourself and see if you aren't impressed as well!
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Silence (II) (2019)
8/10
Great movie that's being unfairly slammed
23 February 2021
After watching this and being thrilled that it's better (Yes I said BETTER) than "A Quiet Place", I've been blown away by the vitriol for it by what looks like a cancel culture contingent. Who did Stanley Tucci piss off? It's like the woke mob got their marching orders to slam this movie for no good reason. Don't judge it by the views of others, watch it for yourself and see what YOU think. Too many goosestep right along with the crowd and like lemmings follow them anywhere. Make your own judgement. Maybe you'll agree with them, maybe you'll agree with me, and maybe you'll have an entirely different viewpoint about the film but don't let other people determine your opinion for you. Educated opinions are always better than word of mouth.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
William Windom is always a treat to watch
19 February 2021
This episode is a little "Death of a Salesman"-ish in that it chronicles the travails of a good man with bad luck who makes horrible choices. I won't recount the plot again here as some other reviewers seem to confuse the idea of providing an opinionated review with providing a beat for beat synopsis of an episodes entire events. But suffice it to say that after seeing lead William Windom in many parts including (But of course not limited to) "Escape from the Planet of the Apes" (Where he played a JFK like President), his personal favorite of all his performances the "They're Tearing Down Tim Riley's Bar" episode of Rod Serling's Night Gallery, and MY personal favorite from him "The Doomsday Machine" from the original Star Trek, take it from me if you haven't seen him in much that he is ALWAYS interesting to watch. He makes this episode like Janice Rule made the previous one. Like someone once said, at least 50% of a successful piece of entertainment (Be it episodic television like this or features) is great casting it looks like Quinn Martin and company understood that all too well.
7 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Poetic, intelligent, and meaningful
19 February 2021
I agree 100% with the reviewer who said "Janice Rule Rules" because her performance and the humanity, wit, and intelligence she brought to her part elevated this otherwise pedestrian story tremendously.

I recognized her from the start and upon checking to make sure that I was right about who she was I confirmed it. She starred in an episode of my all time favorite series, the original run of The Twilight Zone. Her episode of that was called "Nightmare as a child" and I must say that this episode has both a better title and a better plot as well than did that episode with the younger Janice Rule. There's something haunting about her eyes and somehow sad as well. I hope that her life hasn't been as dark as her countenance has been from those 2 performances. But I hope that others will appreciate the quality that she brings to both episodes. She's a first rate actress all the way.
6 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Best Horror/Comedy since "Return of the Living Dead"!
11 December 2020
I guess one of the reviewers said it best when they described this as a real love it or hate it movie. Well I for one loved it! I'm genuinely surprised at the negative reaction that so many have had to it. It's clever, has a GREAT cast playing memorable characters, and the titular song will, like the film itself, stay with you long after the film ends.

If you don't like comedy/horror films then don't watch this. If you ONLY like comedies or horror films and don't like the 2 ever overlapping then don't watch this. But if you appreciate some wit, acting, cleverness, and originality in your horror/comedies then by all means DO watch it and I bet that you'll love it like I do!
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Mandalorian: Chapter 14: The Tragedy (2020)
Season 2, Episode 6
9/10
The Best of The Best!
4 December 2020
Warning: Spoilers
I've loved SW in general and this series in particular since the beginning of both but never until this episode have I been absolutely COMPELLED to write a review after an immediate repeat viewing!

Not only does this, in my opinion the very best episode so far, confirm for those wiseguys who insisted that Temuera Morrison's appearance in the Season 2 premiere DIDN'T prove that he was playing Boba Fett (In spite of all evidence that would attest to that fact), but it also reverts one of George Lucas's worst decisions in deciding that Jango Fett WAS a Mandalorian after all and so is Boba!

And not only do we get to see Boba back in armor and back in action, he teams up with Din as well!!!

The series just keeps getting better and better!!!!!
17 out of 29 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Sporadic & Inconsistent Entertainment
26 July 2018
Well we're 3 episodes in to this show that looked full of promise and since 2 out of the 3 were just so so, it's looking like this is going to be one of those flash in the pans unfortunately and that it will soon be gone.

One MUST lay the blame (Or credit) squarely upon the shoulders of Bobcat Goldthwait. This is his baby just as my favorite series of all time The Twilight Zone was Rod Serling's. But to belabor the obvious Goldthwait is no Serling and this show is no Twilight Zone.

It' s fitting that the premiere episode was half animated because the show itself is a lot like a cartoon, exaggerated and nonsensical without any pretenses of actual reality. It's a fun house mirror version of an anthology.

I differ from some others in that I didn't like the premiere but did like the second episode. The third was mediocre as well in my opinion and the previews for the fourth show no signs that it will be any better. One wouldn't imagine that Goldthwait just wanted to extend his 15 minutes of stand up comedy fame with a disposable Goosebumps style show but the proof is in the pudding and he obviously wasn't going for depth or meaning. If it stays at this mediocre level I predict that we'll never see a second season of this show and probably never hear from Bobcat Goldthwait again either. Hollywood loves a winner but this show isn't one and neither is he for making it.
3 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Should have been the premiere episode!
22 July 2018
After the underwhelming Bubba The Bear premiere I thought that the second episode, Face in the Car Lot (Although it really did need a better title, something catchy like "President Werewolf?" or "Hail To The Wolf" would have been much better) was a vast improvement and expertly wove the humor and the horror hand in hand far better than the series first episode did.

For me the reason is the acting. I really hate to say it about old Scott Evil himself but Seth Green just isn't that good of an actor. Dave Foley and David Koechner ARE good actors and they thread the needle perfectly between satire and horror.

Although I'm SURE that the current political situation was one of the main impetuses behind this episode it ironically rises above petty ideologies to entertain fantastically! I found myself engrossed in the episode from the start! As far as the ending (Which I'll not reveal here) goes I can only say that I hope that the unresolved nature of it will allow for a sequel to this episode within what I hope will be a long running series if it can maintain this level of quality. If there can be more great episodes like this and less so-so episodes like Bubba The Bear, then I think that it will be.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Happy Days: R.C. and L.B. Forever (1981)
Season 8, Episode 19
1/10
Phoning It In
23 February 2016
At one point in this sad (For all the wrong reasons) episode one of Lori Beth's confused parents asks if their daughter is going to be phoning it in as well as her betrothed Richie Cunningham who, since actor Ron Howard had left the show, the writers decided to strand on an army base in Greenland able only to phone in as his wedding ceremony is improbably held without him. Fonzie stands in for him and all the characters still on the show take part but they couldn't even get Ron Howard to pre record or even phone in an "I DO" to make this episode anything other than what it is, a pathetic skeleton of the show it once was. If the show was on life support at this point somebody should have pulled the plug.
5 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Wednesday (1974)
10/10
Jack Lemmon at his absolute best
10 February 2016
For me personally the key to greatness has always been and will always be memorability. If something is great then you'll remember it and if it isn't (At least to you) then you won't, it's as simple as that.

"Wednesday" has stuck with me since childhood. To me, this little seen short film is Jack Lemmon at his absolute best.

He's done innumerable films of fantastic quality and more than made his mark in work that practically everyone has seen from The Odd Couple & The China Syndrome to the Grumpy Old Men films at the close of his deservedly lauded career. Nobody can or should take away the influence of those films. But for me personally it's "Wednesday" that will always be at the forefront of my mind when thinking of Lemmon and if you haven't seen it but are a fan of him & his work then I couldn't encourage you more strongly to see it. You can find it on youtube and elsewhere online. You won't be sorry that you invested the few paltry minutes that it takes to watch this superlative short film and who knows? After watching it you just might end up agreeing with me that when you think of Lemmon, you think of "Wednesday"too.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Zane Grey Theatre: Sundown at Bitter Creek (1958)
Season 2, Episode 19
9/10
More like a Twilight Zone
17 November 2015
Warning: Spoilers
This episode of this (sadly little heard of these days)TV series features the same Dick Powell who brought this series to television as a gunfighter who we see {SPOILER ALERT} die at the beginning of the episode. The fun comes in when he's seemingly brought back from the netherworld of the afterlife by a folk singer's ballad which chronicles the rise & fall of his character (It's a memorable tune too!). Everyone is excellent in this episode but the thing which strikes me most is that if you threw in some Rod Serling narration it could easily pass for an episode of my all time favorite The Twilight Zone! See for yourself & see if you don't agree!
6 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Futureworld (1976)
4/10
You want the good news or the bad news?
16 May 2013
Warning: Spoilers
THIS REVIEW MAY CONTAIN DREADED SPOILERS! Having just watched this on Amazon Instant Video (And no they didn't pay me for that free advertisement but I'll sell out cheap! :D ) my perspective is as fresh as my frustration that what turned out to be the last film in the franchise (Funny how a bad entry can do that) didn't end things on a satisfactory note.

Since I don't know which you'd prefer first between the good & bad news in my review title anymore than the filmmakers apparently knew how to make a good sequel, I'll arbitrarily choose the good. (I'm an optimist, what can I say?) The music is quite good. Blythe Danner is quite good here as is instantly recognizable baddie John Ryan (Ever notice how most bad guys aren't the most handsome devils in the world of movies? And good guys are always handsome? But I digress.). Also I give them points for recognizing that they NEEDED to bring back Yul Brynner for the sequel.

To start off with the bad though whatever points I give for them realizing that they needed Yul Brynner are COMPLETELY negated by the fact they waste him utterly in this made for TV movie looking follow up. He was a virtually unstoppable killing machine in "Westworld", the inspiration for Michael Meyers (John Carpenter has admitted this) & The Terminator as well! Brynner was as The Gunslinger a complete & total BAD ASS! And how do they use him here in his last film? (Tragic when a great actor goes out on a stinker. Reminds me of Raul Julia's last movie being "Streetfighter".) They make him some kind of a Harlequin romance novel fantasy for Blythe Danner's character to get all hot & bothered about!!! I kept WAITING for them to introduce him into the movie thinking "When he shows up it's finally gonna get good!" only to see the aforementioned hippie dippy dream-time sex fantasy sequence! Their misuse of the STAR of this franchise, made all the more sad by it being his last film, was an EPIC FAILURE. I'm not saying that to satisfy me they needed to have him doing exactly what he did in the first one, running & gunning down good guys left & right, but why couldn't they have turned it around & had the good guys use him as their secret weapon when all seemed lost? If you've already seen this imagine how cool it would have been if The Gunslinger showed up at a "We're screwed now!"" moment blowing away his fellow robots with reckless abandon! THAT was what this film needed!

But I digress again.

Back to what's wrong with "Futureworld".

In a word. Fonda. In two words. Peter Fonda.

To say that the acting of Peter Fonda in this film was lifeless would be an insult to the dead. It would have been much more believable if they would have revealed that the character that we thought that we knew him as had in fact been a robot throughout the entire film and at least THEN we could have an excuse other than Fonda taking too many drugs in his life or just never bothering to hone his craft because with his name he didn't need to. He's a blight on this movie. Not that it'd be winning any Oscars without him mind you but he didn't do it any favors starring in it either. Makes you appreciate Blythe Danner's talent that much more though.

Ultimately what we have here is a sequel that failed for the same reason that most sequels fail.

They just didn't try hard enough to make a good film.
8 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Ruby and Oswald (1978 TV Movie)
5/10
If you already believe in the two "Lone Gunman" theories,this is for you
24 May 2012
Having just completed viewing this made for TV movie I can say several things. 1)It was adequately made but not outstanding as far as entertainment. 2)The acting was hit & miss, with Michael Lerner doing the best at portraying an emotionally unbalanced Jack Ruby. 3)As far as historical worth goes this is virtually worthless for any but those who slavishly hold to the Warren Commission's finding of a "Lone Gunman" in the case of not only Lee Harvey Oswald but in HIS assassin Jack Ruby as well. Believers in the "Lone Nut" scenario accused Oliver Stone's film "J.F.K." of being complete fiction & I suppose that it would be to them in the same sense that footage of the Moon Landing would be complete fiction to someone who believes that we never went there & consequently faked the whole thing. This made for TV film is a rote,down the line love letter to the Warren Commission findings,eliminating anything inconvenient (Like the whole "Magic Bullet" part of the tragedy for example. Aside from the trajectory of it which defied the laws of physics "Lone Gunman" adherents would have us believe that it just magically fell out of Governor John Connally to lay gently beside him on the hospital stretcher in practically pristine condition, a condition that never has been repeated since in countless tests under countless conditions. A bullet fired through NO bones or flesh but simply water itself has more degradation than that present on the "Magic Bullet" not to mention that the fragments of shrapnel removed from Governor Connally add up to more mass than is even missing from the conveniently discovered cartridge in the first place!)that they might not be able to explain away with the ease of how for example Jack Ruby came to know that Oswald had been involved in the Fair Play for Cuba committee. (Here it has Ruby overhearing it on the radio shortly before arriving at the police station where he just so happens to get into the press room so that he can have the first of his moments in the spotlight before getting locked away until his own suspicious death under incarceration.) What they don't replicate for their own purposes (Like having Oswald scowl a lot to make him look more guilty) they simply invent (Like the radio bit that I just mentioned) or eliminate entirely (Like the "Magic Bullet" stuff or the fact that Oswald worked at a top secret photo developing lab & would have known how to fake the photos of him with the guns that basically announced to the world "I'M GUILTY!" Here it's portrayed like he was just saying that they were faked with nothing to back it up. Or the fact that a man fitting Ruby's description was seen around Dealey Plaza at the time of J.F.K.'s murder. "When in doubt, throw it out" seems to have been the order of the day here.) so as to convince either the casual viewer who doesn't know much about the case or the choir of Warren Commission apologists that they're preaching to that this indeed is the way that it REALLY happened. (As a side-note it's interesting that with so many rave reviews it's not rated very highly. Almost makes you suspicious doesn't it?)

I'm not saying that you HAVE to believe that there was a conspiracy (Though I think that's the only reasonable conclusion to reach upon examining all of the evidence.)but what I am saying is that if you're interested in the assassination of President Kennedy (As I would assume just about everyone watching this would be)then AT LEAST look at the evidence presented from both sides & decide for yourself.
3 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
A so-so documentary about a fascinating & hilarious enigma
6 March 2012
Warning: Spoilers
You can't get a much better subject for a documentary than Andy Kaufman, entertainer par excellence' & fascinating enigma who so perplexed the world that even to this day his closest friends still aren't sure that he's actually dead.

Andy Kaufman is my favorite comedian of all time even though he was loathe to consider himself a comedian,(it was too limiting for his tastes I imagine)& he had the mark of TRUE genius namely that not only has his legacy survived the years since his exit from the public scene (Either through death or a death hoax) but his body of work continues to be imitated in various forms throughout pop culture. Many focus on Sacha Baron Cohen as "Andy lite" not to mention Joaquin Phoenix's recent foray into Kaufmanland but consider for a moment that some 20 years before the "Masked Magician" revealed the secrets of magic on FOX that Andy & best friend/comedy writer/fellow Tony Clifton Bob Zmuda were doing that exact same thing in a bit, masked magician spilling the secrets & all. This is but one example of the countless efforts from Kaufman & Zmuda that were so far ahead of their time that it's only recently that pop culture is finally catching up to them.

In "The Death of Andy Kaufman" writer/director Christopher Maloney offers an incredibly subdued look at & ode to the genius at the center of this documentary. It is, while respectful, I daresay BORING which is something that Andy only ever was to those NOT catching on to what he was doing. Here that isn't the case as it's clear that writer/director Maloney is engaged in hero worship & as such spends only a perfunctory amount of time on what was to most people looking up the documentary (Myself included) the major draw of it in the first place, namely the search for the answer to the question "Did Andy Kaufman fake his death?".{SPOILER ALERT} Maloney dismisses the individual who not only runs AndyKaufmanlives.com as a fake without explaining who he is if he ISN'T Andy Kaufman (The fact that Kaufman's family has never interfered or placed any legal injunctions against this individual or the website has always been of utmost interest to me) but actively claims to BE Andy Kaufman (I've talked with him myself online under several guises or "characters". He's VERY Andy like.) in what can only be considered a half hearted search for the truth which was probably the result of that individual refusing to be interviewed by him & the conviction with which Andy's brother Michael convinced Maloney in their interview that his brother was in fact deceased. Not to be unkind but if Andy did fake his death & wanted to remain in seclusion for whatever reason then wouldn't it be contingent upon anyone close enough to him to know that he faked it to convince others that he was dead? I'm not saying to strap a lie detector up to Michael Kaufman or anything but let's not be so credulous with someone who has donned the Tony Clifton garb himself (For years Andy claimed that he wasn't Tony & that Tony Clifton was a separate person. Now we know that sometimes it was Andy in the TC makeup, sometimes it Bob Zmuda, & every now & then it was Michael Kaufman.). A TRUE search for the truth about Andy Kaufman's "death" (Perhaps an "In Search Of.." style?) would make for a much better documentary than this lazily paced art house exhibit that would have been better titled "The Life of Andy Kaufman".(Though it wouldn't have been an accurate representation of that either.)This is a mixed bag at best.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
If your standards are low
4 February 2011
If it wasn't for the scene in which Stephanie Powers graces the viewer with her naked backside & some side boob action one would be forgiven for thinking "The Astral Factor" a TV Movie of the week (Which were quite prevalent in those days). As is it's one of the few things that DOES stand out in this lackluster dip into the new age pool. If you're already a fan of seventies era films & TV shows you'll no doubt recognize several of the actors from such fare as "The Love Boat", & "Fantasy Island". Needless to say that there's nothing groundbreaking going on here. If your standards are low (REALLY low) then you may get something out of this. Otherwise buyer (And viewer) beware.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed