Reviews

6 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
Brüno (2009)
10/10
Bruno is one of the funniest of the year!
10 July 2009
Sasha Baron Cohen brings his Bruno character to the big screen with outrageous results. This film is not for the faint of heart or the easily offended. It is however a must for those who enjoy boundary crossing humor. Cohen brings his Bruno from "Da Ali G Show" to feature film in a more fluid and sustained way than its predecessor Borat. Bruno is a gay fashionista who is a well known host in his native land of Austria. A mishap occurs during Milan's fashion week and it results in Bruno losing his job from Bruno's Funkyzeit television show. So, what's a gay fashionista to do...? He packs his things and heads for the US seeking fame and fortune. He tries many things including adopting a child from Africa (or as Bruno puts it an African American child). He gets a role as an extra on Medium. Unfortunately these things do not pan out for Bruno so he goes to the Middle East (or as he puts it Middle Earth) to broker a peace treaty between Israel and Palestine. Bruno is sharp and funny and will leave people rolling in the aisles. It hits many of its intended targets square on. It's at its best when Bruno tries to become a celebrity by trying to turn straight (like famous people John Travolta, Kevin Spacey, and Tom Cruise). Sasha Baron Cohen is definitely brave in what he does. He confronts and exposes bigotry and guilelessness both with a savvy sense of humor. He's not looking to change the world with Bruno but maybe change a few minds with some wicked laughs in between. Note the movies R rating is surprising due to some of the graphic nature of the stunts. So leave the kiddies at home but if you have a strong heart Bruno will provide the other body parts.
2 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
In Bruges (2008)
10/10
In Bruges
3 April 2009
Warning: Spoilers
In Bruges balances black comedy on a razor wire. It's the kind of movie that makes you sit up and take notice. Colin Farrell and Brendan Gleeson are hit men hiding out in Bruges (it's in Belgium) while awaiting on further instruction. Gleeson, the more experienced hit man, wants to take in the sights. Farrell, the novice hit man, just wants to get drunk. Gleeson is at home in Bruges while Farrell is bored out of his wits. Luckily, they stumble upon a movie set that is shooting and meet some eccentrics. They meet the sets drug dealer and a dwarf (Jordan Prentice, who's wonderful) being used for a fantasy sequence. That distraction takes Farrell's mind of his torment. You see he just completed his first job as a hit man and botched it. He made the hit but a child got killed in the process. This is just eating Farrell up inside. In the meantime, the boss calls and Gleeson gets the call, he has to kill Farrell. The boss makes it clear that its unacceptable that a child got killed accidental or not. In a very funny, tense scene, Gleeson is sneaking up on Farrell sitting on a park bench getting ready to kill him only as he gets closer find out Farrell is about to kill himself. So Gleeson stops him from offing himself and sends him on a train so that he wouldn't be found. Gleeson calls the boss tells him that he wasn't going to do it and that he just sent him on a train to god knows where. The boss (played by Ralph Fiennes, who does much with his little screen time) decides to take things in his own hands and go to Bruges himself. All of this builds to a suspenseful and frantic conclusion . You just might find In Bruges well worth a return visit.
3 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
You can get everything you want at Alice's Restaurant...but
3 April 2009
Warning: Spoilers
Alice's Restaurant is one of those film's with a reputation. A film not necessarily classic in the way people speak of it, but one that's definitely of its time. Alice's Restaurant benefits greatly from Arlo Guthrie's charismatic performance. All is well when the film starts Arlo is registering for the draft and trying to get out of it by telling them about a family ailment. Unfortunately since Arlo doesn't have the ailment at the time he will still be eligible. Arlo then tries attending school to get out of the draft. He's given a rough time because he's a hippie and because he gets accused of vandalism (he gets blamed for breaking a restaurants window) he is put on probation (although he was the one thrown through the window). He decides to visit old friends Alice (of the title) and Ray who run a hippie commune. Here is where the film starts to bog down. Ray has an anger problem and it's not really explained what he's angry at or why. Also one of the people from the commune is back from serving his time in the Army so Ray picks him up. There's some feeling that maybe he had some bad experiences in the war and maybe he had post traumatic stress. Then we learn that he was hooked on heroin. The film gets bogged down in plot that it doesn't explain well. Occasionally Arlo visits his father Woody in the hospital and in one memorable scene Arlo plays with Pete Seeger to cheer up his father. Such tender scenes work well. When the film keeps things light it works well. Unfortunately, the film is uneven and that hampers the fun a bit. The music is a plus and some of the counterculture elements play well but the drama seems strained and makes it difficult to slog through. One particular thing that makes the viewer scratch his head is the mood swings of Alice. One moment she's really easy going then she just snaps and blows up. It's very odd. While there are likable elements I just can't fully recommend this piece of nostalgia. It's a real shame because it could have been a real milestone especially with Arlo Guthrie performance and Arthur Penn at the helm.
2 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Watchmen (2009)
9/10
Watching The Watchmen
23 March 2009
Watchmen is a rare film and because of that it may scare off some looking for the usual superhero fare. Watchmen packs in a lot in its two hours and forty minutes so it never feels too long or boring. The film is densely plotted and original. Give director Zak Snyder (300, the 2004 remake of Dawn of the Dead) credit for turning Alan Moore and Dave Gibbons graphic novel into a film; the project had been long gestating since the late 80's. Terry Gilliam was set to direct at one point but ultimately deemed it to be "unfilmable".

According to many Snyder's vision of Watchmen is faithful. Not having read the novel I have to believe they are probably right. Snyder did not seem to want to compromise the integrity of the project. At one point, the studio was in talks with Snyder to make it PG-13 but ultimately Snyder decided it wasn't going to work. Snyder has also said that he is going to add an hour for the DVD and Blu-ray version of the release.

Now on to the film itself, The Watchmen meets and exceeds expectations. The film is set in an alternate reality of the US in 1985. Nixon just won his 5th term in office and the US is in a cold war with Russia and nuclear war is all but on the brink. Masked vigilantes have been part of the culture since the 40's the first group was called the Minutemen and we get a brief synopsis of what happened to them. The latest group are The Watchmen. Some of the Watchmen don't don their masks and fight crime anymore as superheroes are now made illegal. Some decide that its still their obligation. Did I mention someone is trying to kill off superheroes? This brings the group back together. The movie has a lot going on including a very involved mythology which is very engrossing. The film is very satisfying and will leave you discussing and thinking about the film for a long while. Very highly recommended.
3 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Ruins (2008)
6/10
The Ruins
23 March 2009
This OK suspense thriller tells the story of American college students on vacation in Mexico. The students meet a German tourist who has a brother who went to check out these ancient ruins that are off the map (waaaay off the map). They decide that they will go and check out the ruins for themselves and hope to meet up with the German tourist's brother. They soon learn the reason why these ruins are kept off the map. Intriguing premise turns silly when you learn the reason of dread. Soon our Americans are caught between the cursed ruins and hostile natives who know the truth of the ruins and who won't let them leave. Despite the silliness, the film is well produced and well acted. The ending is oddly unsatisfying. Ben Stiller (!) was one of the film's producers.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
The Great Buck Howard
23 March 2009
Colin Hanks Plays a young law school dropout who ends up answering an ad as road manager. Little does he know the ad is to work for Buck Howard or as Johnny Carson dubbed him "The Great" Buck Howard. Buck Howard is a faded mentalist (not "magician", please) who still goes on about his 61 Tonight Show appearances with Johnny Carson (he has a disdain for Jay Leno). He still thinks that he's big time though he's been playing small venues for years. Meanwhile, Hanks father finds out that he dropped out of law school and is none too happy with him working for Buck. Hanks father in the film is played by his real life father, Tom. The younger Hanks decides to stick it out because you feel that he believes in Buck though he may be difficult and deep down he knows its smoke and mirrors. Including one trick that astounds Hanks each time, at the end of the night Buck goes to the back and the audience hides his money; if he fails to find it he doesn't get paid. He's never not found the money. Hanks also knows Buck has an illusion up his sleeve something big, something that would really put him back on the map. Emily Blunt plays Buck's media liaison on the road who becomes Hanks love interest.

The Great Buck Howard is only so-so. It feels like it wants to be The Graduate meets Mr. Saturday Night. Malkovitch is the only standout thing about this picture. The cast is capable but bland. The end result is an uneven, unsatisfying film. The film seems to be missing a spark and as a result it feels like it meanders too much in its 90 minutes. It feels like a short film stretched to feature length.
4 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed