Reviews

7 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
Lore (2012)
9/10
In response to the 1 out of 10 from an earlier reviewer...
18 February 2013
Warning: Spoilers
I've just finished watching 'Lore', and found it to be a deeply moving story, beautifully shot on film (which is becoming a rarity), with a breathtaking performance by the lead, Saskia Rosendahl.

I wasn't planning on coming on here to write a review, but after reading other people's views and comments, I was quite stunned to see one reviewer giving it only one star out of ten, claiming it to be 'Holocaust Denial: Trash!'. Having read this reviewers comments, it seemed to me that the reviewer had missed a crucial element in the film, and her reaction seems to concentrate on a revelation from the final third of the film which, if the earlier reveal isn't taken into account, could have caused her reaction.

The following comments contain a good few spoilers, so please don't read on if you have not already seen the film.

In the aforementioned reviewer's comments, she mentioned the scene where it is revealed that the papers carried by the character Thomas were not his own, but those of a Jewish man named Thomas Weil. It is mentioned by one of the children that Thomas had told him that was not Jewish, but carried the papers because "Americans like Jews". If basing the theme of the film on this scene alone, I can almost see why this reviewer came to her conclusions, as she appears to have assumed that Thomas was NOT Jewish all along.

However, earlier in the film, we see Thomas notice Lore looking at the numbers tattooed on his wrist, which he then covers with his sleeve. Thomas is a survivor in every way. He has survived the camps, and has adapted to continue his survival. Although it is never explicitly explained, using another persons papers may have been easier than not having any papers at all, and the revelation to the younger children may have been because Thomas knew the young boy would not follow him to safety if he had thought Thomas was Jewish.

For Lore, it is evident from the moment she sees the tattoo that she knows Thomas is Jewish. Even after the revelation that the documents are not his, she still knows. This explains her actions in the final few scenes, a reaction against her earlier beliefs and strict upbringing. This is what makes it all the more powerful.

The reviewer also references one other scene, of other passengers on a train discussing the photographs of holocaust victims, and one of these passengers claiming that they are faked circulated by the Americans. Is the inclusion of this scene intended as 'Holocaust Denial'? I think not. When Lore overhears this discussion, she is already fully aware that the photographs are real, and we know this because earlier in the film we see her tearing away a piece of a photo, which is later revealed to contain the image of her father in full uniform, witnessing the atrocities. At this point, she is unable to deny either the events or her fathers involvement.

The reviewer I have mentioned stated that she was hoping for a classic example of the 'Bildungsroman', or coming-of-age story, and personally I feel this is exactly what director Cate Shortland has given us. A tale of a young girl who has to come to terms with the end of adolescence, the end of a brutal war, and the gradual realisation that all she has been led to believe may not be true.
89 out of 96 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
I wanted to like 'Charlie Casanova', I really did...
5 November 2012
I've been a bit vocal in my urging for people to go and watch this film, purely as I feel that someone with the balls to make a movie for under a grand deserves to have their film noticed. Still, though, after finally getting to see it, I think that it could have been much more. Instead, could someone please explain to me how something so recent can feel like it has aged so terribly?

It felt dated like a late 80's TV play that may once have had something, but the years have worn away at its impact. A real shame, as with a little more care and attention, there could have been so much more power. Whilst I have nothing but admiration for McMahon's punk rock take on the "let's do the show right here" ethos, I just wish that the final result had been as powerful as his post-festival-screening campaign to divide the viewers and rile the critics.

The script had some wonderful moments, admittedly, but for my tastes came over a little stagy in places. However, despite this, Emmett Scanlan's delivery and performance were very deserving of all the accolades that have since come his way. Terry McMahon definitely has a way with actors, and gets the best out of his cast. Unfortunately his direction appears to be more towards what the cast do, and less to what we actually see in the frame. In the hands of another director, there may have been a different outcome - dialogue-heavy scripts are not always stagy, and can often provide an electric energy when combined with intense visuals (just look at the early films of Andrzej Zulawski for great examples of this). Perhaps it was due to budgetary constraints after all, but then again wasn't that one of 'Charlie Casanova's big selling points? Did adopting the punk ethic unwittingly sap it of all its punk energy?.

Maybe if the funding had come Terry's way before shooting, then this film might have delivered tenfold, with a little more time and a little more care. I've no doubt whatsoever that Terry McMahon is a great writer, and has a gift for directing actors. I'm sure that one day he will also be able to add great filmmaker to that list, and will one day make a film that delivers on all its promises. It's just a shame that this wasn't it. It could have been, and I really wish it had been...
6 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
This Must Be Thzzzzzz... zzzzz...
5 March 2012
I must admit that I was looking forward to watching 'This Must Be The Place' as one of the highlights of the current crop of Irish funded (or part-funded) feature films. The quality of films either shot by International directors in Ireland, or by Irish directors themselves, has risen so much over the last few years (such as Urszula Antonia's 'Nothing Personal', and Terry McMahon's 'Charlie Casanova') that it is fast becoming a hotbed of great up-and-coming productions. Looking at the names appearing in 'This Must Be The Place', you would automatically assume that this was going to be yet another fantastic film. Well, assumptions are not always correct...

Whilst I cannot deny that this film is beautifully shot, this is where my positive points end. I would compare watching this film to watching a well photographed feature length music video for a song that has no redeeming features. I usually enjoy slow-paced films (the aforementioned 'Nothing Personal' is by no means a rattling roller-coaster), but the pace here was so leaden that it was impossible to become emotionally connected with any of the characters because none of them could hold your interest for such a drawn-out length of time. The performances from the high-profile cast suggested 'autopilot'. Altogether, it was a bit of a chore to sit through. Not recommended.
12 out of 29 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Blanche (1971)
10/10
Borowczyk at his best!
1 February 2010
In a world where excess seems to equate success, it is easy to see why Walerian Borowczyk's movies are finally gaining him the recognition he deserves. True, in many cases, what was once considered "smut" by the viewing public is now regarded as erotic masterpieces, and many of Borowkzyk's films, 'The Beast', 'Immoral Tales', even his art-nunsploitation flick 'Behind Convent Walls', seem to be gaining widespread acclaim. This is thanks, in part, to critics like Mark Kermode, who presented 'The Beast' uncut on the FilmFour channel, and also DVD houses such as Cult Epics, who have released beautifully remastered versions of many Borowczyk films. However, words almost fail me when it comes to the availability of 'Blanche'. This beautiful film, a medieval fairytale-cum-tragedy, is worlds away from erotic fare such as 'The Beast', and is Borowczyk's finest hour. And yet, whilst there is a 3-disc special edition of the latter title, 'Blanche' has never received anywhere near as much care and attention. In fact, apart from a mid-90's VHS version (which seemed to drop out of the shops as quickly and quietly as it had dropped in, but now fetches a fairly excessive price on ebay), 'Blanche' is practically impossible to find anywhere. It doesn't even have its own page on Wikipedia! Surely this is a crime against all cinema lovers, and to Borowczyk himself, who deserves to be remembered as the great filmmaker that he was, and not just a creator of interesting erotica.
14 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Two marks for effort, zero for everything else...
4 November 2009
Whilst I have to admire the fact that Oren Peli made this film for around $15,000, and is now, very probably on his way to becoming very, very wealthy as a result of the films current box office performance in the US, this does not mean that the film is actually any good. Usually, a key factor to liking a film is having some kind of emotional link to the characters - you like them, you don't like them, you love them, you don't. With 'Paranormal Activity', and Katie and Micah, there is simply no connection. What we are presented with are the two biggest half-wits ever to grace the cinema screen. Within five minutes, you are almost willing the entity (or whatever it is) to harm these people so that it can all be over and you can leave. Unfortunately viewers are then made to sit through watching two wooden, unrehearsed actors giving unrealistic performances in a situation than should be striking real fear in their hearts. Eventually there IS a bit of excitement, but by this point I was past caring - it was far too late into the film, and very anticlimactic. True, the new ending (showing in the theatrical version) is better than the earlier one, but only marginally. There is much more that I would like to say, but this would give away spoilers, and I don't wish to do that. Believe me, though, that if I did, it wouldn't spoil your enjoyment of this movie, because there is no enjoyment to be had. OK, people are throwing around comparisons to 'Blair Witch' and 'The Last Broadcast', but those two films were skillfully made and this one simply isn't. Very dull indeed.
5 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Hypnotic...
8 September 2009
I can safely say that I have never seen cinema like this before! Set out over a three-day period, we see widowed mother, Jeanne Dielman, go through her daily routine, many tasks played out in real time, the camera stubbornly static, and often, moreso earlier in the film, at waist-height looking upwards, so that Jeanne's head and shoulders frequently disappear out of shot. At first, watching these actions performed in full seems a touch unnerving - this is something that many people have carried out hundreds of times, but we have never before been forced to pay attention to the monotony of daily chores in such detail. However, holding these shots for so long draws the viewer in even further, making them concentrate on every action, so that when even the smallest cracks appear in Jeanne's monotonous routine, it appears to be almost earth shattering, just as the effect this has on Jeanne is equally momentous.

The wonderful Delphine Seyrig here plays Jeanne with an astonishing subtlety and restraint, almost emotionless throughout the three hours and twenty minutes of running time, yet it remains one of the most affecting, powerful performances that I have seen in cinema.
117 out of 159 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Antichrist (2009)
10/10
Chaos reigns supreme!
19 August 2009
Trier can do no wrong - it's official! It's been a long time since something so gorgeous and yet so confrontational was among us, dividing the critics straight down the line (although, as expected, The Guardian likes it whilst The Times wants it banned). Beautifully shot on the new Red One camera, showing that digital does not have to be the poor relative to film, and hopping from haunting, painterly scenes to hand-held shakiness, this is, IMHO, far closer to a work of art than it is to a horror film. That said, it is creepy as hell, a feeling accentuated by the wonderful sound design, with the creaking cabin at 'Eden', with the acorns rattling off the roof, and unsettling, droning orchestral soundtrack. And yes, some of the scenes are very graphic, but never is it gratuitous. Without these scenes (which have been discussed at length elsewhere), the ever-growing dread that builds throughout the film would not have been given any further avenues to explore, and we would have been left with a dull thud rather than a crescendo. 'Antichrist' is, in part, about the extremes of emotions, and how far they can be pushed. It is only fitting that, in order to truly appreciate these emotions, the viewer has to travel along the same paths as the characters.

As for those that claim "Antichrist" is further evidence of Trier's hatred towards women? Well, it seemed clear to me that all sympathy and humanity went to the 'She' character, and Charlotte Gainsbourg's wonderful and brave performance, scratching at the skin of despair and madness, is the emotional centre of this film. Not to discount from Willem Dafoe in any way - his portrayal of the self-serving, self important 'He' was equally powerful, and I feel neither of the actors would have pulled off such astonishing performances were it not for their full understanding of each others roles, and their respect for each other and the director.
3 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed