Change Your Image
roger-164
Reviews
Orphée (1950)
Great film, but who are the motor cyclists?
An excellent, imaginative movie. Many of the reviews on this site say exactly what I feel so I'll avoid repeating their comments. I'll just ask one question.
Who are the motor cyclists - the black riders of death? Apparently they were brothers and they make an indelible impression in the film just by their physical presence. A director - I think it was Clint Eastwood - once told an actor, 'Don't act, just stand there.' Well, you can see that advice in operation with the two motor cyclists. They don't act; they just are. And their impact is stunning. Attitude and body language say it all.
But nowhere are these crucial characters identified, either in the film credits, modern DVDs, or any book I've read about Cocteau's films.
So who are these mysterious men in black? Did they appear in other films? And what happened to them later in life? I think we should be told!
Der rote Kakadu (2006)
Excellent film - But English subtitles please!
I am English and live in London, UK. Alas, I don't speak German and I'm now too old to learn. The DVD, which contains interesting extra features, is entirely in German and contains no English SUBTITLES. This is a characteristic of many German films now on DVD. Could I make a plea to German film makers to provide English and other foreign language subtitles for their DVDs. Now we have the Internet your films can reach a worldwide audience. You'll increase sales and the money can go to making more films!
This movie is beautifully made and acted and the plot looks intriguing. But many of subtleties were lost on me because of the language problems. So please can the film makers produce a new edition of the DVD that caters to a worldwide audience. You'll benefit, too!
Napola - Elite für den Führer (2004)
Superb! - But special edition please
This is a superb film - miraculous performances from the whole cast, especially Max Riemelt and Tom Schilling. Script, direction, lighting, camera-work, editing, sound effects and music are wonderful. It's a spellbinding film of extraordinary emotional power and haunting in its beauty.
I'll just make a few of points no one else has mentioned. You may remember that Alfred Hitchcock used to make cameo appearances in his films. They were jokey and lasted only a few seconds. Well, the director of this film, Dennis Gansel, also appears in an acting role. Only he's serious, not jokey. If you look at the beginning of Napola you'll see Dennis Gansel takes on the role of the coach at the boxing club. He makes a disparaging remark about the Napola students who are present and turns away in disgust when Friedrich agrees to try to join the academy. Thus the director subtly signals to us the attitude he's going to take throughout the film.
One of the things this film shows is why Nazism was so attractive to many young Germans. The Nazis knew how to target young people and play on youthful idealism. They used this idealism as a cover for their murderous agenda. They not only coerced people; they seduced them. Gansell shows this seduction at work.
Someone once said Hitler was a gangster, but a gangster with style. When it came to style the Nazis had few rivals. Even today their ceremonies, festivals, rallies, buildings, cars, fighting machines and uniforms excite awe. Many young Germans found them irresistible. The Nazis seemed cool. The Hitler Youth wore designer uniforms. The black uniforms we see the Napola boys wearing were designed in the 1930s by a German fashion house that still exists - Hugo Boss. The firm also designed the black uniforms of the SS!
Nazi Germany was a country in uniform. It changed the way people looked, felt and acted. A key moment in the film is when Friedrich first puts on his black designer uniform - complete with a so-called 'dagger of honour' worn on the left hip - and stares at himself proudly in a mirror. Overjoyed, he goes down to the assembly hall and finds himself surrounded by dozens of cadets all wearing black designer uniforms. He is now - he thinks - part of the elite.
Napola is a subtle and multi-layered film that deserves repeated viewings. Gansel avoids the mistake of overloading his movie with dialogue. The script is terse. Sometimes there are few, or no words at all as he lets the pictures tell the story. Things are hinted at and not spelt out and it's possible to miss them on first viewing. But they're all there. For example, it took me time to realise that Albrecht is not only Friedrich's friend. He's also the conscience of the film - the moral centre. He gets inside Friedrich's mind and changes the way the young boxer thinks about the Napola and the Nazis.
Then there's the look of the film. The movie is set in the late summer, autumn and winter of 1942. The Third Reich was past the high summer of its success - 1940 - and was now entering the autumn of its years. This is reflected in the retro lighting and colours of the film. Nearly all the colours are autumnal, or wintry - brown, khaki, green, blue, black, white. The only bright colour in the film is red - the red of the Nazi flags and banners, the red of the Nazi armbands, and the colour of human blood.
Dennis Gansel comes at the Nazis from new angles and provides valuable insights into the German mind. Although a former cadet rubbishes Napola on this site many of the things Gansel describes in his movie really happened. You can compare his film with a TV documentary series on Nazi education on YouTube. It's called 'Hitler's Children.' Episode 2 - Education - deals with Napolas. It contains archive film from the 1930s and '40s and interviews with former cadets.
Incidentally, many Napola cadets who survived the war rose to become respected members in the new Germany. One became a famous actor - Hardy Kruger. He starred in many British and American films, as well as German movies. Kruger attended the Napola at Sonthofen. While training Kruger and two other cadets had to hack two holes in the thick ice of a frozen lake. The holes were 10 yards apart and the cadets had to climb into one hole and swim under to ice to the other.
There are various DVD editions of Dennis Gansel's movie Napola - some with no features, others with interviews and documentaries. The German edition contain the most deleted scenes, interviews with the cast, and a director's commentary which I desperately want to understand. Unfortunately everything is in German. I speak only English! There are no subtitles. Could I make a plea to Dennis Gansel to issue a two-disc special edition (with subtitles in various languages) bringing together all the interviews, features etc that are scattered across the various editions. Also any other material he has about this remarkable film lurking in his archives. And we need it on Blu-ray please.
As a general point - many of Max Riemelt's films exist only in German editions. They have no subtitles. I think they would have a much wider audience if they did.
Incidentally, Max speaks good English. He has a delightful German accent, tinged with American sounds. I'm writing this review some years after Napola appeared and he's made many films since. Surely it's about time a British or American director discovered Max and put him in a movie. He could play a German character speaking in English. I'm sure he'd have a great impact.
Catch Me If You Can (2002)
Great movie, pity about the DVD
I enjoyed this Steven Spielberg movie. Leonardo gives a wonderful performance - witty, amusing, moving etc, etc. But what on earth has gone wrong with the DVD? There isn't a single extra feature to accompany the film. I mean that literally. There isn't even a trailer, let alone a documentary about the making of the film, interviews with the actors, production team etc, let alone a director's commentary. This is unacceptable. If you charge full price for a DVD the viewer has right to expect more than just the movie. There's a serious point here. A lot of movie criticism is wrong. The press are often hostile and intrusive. Extra features on the DVD enable movie makers to restore the balance - to record under controlled conditions what was going on. Features enhance a viewer's understanding and enjoyment of a movie. When these are recorded at the time the movie is made they have historical value. Walt Disney pioneered documentaries about his movies in the 1950s. They give a wonderful insight into how his films were made half a century ago. Is it too much to expect that Steven Spielberg, who directed this film, can come up to date? By explaining what you're doing - or trying to do - you reach out over the heads of the know-all critics and widen your circle of understanding. In Disney's day making a documentary was expensive. Nowadays any member of the production crew can wield a video camera. There's no excuse. I feel cheated.
The Recruit (2003)
Great movie, pity about the lighting
I enjoyed The Recruit. How can you go wrong with Colin Farell and Al Pacino? Good story line. Excitng thriller. But oh, the lighting! This was terrible, the worse lighting I've seen in any film since 'All the President's Men' and that set a record all-time low. All the colours were washed out. The film was far too contrasty - a classic example of soot and whitewash. Shadows and dark areas were blocked up solid black; highlights burnt out. There were few mid tones. The film looked like the snapshots you got back from the local chemist before digital printing came in. I know the director wanted 'The Recruit' to look gloomy and low key. But more finesse please. Look at the lighting in 'Sleepy Hollow' - a classic low-key lighting film. Everything has a beautiful blue cast and yet there's a richness about the picture. Or look at how Stanley Kubrick used low-key lighting in 'Eyes Wide Shut'. Again there was a richness. 'The Recruit' looks tacky and cheap. Does it matter? Yes it does. At times it was difficult to make out the actors' faces. Bad lighting detracted from their performances and ruined the film. Whoever lit 'The Recruit' needs lessons in technique and good taste. Go back to film school and learn.
Single-Handed (1953)
Superb vehicle for Jeffrey Hunter
Jeffrey Hunter sparkles in this film. I only wish it were on DVD! From the moment he appears on the screen he has the audience in his pocket. Strangely, the film has two endings - one happy, the other sad. Audiences were asked to vote for which one they liked best. I am astonished that this fine actor has fallen out of public favour and so little of his work is available on video. He had real charisma and charm. And he could act. It's about time someone presented a Jeffrey Hunter season on TV.