Reviews

18 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
Midnight Mass (2021)
10/10
Religious Horror & a bit of Stephen King!
26 September 2021
Warning: Spoilers
Let me start off by saying i am not by any stretch of the imagination a religious person that's not to say i have anything against those that are but Mike Flanagan's new series is most definitely something that will appeal or at least interest both but for very different reason's i am sure. Flanagan himself immersed himself in the world of Stephen King whilst filming Doctor Sleep so it's no surprise to feel the shadow of the great writer in this piece, there's even a little nod to 'Salem's Lot' early in episode one if you have a keen eye & that book i feel may have served as influence for this little gem. Small town togetherness exposed by a cancer coming from outside that may or may not be reigious in tone but is more likely to be something that goes bump or 'tap tap tap' on the window in the night. Midnight Mass is probably the directors most accomplished bit of writing yet & that is saying something from the guy who brought us 'Absentia' & 'Origin of Evil'.

What it isn't though is fast paced in your face horror, this is more a character driven saga where horror happens in the mind more than to the flesh (although the longer you stay with it, fans of gore do end up with their cake) This is what propels the piece & also brings in those King comparisons, the writer is well known for being one of the best ever at developing characters in his books & Flanagan spends a lot of time making sure that by EP 7 you are entirely invested in them & generally worried for their safety. It's also a very suprising series where unexpected things happen just when you think you have figured how it is all going to pan out, one characters early demise being a case in point, a beautiful scene that illustrates yet again that Flanagan is excelling in the writing department even if it seems like people in real life might not be so well articulate when conversing. Although the well initiated might have figured out the plot easily by the end of the 3rd episode their are many things that i am sure will still surprise & shock in equal measure & on top of that the performances from the cast, many Flanagan regulars, give immense performaces throughout & are a reason to watch even if your not much into religion or horror, this does a lot for the drama hounds also.

Midnight Mass is not without flaws, as i previously stated it does strain a bit when it starts becoming too philosophical, one scene mid-way through the show has a very long 'Meaning of Death' conversation that although at times is quite beautiful & tragic does sound like it's taken off the page & less a normal couple of Joes having a talk & more a couple of would be Socratees hashing it out. Also the CGI at times does as it always does, makes things a little less believable but to be honest there isn't a lot of it & when it is used it is sparingly.

Midnight Mass also does wonders for showing how religion, in particular scripture can be used for nefarious means. You can basically take any passage from the Bible & make it fit your narrative, something many bad people have done in the past & will continue to do. 'Yer, i killed a guy, but this passage here says so & so did it for this reason, so give me my hail mary's & off i go.' The show is definitly spreading the word, it just might not be the word some people out there want to hear? Hence i feel why it's not currently scoring as high as his other shows, you start in on religion & the religious always come after you in some way or another (Not Everyone! So keep your shirt on, their are plenty of nice religious people in the world who live their life perfectly without wanting or looking to damage anyone) However their are those that wish to see every passage through their own rose tinted specs & then squeeze it & fit it nicely in to their bad deeds. If the show has an underlying message i think this is probably the most apparent & poignant.

As for Flanagan's work behind the camera, it's stylish as always, using light to great effect & has a lot of trademarks those familiar with his work will be accustomed too, long slow zoom-in shots, theatrical style scenes with no cuts, the odd jump scare, you know the drill. The score is nice & is dark when it needs to be. Looking back at the directors work, you can see 'Absentia' in pretty much everything he has done & this is the case again, that's not a bad thing by the way. Flanagan for me has a near spotless record in Horror & is yet to let me down with any of the work he has been 100% involved in, i can't think of anyone working in the genre today like that.

Overall Midnight Mass is well worth watching if you like slow burning horror movies or alternatively if your a Stephen King type that likes the emphasis on character driven emotional rollercoasters over blood & guts. It's not for everyone's taste i am sure, modern horror audiences tend to like things at speed these days but like i said previously even those guys & gals will get that eventually, they just have to take the time first to get to know their characters so when something bad happens, it hits that little bit harder, something you'll notice every great writer does. Is Flanagan in that catergory yet? It's arguable but for me i think he has proven once again that he is this generation's Wes Craven, an intellectual who just digs Horror & understands that their is no better genre of movie to convey important or relevant messages of the time.
4 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Empty Man (2020)
9/10
The Shadow of HP Lovecraft in all but name.
27 March 2021
The Empty Man largely went unnoticed when it hit cinemas in 2020, not surprising as a raging pandemic was in full effect & the world wasn't quite ready yet to sit in a darkened theatre for 2.5 hours & be bombarded with an atmospheric slow burn horror that does more for HP Lovecraft fans than the Slasher Kids the initial trailer was aimed at. Great then that in 2021 via Streaming services this excellent little movie is finally getting some well earned recognition. As always the genre that has the longest legs is horror. How many great horror movies flew under the radar only to re-emerge years later as 'Classics'?. Think John Carpenters 'The Thing', Another Lovecraft inspired movie that is now regarded as a benchmark in the 'Sci-Fi Horror' field & thats just the tip of the iceberg. It's true to say Horror fans will never let good movies get away from the general public & in the case of 'The Empty Man' this is already the case & a well deserved one at that. Not a classic yet but the potential is there for sure.

It's easy to see though why those that did brave the cinema (Not that many to be honest) were a bit confused, this is not a Friday night date movie, more one for fans of off-centre Indie horrors like the awesome 'It Follows' or 'Mandy', The Empty Man is full of ideas & be it long, is well thought out & paced slowly enough for anyone to get to grips with it's many concepts. Firmly placed in the realm of 'Cosmic Sci-Fi Horror' a genre represented & pretty much created by HP Lovecraft, you can tell the director is slightly obsessed with all things 'Cthulu' as the movie has all the trademarks. Metaphysical beings, weird cults, ideas & entities human brains lack the ability to comprehend. All of this centred around a career best performance from James Badge Dale (Like Hereditary before it, this is an award worthy piece that will get completely ignored by all in that arena)

The Film is in part a Noir-Like Mystery as Dale goes about trying to solve the dissapearence of his neighbours daughter who's only parting words are written in blood on the bathroom mirror 'The Empty Man Made Me Do It' this eventually leads him to a Crazy Cult who dance around Fires at night & whisper unintelligable ramblings into peoples ears, completely normal right? All the while suffering terrible nightmares & guilt around the death of his wife & son in an apparent car accident. On the surface It's a pretty normal set up but the movie has many tricks & traps along the way & for that reason a second watch is pretty much essential if you want to pick up all you missed first time around. It's a clever thinking person's film & for that reason might not be everybody's cup of tea but if you give it a chance, The Empty Man will have you firmly in it' grasp so don't be put off by that.

The Film starts with a lengthy opening sequence as a group of Kids venture into the snowy mountains of the Himalaya's & stumble upon a cave with a rather creepy looking skeleton inside. This was criticised by some when the film opened for being 'Too Long!' but in hindsight is absolutely essential to the story & like most of what follows, is perfectly paced & beautifully shot (The movie has some inspired moments of camera work that feel similar in tone to the previously mentioned 'Hereditary' & 'It Follows' but have their own stamp of weirdness on it) This prologue sequence really sets up the movie in the best 'What The Hell?' kind of way & certainly delivers on the chill factor & i'm not just talking about the snow.

Overall 'The Empty Man' is one of the best horrors of 2020. It took the Director 4 years from page to screen & you can really tell this is a labour of love for him. It's a shame that the combination of Fox selling to Disney, a pandemic & a misleading trailer all led to it flying under a lot of people's radars but at least in 2021 this chunk of Lovecraftian gold is finally getting the audience it deserved. If your looking for basic linear 'Conjuring' type chills this is not going to float your boat but if you are a fan of dark 'Lynch' like madness without going too far left of centre this will tick every box. Worth watching for James Badge Dale's performance alone. This is 'The Wicker Man if re-imagined by Lovecraft, & if that doesn't make you want to watch it, nothing will. So... watch it & join the Cult of 'The Empty Man'.
3 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A Respectful & Beautiful Take On Toho's Classic Sequels
3 June 2019
Warning: Spoilers
Looking at some of the comments on here today it makes me think that the world really needs a bit of Titan Cleansing to rid us of some of the stupidity coming out of people's mouths. 'This Film was too loud'? (Err Monsters smashing things.. get it) 'Not Enough storyline with the humans'? (Err Monsters vs Monsters.. get it) next time if you are going in to a movie with uncertainty about what you are going to get may i suggest you watch the multiple trailers that dropped way before the film hits theatres & it's safe to say you might have chosen to go see Aladdin instead, cause Aladdin this ain't baby! Godzilla KOTM is a love letter to Toho's classic monster franchise & is by far the best American version yet despite what some might say, Gareth Edwards 2014 movie had it's moments but was lacking those huge monster moments that it was crying out for, here Michael Dougherty (Obviously a super fan) knows exactly what you have come to see and delivers some truly breathtaking & beautiful shots, all filmed like a spectacular painting. There are nods everywhere to previous movies from the Mothra Twins, Music Cues, Movie Titles on banners, even certain battle moves are recreated all without men in suits so those who complain about cgi should check out now before you blow a fuse again! Their are moments of quiet, surprisingly quite a few jammed in amongst all the chaos, and although they serve only to get us from one battle to another, the underlying message of the movie is quite clear & well thought out, is it ridiculous? well yes of course, it's a movie with a giant moth & others of the like in so if you thought this was going to be grounded you are seriously deluded. But compared to previous Godzilla plots, it's a lot more coherent & serves the franchise well for future movies, it's a seed planter for sure. What i loved most about it outside of the beautiful monster designs & moments is it's huge amount of respect shown for past visions, Dougherty clears knows his Big G history and older fans will probably be bowled over by this as much as me, it's rare to see this in an American franchise movie but like the saying goes, if it ain't broke don't fix it. Highlights are many, the Antartica Moment of King Ghidora's entrance was stunning and made me think & hope that Del Toro was watching and thinking about 'In The Mountains of Madness' again. Pretty much every scene with Mothra was just beautiful to look at (listen for the music cues here, fans of the big flappy one will love these moments) Her short battle with Rodan had some comedy in as well which again i loved, subtle & smart from the film makers always. My wife also pointed out the large amount of religious imagery in this film, their were crosses everywhere, usually somewhere around the big monster moments like when Ghidora is standing atop the mountain etc, again this goes well & fits fantastically in with the nature of the story being told. This is NOT just a big dumb monster movie, thought, care, attention have all been applied to it & if you are smart & know your Godzilla history you will be rewarded handsomely. Ultimately this is a movie for Adults who never grew up (yes like me) & children who just want to see something amazing unfold in front of their unschooled eyes. If you sadly are the type of adult who actually grew out of being able to smile, switch off, remember what it was like to be a child (delete where applicable) then this movie will probably not do anything for you, good news though, they make plenty of those movies for you so seek em out but do us all a favour & don't come on here & rant about it unless you have something objective or sensible to say (sorry, it was too loud just doesn't cut it) it's ok not to like something sure but just because it's not your type of movie doesn't mean it's not delivering what it's meant too. Reviewing a title should mean that, you talk about the movie objectively & judge it against movies of it's type, if you seriously though that the plot of this movie could ever be anything other than fantastical, your either a troll or just not paying attention whch means you should not be writing about it. KOTM is not without flaws but those are so few in amongst all of the great that i have no doubts that this is a high bar for future film makers to rise above. Acting was good with what they had in their script, they did the best they could but seriously when your in a movie with 4+ Kaiju (& really good ones at that) you not going to be remembered that much in the foyer after.. sorry guys. A movie for fans of the Fantastic, the Mind Boggling & the Insane. A Movie for big kids & little ones to talk about for years after. A Gorgeous looking 2 hours of the ridiculous, thats everything i could have hoped for in a Godzilla movie. If you think that's being childish, good because i am in love with Movies like this. Long Live The King!!
118 out of 238 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Fans Read! The Golden Comic Book Rules Broken!
26 April 2019
Warning: Spoilers
Let me start off by saying that large parts of this movie i liked, i have after all been living & breathing these movies much in the same way i have done the comic books my whole entire life. But sadly after this movie i left the cinema with the first bitter pill in my mouth for a long long time. Something about finality and saying goodbye never feels ok but in the context of many genres of film this is something we have all learned to deal with. In a comic book world though this is something that although sometimes broken is the one constant you can take from it. Real life sucks but in the world of Iron Man, Spider-Man & Cap & the like you know that you can always escape from the banality of a working life to the worlds that encapsulate the wonder & intensity of a life you secretly crave. I Feel sadly that in this day & age it seems a nessessity for film makers to have to use death to finalise a process, some even yearn for it, why so many fans complained that marvel didn't kill enough of their characters off before now is completely lost on me. Have they not read the books these characters come from? If your building a world, serialising it, would Stan Lee think that killing off Spider-Man for example half way through his first run would have been a good idea? a great way of bringing sadness into his excellent adventure? Yes Marvel Films are trying to bring things more down to earth, more realistic but do they really need to. The Excitement i used to feel before every new Marvel Movie i fear is going to be lost now. That's not all that's wrong with Endgame. I Felt like everywhere you looked something was slightly amiss. Time Travel Holes notwithstanding (You cannot make a time travel movie without holes, never) But i felt that the worst offender here was Captain's Arc, it may on surface feel like a nice poetic way for him to bow out but really? would Cap ever put his shield down for himself, the sheer essence of the character is he will never stop fighting the good fight, not even for himself. That's not to mention going back in time & hooking up with Peggy would mean her kids would never be born! not the act of a selfless patriot. Yes they wanted so much to give these great actors a royal sendoff but at the expense of everything they had built up until now. So sad that we have to now watch those older films knowing that these versions of the characters are actually not those versions we loved so much from those comics we read as a kid. Endgame has some moments of splendour. Cap standing solo against the might of Thanos & his army is one of the shots of the century, also his roll call of 'Avengers Assemble' a line we have waited for a long time (The End of Ultron doesn't count as he never completes it) Rocket Raccoon & Thor again seem to be almost the perfect buddy comedy in waiting. Jeremy Renner also stands out in this film a lot more than previous & get's some meaty action & dialogue & Once again Tom Holland manages to affect me with his acting chops with his final scenes, no mean feat as i feel Homecoming was the weakest entry in the marvel cannon up until now. Also Paul Rudd does what he always does best & brightens every scene he is in & the Women of Marvel have their golden 'Libertators' moment in the final battle with Valkyrie & The Scarlet Witch both showing what they are made of. But it's the fatal flaws of this movie that stand out for me much more than those great moments that a 3 hour Marvel movie will always have. The Golden Rules are broken in this one because someone thought it needed to happen but not thinking about it's core audience, not thinking about the world in which they have almost seamlessly constructed over the last 11 years. Actors move on yes, but these characters live on in their worlds because that's their job, to take us away from the mundane, to encourage us to be better, to give us something to look forward to. Endgame on the whole feels a little generic, like someone really just wanted to put a giant dot above the I. People have been hailing this film as a masterpiece, my only feeling about this is that they are the ones not completely invested in this universe, no true fan of Marvel Comics can walk out of the theatre feeling satisfied about this film, they just can't. When the dust settles i feel that the huge mistakes, gambles even with this movie will really shine through & Endgame will not feel like the satisfactory conclusion of this saga that they actually really wanted. 6/10 for the moments of greatness but on the whole i wanted to score it less for reasons mentioned.
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Welcome To The House!
16 October 2018
Mike Flanagan has slowly been building an impressive CV over the last few years, from the low key but superb 'Absentia' to the likes of the more well known 'Oculus' and the ridiculously underrated 'Ouija Origin of Evil' which to those who gave it a chance delivered some of the finest shocks this side of the decade despite that silly title. With his new project Flanagan points his attention to the old dark house with his re-imagining of the classic book 'The Haunting of Hill House' no easy feat as Robert Wise's 1961 classic is beloved by many and as such lends himself to more critical scrutiny than one would probably like. However the good news for all concerned is there is very much definately nothing to be worried about. If anything Flanagan has improved & enriched the tale way more than anyone could have conceived. Given Flanagan's almost impeccable record in the genre it will come as no surprise to those who have already ingested the man's previous back catalogue that similar motifs & his clever use of non-linear time lines are in full effect in this show and one must keep a keen eye as their are so many tricks & rug pulls along it's long spiral staircase of a story that a second watch will almost be a given if you are to really catch everything the camera is throwing at you. Given that this is primarily a tale about family & the secrets they hold a little too close to their hearts, initially the show is a slow build with gentle nods to the terror that awaits, this is where Hill House succeeds greatly, characters are developed early on through present day & the past and this combination of growth from child to adult only adds to greater connect for the viewer and like other great character driven shows before like 'Breaking Bad' for instance the story flows out of these people in subtle but near pitch perfect notes. The cast do a fantastic job of keeping the show grounded enough as to not let the horror when it does come feel hokey or out of place. Each arc is explored with great detail and where the show succeeds again is placing each jigsaw piece of their story exactly where they need to be for every terrible thing that happens to them to actually mean something by the end. The house itself is a huge gothic rollercoaster of a building & the director uses impressive static long shots & slow pans for you to fully grasp the magnitude of it's wood, bricks & mortar, a character very much of it's own fleshed out across the episodes like any other.

EP 5 onwards is where the House really starts to let fly, Flanagan has already established enough with his use of camera & story hints that from then on in it's a masterclass of tension & technique. Hill House itself literally starts to come alive before your eyes. But for every horror trope their is a curve ball, for every expected jump scare their is a heartbeat, it's a clever mish mash between what you are expecting and what you are actually given and to this end the show keeps viewers eyes glued to every shadow & every corner of the house which keeps tension at a level pretty much unmatched by any other Horror TV show in memory. Of course Flanagan is a film director so this cinematic appproach was to be expected but the Actors & Crew again also do a wonderful job of keeping everything so insanely effortless. Has any TV show in memory looked this good, again only 'Breaking Bad' and maybe 'Twin Peaks' has such a acute aesthetic of cinema as to blur the lines almost to a point where their isn't one anymore. EP 6 is an excellent example of this, told in 5 long cuts across 2 time lines against the backdrop of 2 storms, a bold & brave approach but one that absolutely works especially in the sorroundings of this old dark house, utilizing wide & long tracking shots that give the house an eerie & cold nightmare like feeling, it wears it's influences on it's sleeve from the original 1961 movie to Kubrick's 'The Shining' to Video Games like 'Resident Evil' & 'Silent Hill' but all tied up in something very unique and all very much it's own entity. It's a beautiful episode of TV and all the more satisfying that it comes from a genre that most people turn their nose up at, Despite Horror's so called renaissance in 2017, their hasn't been a film this year in the genre you could actually call 'a classic' but with 'Hill House' despite it's home being on the small screen, we finally have one. Who knew that the best horror film of 2018 would be a TV Show?

That being said their are some mis-steps, more like miscues that this viewer found a little out of place. Songs are placed in to some moments & scenes that clearly don't belong there, more so in the final episode where you would be forgiven in thinking you've stepped in to an episode of 'Dawson's Creek' rather than an internally dark horror opus. I can only assume this was to draw a mainstream audience to a more conventional close than what a Flanagan movie would usually end on. However it woefully draws you out of the horror & with a voice over that clearly is at odds with the chirpiness of it all. Something this creepy, despite it's emphasis on emotional family drama should always end on something a little darker to compliment what has come before and this does not succeed. But that being said maybe some will find some horror in the dulcit tones of mellow indie rock.

'The Haunting of Hill House' is essential viewing, a lot more than a horror show, it's a family drama played out in the shadows, a nightmare that drags you in and never let's you clearly wake. Beautifully shot & staged, an extended thrill ride that at it's core plays like a symphony orchestra on halloween night. Mike Flanagan has once again proved that at the top of his game their is no one working in the genre right now quite so on the money about what really keeps us awake at night. in summation, Watch it! you will not be dissapointed you did, well maybe at bedtime when the lights go out & your house really starts to come alive.
4 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Twin Peaks (2017)
10/10
Twin Peaks The Return: The Devil In The Details
11 September 2017
Warning: Spoilers
If 1000 people all experienced the same dream, would we all interpret it the same? This is the only way one can surmise the spectacle of Twin Peaks The Return. Now that all 18 episodes of David Lynch's magnum opus has now become the stuff of legend It's time now to pack away your expectations and start to unpack what we have just witnessed. Twin Peaks a universe expanding, science fiction, horror, drama, road movie or in which ever genre such a categorically leftfield TV experiment TP lives in, was such a monumental experience that mear words of interpretation may seem fruitless when of course the whole thing is open to the very same beast. Lynch smartly moves his classic cherry pie town away from just the confines of the Pacific NW to travel the heartland, using drone cameras to invest menace in long shots of sprawling NY skyscrapers to forlorn long lost Las Vegas deserts & of course those wonderful ominous trees as much a character as any in the 18 chapters, all these shots remind us just how beautiful & scary America can seem all at the same time. Lynch doesn't fail to use every trick in his arsenal from his beloved back catalogue of horrors. The echoing strain of the industrial sounds of 'Eraserhead' to the long endless roads that figure prominently in 'Lost Highway'. In sound, The crackle of electricity, the humming of the lodge & the Gramaphone static of 'Judy' all encompass such an overall feeling of dread that one can be excused for diverting eyes every time one of those comedic Dougie moments end. Lynch also infiltrates the show with nods to his own love of cinema from 'Sunset Boulevard' to 'Seven' but Most of all the biggest influence is felt in EP8, A now legendary piece of TV art that most who witnessed when first aired are still coming to terms with. It is here that another master framer 'Stanley Kubrick' is evident. The swirling orchestral orgasms & the electric light show of the atomic bomb sequence are pretty much taken straight from the Kubrick handbook and to such a powerful level that the episode almost stands alone away from the rest of the show as a singular piece of art, one that demands attention and study. In itself a perfect visual device to evaluate people's thoughts whilst observing the whole plethora of ideas that episode 8 spits out. Elsewhere the themes of Age & Violence are present & key to the inhabitants of the now heavily 'Lodged' Twin Peaks. Characters are now weary, bitter & ravaged by time, overshadowed by the eerie Douglas Furs that remember the dead & paying for the sins of their parents, none more so than the daughter of Shelley Johnson. Lynch makes this case mid-way through the season in a scene where a little boy accidentally shoots his fathers gun he finds in his car. Bobby Briggs (Now an officer of the law) on investigation finds the boy standing side by side with his uncaring father, a mirror image of themselves perfectly reflecting Bobbie's own story with Shelley. Despite all they learned from their own experiences their own child has gained none of this wisdom and falls into the same traps they themselves did 25 years ago, Shelley herself has repeated the loop by now falling for the town's new found drug dealer. This looping arc has parallels elsewhere within the show, it doesn't matter what you do in Twin Peaks, your destiny will always take you back round again. This may sound a little easy for someone of Lynch's calibre but the directors visual competence & a terrifying consequence to people's actions never allows the show to fall into it's own traps & this gives TP such a defined edge. The final line of the show, from what seems like a disjointed & harrowing epilogue is 'What Year is This?' The truth is it could be any year, any time. Lynch does not believe in linear story telling. He sees life as a dream interpreting life. Like all artists he lays down a pallet & insists on a reaction be it good or bad, to an artist all interpretation is good, what matters most is the emotion that comes with it and this is where Twin Peaks succeeds the most. Despite it's lack of narrative structure their are underlying themes that are fully formed & realised with dare i say, a pay-off. Lynch's co-writer & creator Mark Frost is most definitely at the fore here from heart tugging scenes with Dougie & Janie-E to the blissful diner scene with Big Ed & Norma. The show encompasses a myriad of ideas & every one has a motive. In the end Lynch & Frost meticulously planned a conclusion that was at the heart of everything pretty much the only way it should have ended. Agent Cooper? looking down at the ground, confused & bewildered, a shadow of failure, stuck in a loop of his own making with Laura? screaming that scream we have all come to know most definitely does not mean good things are happening. Was it all a dream. Of course their is good evidence to support this, The White Horse etc. Ultimately all theory is good theory & the fact that people are once again thinking about something they watched on TV is an achievement in itself. Bogged down in a world of mind numbing reality TV. Twin Peaks has brought us back in the loop where TV matters again. A Beautiful haunting coda where conclusions can be drawn from anywhere, where their are no absolutes. Twin Peaks the Return belongs in a field all by itself, baiting the next generation of film makers to take from its core, the essence of what can be achieved in a long fully formed TV show. Make of it what you will but what you will is hopefully never forget it.
6 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Twin Peaks: Part 18 (2017)
Season 1, Episode 18
10/10
We Live Inside A Dream (Forever?)
5 September 2017
Warning: Spoilers
There's a point at the end of EP 18 where Richard (Agent Cooper) looks at the ground nearly falling to his knees in anguish when he has the crushing realisation that things in his dark new world (of his making i might add) are not the way he foresaw in his 25 year plan. This perilous new change is an almost perfect way to sum up the feelings of most that watched this season roll out. An 18 hour epic that twisted & turned & almost literally cracked it's way in to the medium that is so used to bow-tie TV, Shows that hand you everything on a plate, shows that give you a nice little cliffhanger every week only to be resolved quickly thereafter. The Return was not your usual viewing experience. Case in point, Scenes were shown out of sequence, timelines were not clearly evident & Characters rolled up for one scene only to be discarded as quickly as they said their lines. People have been using the term 'Being Lynched' for years but this seemed like the biggest one of all. But Was It? The answer is most definitely 'NO'. What David Lynch does is what so many others fail to do. Treat his audience with dignity & grace and the benefit of doubt. He considers those that are willing to come on to his rides to have intelligence, this is not to say that those who are frustrated & angry with what they have just witnessed because of lack of understanding suffer without it, but he really does believe that if you just let go & are willing to follow his lead you will be rewarded with something at the end. How many other film makers, especially on TV do that? the answer i expect is very few. What you got with the show was what you should have expected all along. Lynch's work 'Fire Walk With Me' onwards have all had the same themes & ideas. The Dualing personalities that reside within us, the dark heart of man & woman's eternal greed for power or acceptance often translated into violence & the Lovecraftian idea of multiple realities existing within the same time & space that we ourselves reside in. The Tulpa's or Doppelgangers that exist within the show are actually there within us all and it takes something truly evil or catastrophic to make them take control, it may not be supernatural in tone in reality but think about what he is trying to tell with this story, a little digging and i expect you will start to see EP 18 slightly differently. Even those angry & cursing at the TV at the end of it all will no doubt be talking about it for years to come, and rightly so. Despite my own reading of the show i am still in doubt about so many things. The Return is the only show i have been witness to that really deserves intense multiple viewings, their are masses of clues littered about in all 18 episodes, some i managed to spot, others are yet to be discovered. Ultimately 'We Live Inside A Dream' is the phrase that matters. What we were watching was just that, not a dream in the purest sense but ultimately i think WE are the dreamers. We saw 4 incarnations of Agent Cooper in this show, 3 Incarnations of Diane. Every now & then we had glitches & flutters on screen, a clue that was given to Andy by the Fireman in an earlier episode. Were these walls between reality's or dreams being cracked by Agent Cooper whilst trying to write the wrong's of Laura Palmer's death. Were we seeing scenes from alternate time lines? hence those supposed continuity errors pointed out by many Blog or Podcast or review. Did the show start at the beginning or the end? 'Is it Future or is it Past?' another clue given to Cooper in EP 1. These are all questions that deserve an answer but it was never an intention of this show to Bow-Tie anything especially if after all, we are the dreamers. If the dream is over than the mystery is gone & then what are you left with? sure for those brought up on reality TV or Crime of the week episodes this would have been ideal but Lynch does not expect you to just dismiss this as mindless jargon. He expects those that invest to think & draw conclusions, to be, i hate to say it, Artistic in your approach to it. Do some work, figure it out, enjoy yourself, sure. But do the math. Lynch has always been about Visuals & Sound, a storyteller in this medium probably more important than any other film maker working today. The Return is proof of this, i have no doubt that when the dust settles, this experience (and it is one of those) will be remembered as even more of a ground breaker than it's previous incarnation. It's influence will be far reaching so those who turn away now will be fool to do so as i really believe it is impossible for those with a love of cinematic storytelling to not take something special away from this. We are the lucky one's, i lived through the 90's version of TP and this is something else entirely. All TV after this will have to re-think the rules of what is achievable through this medium. Lynch & Frost have taken us on a journey through cinematic art & they've done it all in a TV Show. This was not Lynch trying to fool you, he's not sitting around laughing at you, he has given you the tools to dream, just like Agent Cooper or Richard as we last see him, The Dream is not over and it's up to us now to wade through the puzzle. Just simply put.. Stunning.
36 out of 51 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Twin Peaks: Part 8 (2017)
Season 1, Episode 8
10/10
Origins. The Real Dark Heart of Twin Peaks
27 June 2017
Warning: Spoilers
I read recently in a well known horror magazine one writer state that David Lynch had never made a horror film. I was amazed & confused at this observation as at the heart of almost all of Lynch's work the underlying themes are just that. Rewind to Eraserhead, a movie so unsettling & dark that people are still discussing it 40 years from when it first spewed out it's goo onto our screens. Twin Peaks has always been a supernatural show, from it's pilot days it was always pretty clear that something wasn't right about those trees. Fire Walk with me, imo, Lynch's most obvious Horror movie cemented the fact that Twin Peaks was more than cherry pie & soap opera comedy, there was something very insidious & other worldly at play in the sycamores, something the film coldly paints as the ultimate evil. Sadly with the cancellation of the show & the Luke warm reception of it's darker bed fellow, Lynch put his beast in the cage & no one expected it to be unleashed again.

Now we have The Revival, a show so clearly drawn from the 25 years of fever dreams Lynch has had waiting for a chance to paint this masterpiece. Yes, it's a masterpiece & this episode especially, so the hate mongers out there claiming to be lynch fans & booing every time a scene doesn't make sense to them can shout all they want but trust me in 25 years from now, people will still be watching this in awe. This is the daddy of the surreal treating us to something so uncommercial yet so special that if you know the showtime exec that green lit it you would have to buy him a slice of pie.

Episode 8 is the origin of the Lodge, a peek into the multiple worlds that exist outside our own. This is what fans of the show should have been expecting or at the least wanting, it's not clear & definable in any way but when has Lynch been anything other than a provider of images & ideas. It's always been down to the viewer to make their own definitions. It's nice also to see Him draw influence from other film makers in particular Kubrick, another master of ideas who always paid more attention to the detail of the frame than the definition of what was going on in front of it. This is not a show for everyone but how anybody can watch this & not be sucked in is as alien to me as the strange figures that emerge out of the New Mexico desert. The last 20 minutes of this episode are truly horrifying and at the same time it's impossible to look away. Lynch finds a way to make things so ugly look so beautiful. This is true visionary film making, there's a reason for every frame of it, it's not just some art school 1st year's attempt at surrealism, this moves the story on in ways no other film maker could have done. The point of watching this is to be confused & to try & find your own answers amongst the madness. Lynch will never make it straight forward when he's steering the ship.

Do not tune in to this show if you want linear story telling. You need intelligence & patience with this work and if you feel the need to bad mouth it because you can't be bothered to try & understand it then maybe you should rethink weather or not you were a David Lynch fan in the first place & reach for that off button, we won't miss you. Episode 8, Visually it's Lynch's finest hour.
33 out of 50 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Epic Character Driven Masterpiece! Sit Back & Enjoy!
24 December 2015
Warning: Spoilers
Tarantino's 8th movie proper is without doubt one of the finest westerns of the modern era, far out shining his previous effort 'Django' and running alongside 'The Unforgiven' as possibly one of the most beautifully shot, tense & darkest ever made. Stripping away layers of each character as he goes along without time restraints (thankfully) what we have here is more akin to a theatre experience than an outright movie. Don't expect guns a blazing & shallow one liners, this is almost 3 hours of excellent character actors doing what they do best, inhabiting their roles and wearing their scars until we feel every bit of tension & doubt that they do. The Hateful Eight mixes the directors previous quieter movies, Reservoir Dogs & Jackie Brown, throws in a plot that you think you've seen before (The Outer Limits anyone?) adds in a blizzard that keeps the atmosphere claustrophobic throughout (There is no escape for these people, this is something we are reminded of throughout thanks to the wonderful sound design) verbally assaults it's viewers with venomous dialogue and sharp humour then tosses everything together in the blender as only Tarantino can. The end result is a perfectly well executed, genuine bona-fide masterpiece, something that is in short supply of late. What makes The Hateful Eight superior to other recent genre efforts is the directors ability to let his actors have the breathing space they need to deliver their lines to such exciting levels. Kurt Russell & Samuel L Jackson provide the meat of the 1st half of the film, whilst the incredible Walton Goggins & the rest of this fine ensemble cast really shine in the 2nd half, so much so that you don't realise that a gun isn't even fired in this movie until over half way through the almost 3 hour length, Channing Tatum fans will probably be very disappointed with this film, and that's no bad thing! It's been said before who needs action when the dialogue is this good, it just is! The second half of the movie when the guns finally do come out of their holsters is an exciting blend of Hitchcock Mystery Theatre & Balls to the wall blood soaked mayhem more in tone to something seen in a horror film rather than a western but it works as it always does. The directors influences work overtime here from 70's Italian splatter westerns to the more artful touches of Sergio Leone & Eastwood, this is helped greatly by a wonderful score by the legendary Ennio Morricone & the directors always appreciative eye for a beautiful tracking shot or just leaving the camera Static for the right amount of time to soak up the scene. Tarantino may have his critics but there is no denying his amazing ability to make everything in his movies seem perfectly at place even when you think it shouldn't be. This may possibly be his finest looking film to date. Although maybe not to everybody tastes, The Hateful Eight is a skillfully designed exercise in craft. Incredible performances all round, Goggins especially delivers a no holds barred 'gloves off' performance (Think Boyd without the TV restraints, but with some great emotional depth not previously allowed in that particular role) The Directing, score, sound & cinematography are all as good as anything i've seen in the last 5 years and are certainly as good as anything the director has done previous. if you like your westerns with a slow build & a sly wink you can do no better. Watch it!!
6 out of 26 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Take A Step Back From Nostalgia & Review Honestly!
17 December 2015
Warning: Spoilers
Despite my love for Star Wars and my unflinching desire to fall back in love with this universe all over again, having read what i can only describe as 'Love Letters' from some critics it has occurred to me again as it always does, how important it is that real fans voice their opinions rather than critics who run the risk of upsetting the studio that whines & dines them every time a film of this magnitude arrives. Dare they lose their premiere tickets to the next one. The Force Awakens has arrived and whilst it is nice to wallow in nostalgia & remember what it is you loved about this universe in the first place, it is also important to judge a film on it's own merits & not on it's name & status alone. The Empire Magazine film review is an excellent example of one person's love for a franchise blinding them to the fairly obvious. Stating that TFA borrows slight themes from ANH is an understatement of grand proportions but one that is understandable whilst in a darkened theatre but once detached from the experience of the cinema the flaws of this film become evident & much more apparent. In the modern age of online reviews & blogs voicing your real feelings & concerns about a film will have consequences for eventual sequels & spin-offs so fans if you were happy with this film and it's startling lack of originality feel free to keep lining the pockets of the studio that doesn't have to think anymore to make billions, but if you are one of those fans that, like me, have had a huge crushing disappointment please make it known, the future of SW depends on it. To list the inconsistencies, blatant rips from other (better) SW movies & just out & out mind numbing non-sensical plot holes would leave me no room for anything else in this review. The word lazy sadly springs to mind. In almost every scene there is a doppleganger to a previous SW movie from the desert landscapes to the information loaded droid to the father/son love/hate to the planet destroying Death star to the mask wearing voice changing villain & even to the point of recycling old dialogue. I mean if you wanted this you would just pop in the first 3 movies, surely? being a fan doesn't give anyone the right to treat you stupid! JJ Abrahms is a talented director who managed to chisel a fantastic reboot of Star Trek & seemingly had a handle on this kind of material but like every film that has gone before, you are only as good as the story & script and from where i am sitting this is just another, less fun re-telling of ANH with a bigger death star & an older Harrison Ford. If this was a stand alone science fiction movie without the brand, it would just come & go & maybe do low-mild box office. This is what annoys me most, the film makers clearly understood how important this film was to so many people and to treat it with such blatant disrespect as to just churn out a run-of-the-mill retread is just plainly aggravating. So much budget to come up with something so familiar yet so alienating to those that understand what Star Wars stands for as far as Genre Defining Fantasy goes. This pales in comparison and yet i am still in love with the idea of making more of them in the hope that maybe they can re-light the fire again & give todays 5 second attention span kiddies a taste of what it felt like back in 1977 (And i haven't even mentioned the killing of the most or at least one of the most beloved characters in the whole universe, but being that he was meant to be knocked off in ROTJ i will give that one a pass) Despite all it's shortcomings and there are many, TFA has it's bright spots most notably the sound & visuals which are as impressive as you would expect, the new additions to the cast do the best they can with the tired formula, the idea of a turn coat stormtrooper was at least something new added to the mix and sparks still fly when Leia & Han share screen time, it's just a shame that they decided to rely too much on themes heavily apparent in previous SW films. The new villain is one of the biggest problems to say the least, again Empire's review has stated that this is the greatest villain in SW lore, but anybody that believes that is clearly living in a world of coke & happy pills, it's true to say he is clearly torn, but it's more the Team Edward, team Jacob kind of torn than anything suited to a SW movie. A clearer and more fleshed out back story to the missing 30 years would have been in the film makers best interest here instead of all the laser blasting and flat jokes (There's a reason most people love 'Empire Strikes Back' the best, it's called story!) but maybe this is something they will concede too in the next instalment. In the end TFA will join Indiana Jones, The Hobbit & even it's own prequels as being a good idea in theory but sadly lacking in substance & originality in practise, a way to indulge your nostalgia without moving the franchises along.

Maybe it's a sign to pass these newer movies along to the next generation & keep the old ones to us, after all these years they still belong to the fans. Fans who i might add are still living in the 'Phantom Menace' stage of denial, you know who you are. What other film could have a bad review that still scores it 8/10? I mean when the best lines of the film are delivered by Chewbacca, you know your in trouble!
54 out of 99 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Abandon all hope ye who enter here!
11 August 2015
Looking at how the world of superhero movies today has evolved from it's first steps, the early attempts before cgi like 'Captain America' and the Corman 'Fantastic Four' to the signs of possibility laid out by the first Blade movie (For me the pre-cursor to the modern age of SH franchises) all the way up to the giddy heights of 'The Avengers', 'The Dark Knight' & 'Winter Soldier' pretty much the blueprint that all SH movies should be judged against, it seems strange to me that anybody can walk into Josh Tranks 'Fantastic Four' and come out feeling anything but betrayed. 20th Century Fox's cash grab attempt to hold on to the rights of characters they care nothing for is at best an embarrassment to snigger at when you have had a few & at worst perhaps the most inept movie to come from a big studio since, well..ever! To sum up this movie is almost nie-on impossible in a small review here, it's probably best just to read the spate of negative reviews, The first 10 or so on here should be sufficient enough for you just to get a handle on what Fox has cut & pasted together & called a movie. As a betrayal to loyal comic fans & cinema goers in general, Fox has managed to create a film so bad & so blatantly unforgiving in it's awfulness that anyone with half a cinema brain will simply just be picking there jaw up from the ground after the final painful reel (If you thought the Electro-Spider-man face off in ASM 2 was bad, wait till you see Dr Doom's few scenes in this) Of course the blame game & excuses began even before the first audiences started tearing it a new one. It's all well & good to play around & tinker with characters & stories from an original base but if you are going to do it with characters beloved by millions the world over you better make it fresh & relevant which this new rendition, sadly, is the exact opposite. It's highly unlikely that Trank finished this movie by himself, it does have the feel of 3 or 4 different movies strewn together in the same way young Reed Richards pieces his time displacement device in the opening scenes, a bit of junk from this yard, an old car battery, a line of dialogue from that movie, an idea from that Fox exec etc etc. The end result is like watching tumbleweed, it just goes on & on, never going to any one place, sometimes even travelling without moving. If Chronicle showed us anything it's that Trank has a grasp of this genre & has vision, there is nothing here on show that displays any of this and it's far more believable a story to think that the studio that looks at there comic franchises as green machines only took control of it long before the director had any chance of fully forming his take and as such we will probably never ever really know what this was. Much like Alien 3 and David Fincher, a saga more famous than the film itself, Fantastic Four 2015 will always be remembered as a jumbled mess rather than something great to finally put to rest the old 'They'll never make a good FF movie' myth. No doubt the blame game will continue as much as the bad reviews until it's finally forgotten about and dug up for an Empire magazine dissection 20 years from now. Will Trank be given this kind of opportunity again? or have Fox killed a promising career? the proof is in the final product & if he is given a chance at redemption i sincerely hope he manages to shirk off the negativity that this pile of steaming (insert your own word here) has garnered him. To understand the anger that's directed towards this film one must go back to the first 100 issues of the FF, a run of stories so immaculately formed by Lee & Kirby that reading them today it astounds that no one has had the idea of actually adapting them for a modern audience. My guess is that's the FF movie that everybody wants to watch. Sadly for now it seems the real fantastic is still in the 60's comics rather than anywhere on screen so, 'Will anybody be able to make a good FF movie?' it continues.....
4 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Europa Report (2013)
2/10
Jumping The Ship
30 May 2014
Warning: Spoilers
Some films exist in life to oppose popular conventions, sometimes on purpose, sometimes unintentional, the law of thumb with found footage movies is the old 'Less is more' technique, a trick that works fine when done well but in less imaginative minds can end up feeling like a weekend in Bognor with your overly tired Grandparents. Europa Report is such a film. A movie so unimaginative & tired that even the actors look like they have taken a cocktail of zopidone & valium & washed it down with a bottle of Bud. Viewing Sharlto Copley's name on the credits will raise eyebrows & interest but in a Samuel L Jackson 'Deep Blue Sea' moment even he realises what a mistake he's made & bails out halfway through in one of the films very few moments set outside of the crews spaceship, which i can only guess is the directors valiant attempt to build a sense of claustrophobia & isolation in the movie but only ends up in isolating the viewer & giving them time to wonder what film to watch next. I was expecting good things from this film with the pedigree of the cast & adding that to 2 genres that should always set out to astonish & scare in equal measure, sci-fi & found footage, what could go wrong? well to be honest, pretty much everything. Long moments of pointless conversation that should be setting up some kind of irony later on in the movie but are only there to extend the runtime, plenty of static camera moments & inaudible gargling over the coms serve only to try & confuse rather than tease and even the most unashameable of viewers will be turning away from the screen in embarrassment at the faux-doc footage that is interspersed throughout the movie as if the main plot itself wasn't at fault alone for trudging through this material so painfully slow, these moments only serve to destroy the teeny moments of suspense that the better actors manage to wring out of this miserable script. In short because thats all this film really deserves, Europa Report is a failed attempt at mixing 2 usually reliable genres for entertainment and achieves only in making a film just 1 star better than the efforts made by those cinema behemoths 'Asylum' & 'The Sci-fi Channel' an effort so boring i half expected the usual last 10 minute 'crying into the camera' moment to be an apology. because to be honest, the people who made it that far deserved one. Sorry People but Bad, really Bad!!
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Game of Thrones (2011–2019)
4/10
An Alternative To Popular Opinion..Read On If You Dare!!!
11 March 2014
Warning: Spoilers
OK If you are reading this i am guessing you are one of those super fans who can't get enough of Game Of Thrones & like wallowing in your appreciation of this despicable sorry excuse for TV Fantasy drama. As you can tell i am not one of you. Game of Thrones has so many good reviews & such glowing praise as to make me wonder if the whole world has fallen asleep or alternatively hooked up to some matrix-like hive mind channelling this drivel through a tube placed carefully up your backside, can so many people be so wrong? well the answer is Yes obviously. To Critique this show in a sour way is tantamount to treason i am sure but i am British & trust me it is OK to voice your opinion in a negative way despite the whole world wanting to spit venomous bile in your eyes. I have like most of you, watched every episode of it & although you will rant that i have a choice not to watch it or to plainly just go away, i, like a lot of people these days like watching TV shows & be they bad or good it is always good to watch the things that everyone is talking about (and talking about, and talking about) so i carry on in the vain hope that one day i'll switch this show on & something will actually happen but instead i get B grade British actors talking about 'The Wall' or saying things like 'Something awful is coming' or 'Let's shag!' & on & on, talking, more talking & waiting & waiting, always waiting for something to happen, has anyone noticed that nothing has happened in this show for the last 2 seasons? oh but there was a big battle! yes there was except we missed most of it as we were watching the women hiding below talking some more. Oh but there was 'The Wedding' yes there was, 5 minutes of action tabbed on the end of one of those lengthy talky episodes (you know the ones) 'wow so radical, killing off some of the main characters in such a ghastly manner, no one has done that before' Give me strength!! Game of thrones is like a really bad carrot, like the ones you always throw away to get a better one in the grocers, and the viewers are like ageing donkeys continually following it around until you are so accustomed to doing it that you just carry on regardless, yes i am one of them, i've been suckered as well!, i admit it but by always tossing out the promise of dragons i persevered anyway & now i am at a point that i am writing a review about it, not because i like the bloody thing more because i am sick of these endless reviews praising it's 'Boldness', it's 'Genius', it's 'Lord of the Rings-ish-ness.' My god people, what version of Lord of the Rings have you seen? the one i watched was majestic, action packed, sad, uplifting, funny & the real definition of Genius. Not this pile of puss spewing troll bile that passes itself off as fantasy, if anything its more like playboy channel soft core porn than epic fantasy, obviously one of the main reasons its so popular. Of course you will tell your girlfriend/boyfriend your watching it for the breathtaking dramatics or epic storytelling (because of course it has both of those..cough..choke!!) So you will go on watching it telling your friends how amazing it is, how shocked you were by it etc etc but deep down you all know the truth, that this is just a low level generic hybrid of The Red Shoe Diaries, Dr Quinn Medicine Woman & the recent crap Conan movie. In years to come this will be joked about, like in one of those TV Shows that reminisce about the 80's or 90's with a headline like 'How 10 million people COULD be wrong' & you'll sit there & laugh to yourself in a sad 'i wasted my youth' type way, you will finally realise after years of trailing after the carrot that nothing is going to happen in this show, you'll be left with one last talky exposition scene (whilst a battle rages on somewhere else, presumably somewhere they can't take the cameras) everybody will sit round the throne & toast with fine wine & grapes, there will be singing & dancing & orgies (of course) and maybe if we are lucky, one of the dragons might take a dump? Seriously if people don't start waking up soon i worry about the world, i mean Reeves & Fishburne are way too famous now to give a toss so save yourselves. There are much better shows out there to obsess over, much better fantasy books to read, much much better fantasy films to watch & certainly way better porn! but of course if watching evil characters twirl their moustaches & cackling behind peoples backs whilst masturbating over incestuous kin doing the Humpty Dumpty is your kind of thing, there is at least one scene like this every couple of episodes so knock yourself out. oh and of course you will get the promise of dragons just at the moment your thinking about switching off & watching re-runs of Breaking Bad instead... awful TV, watch Lord of the Rings again, that might wake you up my Matrix loving friends. Game of Thrones, enjoy your stay of execution but one day your head is going to be lopped off just like the only good actor in your show... By the way if you are thinking i am a Troll, i'm not, Trolls are fictional beasts that usually turn up in decent fantasy shows along with Goblins & Dragons, all of which do not feature prominently in Game of Thrones!
48 out of 133 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Ritual (I) (2013)
2/10
Snooze Horror!!!
3 January 2014
Wow, i was once prescribed valium for insomnia but it didn't work, i tried everything, herbal tea, Chinese medicine, Zopidone or whatever that stuff is called. Anyway all of that could have been avoided if i had just had this film at hand. Perfect remedy for peaceful relaxing sleep. Now the writer of this film probably thought that some of his ideas would look really cool once they got round to shooting them but seriously sometimes it's just best to look at the end product & shelve it. The Ritual is a bad movie! Awful Film School style visuals, mind numbing sound, terrible script, over long sequences of nothing in particular or interesting. Snap shot editing that feels clumsy & again like a 14 year old film wannabe threw his hand in. Skull masks don't make a film scary & dropping little homages to older, much better horror films does not make your film any cooler if the idea is crap in the first place. This wants to be edgy but ends up looking & feeling all wrong. If you need a film to help you sleep, wack it on but other than that seriously don't entertain the idea of watching it for real, its a mess.
11 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Warning (I) (2012)
1/10
This is a Warning!!!!
3 January 2014
This is a Warning!!! Do NOT watch this film!! if you are browsing IMDb for found footage horror & stumble upon this film, you'll see the score & think 'Maybe' 'it might be OK' do not fool yourself into thinking that the score is wrong or you would like to make up your own mind. This is Grange Hill horror. The acting in my first school play was far superior. The ideas for films you have whilst sitting on the toilet are better, Uwe Boll movies have more intelligence, you could make a movie on your old N95 Nokia phone & it would look like The Exorcist in comparison to this. Don't kid yourself into thinking 'it could be so bad it's good!' it's not! honest!! please do yourself & the world a favour by heeding the words of the film itself, the clue is in the title. 'WARNING' 'WARNING' WARNING' It's too late for me friends, i can't get my 80 minutes back, but there is still time for you. Help the world, bury this film deep, deep into the heart of the sun & pray it never returns. You will thank me later, i promise.
26 out of 33 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Man of Steel (2013)
5/10
Still Living In The Shadow Of The Bat & Mr Reeve
18 June 2013
Warning: Spoilers
This Summers Biggest Super-hero movie is Zach Snyders Re-boot of the Superman Franchise after Bryan Singers extremely dull 'tribute to' fell on its proverbial backside last time round. Warners & DC have turned to Christopher Nolan (again) & 'Watchmen's' under-rated Director Zach Snyder to try & rise above the fan boys glowing admiration of the first two Reeve movies & make something resembling an 'ok' attempt to emulate those 2 classics whilst at the same time trying to re-imagine the mythos in a way to appeal to those Bat fans who jumped aboard via Nolans Impressive trilogy. Not such an easy task even with the talent aboard on Man of Steel. The answer to the question does it succeed is really dependant on where you stand on comics translating to movies. Nolan & Goyer take liberties with the classic standard DC Origin & make some ridiculous mistakes along the way, if anything Nolan & Goyer are to blame for all the failures of this movie as Snyder's style & impressive comic sensibilities can do nothing if the story & script call for some non-sensical approaches (Jonathan Kents demise is almost laugh out loud ridiculous & despite Kevin Costner's superb if under-used performance, he can do nothing to make us believe that Clark would just stand by & watch him die. One of the pivotal moments in Kal-Els life is the death of his 2nd Father, Clark realising of course that even with all his incredible powers he cannot beat the fate of being human) Cavill is impressive as Kal-El but cannot make the transition to geeky Clark like the late great Reeve managed but pulls off Kal-El with ease. Lois just appears & her entry into the movie is another flaw, tracking the legendary urban legend to the fortress of solitude, Lois will know Kal-Els identity throughout the movie seemingly losing all the great potential Lois-Clark-Superman triangle stuff made great by the comics & the earlier movies alike. Snyders approach to the first half of the movie is an obvious nod to planting Superman's roots into a world that could be the same as the one in that other DC superhero movie & the look & feel is much darker & murkier than any superman before it. Kryptons demise is also impressive & one of the highlights of the film (Although again flawed as Jor-El is born a scientist not a warrior but still manages to take out almost all of Zods 'Warriors' with ease but i guess he is Russell 'Fighting round the world' Crowe) The Second half of the movie is kind of like the first 10 minutes of Trey Parkers 'Team America World Police' as Superman & Zod's cronies go WWF on Smallville & Metropolis in turn almost laying the ground flat in both. The Fight scene in Smallville is brutal & the effects by Weta are some of the best i have seen in recent times & its also good to see what would happen if you decided to pick on Supermans Mother, not a wise idea! The problem with the movie is hard to pin point but it just feels like the creators are trying to hard to satisfy both themselves & the fans, sometimes its better to just go one way rather than meander about somewhere in between. There is no real heart to the movie, no real 'WOW' scenes, the actors are good, Crowe, Cavill & Costner in particular give fine performances but are again slaves to a screenplay that doesn't really take off like Superman should. DC have problems & it's plain to see that the shadow of the bat looms large over every other hero in their cannon, Nolan really is to blame for raising the bar in his movies so high its almost impossible to get near it with anything else. Marvel have managed to spend the best part of a decade developing a plan for their universe & the fruits of that labour is plain for all to see. Its a shame that DC has no Avi Arad to consult. If Man Of Steel is a stepping stone to a wider story there are no real signs here & fans awaiting a Justice League movie should really not hold their breath after watching this. Overall Man Of Steel succeeds in being more entertaining than Singers 'Returns' but loses the heart & soul of the Superman Myth, something that is sacred really to fans of the comic. As a movie on its own, it looks good, has its moments but is overall just an average action movie, i wonder still personally weather Snyder would have benefited without Nolans figure in the background, you can't 'ground' a story about an alien, Snyder knows how to do comics (Watch Watchmen) there are plenty of other good writers in Hollywood but i guess the ka-ching factor of Nolans name made Warner's execs eyes explode. Maybe another reason why DC is failing to put their universe in order. A Crisis on Earth? hardly but a real shame.
13 out of 26 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
All You Need To Know About Hellraiser Revelations!!
27 October 2011
Having Watched this on the bounce after 'Howling reborn' this movie seemed much better than it actually was. Having re-watched it after exorcising the Quite nauseating howling turkey, it now occurs to me that this film is about as enjoyable as drinking your own urine whilst being buggered by a fat sweaty homeless man who hasn't showered his whole life. There is absolutely no point in discussing the plot as it's quite obvious that the scriptwriter has done a william burroughs cut up technique with the first 3 movies and re-hashed the same lines in different order. The casting exec has chosen a lead actor that has a distinct inability to read a line without looking like he's standing on the stage like a six year old at a nativity play. The rest of the cast do lots of head scratching and quite literally look like they don't know what the hell kind of movie they have signed up for. Pinhead looks like a constipated Grandad who is trying so hard at sounding like Doug Bradley that the concentration is making his pins fall out. It's like a group of 15 year old fanboys have got together and thought if you repeat the words 'Flesh', 'Pain', 'Pleasure' over and over again, you've got yourself a hellraiser film. Are their any redeeming qualities? Actually their isn't. And if your one of these people who reads all the reviews and thinks 'i'd like to make up my own mind', this is one of those times you should listen to your conscience, No good will come of it, the world will be a better place for you not watching it, trust me, please!
8 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Howling: Reborn (2011 Video)
1/10
All You Need To Know About Howling Reborn.
27 October 2011
It's Bad, Really Bad! Think about all the sequels that followed The original and ONLY good movie in the series and set your expectations a thousand times lower and even then it's far worse. I don't review a lot of movies because their doesn't seem much point as most things get covered and said by other people but having just wasted 1hr 40mins on this pile of stinking Werewolf excrement i think it's my duty to warn you away from this. But here's a tip, if you want Hellraiser Revelations to seem like a good film, watch this first. Seriously bring back Bruno Mattei or Herschell Gordon lewis, at least their crap movies were funny. This is about as low as the genre has ever got, so low you can't even see it. But that said, this will probably appeal to pubescent 17 year old girls who spend most of the day dreaming about robert pattinson, blogging to people who don't give a crap and wishing that they glowed in the sunlight. Horrid!!
11 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed