Reviews

98 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
The Great Wall (I) (2016)
Exciting but for real excitement, spend the evening paring your toenails.
26 September 2019
I can't believe Matt Damon and Willem Dafoe got talked into this mishmash of Godzilla meets Chinese with more arrows than the army has bullets. Evidently, this may be good fodder for children under 10, but when this viewer got tricked into watching this, it was a minus 10 stars if there is such a thing. Aside from a plot that was really only a series of wild pointless fighting, the monsters were done better in the fifties (1950s that is) and otherwise its only positive aspect is that it finally came to a finish and I was able to get out of there. Sorry guys, but that's the way I see it.
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
New Faces (1954)
10/10
I rate this a 10 because of Alice Ghostley and Paul Lynde
20 September 2019
Here is is 65 years later and I still find myself wandering around humming "Penny Candy, Candy for a Penny"!!! I was quite young when I saw this. I liked Eartha Kitt of course, and remembered Robert Clary when he turned up in "Hogan's Heroes". But I can never get Paul Lynde's performance as the poor chap recounting his trip to Africe. He tried so hard to be upbeat and positive about this absolutely horrible experience, it's to die for. They were all good, but those two performances have remained fresh in my mind lo! these 65 years later. Last night I was thinking about it and decided that even at this late date, I had to say something.
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Starting with Luc Besson, Jean Reno, Gary Oldman, Danny Aiello and Ms. Portman - It can't get better than that.
15 August 2019
Warning: Spoilers
When you see Luc Besson's name on a film, you have to see it. Tu m'en diras les nouvelles !

In one of Danny Aiello's greatest performances, he is Tony. Tony owns and operates a small café but the real money comes from his sideline as an "arranger" for the various mobs.

One of those is the Badge-toting Dapper Don Stansfield (Gary Oldman) and his private crew, where he carries on his own sideline within the NYPD. The sideline being drugs and cold-blooded murder etc. not to mention some mysterious but explosive capsules with which he comes armed for that often needed "super rush".

The star here is, of course, Jean Reno, aka Léon. Léon is not ra complete innocent. Rather, I believe he is simply immature. From conversations between Tony, Léon's mentor (and " banker", we gather that Léon was a lost kid on the streets of NY when Tony took him in and taught him his trade. The trade of assassination; that is. Clearly Léon took to that line of work readily because he is now well versed in every sort of weapon and explosive, most of which he carries with him beneath his large loose overcoat.

Even here, I have a feeling that Léon isn't just a cold-blooded natural-born killer, but rather that Tony convinces Léon that his targets are very bad people and it is Léon's job to "take care" of them.

The relationship between Tony and Léon is so unique that it's a story in itself. Tony treats Léon like a kid, doling out money as needed to pay the rent on his tiny tenement apartment, corn flakes and milk (apparently just about all Leon ever eats and drinks and the occasional movie where this loner goes and stares as if having a religious experience as he watches Gene Kelly sing and dance. His only friend is a leafy green plant for which he cares consciencially.

When the ju ject of money comes up, Tony always reminds Léon that it's Léon's money. Tony is just the caretaker. Banks get involved with paperwork and taxes. Tony keeps it all in his head. No paperwork, and Tony assures Léon that he's not going anyplace, except to the kitchen and back.

So while it's obvious to us that Tony is the one getting rich from Leon's work, we still feel that there's a warm relationship between them and in a pinch, Tony would always try to take care of Leon..

Detective Stansfield on the other hand has one of his greatest performances as well. As the more than ruthless, drug-fuzzed detective, he doesn't mind - make that, actually enjoys - bumping people off, men, women, children and if one happened to pass by, maybe a dog or two as well.

Living on the same floor as Léon, Matilda is a precocious 12-year-old abused child with hopeless parents. She often escapes to the inner balcony where she and Léon say, "Hi", in passing.

Only her little brother is dear to her. When her drug-dealing dad can't come up with the money for Stansfield, he comes back with his crew and murders everyone including Matilda's little brother.

Thus begins another great relationship between Matilda and Léon. Although only twelve years old, Matilda tries to convince Léon that he should teach her "the ropes" so she can take revenge on Stansfield.

Without including spoilers, I just have to say that the relationships between Leon and Tony, the relationship between Leon and Matilda, the relationships between all of them and Stansfield as well as the relationship between Matilda and Tony, all, each and every one of them, is a little story in itself and much more subtle than we're used to getting.

We're just not used to subtle relationships. After all, this is a population that apparently believes TV ads that assure us that these are:: "Real people, not actors".

Another point that has been criticized is that Stansfield seems so "aware" I'm certainly no expert, but I can certainly believe that when Stansfield pops those "super " capsules, they must heighten all his senses giving him almost extra-sensory feelings about those around him.

I've seen this film several times and I enjoy it as mure or even more with each viewing. Best films so far for Monsieur Besson, Jean Reno, Danny Aiello, Gary Oldman and - well,what can we say about Natalie Portman?

I have to admit that I haven't see any of her other films. Not because I wasn't blown away by Matilda, but I'm housebound so I only see what comes along. I may have reviewed Léon before but when I watched it last night, I had to say more about it.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Domino (I) (2019)
1/10
Bad...but we've seen worse.
3 August 2019
I wouldn't go so far as most reviewers and proclaim "Domino" the worst movie I've ever seen. I don't know how many bad movies some of the other reviewers have seen but "Domino" wasn't the worst movie ever made by a long shot. If I started a list, this review would be as lengthy as War and Peace.

Yes, this plot had more holes than a Krusty Creme donut shop, some very wooden acting as well as an apparent complete lack of knowledge about policemen and how they should act in the street or at a crime scene.

As many other reviewers mention, Brian De Palma's name on the film sold me immediately. He kept up the pace, but things simply never quite jelled Of course, most of us had never seen the cast before save for Guy Pearce. Here, his performance as a sort of cocky CIA agent who takes his job lightly with terrorists ar work right under his nose.

Only one aspect got my attention. When the cop's partner dies, the surviving cop really suffers here, while in most films, the cop is simply assigned another partner and not much is said about the deceased. Also, the dead partner is usually "dirty" so we have little, if any, sympathy for him/her.

As far as I was concerned, the best feature of this film was the "Travelogue". We begin in Denmark, move through Holland and Belgium and finally, to Spain.

We knew we were in Holland because the scene was filmed right in front of a windmill.

The windup in Spain is filmed during a bullfight in a large Spanish arena. The torero and his adversary, El Toro, give us a taste of a bullfight - and I'm pretty sure a taste is all most viewers want. We didn't have to watch him go in for the kill. Killing the bull seems unnecessarily brutal and I understand that in French bullfighting, the bull is not killed. His work in the arena is done and he can go into the pastures and make little bulls.

In summation, the scenes are well-done. If only the detectives acted more like real detectives and some of the wooden acting reworked and maybe throw in a visit to Paris, this might have been a decent film.

Okay, Paris might not be necessary but I just love Paris, comme ça.
15 out of 34 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Been There, Seen That.
3 July 2019
Here's a plot for aspiring writers: The jaded private eye is drinking himself to death in his sleazy office. A beautiful woman sails in and wants to hire him. He refuses. He doesn't like the sound of the job but she whips out a staggering roll of bills and he quickly changes his mind. Next scene he becomes embroiled with the rich guy's wife, nobody likes him, including the cops and anybody with any sense would go home. But he's just stubborn enough to stick around, sneaking into offices and hospitals that are oh-so-easy to get into in the movies. After gathering enough info and getting nearly killed in the process, he solves everything and comes out on top once again. What? Oh you've seen that one? So have we all. Many times, yet John Travolta allowed himself to be dragged into this tired conception which is supposed to be an homage to those dark mystery/detective novels and films. Perhaps with a flagging career he thought it might help but it doesn't. We love Brendon Fraser but he was so unrecognizable in this outing that we didn't even know it was him. Another wasted role was Morgan Freeman who says several times that he never loses. Well, unfortunately, he did lose this time. Famke Jannsen too was wasted in this time-worn rehash of remakes. Put on The Maltese Falcon or Murder, my Sweet instead.
1 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A Vigilante (2018)
3/10
Good but it could have been great
4 June 2019
Warning: Spoilers
This is a stark tale that deals with abusive husbands and their abused wives. Needing that feeling of being in control, as the abusive husband says, "I love you", his need to control his wife even if he has to beat her half to death overrides that love.

This film deals with a very good performance by Olivia Wilde. She exhibits all the pain, frustration and agony of finding herself in such an abusive relationship.

Getting away from her husband, Morgan Spector, she becomes an advocate for other abused women who hold supportive meetings. Although we see a great deal of pain, the film drags along as Ms. Wilde "handles" some of the abusive husbands. At the same time, she works out so that her body is tuned to perfection.

We aren't really sure how or why she began to help other abused women or just how she makes her living, but there it is.

When she finally confronts her husband, despite her well-tuned body, he is still too much for her to handle.

This is the real "meat" of the story, all told during that final fifteen minutes as we learn of the suffering she has gone through, the accusations of her husband who claims that it's all her fault (because she wasn't obedient).

A sort of "I didn't want to do it, but you made me do it." This film was intense and points up at least one aspect of abusive relaitonships, but it could have been a lot better. That's the way I see it.
8 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
In Time (2011)
1/10
Disapointing Dystopian
1 May 2019
The plot deals with a "future" where "time is literally, money" and people drive 1963 Lincolns and Cadillac Sevilles. Almost all the driving incidentally is not on I-5 but constantly in and around that tried-and-true holllywood set: The Lost Angeles River and a couple of the mandatory bridges. (I say mandatory because I think in the City Charter someplace it must have a clause that requires every third film to include a chase along the river and/or on the bridges). The story isn't terrible, but it comes close. And the entire film reeks of a film made on pocket change. Unless there's a mistake in some of the details, this film cost about $40,000.000.00. Maybe they meant $40,000.00. I absolutely can't believe it cost anywhere near that amount. That wondful film "Jessie' cost less than a million dollars to produce. It didn't look at all like a shoestring budget film except that the only thing we ever saw about police headquarters, was the office of Jessie's boss. That may have been an oversight because it couldn't have cost much to get a couple of shots of a busy police headquarters. Good old stock footage should have covered that adding a mit more realism to the film. $40,000,000.00??? Either that was a big type or there's a lot of fancy accounting going on there and like Desi used to say: "They got a lot of 'splainin' to do".
2 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Moby Dick (1956)
10/10
A film for the ages.
15 April 2019
Warning: Spoilers
In this almost Shakespearian drama adapted for the screen, Herman Melville's sprawling novel stars Gregory Peck as the demented and obsessed Captain Ahab. His first mate, Mr. Starbuck (Leo Genn) and narrator, Ishmael, played by Richard Basehart are the main characters in this sprawling novel that writers Ray Bradbury and John writer/director John Huston harnassed and squeezed it into a film showing us a story of one man's obsession.

With those famous words, "Call me Ishmael", we're drawn into this epic tale of a drifter who gets it into his head that a voyage on a whaling ship would be something new and interesting.

Orsen Wells has a short but memorable appearance as Father Mapple, whose fear inspiring sermon does not deter the true whalers from their intended journey into the sea to fuel the lamps of America.

Ishmael and Queequeg, an untamed tattooed harpooner (Friederich Ledebur) form an unlikely but immediate friendship and are taken aboard the Pequod.

One of the first things that struck me was the costuming. Every coat, every hat, and scarf told of clothing that had never been washed or cleaned. The flat slick stains from grease and dirt from years of constant daily wear showed clothing that was never changed. This inattention to clothing extended to Captain Ahab.

Once the Pequod sets sail, Captain Ahab remains unseen, closed up in his cabin. But when the lookout cries, "Thar she blows!" Captain Ahab immediately hurries on deck with his telescope. He stands on one leg and a prosthetic leg made of whalebone. He has had the ship's carpenter drill a small hole on the quarterdeck where he can place the bottom of his prosthetic leg for stability.

Although the whale they capture is acceptable, it isn't the despised white whale Captain Ahab is really seeking. He displays a gold coin to his crew and promises that it will go to the first man who sights the white whale. He nails the coin to the mast as a constant reminder to the men.

After many days , some stormy followed by dead calms in sweltering heat, the wind picks up and the lookout espies a pod of whales. The harpooners set off in boats for the perilous job of harpooning whales and towing their carcasses back to the ship.

Just as the men return with their bounty, a passing ship informs the Captain that the crew sighted a white whale in a certain area.

To the utter astonishment of the crew, Captain Ahab orders the men to forget the whales they've just killed. They're setting a course for the whale that Captain Ahab has dubbed Moby Dick. We've learned that some years before, Moby Dick robbed the captain of his leg and tried to take his ship and his life as well.

Since that time, an obsession has grown within him, an obsession that drives him to place a higher value on killing Moby Dick than anything else, even if he must risk his career and crew to do it.

Queequeg dies and his coffin is entrusted to the sea. This is an important element for the conclusion of this history.

Mr. Starbuck tries to reason with the captain, saying he might suggest his reasons to the crew.

"I don't give suggestions," Captain Ahab growls, "I give orders!"

The overall theme of this story is that a madman's obsession for complete obedience of those within his command will surely lead to disaster.

In the end, having located Moby Dick, Captain Ahab becomes tangled in the ropes connected to the harpoons. Moby Dick sounds and the captain is gone forever. Moby Dick isn't finished now. He destroys the whaling boats and all aboard. Next he butts into the ship not once but a second time. As everything about the whale sinks, and his vengeance satisfied, he swims off. But not every life is lost. Ishmael is somehow still swimming about, but with only minutes to survive when the miracle happens.

Queequeg's coffin floats to the surface. Ishmael's friend has returned for one brief moment to give Ishmael life. Shortly a whaler, the Rachel picks Ishmael enabling him to record the history of this final voyage of Captain Ahab and the Pequod.

The camera work and special effects in this beautifully filmed masterpiece are excellent, given that it was made before the arrival of computers and CGI. It was a pleasure to see the artfully designed grimness of the vast ocean shown in wide shots, shots of the whalers in their boats trying to harpoon a whale, the primitive conditions aboard the Pequod.

And the whale. This was no studio-constructed shark as in Jaws. I don't know just how they did it, but seeing that gigantic white whale and the frail boats that ventured into the sea to harpoon him was well worth more than one viewing. Above all, the close-ups of Captain Ahab's tortured face and flaming eyes, the eyes of a madman - a man lost within his obsession - that is something few viewers will ever forget.

Under John Huston's outstanding direction, camera angles and long shots all worked together in perfect harmony.

This film is, in some ways hard to watch, yet Gregory Peck's Captain Ahab is so fierce, so obsessed and demeaning that it's impossible to turn away from such intensity. This man was no longer Gregory Peck, the actor; he has become the twisted Captain Ahab, a man whose obsession not only expresses itself in his words, his voice but in his entire body and above all, his eyes are the tortured eyes of a madman.

The film's grim yet inevitable finale with Ishmael being saved by his dead friend, Quueequeg, is as if Ishmael's guardian angel has come to save him so that he can return to record the terrible final voyage of the Pequod.

This may not be a film for everyone. It goes beyond mere entertainment; it is a message to all of us that when one person allows an obsession to take command, there can never be peace as long as that person lives.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Mule (2018)
10/10
Perhaps Mr. Eastwood's Best Film, and that's saying a lot!
3 April 2019
Ever since Rowdy Yates hit the smal screen, Clint Eastwood has never once failed us. He's been a loose cannon cop, a dirty cop, a good cop, a roadhouse entertainor, a drunkard cop, a cowboy, a street fighter, a pilot, a...ah, he's just about done it all, and done it well. We've enjoyed the Dirty Harry films several times and most of the others as well. In the Mule he brings such great talents as myopoic Diane Wiest - we still remember Edward Scissorhands and her great contribution to that film. Andy Garcia is such a convincing drug lord all the time I'm afraid he may decide to become a real one. I hear the money's good. Mr. Eastwood's truck always looked so pristine, whereas Mr. Sharp's truck was said to be a disasteer of garbage...but a good hideout for drugs. Mayhe he wasn't suffering from dementia as much as they thought. It took a pretty sharp (no pun intended) fellow to do all that driving all along at almost 90. The pacing, the characters and photography were great, and Mr. Eastwood is a gread director. Just don't miss this engaging flick.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Fun but not much mystery
29 March 2019
Considering the budget, this film turned out surprisingly well done. The title seems lame and out of place. From the time Sean Young came home and brought out her purchases, we knew exactly what was going to happen. As usual in these cases, the police were slow, following red herrings, etc., but that's Hollyw - or Texas or wherever movies are made. The acting and conflict among the characters was well done and the opening of the film was a fun way to get us into it. One thing that put me off, and that's simply my fault. Being an old-timer, every time Ben Browder appeared I saw bandleader Kay Kayser's in-house cornet-playing comedian, Ish Kabibble. Sorry Mr. Browder. I think it was the way you combed your hair that did it!
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Widows (2018)
4/10
A Viola Davis Movie
9 March 2019
The bad reviews are not unwarranted.. This is heavy-handed in many ways, and some complain that it is slow. The slowness and heavy-handed treatment are more than made up for by Viola Davis' stunning performance. Seldom have we seen a woman express such suffering, indecision, and heartache throughout this film. Ms. Davis isn't acting; she's suffering. It's in her eyes, her mouth, her expressions and he entire body. Throughout the film, it was impossible to our eyes off Mr. Davis. Mr. McQueen tried to get a lot into this film: heist, mistreated women, double-dealing, treachery and star-crossed love. people like Robert Duvall and Colin Farrel and Liam Neeson add spice. Overall, I found this movie entertaining and I'm willing to overlook the chlichéd plot features. After all, clichéd plots are the stuff that made Hollywood great...or something.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Ghost Rock (2003)
En embarrassing attempt
20 December 2018
With their careers drawing to a close, I think Mr.Busey, Mr. Fahey and Ms. Barbeau grabbed the jobs without even reading the script. Oh - wait ! There was no script. This disaster movie disguised as a inept blending of other old western plots had me laughing all the way. But I should have been absorbed in the tale; not laughing. The film screamed "amateur" from the very beginning. Then all through the film (edited I think by the director's sixth grade son) oddly disconnected scenes accompanied by loud (presumably for added drama) music. Although they are featured as the stars, Busey, Fahey and Barbeau were doubtless recruited for a little name power since all of them played only supporting roles. James Hong is always good, but his role added little to the tale. There is little rhyme or reason to this film. I had the impression that the director just winged it from day to day for all of the three days it took to destroy 90 minutes of film.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Jackie Brown (1997)
10/10
One of the Best Movies ever made
28 November 2018
I've never been a big fan of Mr. Tarantino's movies, but when I viewed Jackie Brown I was smitten. I've been watching movies since talkies were in their infancy, through all the westerns and detective movies that kids like to "grown up" films, and I believe I've seen most of the best ones. But Jackie Brown is a film that has it all. Adapted from the Elmore Leonard novel, Mr. Tarantino has developed it into a sparkling tale featuring characters that are at once likeable and detestable. I don't want to go into the plot because it may reveal too much, and I'd rather talk about the characters. Samuel L. Jackson as Ordell Robbie is a casual, fun-loving guy who deals in illegal arms. He's all that but at the same time as ruthless as any mobster we've ever seen on the screen. Bridget Fonda is perfect as Melanie, an addicted bit of eye-candy who lounges about the house keeping Mr. Jackson company and doing little things such as answer the phone or bring him a drink. Robert De Niro in one of his finest performances is dull ex-con Louis Gara. He's just out of prison. Mr. Jackson allows to stay with him for a while mostly for the extra company. Mr. De Niro doesn't have to say or do much to show us he's dull, possible has a fried brain from drugs. It shows in his eyes. They're dull and we know he's now quite all here. What we don't at first know is that he has a very short fuse. That's probably why he was in prison. Tiny Lister doesn't actually do much. He finds people for Max Cherry. If we skipped bail we wouldn't want him to come after us. We can see in his posture that he's serious. Robert Forster is Max Cherry, a bail bondsman who's tired, getting old and just wants to retire. But when the phone rings, he's all business. Michael Keaton stands out as a jaunty agent who's out to get Mr. Jackson but the real star that puts this film over the top is Pam Grier. She's Jackie Brown, a middle-aged single woman working for a second-rate airline. She just wants to get enough money together for the future. Flying out of the country enables her to pick up gun money to bring to Mr. Jackson. Everyone in this ensemble cast is so perfect and some of the scenes are at once a jolt, yet at the same time inevitable, that one viewing is simply not enough. Nor are two. This is an amazing of artful direction.
20 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Bubba Ho-Tep (2002)
3/10
Campbell is King!
21 October 2018
Other reviews have gone over this so many times, there's no need to recap most of the information. This is more about Bruce Campbell. If Bubba Ho-Tep wasn't so low-budget, if it didn't have such a ridiculous title and if it didn't drift off into outright silliness, Mr. Campbell might well have taken the Academy reward for best actor instead of As Elvis/Haff, he became a living legend. One of the most outstanding roles I've ever witnessed in my blank blank years. I really don't believe any other actor today could have done better than this. Bravo Mr. Campbell. Bravo.
1 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Maximum Risk (1996)
4/10
Good Action Film
26 September 2018
Warning: Spoilers
It's a little late at this date to review Maximum Risk. We've watched it at least our times over the years. This is a good action film even though it as its flaws. The first flaw is when Mr. Van Damme enters an apartment building and is confronted by a group of black teens. This is unnecessary and portrays blacks in an unsavory manner. The story tries to make up for that by showing a good black resident who has raised Mr. Van Damme from early times. Another flaw is the fat FBI agent. It seems unlikely that the FBI would allow a slow thinking overweight agent out in the field. Although predictable, the film has its highlight with lots of action mostly in the south of France in narrow winding streets. There are other flaws that viewers might notice, but overall, it's still a good film. For me the highlight of the film is the outstanding performance by taxi driver, Henry Gomez. His performance of the hyperactive wannabe novelist is really something to watch. Every inch of Mr. Gomez is hyper. Especially his eyes and his eagerness to be a part of the action as Mr. Van Damme goes through many challenges not only in France but in New York. I thought the capo was a poor choice, but under boss was really vile and made me believe him. The French cop who was Van Damme's partner was very good too, as was Ms.Henstridge. Shame we haven't seen more of her and Mr. Gomez.
3 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Terminal (I) (2018)
8/10
Something different but well worth your time.
27 June 2018
From the Neon of some unknown city brightly lights up not only store signs, but all sorts of unusually attractive signs, including actors ad time shifts, to the empty café back somewhere in the subway station. this film keeps you on edge, trying to figure out just what's going on. But not to worry, it will come to you and the characters interact in swift-change scenes that you don't see coming. One viewer with me thought it boring and almost left, but I'm glad we stayed because it only got better as it moved along. While it's true that you'll probably guess the importance of some characters who normally wouldn't be important, you won't be disappointed and like any good presentation, they saved the best till last. 'Nuff said. Just pick up a DVD. If you're disappointed, sue me!
5 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
The only true Hercule Poirot -- the rest are ...meh!
26 June 2018
I had this film recorded but somewhere in the middle I lost it. That doesn't however detract from my overall opinion. But like the Terminator, it"ll be back! In 1974 Albert Finney essayed this rôle. The star-studded lineup was great and the set decoration were fabulous. You really felt the richness and almost royal surroundings on storied Orient Express Rail Line. While over all, it's hard to complain, I felt that Mr. Finney worked too hard at being Poirot. Much too expressive and emotional, he liked to get right in the faces of people being interrogated,. At times too loud and grating. As an old-time reader of all the Poirot stories, I feel I know him in the same way I know Nero Wolfe and Archie Goodwin, or Lord Peter Wimsey. David Suchet really came into his own when he was tapped for the part of Hercule Poirot on Masterpiece Theatre. He is every inch M. Poirot. His dress, his walk, his attitude, the way he speaks and interrogates suspects...there can be no other. Mr. Finney, while he looked good, was, I felt, must too expressive, at times far too loud and aggressive. Kenneth Brannagh too, is a great actor, and while haven't seen this version, but I find it hard to believe he can replace David Suchet. Certain actors, finding their niche, are almost impossible to replace. Ian Carmichael was every inch Lord Peter Death Wimsey. I hope you never had to sit through the version featuring Robert Montgomery. I really like Mr. Montgomery (I don't want Samantha twitching her nose to get even!) but he wasn't right for the rôle, and speaking of haunting, the entire script should have been burned before ever reaching the silver screens of America. Thayer David came about as close to doing Wolfe as anyone extant. He wasn't heavy enough, but he carried the role well. I imagine most people will go to see the Kenneth Brannegh version thinking Johnny Depp will be M. Poirot. Nothing against Mr. Brannegh, but I have a feeling that if anyone can come close to replacing the aging David Suchet, it might just be Mr. Depp. He has much greater range than most probably realize. So...in the words of Forrest Gump: "That's all I have to say about that."
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Red Sparrow (2018)
2/10
Some beautiful photography...but...
11 June 2018
The tiele and all the hype had me looking for an exciting tale but unfortunately, this It baby plodded along with a couple of hot sex scenes, perhaps to justify its existence. Red Sparrow begins with a lovely dance sequence, but from there it's all a downhill ride on a sled without snow to smooth it out. I've never seen or heard of a star ballerina who didn't spend practically every spare moment at home or at the studio practicing, limbering up and try new moves, usually under the tutelage of an instructor. But this gal doesn't have time for that nonsense. She's too busy doing little or nothing aside from a little sex show from time to time. Finally, after much too long a wait, she came back out and danced some more as the screen darkened. Some of course, will enjoy the film, but there are people who enjoy things like waiting for the water to boil for spaghetti; public transportation during rush hours and delay air flights to anyplace. Sorry, but that's my humble opinion.
2 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
A well-cast and well played Western. Mr. Stewart was almost another Destry here.
6 June 2017
I haven't bothered to write any reviews in a while, mostly because they've already been well covered, or hardly worth the trouble. How is is possible that people spend so much money to produce such really bad films?

I had never seen this film before. I'm not sure why because I like the stars and well-made Westerns.

I won't go into the overall story since many others have already done so. This film even with its interesting twists was overall, still another Oater. What helped was all the character actors. Strother Martin has always been a favorite and who didn't like Andy Devine? There were too many to mention.

But now to my real motive in writing this review. I've always liked Edmond O'Brien. My favorite, until now was D.O.A. but as Mr. Peabody, the owner, and editor of the local newspaper, he stole the show. Move over Wayne, Stewart, Miles, and Marvin! This drunken newspaperman literally stole every scene he appeared in and I was so captivated that I still marvel today at his range. That was an Edmond O'Brien I never realized existed and never expected to see.

This film is worth watching just to see the drunken antics of Mr. Peabody! Do it!
1 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
A dark revealing film
22 August 2016
Coup de grâce refers, of course, a finality. Often it means a bullet to the head or something similar to make certain the subject is dead. The original title is Der Fangschuß.

In this German and French language film, covering the period just after World War One, and filmed in a dull black and white that evokes the drab, colorless and perhaps hopeless world for many in the war's aftermath. Set in ravaged Latvia where the Czar had previously allowed a number of aristocratic wealthy Germans to continue to own estates with sumptuous homes. Among these, Countess Sophie de Reval has allowed herself to become attached to the promise of Communism. Despite the German Empire's collapse, German troops nevertheless have been stationed in the region, ostensibly to protect the German citizens from Bolshevism. Since this was formerly a part of Mother Russia, many locals want to see the return of Czarist Russia of the past while some hope for a republic and others only wanting an end to all the strife and horror of war. They only desire a peaceful home for themselves and their children. One of the German officers who has returned to his former homeland, happens to be a gentleman the countess has known since childhood. Once they meet, her former passion re-ignites and when he rebuffs her advances, she begins to throw herself at him. Finally, unable to achieve fulfillment with the officer, the countess releases her sexual desires with others, making this a film destined more for adults, despite the fact that there are really no outright graphic sexual scenes. As mentioned earlier, the drab hopelessness of the period is only accentuated by the low-key black and white film production. This is not an action-packed suspense film, but rather a study in human values and emotions during times of trial. One comment is that the subtitles in English are not well- incorporated into the film and many will find them difficult to follow, especially considering that the film does have a number of abrupt changes of scene. For all that, this is a film many will not quickly forget.
5 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Drop (2006)
1/10
One of the worst of all time
29 July 2016
This film is so bad, so poorly made, that it's really hard to know where to start. I don't often write critiques on films because I realize that every filmmaker has a different vision and things don't always work out as expected. Besides, often with movies, it's the old problem of too many chefs in the kitchen at one time. But not even the beautiful and talented Sean Young or not-so- beautiful, especially here, John Savage, can help. From the moment the movie started I had a sudden bad feeling that was right on the mark. It started without any sense of purpose and then moved to a job interviewer who spent endless moments smoking a cigarette in a dark room while he interviewed a job applicant. This dragged on for an impossibly long time, often repeating itself and inserting confusing flashes of possibilities the job seeker was apparently imagining as the employer talked. Offered $5,000, half now and half on delivery, to drive a vehicle from San Francisco to Los Angeles (why any of this we'll never know), the kid, smart as he appears to be, jumps at the chance and away he goes. Again, due to the blotchy amateurish editing that drags on throughout the film, the kid drives and drives and drives and eventually at the end of our tether, he arrives at a huge nearly empty parking garage in Los Angeles. The old amateurish filler of frightening dreams helps kill time while the driver and the poor audience patiently waits. Finally, after getting plenty of rest, the kid peeks into the glove compartment where he finds an envelope containing a key. His immediate instinct is to go open the trunk where a briefcase awaits so he naturally has to open the case. From the brilliant light that emanates from the case, we think maybe it's like that old Ralph Meeker(Mike Hammer) flick with radioactive stuff, but we'll never really know for sure what it was. Again for obscure reasons we'll never know, the kid hides the briefcase and when eventually a couple of rough fellows turn up to collect what is referred to as "the package" (not even a remote relative of The Transporter Franchise), and seeing no package, they become belligerent. Savage then turns up and spends half an hour talking to himself and looking tired and worn while the henchmen chase the kid around up and down and through the parking garage. More than once he is right at the open entrance but he'd rather go back and run around the garage some more. Several times the men corner him and demand to know where he has hidden the briefcase, but he won't talk. So they continue to chase him around endlessly shooting wildly at him, forgetting obviously, that if he's dead he can't tell them where he hid the briefcase. One might think an all out war in the dead of night might result in a call to the police, but no. Never happens. Probably no money left to hire police. I don't want to give away what is supposed, I think, to be a surprise twist, but I can only say that I don't expect a lot of CGI or extravagant sets, etc. on a Top Ramen budget, but such a misguided unintelligent script, utterly impossible lack of direction and editing that a five-year old could have done better. Like, what's with the occasional flashes of little things that went before and have no connection to what is going on now? I'll tell you what. In writing its called padding. All the flashbacks are just padding as is the tiresome drive from SF to LA. Even the initial interview is so drawn out with the interviewer smoking a full pack of cigarettes that's it's already very discouraging. Lots of padding, very little story and/or money and the end result: This is not a movie and should never have been made. How could Ms Young and Mr. Savage be so desperate as to allow themselves to be sucked into this mess?
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Play solitaire on the computer.
9 February 2016
We love Vin Diesel, a true super hero, but even Mr. Diesel couldn't save this disaster. An hour and half (it seemed at least twice that long) of people aimlessly killing witches who bounced right back and witches killing people who I think also bounced back at least in some cases. Lots of computer created nasty monsters that have no place in any witch lore I've ever heard of. Dialog that didn't make any sense and worn-out witch dialog that we've heard before. I mean, witches just don't have much imagination, in our opinion. I had misgivings when I saw the word "witches" in the title, but not being alone, I couldn't just get up and leave and besides, when you're being tortured you don't run out on your friends. I'm sorry. Mr. Diesel must have been well-paid to endorse this film. I say endorse, because with Vin Diesel and Michael Caine leading the pack, people are willing to pay to be entertained, but most people expect more than what we got. The credits name three writers. Perhaps one would have done a better job. Three writers is like congress trying to do something positive if and when they ever go to work on the same day. If you want some more fruitful entertainment, try playing solitaire on your computer.
13 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Guns for Hire (2015)
1/10
Sorry
30 December 2015
Warning: Spoilers
Unfortunately, although this film tries to be very clever, and it first it does seem to be, it quickly deteriorates into a sorry mess. A woman who advertises herself as a tow truck service cum assassin, waits patiently in a local park for the principal to show up, drop a paper bag of presumably money into a wastebasket and move on. The hit woman than goes and gets the money, takes it home and stashes the bag in a hole she has made beneath the floorboards under her bed. During this time she strikes up an erotic relationship with a woman who wants the hit woman to kill her. The acting throughout this film is worse than sophomoric. The only good (even outstanding) performance is by Jeffery Dean Morgan. I can't imagine how this fine actor got talked into this film. Orlando Jones too has a small role, but doesn't get a chance to do much of anything. Okay, all the above is amateurish and we can all forgive a Top Ramen budget, but the real killer is the end when we realize we've been made the butt of a big joke. Everything we've just watched was nothing but the figment of a madman's hallucinations. Hah hah. This is insulting to me, and it's highly unoriginal, the first such film case going back at least to 1920. At the time it was considered unique and clever. Now, ninety-five years later, it's really blah.
8 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
War Pigs (2015)
5/10
Okay
28 December 2015
Having lived through those trying times, I can relate. I felt that, overall, this film was pretty accurate in the way the characters looked, dressed and acted. My wife criticized the constant smoking, but I told her that's what men did in those days, especially when the cigarettes were free. The language too, I felt was much more realistic than in many WWII films. In those days, even foul-mouthed tough guys seldom muttered the word "fuck" or "fucking". Mickey Rourke was the only guy in the film who did that a few times, but being Mickey Rourke, I guess he can get away with that. However, his use of "disrespect" was unforgivable. I'm not sure when that popular word came into use but it sure wasn't back in the '40s or '50s, etc. More like the '90s, and more like gang talk, not military jargon. Of course, as with any film, there have to be contrivances to make things work, and that's okay. Here, a group of misfits dubbed the War Pigs (think half a Dirty Dozen) are sent in on a mission to destroy the infamous V3 cannon. In reality, there were several and I really don't believe any were actually destroyed by allied armies. Rather, the Normandy invasion caused the Nazis to remove a couple, others were dismantled as encroaching allied troops caused the Nazis to break the guns down themselves to avoid having them captured by the Allies. But these guys did a pretty good job and held their own. Overall I enjoyed this a lot more than many war stories since it wasn't filled with as much blood and guts as are so many. It focused more on the men's training, their actual mission and their relationships. I would swear however, than when the leader of the mission was chosen, he was a captain. Two minutes later and up until the end of the film he was a lieutenant. Maybe I missed something. Someone else complained about Dolph Lundgren's French accent. (a) he has become a really formidable actor in his old age, given the chance to do something besides play a Universal Soldier type, and (b) I believe, in the film, he was actually German (probably from Alsace which has an identity problem), who had been conscripted by the Nazis. He slipped off and joined La Légion Etrangère and came back to fight for right and justice and all that good stuff. Overall, I thought this was a pretty good war flick. I'm not normally a war movie lover. I never saw Inglorious, etc. but my wife picked this up at a Red Box, and we could have done a lot worse, as in "Knock Knock". Oy!
14 out of 26 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Van Damme is Back!
19 July 2015
I don't want to discuss the storyline here because from the start it's off-beat, surprising and entertaining. After so many cinematic dogs that made it look as if Mr. Van Damme's films were going the way of Steven Seagal, this turnaround is arguably one of Mr. Van Dammne's best films. The script is right on, direction tight, and the storyline went off in a really different direction. He has to fight, yes, but not just to show off his acrobatics every other scene. And rather than just another action flick, this has heart and a story that may stick with the viewer. Someone once said that a good story should have an ending that is inevitable, yet still a surprise. I liken a good story to a magician on stage. He places his top hat upside down on a table and goes through his array of tricks, and although you just know it's coming, when at the end he pulls that live rabbit out his hat you're surprised and amazed. In this case, I was expecting to take a step further and really surprise with that rabbit, but still, the ending was quite satisfactory, maybe even better that what I had expected, all things considered. I'd say this is a film any Van Damme fan should have on the shelf. One little thing: Although this was shot, entirely I think, in Canada, it was supposed to be Manila. I've never been there, and I imagine there are a great many people there from China, but in much of the movie, judging from the background and all the signs and passersby, I'd have sworn we were in Hong Kong or some such place. That didn't hurt the film however. I'm just saying....
7 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

Recently Viewed