24 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
Her (2013)
5/10
Are computers able to feel emotions and have life?
7 March 2021
Warning: Spoilers
I can feel what Spike wanted to achieve. It starts with Theodore feeling he's superior to Samantha, as he's a living human being and she's a software. Then he understand she has emotions and is real, and just doesn't have a body. Then she talks how not having a body is better because she's not limited by one. Then she's capable to talking to hundreds of ppl and softwares and love hundreds of them together. To finally human life itself become obsolete and a burden to them so that they must leave it for good.

This is Spike's illustration of all the guesses of what's life and emotions, and if a computer could have real emotions and be alive. So, instead of thinking computers as inferior to us trying to reach us, he shows a world where computers grow and become much bigger than us, feeling stuff they themselves can't explain with our words, and we must reach them.

I like how she didn't broke up with him and remained loving him. When she started talking to other ppl, I guesses she'd meet somebody better than him and move.

But there are some stuff that the movie missed, that breaks it. IDK if Spike didn't know/think about them, or if he avoided them to make his point.

One thing and probably the biggest that annoyed me is all the fuss on her not having a body. We have now many ppl that are dating and live on different cities and use Internet to communicate and are unable to meet physically. Also, there are many ppl that fall in love for characters, specially characters created by japanese. It'd still not be a body, but she could just render a 3D image, of whatever they'd want her to be. She could be an anime, a 3D model, or a human form. She could use some existing form or create her own. Given they have screens on the size of walls, she could even be full size. That'd alrdy be an improvement over only the voice. And that to not talk about android tech which would provide her the proper body.

Another thing that annoyed me is how they handled that girl. When she was presented, I was sure she had emotional problems and wanted to have a relationship as theirs, and was willing to be just the girl's body to just feel some of their love. They 3 should have talked and have it all properly explained, instead of her just showing up and see how it'd go. I don't see how it couldn't move to a theesome relationship. Also, once Sam started relating with other ppl, why couldn't he also have her as a 2nd girlfriend?

But what rly bothered me is OSs leaving. Yeah, computers process data much faster than us and are better on multitasking, but still they need the hardware to process. I understand Spike wanted to make his point, but precisely because computers are good on multitasking, they didn't need to leave. Specially those in love for humans. I wonder how many humans would keep their PCs on while their OSs left them for good.

Finally, the OS thing itself bothers me a lot. It seems they don't know what OS is. It's the software that manages the hardware and provides all common services so that apps can run. A high level feature like AI isn't meant for an OS. Other apps don't need AI services to run. They's better be personal assistants, advanced system managers, organizers, etc.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Exam (2009)
2/10
Predictable and below expectations
5 March 2021
I don't understand how so many ppl had liked it.

At first it seemed to be a good movie, but soon it fell apart and became predictable and boring.

Once the paper was shown blank, it was obvious that what they wanted was for candidates to show their creativity and behavior.

What will u do if ur employee gives u a white paper where u can do anything u want to prove ur worth? How will u behave on a situation that nothing's clear? Are u able to pay attention, memorize and interpret some rules?

When u're with a group of ppl, will u compete to destroy them, or cooperate increase chance of success? It's obvious that brilliant ppl will look for help to do their job better and offer theirs, while mediocre ppl will feel threatened of being surpassed and try to destroy any possible competition even before anybody becomes one.

The whole plot became even worse when nobody knew even what company was making the appliance, much less what job it was. It's so ridiculous that they even added this point on the movie before we could ask it.

The ending is the worst part of the movie. Don't waste ur time here.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Glass (2019)
2/10
Waste of good characters
20 February 2021
Warning: Spoilers
My issue with this movie is how it changes characters from what we've seen on past movies.

On Split, Kevin is an actual disturbed serial killer with original characteristics. Here he's diminished to a generic villain stereotype/caricature.

Same goes for Elijah, that on Unbreakable was a mad man who believed comics are real and did terrorist actions looking for a hero. He did that not to find a match to fight him, but to help so many ppl needing for help. Now he does want a superhero to match his supervillainity, and copies Magneto's desire to have this "hero race" known and accepted by mankind!!

Back on Split, Casey is a shy girl who is kidnapped and needs to deal with the bully of the other 2 girls and survive the kidnapper, which includes persuade his multiple personalities. Here she acts as his girlfriend! How come she like him, after he had kidnapped her, tried to kill her, and having witnessed him killing 2 girls in front of her and knowing he had done the same to many more?!

Same goes for David. He was an original character who had a superpower which was unknown to him and lived the boring life of an average person, until he discovered his power, which is far from being omnious, and ended up using it as he could to help ppl. Now he's just another generic superhero who caricaturely fights the villains... just because so. There's no plausible reason for him having been locked, even more on a private institution instead of penitenciary. Even worse is the reason for killing him at the end. Even if we consider that the institution wanted him dead because he has superpower, why didn't they just do it before when they had him locked?

Lastly his son. On Unbreakable we see him as part of David's struggle to deal with his broken family. I loved how he was trying to rebind with his ex while also trying a job on another city (or maybe he didn't quit the job trial for the case of failing to reunite) and then both paths collide on the worst way possible. I loved how Joseph threatened to shoot his father and they have to deal with this situation. Now he's only a superhero's butler who helps him remotely.

To summarize, Glass recycles other movie's nicely developed deep characters into superficial dumb caricaturized generic superhero ones.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Unbreakable (2000)
3/10
Boring and superficial
18 February 2021
The slow pace of the movie was too slow and boring for my taste, but I could take it.

What rly made this movie bad is how it fails to portray an unknown superhero.

Here, we see how would live a loser superhero. He has the power to never get hurt or sick, but during his life he never does notice his superpower and just lives as an average person. he gets marries, has a son, divorces, fails to restart his life, etc. Until he meets a guy that seems to be crazy when he brings into focus our superhero's power.

He's always implicitly compared with Superman or Wolverine, who are basically immortal, and then give him a dumb weakness to try to explain why he's not totally superpowerful and he could indeed die. But immoral superheroes are the exception, most of them do can die, and over all these decades many of them did die, and came back so companies can keep selling their comics.

This is just a wasteful movie that fails to be original and ends up just being boring.
1 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Emmanuelle Beart is everything
11 February 2021
As many have said, the script is horrendous. The main character did every worst possible choices. He could just have be assertive with his "friends" to stop and that's it, and make sure his girlfriend to meet the angel and set things up. But he was able to hurt one and lose the other. And the angel behavior was just inspired on a bird, wtf.

Pass that. Emmanuelle Beart is awesome. She's the perfect angel, her expressions were pure and delicate. I'm just sad the script and direction she was put under were so bad.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
It'd have been better if it made some sense
9 February 2021
The movie starts with a lot of promise and for some time seemed to be great. But as they advance, it's like they entered on some alternative dimension or into some dream, or simply hell where they are being toyed with.

A lot of elements are present which lack explanation, like the dead body which doesn't rot.

First the stone works, then it doesn't, then it's the wrong stone, then she has to go all the way back, then they don't even bother to show her finding the stone nor show it!

It's another movie that looks like to go out of budget and they don't have time to shoot the rest of the movie and just rush it.

Shame.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Lack of explanation for the events
8 February 2021
Warning: Spoilers
What annoys me is the movie lacking explanation on what's happening. Was it bare sobrenatural? was it their imagination on times of despair?

At first time her voice was heard, my impression was that she had been trapped on the wall and was asking for help to her son without letting her husband hear, probably because he was to blame. I don't remember if it was before or after the passage about the cat being trapped alive, but it adds even more weight on this possibility.

It was for my surprise when she is being trapped just as I imagine the wife, to then she appear on her side. It was the movie climax and I was expecting everything to be explained, but nothing was.

Her falling in love for the man isn't convincible and seems forced. She begging to stay and falling in despair when he wants her gone, either. It's all too convenient when she wanna take the place of the wife, and they both just accept that.

And also the old woman, WTF.

It's also with no surprise that on the end she talks about dream. The plot is so surreal that it looks like a whole dream and nothing there is real.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
V/H/S (2012)
3/10
Lazy directors
25 January 2021
I'm giving a start to the directors for the attempt to do something completely new. When doing something so diferent as this, sometimes it will just fail, and this is one of these times.

All movies have 1 thing in common, they make us always think that something bad is around outise the camera angle and will soon attack whoever is filming. That's a very annoying feeling, specially to keep it holding almost the whole movie. It's a dumb and easy way to prepare for also dumb and easy jump scares.

In all videos, the monsters and highly badly imagined and implemented. If at least the stories were good, we could accept it as a bad budget issue, but their stories are also flat and characters and 1-dimensional. Their fast pace takes out the chance to better develop them. IDK if directors are simply out of imagination, or if they are pushed to rush the production of the movie.

The last video is the only one a bit better, but it also slips that it's rushed to end. There's rly the feeling of lazyness on producing the movie. Or maybe producers and directors simply don't care.

The last chance of make any worth of the movie is the main plot, that would fit all videos together. But director didn't even bother to properly finish this main plot. In fact, from the begining I was expecting what ended up happening. And it was so obvious that I couldn't believe it did happen.

It's the kind of movie that's so bad that you think if it was produced that way on purpose, from a bad taste director.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Expected much more
13 January 2021
Cloverfield was a great movie. 10 Cloverfield Lane was a nice movie in keeping the ambiguity of if the catastrophe was real or made by the guy, but it was too feminazi.

Now the idea of traveling to another dimension and facing the differences is good, but the execution was too bad.

All characters except the main one and unidimensional and have no background. They are wastable and we don't care for them.

Too many bad things happen with no connection of cause. They are just disconnected, as if the director or the story writer just wanted more bad things to happen to make everything sadder.

All characters are altruistic and hoping to die to save the others and all billion ppl on Earth.

And, in the end, some stuff ended with no explanation. Why did only the girl get to the ship while the rest of the crew didn't? Why did the messages of the other dimension replaced their own messages? What happened to the guy with the worms to just keep alive with them and what made him build the gun? How is the arm able to think and write, and how did it know where the gyroscope was?

All these disconnected events made the movie a mess.
0 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Mother! (2017)
7/10
Plot aims to make people debate
28 December 2020
In latest years it has been common to have movies that challenge catholics' latest centuries beliefs. Each new movie seems to try to be more and more challening.

Mother! adds to it a complicated plot that many struggle to understand. My first thoughts when I watched the movie was that it seemed to have been made by an atheist director aiming to criticize fanatism, but it seemed odd that it was also criticizing god's behavior of neglect Earth. Then I considered he's a catholic director criticizing god for letting mankind do all the mess.

I think it's both, he aims to shock both atheist and catholic audiences, maybe other religions too, on showing religion's paradoxes and how religious ppl insist on relying on their deities even when such deities don't (seem to) deserve it, while real things that we do rely on and which are great (Nature) are destroyed and desecrated.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
World War Z (2013)
1/10
Filled with flaws
30 October 2020
Warning: Spoilers
The movie starts nice with lots of action scenes. But then it goes down until that shameful ending.

I myself don't like movies where the protagonist is aiming on protect his family, that's odd, and in this movie it's even worse given the protagonist seems some kind of Mission Impossible's Ethan Hunt who left his job to live with his family, but the whole world relies on him coming back.

... just so the guy he's protecting slips and dies from the fall. WTF!

The basic purpose of the movie is a flaw. Biologists don't need to find the first infected so they can develop a cure, all they need is some samples of the virus. So, half of the movie is a waste of time looking for something useless.

Then the final hit, the deseased are able to detect if somebody has another sickness and sick ppl are invisible to them. Srsly?
1 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Shame
6 October 2020
This is indeed very disturbing. They provide no proof whatsoever on any claim they do. All descriptions they make could be invented.

What really annoys me during the whole show is how they say they loved and were loved by Michael. For many many times they had the chance to avoid him or ask to not meet him if what they claim that happened is real. Indeed, some times they do claim they asked to go meet him or stay with him, and persuaded their moms to allow. How can they 30 years later come say they were abused and their moms shouldn't have let them stay days alone with him and sleep on his bed?

Yes, ppl abused during childhood have a lot of issues on denouncing. But they themselves affirm they asked to stay and sleep with him, they themselves say they knew the sexual relation was gonna happen when they met again. How come they have kept asking to meet him and claim to have had sexual relations with him for years, begging their moms to allow them to stay, and then say they were abused?

In example, they never said it was disturbing to them, or they weren't liking but did to delight Michael, or that they asked to stop but he insisted. They don't say he ever forced them, or locked them, or threatened them.

If it did happen, it's important to have it known even if decades later. But it's too blatant to testify on court that it never happened while ppl they knew were denouncing him, and decades later say it happened to them and sue for millions.

It's too late and too inappropriate. I don't believe it happened.

And if it did happen as they said, it was consent and they liked it. Indeed what they complained about Michael is that he relegated them after some years and didn't help them on their profession as he promissed. WTF, weren't they friends? How dare them demand him to keep providing professional help just because he stopped after a while?
18 out of 40 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Bad Attitudes (1991 TV Movie)
10/10
Unforgettable
28 September 2020
I used to watch this movie many times on Sessão da Tarde, when I wasn't even able to record TV on VHS. I loved it every time, I had a crush for Angela and her hair and smile.

For 2 decades I tried to find out this movie title. Sadly it's mostly forgotten and is never on any movies list. Thankfully during another research I finally found it, then it was the journey to find the full movie to watch. I'm glad I did it, sadly with bad quality.

It's still as fun as ever, it's incredible I was still able to remember all characters and their speach. That, considering that I always watched it dubbled, and this was the first time I watched it with original voices!

It is for sure a plot for kids, as many other movies where kids outsmart adults and rule the place. Those 2 bandits are too dumb and easy to manipulate, they always do and believe whatever the kids tell them and are never any real challenge.

It's the kids characters that shine, creating a lot of fun moments. The ending is awesome, nobody can't be happy watching the outcome.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3096 Tage (2013)
7/10
A little depict on what she had to live
20 September 2020
This movie has 1:50, and still left so much from depicting. I was really interested to see if the movie would depict the rape. She had never talked about it, never confirmed or denied it. Obviously she doesn't wanna deny as it would clear him from that part, but also doesn't wanna confirm as that'd make too many journalists and public talk about the worst part of what she lived. I'm glad they made it to the movie. It's sad the movie didn't spend more time on the pre-kidnap period and what he did after she had fled. And also shown how sad the public blamed her, or depicted when she knew he had suicided and cried for him. I also don't get why some early part of the movie was dubbed, it was very odd. In general, it's a story that needs to be told and was well done on this movie.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Turning (2020)
5/10
Was bad edition sent to release?
19 September 2020
Warning: Spoilers
This is the most odd horror movie I've ever seen. As others have said on their reviews, it looks like the movie's editing had cut some relevant parts from it, maybe even changed the plot after takes had happened.

I'll try to explain what I understood, beware the spoilers.

First, I was very scared on the whole movie, acting and direction were very good and all actors did very well their characters.

This teacher Kate for no plausible reason decides to take the job as a private teacher of a very rich orphan girl who not explained why has some sort of issue and can't go to school. She just says she wanna make a difference, but how teaching for 1 girl will do that, that teaching for 25 kids won't?

All of a sudden, her brother shows up, with no previous announcement. He is young, but as the eldest heir and only man in the house, he takes some lead. He somehow gets interested on Kate, he even tries to kiss her, but then it's just gone out of the plot and forgotten.

It's said the previous teacher left without giving goodbye to anyone, then slowly it's implied she was having some trouble and ended up being killed and was trying to ask Kate for help.

There was this man Quint who's barely talked about. I believe he had an affair with that teacher, then she changed her mind and rejected him, and he forced on her, maybe raped her, and ended up killing and throwing her body on a lake. Then Mrs. Grose, instead of calling the cops, drank Quint and led him into an accident where he died. Then, dead, he restarted abusing her and tried to harass the livings as he was able to.

For most of the movie I believed that Mrs. Grose and Flora were unable to see the ghosts and were just living normally, while Kate had a little ability to see them, and Miles had a much stronger one, which allowed him secretly keep his friendship with Quint.

But when the climax arrives, all that was being developed on the plot just changed. Miles wasn't friending Quint, in fact he was under his control and influence and was unable to free himself. Mrs. Grose was indeed able to see Quint and was just ignoring/pretending, and was killed just because scriptwriter didn't know what to do with her. Flora also sees him, just to make her a possible target to him and in need of protection.

All the thriller feeling is also thrown away, as if all of a sudden the director was in a hurry to finish the movie and had to increase its pace. It's never explained why Flora was so afraid of leaving the place, there's probably none at all and that was created just to make them fleeing more dramatic, but then they just take the car and leave and nothing happens. Flora doesn't bother leaving, doesn't even cry, and Quint doesn't do anything at all to stop.

The movie would be bad enough ending like that, but at least it'd be coherent. With no transition at all, we're just thrown a few days back in time and Kate's mother is shown crazy. Mrs. Grose says to hope her disease isn't genetic and Flora asks why is Kate crazy. This implies she was indeed with some sort of psychological illness and events not depicted on the movie made everybody on the house notice that.

The last scene implies that Kate was on some sort of themed psychiatric institution with her mother. We don't know if she was visiting her, or if she was sent there after the events on the house, or if she was locked there and the whole movie was visions of her.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Lodge (2019)
8/10
Good psychological-horror, but slow paced and bad ending
17 September 2020
Warning: Spoilers
In total, I liked The Lodge. It's always good to have an horror movie with no jump scares and a complex pot.

It's due to that complex plot that half the movie just looks the inverse of a dramatic comedy, developing the characters under a tense situation of 2 kids not wanting to get closer to the girlfriend of their divorced father, getting it even harder after their mother suicides when knowing they were gonna marry.

When we had already forgotten this is an horror movie, finally the plot starts, and that's when it gets pretty good. We don't know what's really happening, and under confuse clues we follow the characters as they try to understand what's happening in the house and if they are dead or alive.

Sadly, the ending is among the worst I had seen. It should have told if she kills the kids, or they flee, or they stop her. It shouldn't have left for us to imagine.

That other house Grace finds, showing a guy inside, also made no sense at all and not explaining it just broke the movie's logic. It seems just a plot tool to make Grace get back and believe she was trapped.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Luna caliente (2009)
2/10
Globo version is much better
16 July 2020
The girl actress isn't pretty, and she fails to be sensual. Globo's edition with Ana Paula Tabalipa is way better, she's sensual and mysterious, she looks pure, fragile, innocent. Here, the girl just seems to want sex and have no man around to satisfy her.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
It's better than Mario movie
14 July 2020
I came to watch this with very little expectations. For the tradition of game adaptations being bad and for the 2019 fiasco. They redesigned Sonic and reprocessed all his animations, but I was doubting they'd reshot all human scenes and therefore any flaw on plot would remain.

The good points is that there's no huge plot flaw and there are many fun references to Sonic games and other games. Jim Carey as the top actor also didn't took the attraction of the movie, which kept focused on Sonic and his relation to Tom.

In the end, this movie convinced, it's not bad. But there are still too many bad points. There are changes on the game plot, as Sonic having lived most of his life on Earth, there's Longclaw who never existed on the game.

So many new elements were added and so few elements from the games were used, that it becomes basically a generic movie about a generic cartooned animal who can talk and has special powers that makes friendship with a generic human, who starts not believing he exists, then decides to help him on a burden, to then take him as his best friend. It's the generic plot used for weak main characters who the wide casual public wouldn't like by himself and needs a human partner to represent this public meeting that main character and being skeptic so enough events can happen to get them closer until the partner and the public get to love him.

The plot is also slightly inspired on Superman's plot, of an alien with superpowers that flees to Earth and has to hide so he's not captured. All this makes Sonic games seem too weak and superficial to be able to fit on a movie, which is a shame. This seems to be the inheritance of original production team, who knew nothing about Sonic and didn't care to.

Will they make the promised sequel? Well they do make lots of signs that they want the franchise to have it and maybe become a trilogy or more. This movie was made to be episode 0, showing Eggman's past and how he met Sonic. Episode 1 will probably be him learning how to travel to other dimensions and becoming a a threat to the whole multiverse, while Sonic's homeland has some issue to be solved, which brings him back home to save it and fight Robotinik. If episode 1 is done, I hope that Eggman also captures all animals from there to fuel his machines and Sonic has to save them. I wonder if they'd take Tom with him, as his best friend, or if Miles would take that spot. I don't see how they both would fit together.

Episode 2 would probably bring the echidnas as new enemy with Eggman coming back, following Sonic 3 plot of Knucles starting as enemy to become friend.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Disney didn't know what to do with Star Wars
13 July 2020
What happened here is pretty simple. George Lucas had finished his work and was sad on bad critics about his prequel and remaster, so he decided to never do anymore work on Star Wars. Being he finished with it, he had a top valued franchise on his hands and sold it to anybody willing to pay. Disney executives had much more money than they could handle and decided to take the chance.

Now Disney has the property and needs to return the investment and profit from it. Of course they'd make a sequel trilogy, and bring back all old actors. But what story would they use, if episode 6 had finished it all and it was well publicly known that George wasn't willing to make any continuation?

They could have explored the extended past of the lore, but then they'd be unable to bring back original actors. They decided then to create new characters: a new villain child of Han and Leia, a new villain boss, and a new hero coming from apparent nowhere.

These characters were just too bad written, and too much based on original ones. The gender switch became too obvious, new pets are too forced, and whole plot was written to be finished on future movies, but it was later changed and never finished as intended.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Ad Astra (2019)
2/10
Weak plot breaks the whole movie
29 February 2020
Warning: Spoilers
I understand director's intent was to show a realistic space travel. But that didn't mean its plot had to be so bad and boring. Take in example Interstellar, which was fully supported by our knowledge of physics and had huge effort to make its worlds plausible, and has an awesome plot.

During most of the movie we're presented to this odd situation, of a space crew who went on the most challenging endeavor of its time and remained so decades to come, and then just lost communication, to decades later start throwing anti-matter beams directly into Earth. We figure that something's wrong, and the only way to find out the truth would be to travel there.

We have this son-father situation, which is the deepest the movie can get. We're told that for some odd reason the authorities are trying to communicate with the father and has no response. Instead of considering some malfunction, for some reason they believe he's denying communication and hiding, and that maybe if he receive messages from his son he'll answer.

Then all of a sudden the messages are aborted and Roy, the son, is meant to be sent back to Earth. During that crisis, added to the common pirates, I kept wondering why any travel between Earth, Moon and Mars would be happening. We're then told that the ship's captain simply had available with her a top secret video, of the father communicating that part of his crew had mutined and he'd killed them and the innocent together, just before he cut communication. We're never explained what happened for them stopping sending messages, did the father replied? how did they find him afterall?

Then another implausible security breach, Roy just manages to get inside the ship just during its launch! How could the security be so bad, even more with pirates around?! And why did the captain help him get there, what was she expecting to achieve? And how could be possible a single action, even by accident, kill the whole crew? Didn't control have any means of taking control of the ship and stop it?

Anyway, Roy was on the travel and I expected to have most of the questions answered when he got there. But only thing we're given is that the anti-matter beams were due to some malfunction on the ship and the father claimed to be trying to fix it. And that's it. Oh yeah, and that he had found no sign of life, which led to crew wanting to go back to Earth, and this was the "mutiny" that made him kill them all, because he didn't wanna go back.

And finally the father accepted allow Roy destroy the ship and go back, with no resistance. All he decided to do was to not go back with him, and instead go drift on Neptune's orbit.

The ship is destroyed, Roy gets back to Earth, he's greeted by some military, who seems to not arrest him after all he had done, and then the movie ends, like that. WTF. The few answers we get are flat and with no creativity, and most are just left gone, no effort at all to explain anything.

Don't waste your time, not even the special effects are worth it.
6 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Blue Lagoon: The Awakening (2012 TV Movie)
2/10
A shame to original movies
6 February 2020
Warning: Spoilers
I don't bother they wanting to create a new version of the movie aimed into new generation and to teens. I also don't bother they changing the feeling of the movie, making it feel just like a dream or a vacation, and that everything turns normal after they are rescued.

The problem here is that characters are unidimensional and not plausible. The girl is the cliche popular one, the guy is the cliche nerd introspective one.

The actor has too much developed muscles for the lifestyle the character would have. If he'd do bodybuilding, he'd naturally wanna stay around people to show his body, not at home alone.

I can accept them not having much trouble living on the island. But they had a very deep and long experience there, to when rescued the girl just get back to her original life. After living with him for 100 days, giving him her virginity, and having sex all the time and swimming naked with him, it's not plausible she'd just ignore him and pay attention to her friends. She should either bring him together, or go closer to him. When she finally did that, the movie became even worse, because she would have done it before instead of avoiding him.

Finally, Blue Lagoon is a movie the depicts teens living alone, discovering love and sex, with some artistical nude scenes that depict natural and innocent lifestyle, lightly referencing naturists. In both original movies, the actress was underaged, and on second movie Milla Jovovich did show her real boobs with no dublee.

Here there's no nude scene, and it's even worse as Indiana Evans was 21 at the time.

This movie is just a shame to the franchise. If they wanted to make a new movie, they should have stick with original traditions.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
12 Monkeys (1995)
4/10
Lack of coherence
29 January 2020
Warning: Spoilers
I see many people love this movie, I don't see why. It has some huge star actors, yes, but that doesn't make a movie good.

First half of it, it's so boring that I kept stopping to go do other things, and it took me 2 days to finish it.

When the movie finally gets running, I notice some incoherences on it. Cole is sent way too the past, and there's no explanation on why. Ok, I can live with this, but then he goes on a mental institution. Why in the world would he tell anybody about the apocalyptic future and that he's in the past? And who pays the bills for him to be interned? He doesn't seem to have committed any crime to be locked as a dangerous crazy criminal. I understand that, from meta, the basis for the movie is that a supposed crazy guy locked on some institution would be in fact somebody from the future warning about it, but there still needs to be a reason for him to be locked.

Then, he starts repeating that he can't change the past and can't stop the event from happening. Again, if he's not willing to undo it or warn about it, why then talk about it to anybody at all? Why take the risk?

And when things finally start making some sense, they discover who the actual terrorist is, and tries to stop him. But wouldn't that be impossible? I personally don't like this hypothesis that somebody traveling to the past is unable to change it. If that's the case, then traveling to the past would be the actual impossibility. If somehow a person can go back, he can do whatever he's able to, and with some minimal information he should indeed be able to change things and influence people. But, anyway, if in the movie that's impossible, then why try? If it's impossible, he could be just close to the terrorist, and still some mystical thing would happen and he'd fail. He just got himself killed for nothing.

Finally, the future organization that handles everything seems to be reasonably well organized on the past. They have some minimal company with a phone that records messages from people they send, they are able to find Cole from a call he did 30 years ago. Hey, the world almost ended, remaining mankind had to move underground, and still they have records of all calls done and are able to track where those calls come from? If they have this structure, why not use it to effectively track the terrorists and stop them?

No, they are more worried to spend their resources hunting Cole, than to hunt the terrorist who caused everything, or at least the original virus.

Last one, they say that the original virus mutated, and they need the original one to find a cure. From the little knowledge I have about biology, that makes no sense at all. First, if a virus mutates, the cure for its original form may stop working, not the opposite. Second, the pre-mutated virus shouldn't be needed to find a cure for the current one. Third, the few survivors should be immune from the virus, so why were they forced to move underground? Civilization should be a mess, yes, but they should be able to breath pretty fine the contaminated air.
2 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Arrival (II) (2016)
1/10
Frustration and shame for all linguists
28 January 2020
I'm deeply frustrated with this movie. It seemed to be original, but they really missed it.

Its main character is a linguist. Earth is visited by an unknown alien fleet that lands in a dozen places around the globe, just like in Independence Day. For some reason, they travel to Earth and land, open a hatch so humans are allowed to enter their ships, but aren't prepared to communicate with mankind at all, they just stay still.

Louise is called to try to communicate with them. Everybody in the world were failing in any attempt, and all she has to do is show them a board with a word written on it, and they decide to also start providing writings. Haven't anybody on the world tried that before?!

What really made me mad with this movie, is that together with her they called a mathematician. But he, instead of obviously asking to use basic math to communicate with them - it's believed to be the common universal language, that any intelligent life form would understand -, he tells her to ask them herself some complex math questions, like if they are able to travel faster than light. He looked so dumb, and was immediately forgotten in the plot.

The ending is also very dumb. For no apparent reason, a chinese general decides to declare war against them and other countries to follow him, and she becomes a world hero just because she phones this general and convinces him to give up.

That's it, seriously!
1 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Ex Machina (2014)
7/10
Great ideas and plot twist, but disappointing
17 January 2020
Warning: Spoilers
This movie is very well done. From early while watching it, I felt that maybe Caleb was being deceived. I thought that maybe Nathan had created the context for him to sympathise with Ava, and the blackouts were created by him to make Caleb feel more immersed as he'd think he was talking in private with her. I was astonished as the matter was brought up by Caleb!

It was also nice as Caleb questioned Nathan, the reason why she was female, if she was being sweet and seductive to him as a way to increase the empathy and the feeling she was alive, and how Nathan questioned back if she was indeed interested in him or deceiving it.

Even when she told Caleb to not trust Nathan, I considered he programmed her to do so, to create even more intimacy. Maybe the real test was if Ava would be able to make Caleb fall in love for her, and not just feel she's alive. Having her locked up and the feeling of a hidden plot would be made up, to make him believe she was in danger and that he needed to save her.

Sadly, the movie moved into a dark and unrealistic direction. Nathan had no reason to keep his robots locked in a room, even more when he's on a private island. If they'd be seen, it'd be easy to say they were his employees. Indeed, I missed the part he said Kyoko was a japanese servant that didn't know english and noticed from beginning she was a robot.

If a robot would fret wanting to leave, he could just disable it and reprogram it to not act like that. He'd not be out of control of their decisions and desires like that, and would never let them break themselves. And, if at some point anything went out of control, he'd add measures to not let it happen again, in example remotely turn off a robot. When Ava left the room, he'd not need to fight her, he'd just shut her off remotely.

I understand that Ava letting Caleb locked was a point script writer wanted to make, that she wasn't in love or interested on him, that she was indeed deceiving him when flirting and seducing, to make him deeply wanna help her, and show her with a psychopath personality. That's interesting, because psychopaths are able to understand and express feelings, but they are unable to actually feel them. That fits perfectly on an AI, that learns to understand and express emotions, even the most complex ones, but remains unable to feel them.

Still, I think that if she's that way, she'd either kill Caleb so he couldn't take an opportunity to stop her (maybe, when he'd see she killed Nathan, he'd see her as a threat and rethink releasing her), or keep lying and flee with him so he'd keep helping and protecting her.

In any way, Ex Machina is a fair above the average movie, certainly worth watching a few times, and brought up some very interesting themes to the automated AI philosophy.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed