Reviews

9 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
An atmospheric, blackly comic look at celebrity obsession
22 June 2013
Sofia Coppola is one of the most interesting and divisive filmmakers working today. It seems that with every new film she releases there's always a wide array of responses, both positive and negative. And that's very true with her new film, The Bling Ring. Some love it, and some loathe it. I personally enjoyed it very much, and the more I think about it, the more I like it and would maybe even see it again. It's an interesting and atmospheric look at American celebrity and media culture that bleakly shows how we can think being rich and famous can make us "happy."

The film is based on a Vanity Fair article about how in 2008, a group of Californian teenagers (4 girls & 1 boy) stole millions-of-dollars worth of clothing and jewelry and possessions from celebrities such as Paris Hilton, Orlando Bloom, Megan Fox, and others. It's a stranger-than- fiction kind of story that could lend itself to exploitation, satire, or even heavy-handed moralizing, but Coppola distances herself from the lurid material and simply displays it as a set of facts. It's a cold, deadpan film, but there's several fascinating moments of insight and darkly funny commentary that make it interesting. It's been compared to Harmony Korine's similar film "Spring Breakers," which also features several young girls trying to experience the media's view of what a fun Spring Break is. Whereas that film is knowingly repetitive in its dialogue and images and very violent and exploitative to get its point across, Coppola goes for a more restrained and almost documentary type of style. In fact, there's several instances where the main action is interrupted and we see scenes of the characters being interviewed after the events or TMZ-like celebrity news stories.

The Bling Ring is benefited by its central young actors who give strong, naturalistic performances that feel so live-in that they give an improvisational feel. The leaders of the Bling Ring are Marc (Israel Broussard) and Rebecca (Katie Chang). Marc is the quiet, insecure gay kid who soon is taken under the wing of Rebecca, who's troubled yet confident and cold-as-ice. Broussard is charming and subtly sympathetic and Chang is hyper-perceptive, smart, and cold but not without a conscience. There's Chloe (Claire Julien), the loud and outgoing one in the group. Then there's sisters Sam (Taissa Farmiga) and Nicki (Emma Watson). It's interesting seeing Watson in a supporting role since she's arguably the most famous out of the central gang, but it pays off because of Nicki's larger-than-life, self-absorbed Valley Girl personality. Watson is the scene-stealer of the film with her smart and satirical performance that never goes over-the-top and always feels real, which makes the character that much more misguided and tragic. It's early to say something like this, but it's a performance that deserves some Best Supporting Actress recognition. Also very good and inspired here is the always funny Leslie Mann, who plays the flighty mom of Sam and Nicki and teaches them the ever so spiritual teachings of "The Secret." There's a scene near the end of the film between Watson and Mann that is just pure, dark comedy gold.

The plot mostly consists of the gang clubbing, breaking into houses, driving around, and trying on clothes. It sounds repetitive, and well, technically it is. But Coppola distinguishes each break-in with its own tone and style and you can very subtly see how the characters change as they become more and more comfortable with invading the houses. For example, the break-in of Audrina Patridge's house is all done in one, long take from outside, across the street as Marc and Rebecca rummage through all her things and run from room-to-room and eventually leave. Another break-in finds Sam cluelessly waving around Megan Fox's pistol without a care in the world. And one of the film's most telling and haunting shots comes when the gang is inside Lindsay Lohan's house and Rebecca stares at the mirror and smiles so genuinely that it almost seems like that's the happiest she's ever been. It's a truly disturbing and haunting moment and the film is full of subtle images that let you into the characters' psyche and ego.

But the glue that holds the film together is the dynamic between Marc and Rebecca. There's several poignant and moving moments between the two characters that cut through the film like a knife and let you into the ultimately empty and sad feelings the two characters have. Their scenes and dialogue are so sharply drawn that it reminds you just how gifted of a writer Coppola is as well.

So this movie just worked for me. It's not a film that's trying to dig deep into it's subject, and it's not even really interested in telling you all of the details about this group of young robbers. It's ultimately this odd, off-kilter tone poem that's beautiful to look at and at times surprisingly poignant and hilarious. (And lastly I'd like to mention the great and legendary work of cinematographer Harris Savides, who, during shooting this film, passed away from brain cancer. The film is dedicated to him.)
97 out of 143 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A Separation (2011)
10/10
A Complex Masterpiece.
14 March 2012
'A Separation' is quite simply one of the best films I think I've ever seen. Its a film you can't think stop thinking about, and it seems to live with you afterwards.

The film opens with a married couple filing for divorce. Their names are Nader and Simin. Simin, the wife, wants to leave Iran to go to American with their daughter Termeh. She states that she doesn't want her daughter growing up in "the circumstances" of Iran. Nader, the husband, says he can't leave because his ill-father still lives with them in Iran. Right in the opening scene, we as the audience are already forced into a challenging moral dilemma. This is the one of many moral questions we are asked during 'A Separation.'

Soon Simin goes to live with her mother, and Nader and Termeh stay in their house. To look out for his father, Nader hires Razieh, a devout follower of Islam who belongs to a lower class. One day when Nader and Termeh come home, they find Nader's father on the ground tied to the bed. Soon Razieh returns to the house. Nader forces Razieh and her daughter out of his house.

Now it may clearly seem that Razieh is in the wrong. But there is still so much to learn about the characters and the mysteries revolving around this simple event. We learn that Razieh had a miscarriage, and Nader is accused of murdering her unborn child when he forced her out of the house. She claims Nader pushed her and she fell down the steps.

'A Separation' is a very character-driven film, but one thing special about it is its original narrative. We don't see all of what happens, and new pieces of information pop up organically and in inventive ways. 'A Separation' almost plays out as some sort of murder-mystery.

In this film, there are no heroes or villains. These are just flawed everyday people. Asghar Farhadi does a great job of bouncing sympathy between his characters. At one point in the film, you may feel strongly about one character, but when you learn something important about them, you feel a different way. Everything is grey. There's no simplicity. And that is why 'A Separation' is a complex masterpiece. Its a film that forces you to determine what you think what is right, and what is wrong.
15 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Party Down (2009– )
10/10
One of the very best comedies to ever air on television
23 January 2012
Its a real shame that the very best shows that ever aired on television got canceled so soon. Shows such as 'Arrested Development' and 'Freaks and Geeks.' 'Party Down' is another one of those shows. So smart, funny, innovative, yet, gets yanked off the air because of low ratings. Sad.

'Party Down' revolves around a party-catering company. The structure of the show is very simple yet effective. Each episode takes place at a certain event with certain types of people. This gives each eccentric character a chance to interact with all of the party guests in so many awkward, unusual, and flat-out hilarious ways.

A major theme of 'Party Down' is young people trying to have breakthroughs and make it into the film industry. They want so badly to become noticed, yet, they work for others every week and have no satisfaction. This is one of the many genius pathos that drive this very thoughtful comedy.

As a whole, 'Party Down,' obviously, was very underrated. But something very underrated is the cast of the show. 'Party Down' has one of the very best comedic ensembles I've seen on TV. The main character is Henry, played by Adam Scott. Henry is a very hopeless and apathetic actor who made it somewhat big with a famous catch-phrase on a beer commercial. Now, though, he can't seem to find his breakthrough, so to get by, he works for the Party Down company as a bartender, but has no interest in it at all. Adam Scott is one of the very best young and comedic actors around. He plays the part very subtle and small, making the character really speak to us. He plays the 'straight-man' to all of the eccentric characters, yet he has this relaxed humor that doesn't come off as over-the-top. Scott's performance reminds me a lot of Jason Batmane's in 'Arrested Development.'

The supporting characters here are all so interesting and wonderfully weird. There's Casey, a character who's very similar to Henry. She's a comedian trying to strike it big and Lizzy Caplan plays the role very subtle but has a biting delivery as well. Her and Scott's chemistry is something so sweet and honest to watch. Ken Marino plays Ron, a character who's so cringe-worthy but yet so addictive and funny. Ron is the company's leader who we learn used to be into drugs. He becomes clean, and now parades around his coworkers making sure they know just how much of a good person he is. Ron is a good person, but he's so painfully honest and does everything for the best of his team, which takes the character into some hilarious situations. There's Roman played by Martin Starr. Roman is a character who reminds me of Dwight Schrute from 'The Office.' He's very nerdy, intense, but yet kind of driven. Roman is a science-fiction screenwriter hoping to get noticed. He's very eccentric and makes for some very funny moments. There's Kyle, played by Ryan Hansen. Kyle is your typical Hollywood pretty boy actor. An actor who may become famous just because of his long blonde hair and good looks. He thinks he has talent, but is so oblivious to what he really is. Then lastly there's Jane Lynch as Constance and Megan Mullally as Lydia. Both of these actresses and characters are very similar. They are very big comedic performances that offer some scene-stealing moments. These characters are the oldest ones of the group, and play as each young person's mentor. These actresses are obviously two hilarious and very talented women, and both of these characters are so wonderfully weird.

'Party Down' has a very quiet, subtle, and smart sense of humor. Its very character-driven, which is something you don't get quiet often. The situations and pathos in each episode are very true and seem so real. 'Party Down' is also filmed in a very interesting way for a comedy as well. Its basically a hand-held camera, but the filming techniques here simple and effective. The directors let each scene roll in a relaxed way so each actor/actress can really let loose with their lines and get really creative with their characters.

The complete series, which consists of only 20 episodes, is available on Netflix. If you're into intelligent comedy with real, interesting characters, 'Party Down' is something you should experience.
11 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Breathtaking.
12 June 2011
Warning: Spoilers
Where to start. Well to explain this very complex film, I'll just start by explaining the story. The story is about a man (Sean Penn) who is unsure of himself, his faith, his existence in this world. This set-up is so easily done that right away, just by the way Penn moves and looks, you already know the central plot. But this wonder of his character brings up two major stories of the film. In the beginning, you hear voices such as "why are we here" (that's not exactly what is said, but something very similar explaining why...) So around 30-45 minutes is really images, with voice overs that make you think. Some critics and people complain that this part of the film, which includes evolution and dinosaurs, and nature's beginning is not needed in the film, and doesn't connect with Jack's childhood (the other part of the film). I strongly disagree. I think ultimately, Jack is trying to wonder "why" about everything. And the beginning of time sums this up in more of a big- picture way. But nevertheless, this part of the film is amazing. The visuals are stunning, and because of this, I recommend seeing the movie IN theaters.

So the next half of the film is about Jack's childhood from the 50's. This is where the performances of Brad Pitt and Jessica Chastain shine. This part of the film explores the O'Brien family. It shows the three boys (Sean Penn's character as a child is the oldest of the bunch) adventuring around in Texas. And it shows the parenting of Mr. and Mrs. O'Brien, which also explains why Jack wonders "why" about everything. Brad Pitt plays the strict and stern father. Very old-fashioned. But this character is not a monster at all. He's a loving father, but tries to show his boys right from wrong, but doesn't quite know how to express it without being aggressive. Brad Pitt gives a fantastic performance, and probably his best in his career. Jessica Chastain plays the graceful, protective mother. She's equally as loving as the father. But here she is much more passive. Not a bad parent at all, but always remains calm. There's a scene in which Jack throws a rock into a garage of someone's garage, then when Mrs. O'Brien finds out, she tells him not to ever do it again, while if it was Mr. O'Brien who found out, he may just lash out on Jack. Then even Jack asks if she will tell his father what happened. But Jessica Chastain really does a terrific job here. She doesn't have too many lines at all. And this is a film not relied on screenplay that much, so really no one has a ton of lines, so that shows how little she speaks. But that shows the difference between her and her Brad Pitt, who is always first to parent and teach the children. But Jessica is mostly heard in soft-spoken voices. But its her body language that speaks in volumes. In a memorable scene, Mr. O'Brien just got done punishing one of the children after they asked him to be quiet while the family was having dinner. In that scene, you immediately see her grab one of the children to protect him. But after, when her and him are in the kitchen, you can just tell she's mad at him. Then she turns around and shoves her face into his face and tries to show him what he's doing to their children. She really doesn't say any words here, but just the way she moves is so graceful, and effortless.

Well either way, this a really a thought-provoking film. After seeing it, you will be a little confused on how to feel. But for days to come, you'll constantly be thinking about every moment, and what everything means. This is a film that is certainly not for everyone though. Its not totally for the casual independent film junkie. Its for people that want to think. Who will enjoy the film's artsy visual flare, and also want to be challenged with deep-thought while watching this film. Even if you're not sure about seeing it, I think you should just try it. Its very beneficial to watch. And this is a beautiful film anyway. Bottom line: this is a film that will be discussed for years to come, and should be appreciated in the history of American cinema.
6 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
once in a lifetime...
2 May 2011
Warning: Spoilers
Sofia Coppola's "lost in translation" is a beautiful film. Everything about it is just so great. Its about an againg actor Bob Harris (Bill Murray), an actor out of his prime, not sure about life, about to shoot a commercial in Tokyo for whiskey. Bill Murray amazed me when I saw this film. I really didn't know that he could have this type of emotional range. Bob Harris is a character similar to Bill Murray, but Bill Murray makes his character so original, funny, and likable. Bob eventually meets a young woman named Charlotte (played by Scarlett Johanson). Like Bob, Charlotte is a person not sure of their life, and what they want to be. Charlotte tags along with her husband, who she jumped into a marriage with, while he shoots a music video in Tokyo. Scarlett Johanson really defined herself as an actress here. She got snubbed for Best Actress at the Oscars (she wasn't even nominated). She is a very curious woman stuck in a glass cage, wanting to discover life, then she eventually does when she meeets Bob.

The story is very simplistic, but the dialog is so masterful that its entertaining at all times. Sofia Coppola is a great artist. Her screenpplay earned her an Oscar, which was very much deserved. Its full of realistic and thought-provoking dialog, and funny written parts, and its just a great screenplay. Sofia Coppola is an equally great director as a writer. She is a much more art house, independent director. She has an always moving camera, steadily moving though, and uses beautiful placement in her scenes. I love the part where Charlotte is looking out the window. The camera starts on her, then moves to the window, looking out onto the massive metropolis of Tokyo, and you really feel what she is feeling. The part where Bob is in the hot tub talking to his wife on the phone is another part where it just ties you in so much. And I don't know, the whole film is a poetic and beautiful work of art. And lastly the ending. For sure one of the best endings ever. (SPOILER!) Bob goes to say goodbye to Charlotte while she is walking around, then Bob whispers something to her, and you can't exactly hear it. It was such an impressive technique there. It really made you see how close they were, and whatever they said, its between them. And then right after, the two hug and kiss, and you see tons of people walking around them, but you're focusing directly on Bob and Charlotte, because there, is where so much heart and emotion is. Either way, great film.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Office: Goodbye, Michael (2011)
Season 7, Episode 21
10/10
A Silent and Superb send-off to the World's Best Boss.
28 April 2011
Warning: Spoilers
This is probably the best episode of the season yet. Compared to the other seasons, this one has been just alright. It hasn't hit me on a very funny, smart, or emotional level. Its still good though, and I have seen every episode of this great show. Well either way, I thought this was such a smart and different send-off. It was really something you wouldn't expect from a comedy show, or even a drama, or any show in that case.

The main premise of the show was focusing on Michael. He printed out a list of everyone who worked in the office with him, and wanted to say goodbye to them in special ways. These moments were very touching, and even funny, especially with Oscar. And it also showed that Michael was not ready to cause any drama. Especially when he wants to say goodbye to Kelly, and she's on her phone and ignoring him, then he leaves. That was pretty much how his character was today, very calm, very quiet. This episode also had some very smart ideas to it. I enjoyed the interview with Dwight, him reading Michael's letter, being very sarcastic because he is mad at him, then the camera zooms in on him. Then when him and Michael play paintball, and how the camera sits far away, as we see two close friends have fun for one last time together. Another great scene which blew me away in such a small way was when Kevin, Jim, and Pam are eating in the breakroom, and Michael is in there also, and as the three blabber away, the camera zooms in on Michael, realizing that he is truly going to miss these people. Another great subtle part was when Michael, just as he's about to leave, looks at everyone working and going about in the office. The camera just sat there for a couple seconds. And lastly, that final ending. The whole time, I was really hoping that Pam and him would catch up, and I literally almost cried when he leaves, and then Pam arrives at the office right as he left. But that airport sequence was genius. Another great technique was how it cut out the sound at the part. When Michael is about to board his plane to Colorado, he says "finally get to get this off my chest," referring to the microphone, then the sound becomes less clear, but you hear him murmur his last "that's what she said" joke. Then the camera stays, as you see him walking towards the plain, about to board it then Pam comes running out to say goodbye. It caught me so off guard, but it was so great. You see them saying goodbye, but you can't exactly hear what they're saying. Such a great part. It reminded me of the end of "lost in translation" so much. Then that final shot, where the camera is behind Pam's side, and you see her, looking up at Michael's plane, as he leaves for a new life.

This show was superb. Very emotional and smart, and yet very subtle. I liked that it chose not to make a huge deal of Michael's departure in the plot. It took a more quiet turn, and it showed Michael's transformation as a person. In pretty much seasons 1 - 6, he would be making a huge deal out of him leaving, or anyone leaving in that case ("Goodbye Toby" season 4 finale). But Steve Carrell really pulled it off here. He showed that his character, on the outside, is somewhat a pathetic goofball that needs to be liked and is very crude and obnoxious, but at heart, Carrell showed that all along, Michael Scott was a man looking for a stable life, with a nice wife, and "100's of children so that they can all be his friends." He complains about this throughout the series, and finally, in this excellent send-off of Michael, it all came true.
270 out of 275 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Office (2005–2013)
Subtle, dry, smart, heartfelt, and brilliant
22 March 2011
Warning: Spoilers
"The Office" is really one of the best TV shows ever. First off, the acting is so superb. Steve Carell is so crude and funny as Michael, the boss. Rainn Wilson is so weird and a very good, quirky character as Dwight. Jenna Fischer is also very good as smart, clever Pam. And John Krasinski is also plays a great supporting role as confident Jim. One thing that this show does that I love is it develops all of the other characters. Its a very quirky show, and all of the different characters have different things about them that can be bold, but you learn to like them, and each supporting character is some-what likable and funny. Ensemble acting.

Some people who don't get the mockumentary concept of the show dislike the shaky camera, but it really gives the attitude that powers the show. The show is about a documentary crew that tapes average days of the employees of Dunder Mifflin: Scranton branch. The shaky camera gives you that documentary effect, but they also make it some-what stylized in that way by not making it completely dull. So while it may not be the most visually attracting directing, its for sure one of the best works of directing because its realistic.

The show has superb writing. Just such weird, quirky, and funny dialog. Also the events that are written out are very hilarious and come naturally, and aren't just ideas thrown in. The writing heavily depends on the actors, and because of that, it shines. But it also strikes up emotional themes too. One major one is the friendship/relationship of Jim and Pam. Just everything there is so very heartfelt, real, and brilliant Great.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Beautiful, disturbing, funny, haunting, classic.
19 March 2011
Warning: Spoilers
Stanely Kubrick's "A Clockwork Orange" is his best work, and one of the best movies ever made. One big "thing" about this movie that really makes it a landmark film in history is its content. This movie is really rated 'R'. Explicit sex, rape, and sadistic violence. This doesn't make the movie good, but in the 70's when it was released, it shocked everyone, and was even withdrawn from England. This really shows Stanley Kubrick's fearless directing. So that's a big reason why its known as a landmark film. But as a movie itself, its flawless. Malcom Mcdowell (who should've been nominated for Best Actor when released) gives such a chilling portrayal of a disturbed young man. In the beginning, just the his voice overs give you the chills, and with dialouge, he again is so chilling. Then towards the conclusion, he shows his transformation, and is so vulnerable. Classic performance in film history. Next, Stanley Kubrick's directing is so beautiful, and yet, disturbing. This movie really introduced deep psychological themes, and many movies were not advanced like it at that time in the 70's. Next, Stanley Kubrick is just such an innovative director. His directing gives his movies just such a visual attraction. He just uses so many techniques and made this film so creative and groundbreaking for any movie at that time. This movie has such a great screenplay too, also written by Stanley Kubrick. The screenplay has such great narration by Alex. It delivers his madness and thoughts in such a casual way, that that becomes the attitude of the film, and you get comfortable with it. It also has great dialouge. It also is very "weird" and not super realistic, but Stanley Kubrick constructs this future society so easily that the dialouge comes so naturally. It also blends a very sadistic form of dark humor. Along with being a sci-fi psychological movie, it also is known as a dark-comedy. And so this makes this screenplay very fresh and smart. So I love this movie. Its definitely one of my favorites. While some older movies can feel kind of out-dated, this movie is just so advanced and really original that it will really always be mentioned as a strong part of movie history. 10 out of 10 stars
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Another Year (2010)
10/10
Best film of 2010
14 March 2011
Warning: Spoilers
This was such an amazing movie, and my personal favorite of the year. The movie relied on mostly dialogue and acting, which it did greatly. Mike Leigh just had the camera focused on a small area for a couple of minutes while smart dialouge and great acting was portrayed, giving the film its more human attitude and tone. And the acting was excellent. Jim Broadbent was great as Tom, who kind of has that dry sense of humor and is just a genuinely nice guy. Ruth Sheen was as equally as great as Gerri, showing care and empathy for Mary, and always being there for her. But Lesley Manville is the most impressive performance here. She plays Mary, the friend of Tom and Gerri. She is older, not married, no children, and still emotionally searching. Very fragile, and needy. Lesley Manville was excellent. Next, the screenplay. This earned the film its only Oscar nomination, and it was well deserved. Truly smart, sad, witty, screenplay which makes this story of everyday people so complex and interesting. It develops each character well. And Mike Leigh's directing was also excellent. He has a style of having his actors doing the work. For example, Tom and Gerri getting the door for Mary, and the camera just sits there, as the actors work together so beautifully. This film (which deserved other Oscar nominations such as Best Actress and Best Picture) wasn't nominated as much because its a much more smaller movie, with a small story about everyday people. After seeing it, I went through every Best Picture nominated movie and compared it to "Another Year" and I really think it was better than everyone. This movie is just much smaller, and very subtle. (Spoiler) So to wrap it up, I have to say that this movie had the best ending of the year. The way the camera starts at Tom at the dinner table, then pans over to John and Kate together, then behind Gerri, then infront, then eventually goes over to Tom again, then lastly to Mary, who at the time is a mess. The way the volume is cut out, and focuses on her, its so amazing, and it makes it one of the most thought-provoking moments in film that I have ever seen.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed