Reviews

The simple fact is, if I could vote 0/10 for this film I would. I thought the Hangover Part 1 was quite bad, but had some funny moments so I thought I'd give Hangover Part 2 a chance... Oh, how foolish.

This film has the SAME concept as the original with the added benefit of being dreadfully written. If there was ever a film where they went 'Hey, the first one made a fair whack of money. Lets rush out a second without writing a decent script for a pay day' then this is that film. Saddest part is it was a smash at box office which makes me question people's senses of humour if this is funny to them.

In the duration of the full film I laughed once, and it wasn't even a real laugh, it was more of a cringe worthy laugh. The acting is... *thinks of a non-offensive word* ...appalling. The whole scenario of which is film is based is retarded. The script should of been burnt.

I will say one thing that this movie did do well at... And that is having people use their hard earned money to watch this garbage. It would of been betting just to throw it it in a wishing well. Maybe you still can and wish you never watched this film; I shall.

Drama set in London about two friends and their gang trying to get rich the only way they know how; selling drugs. The cast is a mix of actors and grime artists such as Kano and Scorcher all of whom are from gang London so they know how the character should be therefore giving their characters true realism. The shows gives an inside look into London gang lifestyle on the estates of London and how kids become 'shotters' for the more notorious people on the estates. Each episode of Top Boy has a gripping storyline which keeps you wanting more; one millions viewers for a urban C4 show cannot be wrong. Not only is the acting good, but the soundtrack is phenomenal, showcasing a lot of London grime artists.

Two and a Half Men with Charlie Sheen is was, if not, the funniest sitcom on TV, and easily one of the best ever made. Charlie Sheen and Jon Cryer together was a match made in sitcom heaven, whilst Angus also added a lot, especially when he was a child.

Ever since they thought it was necessary and they could not forgive him, they got rid of Charlie Sheen and completely ruined the show. Ashton Kutcher isn't a good actor, hes mediocre at best and plays the role bad. He isn't no Charlie Sheen, and it shows. Ever since Sheen left, they have been trying to bring in jokes, that just don't work without his dry and sarcastic humour, Kutcher isn't of the same acting pedigree of Sheen.

This show is actually one of the best sci-fi shows I've watched, and this is coming from someone who usually hates sci-fi themed shows. The show is getting the same negative reviews about how it's been done, clichés, bad special effects and bad acting, which is just narrow minded. This show reminds me of Lost set in the dinosaur era. The acting is decent, the special effects are just as good as anything else and the clichés... what clichés? So you're telling me if one thing has been done then it can't be done again? We might as well watch a blank TV screen if we cant make new shows with similarities as others. The story line in the show is good, and its getting better with you wanting to know what's going on... Rather than criticising it, either go back to watching 20yr old Star Trek and Star Wars or just watch it and see how good of a show it's going to become.