Reviews

7 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
Black Book (2006)
9/10
Picture a cross between Schindler's List and Starship Troopers... if such a thing is humanly possible.
17 April 2007
Warning: Spoilers
For any self-respecting movie fan the words Directed By Paul Verhoeven are just about the ugliest and most blood curdling words one could imagine. This is a man responsible for such cinematic landmarks as Basic Instinct, Total Recall, Hollow Man, Robo-Cop, Starship Troopers and of course Showgirls. A man whose idea of subtlety involves full frontal nudity, excessive, perverted violence and a gratuitous two fingers to anyone who dares question him. He has been dubbed a pervert and is basically a walking controversy... in Hollywood that is. And here lies the key to the sheer greatness of Black Book: It is Verhoeven's first movie to be made entirely in his homeland of Holland since 1983. It therefore ranks alongside his previous Dutch-made movies Soldier Of Orange and Turkish Delight as one of his greatest movies.

It's a somewhat subtle and ambiguous movie (in particular the mixed and confusing portrayals of both Nazi officers and resistance fighters. Any pantomime-style cheers of hatred or disgust for the Nazis will most likely be followed by a "Er, maybe not", as will any cheers of support for the drab and corrupt resistance) and there are more double/triple/quadruple crossings than most audiences could care for, but it is an expertly crafted and beautifully acted movie. And of course it is a Paul Verhoeven movie so the expected gratuitous nudity, excessive violence and perverted degrading of central characters is very much present throughout the movie. Verhoeven is still a cheeky and explosively spontaneous filmmaker, so when you see human waste getting poured into a large vat you just know it's going to end up all over the lead character at some point. And yes, she's going to be half-naked at the time.

Altogether it's a very strange movie. Going in to the movie it's impossible to know what to expect and upon leaving the movie it's equally impossible to not to surprised, moved and maybe a little disgusted by what you've seen (it is after all, a very big bucket of poo). Picture a cross between Schindler's List and Starship Troopers... if such a thing is humanly possible. The message, if there is one, seems to be that the lines between good and bad aren't as clear as they would first seem. A message we've all heard before of course, but it's never been told quite like this.
4 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Sunshine (2007)
5/10
Tense is not a strong enough word
17 April 2007
Seriously, tense is not a strong enough word. This movie was absolutely terrifying. In the cinema I was thinking, Whilst this is a good movie and I would recommend it to anyone, I will probably never watch it myself again. It was just too intense. I do have a few problems with it. The plot for one; it starts off very plausible for a sci-fi and continues to be very believable until the last half hour or so. The mood is established enough that by that point you should really be into the film enough to go along with anything (see Alien for what I mean here), but there are a few factors which just create this huge gaping plot hole. I won't spoil anything but if you watch it just pay attention to the situation and remember the time frame that is mentioned.

I've got to say, the acting and direction were spot on. Cillian Murphy is brilliant as always, as is Michelle Yeoh, Hiroyuki Sanada and Cliff Curtis, but all are outshone (ignore the pun please) by Chris Evans. Yes that's right, the Human Torch. The role was so different from his previous roles and he handled it ridiculously well. That was the biggest surprise of the movie.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
An enthralling and at some times harrowing tale of responsibility, family and mortality
17 April 2007
Warning: Spoilers
This is an expertly crafted story of emotional turmoil and awakening and rather than just tug on your heartstrings it grabs them and pulls them as hard and as continuously as it possibly can. Practically every single character is keeping a secret from their loved ones and as each secret is revealed the consequences are felt full force by the audience. You are genuinely made to feel for the principle characters. It is true that in life keeping a secret is sometimes worse than actually revealing it and getting it off your chest, the secrets in this film and their after effects do not do this. Each revelation is a crippling blow to every character involved, and requires immediate and possibly drastic change to their lives.

Mads Mikkelsen shows that he's more than just a blood-weeping Bond villain as he portrays Jacob as a strong-willed, compassionate and genuinely decent man who has put his dark hedonistic past behind him (or so he thinks) and only remaining fault seems to be that of being a little naive. He is a man of very few words and he makes an effort to hide his emotions from his fellow Danes, whom he doesn't trust or particularly like. The love for his Indian orphans however cannot be denied. Rolf Lassgård's Jørgen is a larger-than-life, jolly, wealthy man who has a clear abundance of love and adoration for all his family and friends but is plagued by what first appears to be a simple drinking problem but later reveals itself to be much, much more. About half way through the film he becomes the main focus of the story as every thing around him collapses and Lassgård delivers a harrowing powerhouse of a performance.

At some points it does get a bit overwhelming as almost every thing that can go wrong does go wrong and Jacob's stubbornness does get on your nerves a little, but all in all this is a fantastic, powerful heart-breaker of a movie. The girl behind me in the cinema cried like a baby, a hungry, angry baby. I have to admit I was a bit tear-eyed at some points myself. A genuinely moving and quite brilliant film.
4 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Every positive word written about this movie is absolutely true
17 April 2007
I am still quite speechless. Overwhelmed by how utterly compelling the story was and by how emotive the acting story was. Floored by the unbelievably great character development. This film is close to perfect. It is a spiritual cousin to 2004's magnificent Downfall and shares a lot of similarities with Paul Verhoeven's stunning Black Book from last year, not just because these films share two actors. This multi-faceted character driven masterpiece really is as good as it's hype says.

Sebastian Koch in particular absolutely shines. He is one of the best international actors working today and he follows the brilliance of his role in Black Book with the lead here. With his bohemian, dishevelled good looks and brilliant charisma, he's the best German-speaking actor since Bruno Ganz. But he is far from the only good actor in this movie, Ulrich Mühe as the State Security (Stasi) agent whose task it is to monitor Koch's suspiciously free thinking playwright, brings another near perfect performance to the movie. Agent Wiesler initially appears to the audience as the polar opposite of Koch's character. With his grey button down clothing, closely cropped hair and consistently emotionless face he symbolises everything about the overbearing untrusting Socialist government of East Germany that is wrong. He could easily have remained that character throughout the whole film but he becomes the surprising emotional centre of the story and the line between heroes and villains is significantly shifted (something which extends to the supporting cast as well. Truth be told there are probably only two characters in this film whom I didn't have to rethink my opinion of). Weisler reveals himself as a lonely, isolated man who risks his entire career as his attitude to his subject changes from one of mistrust to one of near-adoration. There is an undeniable link between the two characters even though they never share a single scene and Georg Dreyman (Koch) doesn't even find about Wiesler until the last 10 minutes of the movie, which leads us up to what should go down as one of the greatest endings in cinema history. Just thinking about the final spoken lines brings the tears to my eyes.

As I said, without a doubt one of the greatest movies I have ever seen. And as much as I adore Pan's Labyrinth, this one really did deserve it's Academy Award for Best Foreign Language Film of the Year. An absolute masterpiece.
75 out of 83 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
El Topo (1970)
7/10
It's all about the imagery
17 April 2007
Regarded as a masterpiece by some, including Dennis Hopper, the late John Lennon and George Harrison, this is the very definition of a cult film. A violent, surrealist, allegorical underground sensation upon its release 37 years ago, the film has been out of print since - existing only in poor quality bootleg videos. Now the film is finally being released on DVD and is currently on an exclusive cinema run around the UK.

To me, it's not very easy to love surrealism. It's easy to respect it and even easier to hate it all. But one things for sure, it certainly makes quite an impact. Many images from this surrealist Mexican pseudo-biblical western will stay with me for a long time, no matter how ridiculous I thought it was at first. The images contained in this film include a man being buried in dead rabbits, a man with no legs being carried on the back of a man with no arms, several dozen black and Mexican men being branded with hot irons and sold as slaves, a group of deformed and disabled people being mercilessly gunned down by a group of morally-twisted cross-dressing townsfolk, a man catching a bullet in a butterfly net and throwing it back at his opponent, and a nail-bitingly tense game of Russian roulette in a church. As with all surrealism, for every image to laugh at and ridicule, there is one to be utterly floored by due to it's undeniable power.

The imagery and symbolism permeate every scene of this film, sometimes bluntly and sometimes more subtly. Elements of Judeo-Christianity include the four duellists representing the four prophets (Isaiah, Jeremiah, Ezekiel and Daniel) and El Topo himself as Jesus Christ, whilst the latter half of the film can be seen to show the reincarnation beliefs of Tibetan Buddhism.

As the round of applause from the audience at the end of the film tonight showed, this is a profoundly powerful and daring film but it is definitely not for everyone. It is somewhat dated and perhaps a little flawed. But as El Topo himself says, "Too much perfection is a mistake."
1 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Fountain (2006)
9/10
one of the most critically divisive movies of recent memory
17 April 2007
Darren Aronovsky's beguiling time-travelling hallucinatory love story The Fountain. You may have read some of the polarising reviews of this movie already. It has been described as everything from new age pseudo-intelligent pointlessness to a peerless cinematic beauty.

The plot is in three parts: the first of which chronicling Hugh Jackman's 16th century conquistador Tomas' journey into the heart of the Mayan empire to locate the mythical Tree Of Life and reward himself and Queen Isabella with eternal life so as to escape from a dying Spain, the second is set in the 21st century and sees Tommy as a scientist trying to cure his wife of her cancer and, with help from a strange South American tree, stumbling across a potential cure to ageing. Ageing, but not death. The third plot sees a futuristic Tom escorting a dying Tree Of Life (who would have thought that the Tree could die?) into the heart of a dying nebula where both the tree plan to be reborn.

The relationship between the plots is blurred and certainly open to interpretation. There are however certain constants throughout each act as it were. Not counting the obvious themes of life, death and love, there are repeated elements of tragedy and noticeable splashes of shared dialogue, imagery and colour (especially gold) throughout each different time period. The romance between Tommy and Izzy, particularly in the 21st century time period, is an heart-breaking portrayal of love and loss.

Jackman and Weisz both turn in the performances of their career and give even the more absurd elements of the film a startling believability and honesty.

The film is one of scarcely believable beauty. Practically every scene is the cinematic equivalent of a classic work of art and the whole thing is strengthened by the musical work of Aronovsky's regular composer Clint Mansell. The film is thought-provoking, debate-raising and jaw-dropping and includes everything from religious spiritual journeys, philosophical and moral realisations and scientific miracles. It remains a very divisive and polarising movie, but it is a work of absolute artistic passion and a fabulously beautiful movie to watch.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Irreversible (2002)
8/10
Unwatchable yet unmissable
12 October 2003
This is a truly disturbing film, yet is also one of the most wonderful films I've ever seen. I don't think I can say anything that's already been said, so I just want to say to everyone who likes deep, thought-provoking, emotive movies should watch this... and have a pillow to hand to hide behind.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed