Reviews

5 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
4/10
A wonderful movie that just didn't make it
15 July 2009
Warning: Spoilers
Is this a drama, parody, comedy or just plain silly? It's been a while since I wanted to write a review on a movie. I saw part of the R-rated version in one of the premium channels last month and so I watched it again this week from start/finish to really get the essence of what the movie is about.

Great to say that John C. Reilly, although he is mostly known for his goofy comedies (and usually teamed up with Will Ferrell), is a wonderful singer and musician. It is refreshing to see someone who can really play the guitar in the movie. Really folks, I watched his fingers and it shows that he really knows the guitar chords. That made the movie so real for me.

All the songs are terrific. The changes in the style of songs Dewey Cox sang as he goes through his journey conformed very well to the changes with the times. Kudos to the music composers.

And unfortunately, that is where it ends. Where the music delivered, the drama/comedy/parody plot destroyed it. It is anyone's guess to really understand what the writers were trying to do with this movie.

In my opinion, the movie would have been better off with more drama and mystery like "Eddie and the Cruisers" than the too much silly encounters with the celebrities. The writers tried so hard to copy the fictional character/celebrity encounter from "Forrest Gump" and failed miserably at it.

Also, the sub-plot to Dewey Cox's childhood that created his demons was so unrealistic. A simple plot there would've allowed the audience to capture the emotion and empathize better with Dewey's risqué and volatile behavior, much like the emotion he showed for the love of his family at the end of the movie.

There is one sub-plot that I thought was properly done: Dewey's exposure to the different paraphernalia and drugs through the years. That was a masterful stroke and funny because the audience can relate to it.

All in all, I did like the movie due to John C. Reilly's great acting and singing. Much of the supporting cast was good also.
0 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
What baseball was and should still be. . . .
26 March 2007
Warning: Spoilers
The movie captured the heart and soul of what baseball really meant to us.

The banned players, seeking redemption from the game they were sent away forever.

The minor league player who never made it, hoping for one more opportunity that had eluded him.

Their ability to complete the "dream" to play in America's game again was beautifully portrayed behind the picturesque Iowa farm (or "heaven").

But in the end, we all finally saw what baseball should be: Father and son enjoying a day together by having a catch; marking time where the older generation passes on the traditions to the younger generation.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Worth Winning (1989)
9/10
Worth Watching! ! !
18 April 2005
One of my favorite movies. The plot is simple and predictable. The lines are sometimes cheesy but overall, the movie is very entertaining. Love the soundtrack too.

Synopsis: "Taylor Worth (Mark Harmon) is a local weatherman in Philadelphia who loves two things: gambling and women. Ned (Mark Blum), his psychiatrist friend, believes that Taylor's behavior is an excuse from establishing permanent relationships. To prove his theory to be correct, he made a bet with Taylor. The bet: Taylor is to be engage to three women in two months. The stakes: A fishing cabin for a Picasso. The catch: Ned will pick the three women and the engagement has to be videotaped." "What happens next is wild roller-coaster ride as Taylor plots, schemes and executes plan after plan to beat his friend." What strikes me about the story is how Mark Harmon played his character. He used more finesse rather than the egotistical "God's gift to women" attitude. He is no Cassanova but somehow irresistible. I couldn't help but cheering for him even though the bet was morally wrong. The supporting cast is excellent.

If you like a light-heart sexual comedy movie, then this is for you.
14 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Nice light-hearted Comedy
9 January 2005
Some comments would have you believe that this movie is annoying and stupid. Don't believe that for a minute. It is an unfair assessment of what movies were like in the 80's (not 70's as was indicated in a previous comment).

It seems pretty obvious that if you were old enough during the early 80's, goof-ball comedy and romantic comedy were at its peak (Check out some Neil Simon, Blake Edwards, Dudley Moore, Chevy Chase, Bill Murray, Dan Ackroyd, Harold Ramis, Goldie Hawn to name a few). The theme songs are soft and melodic. This movie is no exception. If you expect something much more, then you are in for a disappointment.

Synopsis: Ivan Trevellan (Al Pacino), a playwright, has a deadline to finish his play. Along the way, he struggles to keep his marriage, provide support to five children (in which four of the five are his wife's from previous marriages) and deal with his demanding producer and director.
13 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Village (2004)
Like It Or Not...
7 August 2004
I think just about every fan of M. Night Shyamalan expects all of his movies in "The Sixth Sense" caliber. By using that as a standard, they fall into this hole and come up disappointed.

This movie isn't that bad. I will not say that it was great either. The human element is more pronounced here than in any of his previous movies. In my opinion, Shyamalan's movies (this included) are all about our deep inner self, our hidden passions, vanities and guilt. It wasn't evident to me until I saw this movie, which lots of people would agree that it is similar to "Signs." It had the same human inner emotion link to it (inner belief in "Signs" vs. inner guilt in "The Village").

True to his film-making ways, Shyamalan tries to provide twists and turns while exposing the human element to the story. Unfortunately, critics of this movie is only focusing on the "twist and turn" element. They had become spoiled and expect the last great twist comparable to "The Sixth Sense." And when that didn't happen here, they are sorely disappointed.

Watch it for the story and don't make any comparisons. You'll find this movie much more enjoyable.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed