Reviews

2 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
Les Misérables (2018–2019)
9/10
A triumphant adaptation
13 July 2019
This rendition of Victor Hugo's breathtaking epic Les Misérables is perhaps the most faithful ever committed to film. While, tonally, the series occasionally feels more bogged down than the novel in the misery and wretchedness, the performances and the overall quality of the production make for a truly remarkable adaptation of one of the greatest novels ever written. Despite a few minor structural alterations and several slight changes to the dynamics between characters, this new version of the classic story taps harmoniously into the novel's central themes of love, hope, faith and redemption, delivering an emotionally satisfying and resoundingly powerful television series.

The casting for this adaptation is inspired. The magnetic chemistry between Dominic West's Valjean and David Oyelowo's Inspector Javert is pitch-perfect and absolutely electric, and both give jaw-dropping performances in their respective roles whether or not they're sharing the screen. West's Valjean is more visceral than any other and a little more brooding, rendering the occasional aggression he exhibits and his struggle to overcome his brutal past entirely believable and palatable, and his dire need for protectiveness establishes some of his lighter moments as positively joyous by comparison. Other performance highlights include Derek Jacobi's beautiful Bishop Myriel, David Bradley as Monsieur Gillenormand, Adeel Akhtar and Olivia Colman as Monsieur and Madame Thénardier, and Lily Collins, who relinquishes easily the most devastating realisation of Fantine's tragic story in all of film history.

My only real grievance is with the score, which - while certainly not bad music - often feels entirely unfitting and makes the whole thing almost too miserable; it may have been more poignant had the music been used to juxtapose the often harrowing imagery as opposed to leaning into it. In terms of tone, I find that the score is wholly responsible for setting the story in a world even bleaker than what I believe Hugo ever intended, and though there are some beautiful musical moments scattered throughout the series - particularly in the quieter, more climactic scenes - overall the score isn't the lush, orchestral beauty that it could be, frequently coming off as cold, bland and distant. Particularly in comparison with Martin Phipp's rich and beautiful score for the BBC's 2016 War & Peace miniseries, John Murphy's work on Les Misérables falls drastically short.

Overall, this series is an incredible achievement, a coming together of such immense and powerful creative forces that one watches on in awe as the story unfolds. Les Misérables feels like it should, masterfully asserting itself in that delicate balance between delight and despair which stands at the heart of Hugo's beloved story.
0 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Doctor Who: Arachnids in the UK (2018)
Season 11, Episode 4
8/10
What's to hate?
30 October 2018
Warning: Spoilers
I've been an IMDb member for years, but this is my first review. I feel like there's something I need to say regarding this series of Doctor Who: I just don't understand why it's been receiving so much hate.

Usually I'm the first person to notice flaws - even in films, shows, and books that I love - but for the life of me, I really cannot understand the criticisms levelled at Jodie Whittaker or series 11 in general, and I genuinely can't see how some of these bizarre conclusions have been reached. I believe I'm generally a good empathiser, and I'd like to think I'm a fair judge when it comes to things like this, but every time I see someone calling the writing and acting of these episodes "forced", all I can think is how completely natural it all feels to me, more than Doctor Who has felt in years. For everyone saying it doesn't feel like the same show, I just can't understand how?

Yes, there are moments where plot devices don't work as well as they could, but hasn't this always been an issue with Doctor Who? It's not like it happens any more or less often than it always has. There have always been amazing Who episodes, and some less than amazing ones.

The resolution of "Arachnids in the UK" may have been a bit of a cop-out, but it didn't feel any more egregious than Doctor Who's regular cop-outs. Have we forgotten Moffat's tendency to press his big "reset" button, his fear of consequences, and his tendency to forget to provide lasting closure? In comparison to some of his crippling writing issues, this season (so far) hasn't been nearly as bad.

It's just strange to me how the fan base for this show can be so polarised. For me, this season has felt like a breath of fresh air, almost a return to former glory. This episode four felt particularly like a classic Who adventure. There was something about episode three, "Rosa", that sat slightly uncomfortably and never really gelled the way it should have, but otherwise the rest of this season has so far felt like prime Who. The companions are engaging to watch, and make for interesting, relatable characters; they feel more like real people than any companion since Donna Noble. I care about them. I feel for Graham and I sympathise with his loss. I empathise with Ryan's dismissal of Graham as a grandfatherly figure. They're well-written, well-rounded, three-dimensional (and actually helpful!) characters, unlike the flawless, cookie-cutter companions of recent years who often seemed to exist just to worship the Doctor and make him look clever by comparison.

And Jodie is an absolute delight. She, particularly, is a complete joy to watch. She has the excitability of Tennant and Smith, with this wonderful new feminine energy that I just adore. There hasn't been a single moment where she hasn't felt just like The Doctor should, and I actually took a more immediate liking to her than almost any Doctor ever. I don't understand how people refuse to warm to her. I've seen some genuinely horrific comments.

The writing is nuanced and clever, the humour more genuine and natural (the jokes land better and pack more of a punch than they have since Russell T. Davies's era), the production values have shot up, the music is appropriately atmospheric (if a little nondescript at times), the new intro is fantastic, and - best of all - the new cast is genuinely fun to watch. And it almost feels more English than it has in years. I just don't understand what's not to like.

I can easily imagine that many who are taking issue with this series are simply annoyed or made uncomfortable by the emphasis on politics in the last two episodes. Fair enough; to each their own. But surely, this can't be enough to suddenly turn legions of devoted fans into haters.
18 out of 34 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed