Reviews

14 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
3/10
If you've seen the trailer, you've seen the movie
15 December 2008
Warning: Spoilers
There is nothing in the movie that wasn't in the trailer. Indeed, the trailer might have had a better plot. Here's a short summary: Spaceman comes to earth. Earthlings freak out. US government reveals its arrogance through an unconvincing secretary of defense. Through an implausible series of events, spaceman meets earthwoman. Superintelligent spaceman taught a lesson or two by humble earthman. Tears. Spaceman must decide fate of world.

Only things giving this three stars are the performances of Reeves (who doesn't need makeup to look like a spaceman) and Smith. Everyone else seems to be sleepwalking.

You could swallow all of that, but it seems the producers ran out of money for special effects pretty quickly -- which adds insult to injury in such a poorly conceived remake of a classic. The only reason to remake a classic sci-fi flick is to bump up the special effects, but I'd guess the original must have had a bigger special effects budget than this remake.
4 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Stereotypes? I don't see no stinking stereotypes
23 November 2008
I had every reason not to like this movie: the plot is two of the oldest in the book (aristocrat falls for servant twice over; kidnapped/lost talking animal among really bad people trying to get home), hopelessly bad puns, predictability, but .... somehow it worked for me and my kids. We thought it was brilliant. We were rolling in the aisles from start to finish, and they were begging to buy the DVD once it comes out.

Gotta mention, though, that a lot of people have complained about Mexican stereotypes in this film. What stereotypes? What are the stereotypes? Lazy? Drug runners? Illegal workers? There was none of that. There were crooks, yeah, but is that a stereotype? What movie doesn't have crooks? There were accents, yeah, but the film takes place mostly in Mexico. Even the Latino gardener/landscaper was a professional contractor v. some brawny guy just over the border. The only stereotypes milked in this film were Beverly Hills stereotypes, and I say, fair play.
4 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Body of Lies (2008)
9/10
This is what a spy movie should be like
21 November 2008
Brilliant film by a great director, and the casting for all roles is excellent. I've never been a fan of Leo's, but after Blood Diamond and now Body of Lies, he's risen substantially in my book.

The film itself is a great adventure spy thriller set in the chaos of the middle east. A very, very good balance of action, drama, and humor. (The kind we used to expect from James Bond, but were short-changed with Solace.) Only criticisms are that it starts a bit slow as the context is set before getting into the main drama, and some of the climax is quite predictable ... even though you can tell they tried to twist the formula as much as possible.

Well worth the ticket and the popcorn.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Eagle Eye (2008)
4/10
This is a SMART mastermind?
12 October 2008
Warning: Spoilers
It's hard to comment on how stupid this movie is without giving away the main plot devise, but before I do, if you want to see a bunch of cool car chases and some unbelievable special effects -- unbelievable in the sense that the laws of physics wouldn't allow this -- you could find worse places to waste your money.

(spoiler)

But let me get this straight: There's one man on earth (who through the grace of God has allowed his vocal chords to develop exactly like his twin brother's did -- flu for flu, adolescence for adolescence)who can allow Aria to kill off the leadership, and the best way she can figure to get him to Washington is to make him the country's most wanted terrorist and send him through a ragged series of near-death experiences with the FBI and everyone else trying to gun him down? She has to get a crystal in the capital, and her best plan is to put it around the neck of a distraught mother making the same insane race to the Capitol? Her best plan for activating the crystal is to hope a nervous 8-year-old hits the perfect difficult note on a difficult instrument? And the whole plan involves "activiating" a dozen or so other operatives as minor cogs in her whole evil scheme, showing that she doesn't understand that the more moving parts you have the more likely something will go wrong? No one ever told her: Keep it simple? And this is a super-duper-i-can-even-read-vibrations-in-a-coffee-cup- made-by-a-cel-phone's-tiny-speaker computer?

(end of spoiler)

I think we're safe for a while.
22 out of 33 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Meet Dave (2008)
7/10
Didn't expect much ... and was greatly surprised
17 August 2008
Meet Dave isn't an act of comic genius, but it was much better than I expected. Murphy plays the captain of a space crew from planet Nil, which possibly stands for Nerds In Laboratories since they are a highly technical but socially inept race. Imagine, if you will, an offspring of Dr. Spock and Dr. Strangelove. The film has some great (though too-often predictable) moments of comedy as Murphy and gang navigate the earthly environment in search of the Orb. Nice sub-text around: what if all you knew came from Google? But not-so-nice sub-text about the environment, too much like a frying pan upside the head for my tastes.

All in all enjoyable as long as you don't think too much.

(Now, if Murphy would just do another Beverly Hills Cop I'd be really excited.)
9 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Lucky You (2007)
2/10
Lucky you ... if you didn't see this
10 September 2007
Warning: Spoilers
Right off the bat, I gave this film two stars instead of one because the makers did the almost-impossible: They made a film about a sports/gaming event where you don't care about who wins the BIG game. That must have taken some skill. And I give them credit for doing it on purpose. They must have, right? I'd bet on it.

Like others who have commented, I'm a big poker fan and player, and the idea of a chick flick about poker seemed too good to be true. I could get points with my wife, and still enjoy a movie! Sadly, the relationship side of of this film was as predictable as a fish overplaying a gut-shot (a new player betting too much on an inside straight draw), while the card play is as disappointing as watching everyone fold to your pocket bullets pre-flop (having a great hand -- two aces -- but no one to play against).

Let's walk through the plot and see if you can spot the surprise: Pro player revving up for the big game (the World Series of Poker) meets out-of-town cutie hoping to kick-start her singing career in Vegas. Player doesn't have the entry fee. (Substitute player and poker with driver and racing, and you've got "Viva Las Vegas!") Player and father (a big-name pro player) are kind of estranged, kind of not. Player gets and loses entry fee repeatedly, while singer gives up on it all and goes back to the sticks. Player gets the entry fee (again) just in time to play the big game. Rapid fire cameos of poker greats generally not playing cards. Player shows humility and gets the girl. All this with poker slang crowbarred into the script so it all feels authentic.

The surprise? That the real poker stars agreed to do this film at all. I guess they were all building a stake for the next big game.
0 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Hitch (I) (2005)
7/10
Great cast in a fun movie
15 March 2005
Will Smith does a great job as Hitch, and the rest of the cast keep this movie humming. Take a date to this very enjoyable romantic comedy, and you could learn a thing or two. (My wife assures me that most of Hitch's advice is right on the money.) But has anyone else noticed that Hitch's high moral stand doesn't really match his behavior in the pool bar? But the script zooms past this inconsistency and you barely notice it, if at all. All-in-all, the writers have found a delightful way of exploring that ultimate guy question: how exactly do you get that first date. Of course, answers that involve olives, puppies, and abandoning your career may be beyond the reach of most ... but you get the idea.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Forgotten (2004)
5/10
Hard to say anything but "mediocre"
15 March 2005
After a slow start, the movie grabs you as the questions start popping up left and right. But then it plods along with OK acting, dialog, cinematography, directing to an ending that suggests much more power held by the friendly man and his colleagues than the question in their experiment would suggest. If they could make all the necessary changes -- first to support the experiment, then to undo it for the ending we're given -- their abilities are way beyond the question posed on the experiment. It would be like NASA not yet understanding what makes a '68 Ford Mustang work. Even with our emotional attachment to the Stang, as science, it's pretty simple.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Jumanji (1995)
7/10
Fun little movie hidden in the back drawer
18 January 2005
Movie plays. In comes zoo. Who's that laughing? Why it's you!

Jumanji never made a big splash (though the PR engine tried its best) but it's a clever little fantasy about a magical board game that changes reality. The special effects are laughable and enjoyable at the same time, particularly the stampede, and altogether it's a fun jaunt. Surprisingly, considering that the rest of cast is mostly up-and-comers, Robin Williams doesn't dominate the film, but adds the right touch of insanity to the whole affair.

But, like many Williams vehicles, there's a heavy "let children be children" component, as well as a domineering father figure who somehow just can't show his love for his child. Ignore all that, and just enjoy the game.

7 of 10 from me.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Scrooged (1988)
10/10
Bill M at his best
13 December 2004
Granted that I'm a sap for these kinds of movies, but this is one of the best holiday movies ... ever. Bill Murray is at his best throughout the film, and he's supported by an excellent cast that matches his talent step for step, in big roles and small. This movie hits all the right chords without becoming sentimental hogwash. (You'd never catch Jimmy Stewart telling a dead guy, "You'd have been a better color!") I've seen this a dozen times now (starting with a theater showing during which you could just feel the energy growing) and it hasn't lost it's luster at all. In another era, this would be THE movie that would have families gathering together around the television set to watch during the annual broadcast.

Ten of ten.
3 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Score (2001)
7/10
Not a perfect plot, but great acting
12 December 2004
The caper doesn't have a perfect plot -- either as a movie or a crime. Too much is left to chance or quite formulaic. How many times have we seen a soon-to-retire/just-retired master thief called up by a life-long friend/partner/lover for one last job with a huge pay-off and forced but whatever means to work with a young, arrogant unknown? But despite my best efforts to dismiss this movie, the three main actors are captivating ... passing the viewers' attention around as effortlessly as the Harlem Globetrotters with a basketball. It's well-worth seeing just for the acting, but it's sad to think what was missed by not giving these guys a better script.

Seven of ten from me.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Saw (2004)
2/10
A Se7en wanna be that is barely a Two
30 November 2004
Warning: Spoilers
I'm a great fan for horror, suspense, thrillers ... you name it .. and I was excited about the trailers for this one. But I was very disappointed. Camera work is nice, but just about everything else fell flat. I can enjoy low-budget films as long as the plot holds, but this one doesn't. Ar every turn there's something implausible.

++POSSIBLE SPOILER++

Someone else has already commented the Amazing Man Who Can Hold His Breath For Hours (not to mention who trusts a kind-hearted victim to do his dirty work with perfection despite a lack of any real oversight), but wouldn't you expect this amazing man to have the strength, stamina, agility, time, and even money needed to put together these clever traps and execute them? This guy must be getting some great drugs.

++END SPOILER++

If anyone can find a rhyme or reason to this killer's choice of victims, please tell me. Doc I can understand. But the others? Especially the only guy in the film to show some compassion? Perhaps the filmmakers should have taken a 19th day to think about the script and fill these holes, tie up the loose ends, and give the characters some character.

I give it a two ... because "ones" can at least be unintentionally enjoyable.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Pixar just wants to have fun
30 November 2004
This movie is real fun for adults and kids alike. Much of the humor might be over the heads of kids -- as is the running social commentary raging against the celebration of mediocrity -- but they'll love the action bits, the slap stick, and the entire comic book feel. This might not be suitable for the very young. My 4-year-old wanted to run out of the theater during some of the robot scenes ... but them wanted to run back in to see what was happening.

The true joy of this movie it that its obvious that everyone involved just wanted to have fun. Must be a great way to make a living.

Easily a nine for the genre.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Museum of the Dead (2004 Video)
1/10
What possessed me to rent this flop?
27 January 2004
Plot: None. Script: A string of cliches. Acting: Not in evidence. Special effects: Title sequence kind of cool, but otherwise exceptionally poor. Fright factor: Crossing the road is scarier. Cult factor: Only the most desperate cult would latch onto this dog. Can't you say anything positive: I did. The titles were kind of cool.

(Special bonus question ... your idea of hell: Being at a party with people who voted this flop a 7.)
4 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed