Reviews

2 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
3/10
A great movie for scenery lovers.
26 December 2006
Warning: Spoilers
For everyone else it's pretty God awful. A definite double feature for Guantamano Bay. What hurts the most is you get the feeling that this really could have been an awesome movie. It sets itself up for court intrigue, you get no court intrigue. An interesting arranged marriage is made, it's as bland as unflavored oatmeal. This is the time of the French Revolution, the age of Voltaire and Franklin - where are these two giants of the age? Most of all, where are the French Revolutionaries? Instead of just weighing the film down with pregnant yet still-born shots of how beautiful it all was, we should have been given a view of what they were doing to the country. Where is Paris with its masses wallowing in misery? Granted the royals were aloof and completely removed from the needs of the people, the audience is not. When an adviser says they will raise the taxes just a little bit, we the audience need to see and feel the ramifications of it. Where are the people being beaten and incarcerated for the simple crime of being poor? That was the truth of the age. Without that kind of contrast, you get far too many hours of bratty teenagers of a different age enjoying themselves. Ho -and- Hum.

If the movie had not remained as aloof to the audience as the French Royalty was to the people of France, it could have been Oscar material. As is? It has a nice soundtrack.

PS: The French Revolution happened 13 years after the American Revolution. Granted much of the unrest was caused by military spending, it was not the support of the American Revolution which pushed them over the brink as the movie seems to imply.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The only good ski movie ever made
26 April 2004
With the possible exception of Cusack's Better Off Dead (which only includes a bit of skiing).

In response to whoever wrote something like "if you like Chocolat and the Piano, you're not going to like this." I loved Chocolat. I loved the Piano. And I also sincerely love Hot Dog the movie. And just so I don't seem like a simpering love-it-all. I hated Lord of the Rings, the Return of the King (the Two Towers was excellent, this one just did not know when to end and had nothing new to give). But back to Hot Dog....

This film actually seems more like a 70's flick than an 80's flick. Unabashedly sexual, friendly, self-absorbed but not self-conscious, Hot Dog is absolutely uncaring of the way the world takes it. It does not fit into the 80's scheme of things. It has more than its share of titillation, but it is not coldly calculated soft-porn trash ala "Hardbodies." Hot Dog is more like Caddyshack but with ski stunts instead of star power.

Hot dog is about the joys of hedonism and self assertion, plain and simple. It captures a brief moment in time just before Aids and the war on drugs would make everyone very nervous about who they are and what values they espouse. Which is also why no one has come close to making as good a ski movie as Hot Dog. What little I've seen since has been nothing but toned down Hollywood pap for the family market. Perhaps it cannot be done.

Despite Shannon Tweed's plastic tits (although, did they have silicone implants back then?) and some very bad singing (and I don't mean Duran Duran - which was awesome!) this is a very fun and strangely honest film. Definitely worth checking out.

Plus - it did coin the household phrase "Chinese Downhill." Which no one on the slopes I frequented had ever heard of before Hot Dog. How many B-pictures can claim that!
5 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed