Reviews

117 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
Ad Astra (2019)
1/10
I am so glad--I didn't pay to see this movie.
7 March 2020
Warning: Spoilers
Instead I decided to borrow the DVD from the library--It didn't cost me a penny and it stay in my house less than a week. I strongly recommend doing the same and if one's local library doesn't have it for free, borrow it from a friend. I did the latter with 2012 and that choice was number one thing regarding that atrocity was satisfied with.

AD Astra was an obvious ripoff of 2001: A Space Odyssey (An important meeting in space. The ships slowwwwly going from place to another); The Martian (Main character not losing his cool as he confronts one life- threatening situation after another--But also in my opinion that astronaut was more likable); and let me not forget Star Trek: Nemesis (The unnecessary space buggy chase sequence!).

Mentioning that last film reminds me of AD Astra's galling failure: the random dropping subplots that would have made things more less predictable and more intense. For me only flesh and blood character that intrigued me run-in with the monkey.

Skip any remorse: you'll have it even buying this for a dollar or 50 cents at a garage sale.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
I fell asleep for a bit
20 February 2020
Other than the death of Rizzio (sp) and the scenes with John Knox (Yeah, I'm a Dr. Who fan.) nothing held my attention. Everything was either under-whelming and/or beyond boring. I'm only going to list three things (not in order of irritation) that annoyed me--Actually there were twenty in all.

#3 The lack of splendor--Especially Elizabeth in the realm of costumes. Where was the jewelry in her clothes, hair and long necklaces? I saw a small choker and an abomination of a crown. And Mary! I think I saw a ring--I think I saw??!!! I sure know what I didn't see: tapestries in either English or Scottish castles.

#2 A black ambassador who wasn't black! I can see an assistant to the ambassador who talks to his boss--but instead the audience gets... Know exactly why this was done: so the black audience would feel a part of the movie. Well, speaking as a black person I was insulted by one of the worse of the flagrant warping done of this mess called a movie.

#1 Could barely hear what anyone was saying, let alone the music soundtrack. I strongly recommend (If one wants to watch this mess) using closed captioning. It's that bad.

Skip this movie.
7 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Secretariat (2010)
2/10
Anticipation turns to Anger
18 March 2019
Warning: Spoilers
I'm a racing fan thanks to Secretariat. I saw the Preakness and Belmont Stakes in 1973 and got swept up in Secretariat Mania. I gave my two dogs Secretariat as their surname. I now watch the Belmont Stakes footage at least twice a month on Youtube. Today, still watch the subsequent Triple Crown races for two reasons: To see what horse will join number 9 in the exclusive TC winner club and, more importantly, to see who will break those records that have stood since 1973.

And my wait for broken TC records and/or a horse with as close to the charisma of that Superhorse continues...

Due to many reasons, I did not see the film in 2010. Then at last I put aside procrastinating and I checked out the DVD from the library in early February, 2019. Didn't expect much--Knew I would get--and got--human interaction over the title named non-human Ooohhhhkaaaay. I can get through this.

No, not okay. It's based on a true story, a great story but for some reason is transformed into a soap opera. Tension between wife and hubby. Wife vs. Stuffed shirt horse racing people. Wife vs Trainer and Jockey. Secretariat gets a sore in his mouth--Wow there's a fact in the life of the horse that was exclusive to him. That last is among one of the four best scenes in the entire film it's . The others are the foaling, Eddie Sweat washing while "Oh Happy Day" plays on the radio, the family back in Colorado looking at the Preakness--Actual footage of the event.

If only the Belmont Stake's actual footage could've been used. What was presented was an underwhelming, cringe-worthy. rage inducing in me mess. The "announcer" lacked both awe and excitement at what he was seeing and I won't get into the out of place lines from the famous reporting. I couldn't discern the distance between Secretariat and the rest of the horses after the last turn.

I recommend if you want to introduce yourself or your kids to this racing champ, go watch youtube where Big Red is accurately shown.
1 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Bat-thug v. Man of Sour--Are you kidding me?
25 June 2016
Warning: Spoilers
Maybe I should start reading comics again. When did Batman--I saw this film a little over two months ago and still have yet to get over the caped crusader handling a gun to kill people and branding criminals. I can't decide which I was taken aback with most. When did he stop being a detective? Some one tell me where other than finding the picture of Wonder Woman that his investigative actions weren't driven by his wanting to killing or maim someone. Lois Lane was doing the detection things Batman should've been doing. Instead I get Bat-thug!!!!

And O-M-G Superman is even worse--With his powers he could have saved people dying in the congress hearing scene. Hearing and/or X-ray vision and super-speed found the bomb and carried it away as quick as one could snap their fingers. But wait, was Lois in the room during the hearing? I don't remember seeing him fly away with her in his arms. I saw it too many times. I do remember every time she was in jeopardy he stopped anything in his tracks to rescue her. Hello, uh, other people in the world. There's only two scenes where he helps someone who's not close to him and only one of those two were touching. This Superman other than his looks didn't like him at all--Too boring, brooding, less than caring for strangers, and worst of all doesn't take the time to try to make others see his reasons he did the things he did. The hearing which he comes no speech about the destruction in the first film and the battle in Africa that happens earlier. Superman's speech in "Quest for Peace" for me now is his 2nd best the first being the one he makes at the end of Superman II.

Watch this super dark, super confusing, humorless piece of crap on those devices where the viewing can be speed it up. Get to all the itsy-bitsy parts with Wonder Woman. She was the ONLY super heroine that engaged my interest. I sat upright in my chair thanking God I didn't walk out (and I so wanted to 3 times) when I saw her using her lasso. Thing I think that made her stand out was that action-wise she was transported to the big screen with little to no tampering with her character or fighting style. Can't wait to see her film.

In closing, I will state I won't mention the other characters as I want to spare you the reader from long, long tirade regarding Alex Luthor Joker Poser, forgettable Flash, forgettable Cyborg and biker gang man stereotype lookalike that was Aquaman.
8 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Compared it to Emmerich's Other Stuff:
24 June 2016
Warning: Spoilers
Day After Tomorrow, Godzilla (1998), 2012 (horrid, horrid and horrid)--I consider this the second best film from the above mentioned director-- The best IMO being Independence Day.

Back to this new film--Second best I've seen this summer, the first being Captain America Civil War. Lighter in atmosphere and funnier compared to the horrendous Batman V. Superman. Lots of battles.The aliens were as vicious as they were ugly this time around. More Dr. Okun. I missed Will Smith but the 5 young characters together made up for his absence after 20 minutes in. No Michael Bay's treatment of women--Hot and unnecessary.

Major Downsides: the length. I didn't fall asleep due to wanting to see Dr. Okun and the special effects but a couple of times I was tempted. Frankly I got bored with the love scenes.

I will go see it again.
11 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Battle of Los Angeles (2011 Video)
1/10
And last night it happened
5 December 2012
Warning: Spoilers
I saw a movie worse than the original Stargate. So cheap they didn't bother hiring extras to make it appear that it was a MAJOR city under attack. The setting should have been a small town and the aliens should have attacked at night. The ship was cgi, the blowups were cgi they couldn't make tiny cgi people--There were tiny cars. I refer to the opening scene, specifically the alien's opening attack. I was warned then and there but I thought it will get better--No. I saw one dead civilian in a parking lot, a highway, whatever. The arm forces (one couldn't pay me to guess which branch they were) running around, screaming, shooting, running some more, screaming some more. The guy form the 1940's gets big intro and does nothing as far as I watched which was an hour. Ninja gal gets introduced my sense of someone insulting my intelligence raises to levels I can no longer ignore and I went to bed.

My thoughts are paralyzed in terms how further I should go describing the badness so I'm going to stop. Sometime in the very near future I'm going to watch Independence Day.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Battleship (2012)
This movie is not M. Bay's Transformers
15 June 2012
All three movies the civilians were civilians and the armed forces give me the impression of not having a felon amongst their ranks. That's the aspect of Battleship I couldn't get past the opening scene: What was the point of the guy stealing other than to be "comedic" and why did the girl have anything to do with him after-wards? I'll tell you why concerning the later; not long after there's a "love scene" so forced it turned my stomach. That whole love plot should have been left entirely out the film—Should've started with the sailors competing hence the main guy would've have been an intense guy instead of a thief and lazy boor.

Further the Transformers trilogy wasn't so bad I wanted to get up and walk out because I didn't give a hoot for anyone. In that timing in that way was good, minute I started gathering up my things to go here come the aliens ships which except fore the destruction of the communications ship was a rip off from the Autobots' arrival in Transformers 1. Before that boring love story, boring scientists, stereotypical Japanese v. Americans, a space transmission that with the exception of one, doesn't contemplate the negative consequences. Predictable outcome the consequences but the one element Battleship rocks—The rolling spheres that spit fire and mow down everything unfortunately ignoring terrorizing the awful script which makes characters sub-par and the story predictable. If there's one thing I can't swallow is predictability and an overt lack of believability when a trailer portrays an air of gritty sci-fi. Transformers never passed itself off as gritty sci-fi.

Filched burritos and nonetheless makes it into the Navy anyone?
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Worth watching
29 October 2011
Warning: Spoilers
I'm referring to the full version. I don't know what other distribution companies have put it out but the one I purchased (Image Entertainment) said on the package it was the full version and I believe it--Because the story made sense. Another version I saw was disjointed to the point of ridiculous and boring. Only portion close to boring in uncut Dain Curse was Gabriella beating her habit and that because it got monotonous. Also a slightly negative point I guessed who the chief villain was by midway through part 2.

That aside, I found it rather entertaining and efforts to make it look a period piece a superior one and all the bulk of the cast captured the era's behavior modes.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Star Trek: The Doomsday Machine (1967)
Season 2, Episode 6
9/10
Episode #1 of the franchise I feel strongly obliged to write about
10 September 2011
Warning: Spoilers
I vividly remember watching it when it first was aired; I was five and it scared me to pieces. It's not the first episode I remember seeing -- that's Squire of Gothos -- but I remember virtually ALL of Doomsday Machine. What made it stick out was the machine. Special effects bad--now with all the advances in FX but it does not take away in me how lethal it was (despite its ice cream cone, spyglass appearance) and besides the potential loss of life had it not been destroyed, what Starfleet's enemies got hold of it's technology. *Burr* The facet of the possibility Staffleet's known enemies discovering it never comes up but did it need need to? The simplicity of it's it or the universe is enough more than enough. Intense in all caps music, performances, pacing--And Never, after 40 years plus, has it become silly over time.

This just might the episode that turned me into a Star Trek fan.
16 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Inception (2010)
9/10
Reminds me of the 1st Twilight Zone series in a very good way.
10 August 2010
I hope if this fails getting an Academy Awards nomination it wins the Saturn Award for best picture. It's pleasantly confusing and the "dream team" acts adult level and professional. There's too many sci-fi films were researcher heroes supposed to be colleagues working together but I can't believe it for the lack of discipline. Thank God there's no love interest side story that takes attention from the rest of the goings one. It instead adds deeper sense of tragedy.

I was sucked into this world and 20 minutes in I didn't know where the dreams began or the whole thing was a dream. It reminded me of the twilight zone that the dream technology was refined into an art.

I loved Leonardo Di Capro in this, torn by guilt, but staunch on getting the job and why he wants to succeed.
2 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2010 (1984)
2/10
Dated, so dated
7 July 2010
Warning: Spoilers
Still have many gripes with 2001 but one of them wasn't the saturation of technology after the first 10+ minutes. It was either in my face or going about along the side lines. There are still things that have yet to be created let alone mass produced.

2010 is polar opposite. Kulbrick died in 1999; someone tell me why he wasn't assigned to get this together? Should have made this something Not Associated with 2001--It's a good by the numbers space saga with a smattering of the Cuban Missle Crisis and The Day After. It would been looked advanced if made in 1950. I can't get past 2010 looking the year it's made. Liinking it with its predecessor is attempted--Hal, Bowman, only Star Child my attention was engaged for the period he was there--less than a minute.
4 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Yu-Gi-Oh! GX (2004–2008)
2/10
I'm backing away from this future
3 July 2010
I have somewhat an affinity to the 4kids Yugioh--Hey I didn't know it was a mess up of the Japanese version--When I found out about original version first time I came across the manga, nabbed it and loved it too. I think of 4kids as taking place in another dimension and the manga in another dimension. Back to 4kids Yugioh--it's better than messed up Pokemon which I swear I wonder why the latter show hung on so long. Having watched GX I figured why Pokemon is still going strong.

Let me start with average episode--Oftenimes Left me scratching my head. What's going on here and why is it so boring? The reason for their dueling I had not the slightest idea. Worse, IMO too many characters looking like original Yugioh characters. The worse offender is Shō Marufuji (Syrus Truesdale)--Turn hair upside, ditch his glasses, dye it purple front yellow at the hairline and see who's there. And if a character doesn't look like an old character they act like one--Good God, Shō's (Syrus) brother. Seto cocky Kaiba.

I'd love to see GX the Japanese version--And while I search for it watch the Yugioh's more superior better Capsule Monsters saga better I mean it had coherent plot than this. Still I'm giving it 2 as unappealing I find this show, it's better than mind numbingly repetitive Pokemon,
5 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2012 (I) (2009)
1/10
Look at the IMDb's "Errors" section for this film
18 April 2010
Warning: Spoilers
I've never seen so long a list!!! Knowing I'm a Science-Fiction/fantasy buff a friend of mine at work loaned it to me telling me (paraphrasing here)"You can buy if off me" I should have taken her up on that offer then put a match to it once I got home. Night before, I sat through it once and after all the crap was done deeply felt I lost my best friend named my time.

As many have mentioned too many hair's breath escapes--After flight in limo & plane it got stupid. But wait, no; before the limo jet escape there's the horrible destruction of supermarket scene--where no one died??? The way that place was shaking, shelves made from metal wobbling ground splits open exactly where ex-wife and new hubby were to boot--OH COME ON! Come on to the infinite--Divorced parents Dad desperate to win back wife and kids--have this movie's writer's have had long-term friendships with those script writers on Sy-Fy's original films? If the ho-hum Farrier's of Spielberg's War of the Worlds were switched with this ho-hum family? Tell you the truth: I wouldn't notice the difference.

The clincher was the scene of cute Japanese Chin crossing a rope like a cat--it's not a cat!!!! Dogs don't have that type balance. And did anyone else think the chasm below was cgi or matte paint?
10 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Pornformers--Disgust meets MY eye, hits my brain, goes to my stomach...
12 July 2009
Warning: Spoilers
The twins bothered me little to none; have older twin sisters--Nowif they had been named Sideswipe & Sunstreaker I'd been big time irate. Black & female, I found TF1 more racist of the two; Glen Whitman's 1st 3 scenes were groan inducing, the scene of his & Maggie's taken into custody was horribly blatant. Later Whitman delivered the goods (Unlike Sam's super annoying idiot college roomie). Was hoping Glen Whitman and Maggie Madsen would return in TF2.

Having seen ROTF, wouldn't be surprised learning Rachel Taylor walked away once apprised what script required her to do. As Alice pushed Sam on bed considered walking out but "I'd miss Prime". Happily I stayed; classiest character in 2.5 hrs of over top sexploitation profanity and ignorance. Enduring Prime's TF1 "Sorry, my bad" or Skids and Mudflap's antics; guess who wins. For love of Prime, only that, I'll rate it a 2--one for each 20 minutes he's on screen. Advised my one married sister (by the way, she married a twin) this wasn't fit for her 10 year old to see and she agreed. I'd even go out on a limb saying Transie girls suffering low esteem in terms of appearance steered even further away. No other way I can interpret it; Bay's forgot female fans a little more than the young boys target market.

Where's respect for women? Hot or dumb boats, no middle ground called smart--including Alice; could've tried knocked Mikaela out when she burst in on her with Sam. Was Alice panty peekaboo necessary? It's obvious Mommy Witwicky doesn't recognize joint plant on package even though she has a young adult son. Not one of those hot co-eds wore loose below waist clothing to the knee or weigh over 130. Mikaela's wardrobe is poster girl for absurd, worst of all her standing white slacks and no bra...in the desert, in an Islamic community...riiiight. Shows how little homework was employed throwing this together and/or no woman on staff pointing out women would more likely wear coveralls working in a garage. Why I didn't I spot only one buff guy entire film and no shirtless guy, buff or stick? (Nauseating) thong butt cheeks failed distracting me from what I really wanted! Why did I leave 1st & 2nd times deciding only hot guy was ten ton Autobot leader? Was doing ear candy double dipping; needed to as I didn't get it from my ultimate Decepticon brand ear candy. Biggest letdown regarding v/a's Bay hires ford Agency girls yet doesn't bother renting a synthesizer for Soundwave! Dunno why but do know Mikaela wants Sam to say he loves her. And she urges him to do it in various ways again and again and again--Wait a sec, didn't by his TF1 actions showed he cared for her? What happened to Mikaela? Before the infamous Wheelie humpty she's flirting with it and it's Sam who pokes it off! How does Mikaela going through 3 sexy suits in space of under ten minutes contribute to Decepticons wreaking havoc, develop The Fallen into a more menacing creature--I'll spoil it for you she's not pivotal in either situation. Script wise she was given more to in TF1; this she's hot fest, ahem, why is she in this? Most annoying change is her clinging to Sam--crying out loud have her take the Matrix to Optimus! Having pointed this out, a slightly deeper question: why couldn't Mikaela already be in college on an engineering scholarship? Why couldn't both of them be members of Nest? Yes besides more screen time for Lennox & Epps--oh wait forgot, less situations permitting Mikaela dressing to sexy excess.
2 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Citizen Kane (1941)
10/10
Unmatched
20 June 2009
This is my favorite film. Biblical flicks are in a category all its own.

It's screenplay uses elements from every movie genre except sci-fi as its reaching beyond imagination. But in terms of imagery it takes a little bit of everything. The beginning plays as an early Hollywood horror story; darkness, fog; the later Hitchcock film Psycho brings to mind Kane's castle "Xandu" it's featureless house, other than its dark shape, looming in the moonlight. Don't touch it's cinematography; it'd be akin to making Gone With the Wind black and white.

The ending left me a pleasant mishmash of emotions. It's a deliciously fragmented piece the outer manifestation of the story telling, Susan's obsession with puzzles and the gradual corruption of Kane's personality is pieced together by those he came in contact with. Neither are finished--but that's the the aspect of this masterpiece that sets it apart; Welles keeps his characters unperceptive of what made him tick. In his divulging the film's nagging question, Welles concludes its ending opposite of the style he had employed throughout--successfully drawing the "Rosebud" mystery away from the compilation of putting together by the characters then waving the answer in front his face--It's impact upon me was a jumble, none of it "lame": bowled over how the answer had indeed been provided albeit fleeting much earlier. It's a touch of sadness; for the reporter's quest remaining unsolved and those in contact with Kane never understood him. He was an enigma.

Between creepy beginning and mind-blowing ending, poignant, touches of comedy, those in Kane's life (especially promoting his "singing" second wife) and the title character's slide; from champion of the people to absorption of his infallibility.

Concerned over repeating myself and not describing it to the digress I want without spoiling it, I'm closing it by recommending While watching it (and please watch it; it'd be worth one's while) Keep those reminiscing about Kane as separate puzzle pieces while watching.
7 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Pitch Black (2000)
9/10
Have seen other films with the same scenario, so what sets this film apart:
27 May 2009
Warning: Spoilers
Not in order The crash landing...I see where Star Wars Ep.3 garnered inspiration from. The blood thirsty creatures. Cleverly displayed dark and fleeting; there's 3 scenes I saw them in detail. I still debate which species is worse the 1979 Alien or these guys...still can't decide. Anywhoo I love their deceptively sweet whale-esquire sounds and how relentless and by and large unstoppable.

The Characters: My favorites (in order) Fry, Jack, the leader of the New Mecca pilgrims then Riddick. My one trouble with the film and I had this with Chronicles of Riddick--Most the time I don't understand what Diesel is saying first hearing his lines; I have to listen at least three times. But that's just me--He's the funniest one in the film. Except for 2 of them (both a bit overly depended on controlled substances), I was sad when they were offed.

Now number 1 The whole eclipse sequence and the rise of the beast. Wow! Especially the eclipse--I've keep going back on it beginning to end.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A.I. Assault (2006 TV Movie)
1/10
Among the worse bait & switch jobs Sci-Fi Channel's ever got over on me.
26 May 2009
Warning: Spoilers
Nine times out of ten when I watched the TV ads for the movie they mentioned George Takei and Michael Dorn are in it. So I go watching it—Trek alumni one of them Takei-whoo—hoo! But before the first half-hour passed it made me sick.

First Takei appears for less than fifteen minutes. Dorn was coursing in via his good looks and voice. Big surprise Voyager's Robert Picardo is it—but his character has no impact on the movie. No character makes impact and beyond thinking they should have been the Martian tripods for the straight to video War of the Worlds—indifferent towards the "mechanized monsters". By the ending I was confused and more indifferent. I blame this on the mediocre script and lazy character development.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Life After People (2008 TV Movie)
3/10
Should be on the Sci-fi Channel
26 May 2009
As it's based on scientific conjecture anyway. Where's history where's there no people to live it? And no I don't believe the monkeys will evolve. Yep, swap this with Sci-Fi Channel's Ghost Hunters which deals with histories of sites and lives. History's movers and shakers must be they so desperate to get it's emphasis off WWII they'll leap on anything—and such a stupid pointless anything. I've tried watching and I just can't. It goes over the same progression—One day , month, year....Blah. And it's mostly CGI—make a video game out it please. I'm giving it a 3 for the animal shots that said it could be transplanted to Animal Planet. Please History drop this; make more episodes of "Gangland", much needed new episodes of "Civil War Journal" hey even "Modern Marvels" which though I don't like all that much it provides the background of inventions. If it has to stay on History it should be a series shown on random occasions—weekly doesn't work to for me.
3 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Have 1, 2, 3--I'll never get Alien 4
3 May 2009
Warning: Spoilers
3 is very depressing but it was fairly well written and realistic. Poor Ripley had to contend with the usual evil alien in and out belly and alongside that the possibility a prisoner could rape or kill her. What held my attention--How was Ripley going to get out. Well, she got out her predicament--Not in the way I would wish but it made sense.

Nothing in Alien part 4 makes sense. I've seen it only once and that was more than enough. Events taking place 100 plus years later doesn't explain how they successfully merged two vastly different species, one that is especially lethal to the other, without some method; one is never provided mentioned how this was done. The internal confusion that usually crops up when a cloned character is in a plot isn't hashed out not one second--and if one movie needed it to happen was this one. Other than the basketball scene Ripley space reptile is completely unwatchable, not one shred of her human side and I was incessantly confused whose side she's on--found nothing positive about her nor those characters surrounding her. There's plenty to nauseate, though, the octopus derived mutations, the tedium of slow or still imagery and the swathed in bubble wrap Jabba the Hutt calling itself a "baby".
5 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
IMO the best and saddest of the Irwin Allen 60's TV empire
20 April 2009
Ruined the same way as LIS--and in this instance the was no presence of children to excuse it. It was--had been gravitated towards an older audience. The characters remained the same, the crew being people in the navy had an air of realism and the cast were competent actors; at the end the acting was the lone contributor of keeping the show on. Oh yeah and for me, using the modern term: "Crane was hot". I scored it 8 because it was 2nd to Star Trek in its convincing me for a long time it was a real ship they were filming.

Clearly fault rests solely writers dropping the cloak and dagger spy genre of season one for taking inspiration from drafts of LIS season 2 & 3 episodes.
5 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Lost in Space (1965–1968)
6/10
Actually it's three shows
20 April 2009
I was three when it first premiered hence I vividly remember seasons 2 and 3 in its original run. Favorite out those later years the Anti-matter Man (yr#3) and the ladies caught in the cross-fire of a conflict between two aliens (yr#2). Sadly I forgot the name of the later.

I saw season 1 much later (for some reason it's rarely shown when I catch it in syndication)--It's an entirely different atmosphere. The family is not looking to get back home as much as surviving where they're living. That first planet was not explored in depth I say after the first half dozen episodes. Thereafter it was aliens, advanced machinery and their robot growing sassy (towards Smith) and lovable. Smith was a monster in yr#1--and changing him to...Just before yr #2 he appeared to have a mental breakdown of a sort after seeing one too many ugly aliens. That's when the show jumped the shark; Smith transformed into that.

But throughout the series all three years the family were a family. The cast was selected well, not only acting as a close loving unit but the Robinson kids looked like brother and sister. And here too, treatment of a plot aspect sank...Will got too much exposure whereas Judy had virtually none. And Will and Penny were teens--kiddie stories fit their age group. But what killed it was the over-the-top whimsy of year three--Too many reworked fairy stories and kookiness--Absolute worse being the human carrot.

For all its flaws I rank #2 in liking those 1960's Irwin Allen programs.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Star Trek: Enterprise (2001–2005)
2/10
Bow-Wow for the dog on a dog.
28 March 2009
Only ENT character was anxious to see and disappointed when I didn't: Porthos. When finding out ENT had been canceled, first thing pops in mind: "Oh, I'll miss Porthos". That is sad--My watching sci-fi, TV shows, movies,quality of characters before all else--including the resident pet. Lost in Space--Penny Robinson over pet space monkey; ST:TNG, forget Spot--its owner and his best buddy Geordi were the two I tuned in for.

This show cried for a watchable character the likes of a Sulu or Geordi or Tuvok for me to root for--not here. Character write ups are crap fests; these poor actors what bottom barrel scripts they have to work with and Braga and Berman holding the reins of everything. Porthos' owner I tolerated more than liked and more often than not thought him an idiot--the episode where his beagle got sick particularly comes to this pet owner's mind. Where's interstellar SPCA? I implacably hated Phlox and Reed--when were these 2 gonna die? Hoshi mildly interested; hers is the only character regularly convincing me she had a job but in the same instant can't convince me she's older than sixteen. And if anyone thinks Geordi LaForge underused should take a look at Mayweather. Think I'm not over-dramatic estimating his screen time all four seasons is the equivalent of one episode the entire series-- Nothing short of a glorified extra. Anthony Montgomery's paycheck must been mighty hefty can't see any reason for him to put up with his character getting zip development while Angelina Jolie's ancestor meets 7of 9 meets Tuvok meets Mr Spock is soft porn overkill doused on the audience. Snore. So and T'pol's here again because why? They put more attention on her romance with boring Archer and a slightly less boring Tripp. Dr. McCoy/Engineer Scott hybrid Tripp mildly amused of course still not enough to carry the muddled tripe passing themselves off as episodes. I felt sorry for Jolene Blalock; what I have read of them, her viewpoints of the course of the show were more Trekker friendly than the clueless pair producing this "show".

Worse than the creep towards soft-core porn Braga and Berman's rewriting history. Besides other reviewers touching on that crap, l go into writers block attempting same endeavor. I'll just say the Frenghi episode was the absolute last straw. If only the Nazi Alternate Universe and Augments trilogy had aired three seasons earlier!

Rate ENT 2--"Bark, Bark" for Porthos. Good doggy on a dog of a show.
12 out of 31 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Would rate it a nine
28 March 2009
Warning: Spoilers
But there's the supernatural slant in it taking away from volcano action. But for once it's okay it's better than most distracting subplots. First it's more jaw-wagging bizarre unreal than laughably unreal. The character whom this angle revolves around, Angela, has a decent actress, specifically she big time can project the weirdness everyone points her way. Moreover the role of the priest (the actor is a tad hammy but not annoyingly so) is decent; seen too many films as of late depicting priests as corrupt.

I give film high marks for attempting putting the story in Italy--something 2 Sci-fi movies using Russia as its backdrop completely failed to do. There's people with accents (might not be the actual Italian accent but at least they try.) frequent breaks between American English an Italian. Wish they interjected subtitles when the Italian starts up. But back to the good, there's a major one haven't mentioned as of yet--It sure ain't predictable.

What really sells me on this film is the lead guy--nice on my eyes but OMG he can act too. He makes the character likable.
4 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Lake Dead (2007)
1/10
Tasteless & Abominable
17 March 2009
Never watched the Horrorfest DVD; saw Lake Dead after Saw wanna-be See No Evil on the Sci-fi Channel. Between the two, I rate "Evil" nine; "Dead" flat-line zero.

Horror movie only in its disrespecting women. How I regret not heeding the warning as I watched the drunk gal in film's first ten minutes. TA, woman held down and taped up, girl apparently in of the mentality can't do better hence putting up with a cheater. Began thinking those responsible concocting the "story" shallow perverts. Second bend over I got nauseated and angry--stop "The Making of Girls Gone Wild, the PG-13 version!" Bless the RV men with an eighth a brain; dumb fiancé and dumber frat philanderer! Not being sexist here both men and women deserved equal allocation to a special prize called commonsense. Funniest instance involving the male morons, the fiancé of one of the sisters complains eyes itching yet he dives into murky water. What too lazy to get water in close-by RV??? IMO, most interesting characters were the killers; I don't like feeling this way watching a horror film. More importantly looks STILL don't carry a plot less film and horrible acting but so far.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Unbelievable!
15 March 2009
--Show's producers didn't think getting another news chopter reporter other than a guy who spews the word "unbelieveable" in 95% of his "observations".

--Resident news chopter guy isn't on Valium. If he isn't, think he should be. I'm not asking a question.

--That, according to clever snappy quip-fest (in his own mind), police infallible and invincible wanna-be brainwasher "Sheriff" Bunnell, police are indeed invincible an infallible.

--It seems according to Bunnell, all criminals are unbelievably stupid.

--If police analysis regular C.W. Jensen hasn't been prescribed eye drops. His eyes blinks an average 2X--when his eyes blinks.

--There's no person lifting up one word per card for Jensen to read.

--I see a police-person other than C.W. Jensen dosing the audience police procedures 101.

--That everyone breaking in with a comment that precludes an "unbelievably harrowing crisis situation" thinks the audience just finished watching "Sesame Street".

--Nobody (especially Bunnell and chopter guy) thinks just to shut up and let the footage play out.

--Pure camp talker C.W. Jensen doesn't bust out laughing once the camera moves onto an unbelievable police chase.

--If that helicopter guy does not look to that eye-witness reporter at the Hinderburg disaster as his role model.

--It appears Bunnell envisions himself as the John Walsh of the 21st century. Believe he should dream on; has a huge act to follow.

--When I'm not laughing after ten minutes into the show.

Watch cops, American Jail, Forensic Files, and many, many more. All are more...believable. This is unbelievably funny.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

Recently Viewed