It's very challenging for a director to make a sequel or prequel similarly appealing as the original series. Vince Gilligan did it - partially.
Saul Goodman is a great character and it's interesting to watch his transformation into a corrupt and dodgy lawyer who knows no limits.
Great acting by Bob Odenkirk.
But the other characters seem less layered than in Breaking Bad. In the original series, Gilligan mastered the art of realistic exaggeration. Better Call Saul most of the time appears to be average. There are not many scenes that one keeps in mind after watching all of the episodes. I can hardly recognise what big happenings there were in season four for example.
I appreciate that Gilligan made this pretty good show, but comparing it to Breaking Bad I can't see this as potential fully exploited.
Saul Goodman is a great character and it's interesting to watch his transformation into a corrupt and dodgy lawyer who knows no limits.
Great acting by Bob Odenkirk.
But the other characters seem less layered than in Breaking Bad. In the original series, Gilligan mastered the art of realistic exaggeration. Better Call Saul most of the time appears to be average. There are not many scenes that one keeps in mind after watching all of the episodes. I can hardly recognise what big happenings there were in season four for example.
I appreciate that Gilligan made this pretty good show, but comparing it to Breaking Bad I can't see this as potential fully exploited.
Tell Your Friends