Reviews

7 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
The Duel (I) (2016)
8/10
woody does it for me
17 July 2016
A very good film that ticks all the boxes in all the right places.

It's not exactly fast paced but it's always moving forward. The actors all do their part and Harrelson runs the show. I like Harrelson A LOT so i may be a bit biased with any movie that's got him in it. BUT this film did need him and he really does play this kind of role well. It's his eyes letting you into his soul.

It's a good circular kind of movie. I wonder if the spiritual side of things could have been explored more or if that would have deviated away from the plot. I mean i really wanted to know some things about how Harrelson is so nutty. However, the fact that it doesn't delve too much into it keeps you thinking and lets you draw your own conclusions as the movie moves along at a bit of a trot. It does gallop at times and those are the best moments. Someone is going to get shot.

A good western genre style movie with the added mysticism of Woody's crazy-self.

How to end a movie like this? Ride off into the woods.
18 out of 35 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Like a Painting That Asks Questions
22 June 2016
I won't pretend to understand everything or even half of what went on in this film. I gave up pretty quickly into the film, however, I wanted to keep on watching and the film kept me enticed mainly for that reason.

Sometimes it feels good not to understand? Just to watch for the beauty? The Magic? The craziness? The unknowingness of it all.

I really found this film like I was wandering through a modern art gallery but so much better. It was painted beautifully, the setting and the colours; my mouth watered and i felt like i was eating a six course meal.

The words also seemed to be quite poetically abstract to fit in with it all.

A dream like film.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Home (II) (2015)
5/10
Agree completely with other guy but he was being kind, 5/10 at best
22 November 2015
I watch a lot of animations and cartoons and love me a feel good film. This movie had some basic elements and the overall moral was quite nice. But this movie had been done a million times before and in a million better ways.

The main thing about this is that you have Rhianna.. If you like her you will probably like this film. I think all of the music was her. It annoyed me. Anywho, it was alright. It is a movie that you could watch to pass the time. Or put on at the back of the car for your kids.

This movie is in no way great. or noteworthy in anyway. Unless of course you love Rhianna... then that would be it. And I guess that was all this movie was aiming for. Using that name to bring you all in.

I wouldn't waste the time watching this again.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Fury (2014)
4/10
Could have been good but just not so...
5 November 2014
Well, I had high hopes for this movie. I had awaited it's release and enjoyed the build up... hearing that Shia Lebouff didn't wash for weeks in order to get into role; much to the annoyance of the other cast members...

Though, in truth this movie didn't reveal a lot about what it was like living and fighting through the war. I understood nothing after watching the movie about how cramped or what it might be like to live, fight and die inside a tank. Instead it seemed like "it's the best job ever" - alcohol in the pantry and (seemingly) plenty of space...

The movie did provide loud noises. Colourful explosions. Some gruesome and somewhat shocking deaths. Some love. Some hate. And about as many war movie clichés as could be fit into the running time. Seriously, the end of the film will have you thinking - This is definitely an American made movie.

I would still rate it as a 'decent' war movie. Though, do not get your hopes up. There has been such a dry patch and nothing can come close to Saving Private Ryan or the characterisation of band of brothers series...

This movie played all the stereotype characters and yes they did play well. But I wanted so much more from the film. I wanted to feel like I had learnt a bit of history or at least a bit of insight after the screening. Instead all I learnt was that American blockbusters still play the stereotypes, the clichés and SO much cheese at the end the movie ends up stinking.

Enjoy for an easy war flick but don't expect too much.
352 out of 625 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Don't bother
20 December 2013
Just outright annoying...

A fair few good bits of humour (mainly in the first half of the film - it's all downhill from when he bottle feeds a shark) Though, many many lacking any substantial value. If you like intelligent humour. Don't watch this. It felt forced a lot of the time. Some gem moments. But not worthy of the cinema ticket price in todays world. Thus, I would advise you download this film rather than feel robbed of your monies.

It will of course be a hit with many. Many who follow the cult and the enjoyment of pure crass and limited humour. Although, there are intelligent moments and some humorous value for all. These are most definitely outweighed by the flops.

At times, I felt like I was watching Family Guy during one of the 'filler moments' with a chicken fighting Peter. Felt like I was watching..nothing much.
19 out of 51 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Chimpanzee (2011)
4/10
Don't bother unless you've nothing else to do...
14 May 2013
The only thing keeping this movie up is the subject matter. No matter what watching this you will enjoy the up close relationship that is developed throughout between the Chimpanzees and the audience.

The downfall of the documentary is in the narration. Unfortunately, Tim Allen was a complete flop. If you love nature docs and love David Attenborough and other natural world docs that feature a narrator that is able to tune in to the documentary and thereby have the audience fully enticed and watching with awe and excitement.

Instead of this, you are left feeling is this a joke? The side narration 'giving the chimps a voice' was at first, intriguing... I wanted to see how Allen would go with it. Sadly... He didn't - Instead he sounded like he didn't want to be reading out the script he had been given. Which leaves the viewer not buying it. I just can't believe no one listened through and thought it didn't sound right! Anybody could have sounded better than that! Allen had no enthusiasm except possibly when he was talking about tools.

BUT the subject matter is the key. If you have children then I'm sure it will be a nice close up look at nature for them. However, because it is aimed at children it has seemingly been dumbed down. This is an unfortunate inevitability when producing documentaries for children.

I would not recommend paying to see this in the cinema. Instead watch some David Attenborough, or wait for 'Chimpanzee' to come on TV.
0 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Braveheart (1995)
10/10
Epic and a Classic film
14 May 2013
Warning: Spoilers
Okay, so here goes my first review. And, for the first, I had to choose my favourite film of all time, Braveheart. Firstly, I must start by saying that this will probably be a very biased review. By no means do I think this is the best film of all time. For me, that would be the Godfather (all parts – It's one big ass film, not to be judged in parts) but the reason for Braveheart being my favourite film of all time, is purely due to the fact that it is the film I have watched the most during my life probably around 50+ times.

Secondly, the film received 1995 Best Picture and many other awards and nominations. At that time (1995) I was only 5 years old… Now I don't think I saw this film first when I was five. But I am pretty sure I watched it while I was in primary school, aged around 7 or 8. It was my Dad's way of teaching me history, his way of bonding. He was born in Scotland and I was born in England; therefore, he felt a need to educate me that the English are pigs. It was a bad history lesson though, as the film does not pay particular interest to being historically accurate, other than stating that Scotland and England had a bit of a bloody history together.

Thirdly, at that young age of being easily impressed and all things coming new to me, this film blew me away. It had me interested from the beginning, it had me gripped on the plot line, it had me believing in the characters, it had me screaming inside for freedom and justice and it had me in tears at the end. Now I'll be honest, I didn't cry the first time. I was a young boy and loved the real grit and rawness of the violence and battle scenes. The violence and the battle scenes were sprung from the pain and anguish of young lovers having their right to love stripped away with a clean cut of the knife. But this is predominantly a man's film, filled with blood, violence and hairy men. The love scenes between Wallace and the Princess are clearly just an extra bit of intrigue and probably placed there to keep the partners of the men at least thinking it's all about love. In truth, though, this film is all about violence, standing up for what you believe in and fighting for your right to live. If this film had been all action and not split up with love scenes would it have been any worse? I think not. It is, in reality, almost one long film of battles. But the side plot of secret lovers and other plots (fathers and their sons) do help to give the viewer some time to catch a breath before the next beautiful battle. And that is truly what this film is. A bunch of beautiful battle scenes.

So let's begin. . . Braveheart, for its time, seemed to come out of nowhere, with visually stunning and very, very, very real looking battle scenes. From the horses being impaled, to the legs being lopped off and even that sharpened wooden stake being stuck up some poor English pig's throat… The soundtrack throughout keeps your heart beating and the sound effects of the groans and thuds and clangs and twangs of swords keeps the hairs rising and the blood curdling. From beginning to end you are at the edge of your seat, gripping to hold on and rooting for William Wallace and Scotland to be victorious. Alongside Mel Gibson (William Wallace) you have Patrick McGoohan (Longshanks) who displays a truly powerful performance as the tyrant, King Edward I. You believe in him from the beginning and want to stab him in the back as soon as you realise what kind of man he is. Then there is Sophie Marceau (Princess Isabelle) not just a pretty face but with the acting ability to complement. Is she more beautiful than Catherine McCormack (Murron)? I think not. They are both beauties and they both have a power over Wallace and the audience alike with their phenomenal performances. There are also many other great actors/actresses to be seen in this film – Brendan Gleeson, Tommy Flanagan, though I shan't comment on them all for fear of the word count and blabbing too much! This leaves me really with only one thing left to express an opinion on. And this is probably where I come out of the closet. HA, I joke. But, seriously: Mel Gibson in this film, even with a wee bit of a dodgy Scottish accent, simply blows you away with his performance. As he is the main character as well as the director it is clear he truly had a real passion for the making of this film and that is shown throughout in his superb acting. He does everything he needed to do to have you believing in him and (as I got a bit older… and clearly more sensitive…) even crying at the end. When he looks out about the crowd who are watching his execution and somewhat smiles as the axe comes down, the handkerchief falls out of his hand as he holds the gaze of his 'original' lover's eyes (Murron)... It may be true to say I pretty much idolised Mel Gibson after this film. I wanted to be (as a young boy with not much to do with my days) William Wallace, fighting for what I believed to be right, fighting the English. And I did spend a fair few days in the garden attacking weeds and trees with wooden sticks… The powerful performance of Braveheart is relived inside you. That's it. It's simply one of those films that, no matter what happens, you will always take with you. It is a timeless classic and a truly great piece of cinematography
0 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed