Reviews

71 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
Wonka (2023)
1/10
In a time of unnecessary remakes, this one takes the choolate
2 April 2024
One of the most pointless remakes I've seen in, well, ever. Notwithstanding the fact that the previous installments featured far superior actors, this one is simply too fatuous for words. And even for a story about chocolate, the treacle is so overpowering that the audience should be administered a dose of insulin before and after each show.

I don't know how many writers contributed to this script, but they don't seem to have communicated with one another, because an hour into it we meet a couple being married. Evidently for the purpose of introducing another awful musical number. And yes, they are ALL awful. As is the plot itself, which has all the structural integrity of a chocolate bar left in the sun all day.
6 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Peaky Blinders (2013–2022)
4/10
'Godfather' without the heart
28 January 2024
Imagine Michael Corleone, war hero just back from victory, back in the bosom of his sprawling family of crime. Alas, in "Pinky Blinders" the war hero is already the head of this crime syndicate. Unlike Michael, who at the opening of "The Godfather" was a respectable citizen who wanted no part of the Corleone family business, Thomas simply picks up where he left off, albeit somewhat the worse for wear after WW 1. Michael loses his earlier warmth and becomes a ruthless gangster over time. Thomas merely becomes more callous and cruel as the series unfolds. If he was ever warm, we rarely glimpse it onscreen.

This is a ponderous series with great acting and some great scenes interspersed with utterly ridiculous ones. The plot holes are gaping, as are the historical inaccuracies. As for the accents, other commenters are way ahead of me there too.

I stuck it out through Season 4 but found it impossible to invest in it after that. There are no heroes, or even villains, in what became an exercise in nihilism.
1 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Law & Order: House Counsel (1995)
Season 5, Episode 10
8/10
Good friends gone bad
21 December 2023
We have already seen variations on the theme over the run of "Law & Order": an old friend of a main character returns, only to betray his trust to some degree, which sets the drama in motion. Capt. Cragen's old mentor O'Farrell.from S1 ("The Blue Wall"). Ben Stone's old friend Roberto from S2 ("Heaven"), Briscoe's old cop buddy Ted Parker from S4 ("Kids"), Schiff's friend of many years Sol Bregman, also from S4 ("Snatched"). Schiff , in fact, will have so many Good Friends go bad on him over the years that you have to wonder about his choice of friends, and how he managed to become district attorney in the first place.

Yet despite the fact that practically every character in the series will be betrayed at some point by the Good Friend Gone Bad, Ron Liebman's incarnation takes the archetype to new depths of sinewy deceit. His condescension toward McCoy, his disregard for the canon of ethics, is so beyond the pale, one forgets after awhile that he's actually defending a mafia don. It's almost painful to see McCoy's far-too-belated realization that his old friend has become the mafia don himself.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
I haven't seen the Swedish original
8 May 2023
But I have seen "Gran Torino" to which "Otto" can't help but be compared. Alas, on every level it comes up short. For one thing, Hanks' character lacks the xenophobia and bitterness at the outset that makes Eastwood's character all the more compelling at the end. For another, while "Gran Torino" seems almost rushed in places, "Otto" drags on interminably, with scenes and entire plot threads that could have been cut.

But the main problem is Tom Hanks. Not that he can't act, but he's been typecast (or allowed himself to be) to such a degree and for so many years that you just never believe Otto could be a bad person in the end. You know in the end there would be redemption somehow. IT'S A TOM HANKS MOVIE FOR CRYING OUT LOUD. Clint Eastwood? You bet, his Walt Kowalski was a very bad person, could yet be! You had to watch and find out.

So the end of "Otto" was neither a surprise nor a tragedy. It was closer to blessed relief.
2 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Windfall (2022)
4/10
Three characters in search of a plot
3 April 2022
At first it almost seemed like this could be a comedy, or at least a farce. Much like the home invasion and kidnapping itself, the plot of Windfall has a makeshift, seat-of-the-pants quality to it. If only it had kept this light touch, the movie might have worked. At least it wouldn't have grown so increasingly frustrating to watch.

The characters in question are all in the own way dislikeable, even despicable creatures. Nobody could feel the slightest emotional investment in a corporate raider from the outset. His wife perhaps. The hapless, incidental kidnapper? Maybe. But in the end they are all unworthy of our interest.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
The title may seem sensationalized
19 July 2021
But while provocative, it's not inaccurate to say that John D. Rockefeller and the industry he founded would dominate the country's, and indeed the world's, economy. James Corbett demonstrates how Rockefeller and his progeny achieved this dominance though shrewd business acumen, extreme ruthlessness and an insatiable appetite for power.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Crown: War (2020)
Season 4, Episode 10
7/10
And here's your lovely parting gift
29 March 2021
It's a tribute to the writers of this show that they successfully excavated nearly 100 years of Windsor family lore, much of it obscure or unknown to the public, and presented it in such a compelling way over multiple seasons, using multiple casts. (As an American, I wasn't familiar with the cast, save Gillian Anderson and Helena Bonham Carter.) Perhaps fearing the series was becoming "The Charles and Diana Show", the writers looked desperately for fascinating subplots like the Michael Fagan break-in and the Bowes-Lyon sisters. But we all know what was coming.

When Prince Philip addresses Diana in the penultimate scene, me might as well have been talking to us. We are all outsiders, every one of us. (It's a clever scene that gives each actor a final cameo.) Speaking for myself here, I couldn't help empathizing with Maggie Thatcher in "The Balmoral Test" as she sat through the ludicrous feats of strength in Scotland. Who are these people, she asked Denis. How did this clan of inbred imbeciles who never worked an honest day in their lives come upon such incredible wealth and power? In the end it doesn't matter how or why, they still have wealth and power. There have been six prime ministers since the Iron Lady. They still bow to QE II.

No doubt the writers will find more reasons not to turn The Crown into the "The Charles and Diana Show", but let's face it, that's all the monarchy was by the 90s.
8 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Rust Creek (2018)
2/10
Cliche-riddled absurdity
8 December 2020
Warning: Spoilers
At various points in this film I found myself asking, why go through all this trouble? Sawyer isn't any real threat to the meth operation. Hell, she's even helping Lowell with his latest cook. This vague interview in DC is totally forgotten by the second reel anyway. Even if she was a threat, why not just kill her? Nobody would ever find her. But then we wouldn't have this movie, which is the worst parts of "Breaking Bad" and "Deliverance".

But such logic is nowhere to be found in this ridiculous script, where characters exist only to advance a plot that makes no sense, later to die (the deputy) or disappear (Slattery).

Let me address one obvious problem. Sawyer isn't very bright. She wouldn't have survived the first night because she inexplicably discarded her sweatshirt. Judging from the dialog and the foggy breath from other characters it was a cold night and she would have died overnight from exposure. The biggest problem is her character is easily the least interesting in the film.

The final scene at the creek sums captures the essence of everything wrong with Rust Creek. We see Sawyer sprinting through the woods. Moments later she is crawling out of the woods just as a vehicle pulls up. A good samaritan perhaps? Oh no! It's O'Doyle! (Such synchronicities are a feature of this movie.) So what does O'Doyle do? In real life he would simply shoot her and dump her body back at the meth trailer and call it a day. Here we get a preposterous scenario where he leads us to the eponymous creek where Sawyer, somehow re-energized, has a chance to emerge victorious.
4 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Law & Order: Burn Card (2008)
Season 18, Episode 14
9/10
There's a lot we didn't know about you Ed
7 December 2020
Warning: Spoilers
Throughout his lengthy stint at the two-seven, Ed Green made knowing references to gambling, so in retrospect it's not altogether surprising that his career would end over the body of a bookie. It's a poignant episode, and a clever way to introduce the excellent Anthony Anderson to the cast.
12 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Wormwood (2017)
8/10
Cold war story of style and substance
25 June 2020
There is no denying the almost boundless intrigue surrounding the death of Frank Olson, nor the tireless efforts of his son to solve this coldest of cases. And Errol Morris has an impressive list of documentaries on his resume. Yet I can't help but wonder if "Wormwood" might have been more focused and powerful had Morris had less money to spend. Were all these slow-motion shots of cigarettes being lit necessary? Did we need to see so many stylized versions of Olson plummeting from his hotel window? How much did the overcooked score add to, rather than distract from, the story?

Ultimately these indulgences did no real harm to the story, but I didn't feel any guilt in fast=forwarding through the more redundant parts.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Law & Order: Myth of Fingerprints (2001)
Season 12, Episode 7
6/10
Another old friend turned bad
22 April 2020
Warning: Spoilers
It is a well-worn L&O trope: A longtime friend of one of the leads turns out to be a criminal, or at least the parent or patron of a criminal. After initially defending the friend, the scales slowly fall from the eyes. Adam Schiff seemed to have the worst judgment of character - Robert Vaughn as the unhinged Carl Anderton is most memorable of his numerous fallen friends - but he had plenty of competition.

Anita van Buren would seem the last of the show's stars to suffer this kind of tunnel vision. Yet in this episode she repeatedly goes to bat for Diana Scarwyd's forensic expert. It's perhaps the best case of slow disillusionment of the entire series because the writers invest plenty of time educating us in the subjective science of fingerprint analysis. Not only do we understand how such a miscarriage of justice could happen, we wonder how often it does in the interest of expediency or career advancement.
8 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Pack of lies
6 August 2019
McNamara was the principal architect of the war. He lied about the Gulf of Tonkin incident and convinced LBJ to respond militarily, knowing that a declaration of war was inevitable. The documentary is a self-serving lie.
3 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Law & Order: Vengeance (1992)
Season 2, Episode 16
9/10
Twisting slowly ... slowly
30 April 2019
Warning: Spoilers
This is the one L&O episode that gives an idea how interrogations really happen. TV by necessity truncates this process: The "perp" either fesses up or lawyers up in a few minutes of screen time. Here, James Rebhorn's character is subjected to intense, protracted interrogation, with an increasingly aggressive team of detectives pushing every button. Even Capt. Cragen joins the tag-team browbeating until Rebhorn breaks down and supplies evidence of his crimes. In later episodes Rebhorn would play Garnett, a shrewd foil to ADA McCoy. His performance here is marvelous in its subtlety.

Michael Moriarty turns in one of his finest performances as Stone, who must defend Rebhorn in civil court against his extradition to Connecticut- sparing him from a possible death sentence - so that he can prosecute him in New York. Moriarty thrives in these paradoxical scenarios. The interchanges between Moriarty and Richard Brooks, whose Old Testament values want Rebhorn to face ultimate vengeance, are excellent.

We're also treated to standout performances from Allen Garfield, as defense attorney Berg, and Barbara Barrie, as a grieving mother willing to commit perjury to avenge her daughter's death.
5 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Law & Order: Criminal Intent: Shrink-Wrapped (2004)
Season 3, Episode 15
9/10
Fun episode with strong guest performances
7 March 2019
First there's Brent Spiner, whom most viewers haven't seen outside his role as Data on Star Trek TNG. Margaret Colin has a slightly slimy sultriness as his wife, also a psychiatrist. And no conversation between shrinks must include the line "how does that make you feel?"

Both are so absorbed in their own mutually manipulative relationship they barely notice their daughter, played by Taylor Roberts. But she's watching everything they do and taking notes.
14 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Homicide Hunter (2011–2020)
9/10
Damn fine cuppa Joe
28 May 2018
Evil lurks within the sordid underbelly of an outwardly bucolic burg in the West. But this isn't Twin Peaks, this is Colorado Springs. And this isn't FBI Special Agent Dale Cooper, this is Lt. Joe Kenda. And the stories are real.

Kenda claims to have solved over 400 homicides over the course of his career, which means the show could go on almost indefinitely. We see him in two guises: one is the young homicide investigator, played by Carl Marino, the other is Kenda himself, who appears frequently with commentary on the case as it proceeds. The younger Kenda does resemble Kyle MacLaughlin's Dale Cooper, with a healthy dose of Jack Webb's Joe Friday. We occasionally see Kenda in repose, enjoying a rare moment relaxing with his wife, when the inevitable call comes. Another homicide. And Kenda is off.

It's the present-day Kenda, however, who makes the show worth watching. World-weary, laconic, jaded but not quite cynical, Kenda renders lacerating insights into human nature and the criminal mind. More often than not, alas, these are mindless, unnecessary murders, and we can only nod in agreement as Kenda bemoans the pointlessness of all the lives lost.

If you kill, Kenda will not only find you, he will mock you, and we will love every minute of it.
21 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Law & Order: Scoundrels (1994)
Season 5, Episode 9
8/10
Improbable? Definitely.
14 March 2018
Ludicrous? Perhaps. Sometimes you have to remember that the writers of this show aren't lawyers, neither are the vast majority of viewers. All they want is an interesting story to entertain them for an hour, and by that standard "Scoundrels" succeeds.

All crime dramas, and L&O is no exception, demand compelling criminals. This episode offers three. First there's the homicide victim, Kopinsky, a sleazy lawyer who was retained by the second criminal, John Curran, to investigate where a third criminal, Willard Tappan, hid the money he swindled from him. Along the way we meet a variety of colorful characters: Carl Piselli, an erstwhile inventor who hired Kopinsky to sue Alice Huntley over pig dishwasher magnets; a nursing-home resident who has a talent for eavesdropping; a female defense attorney who just happens to have worked with McCoy (and Kincaid already knows that that means).

As Tappan, Michael Zaslow makes an excellent bad guy in an episode full of them. Sure, McCoy's case against him was full of holes, and surely would've failed on appeal. But as dramas the episode holds up very well.
8 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Law & Order: Dissonance (2000)
Season 11, Episode 3
6/10
The long decline continues
24 January 2018
There was a time when L&O plots were "ripped from the headlines" of the front page. By this point and for the rest of the long run of the series, they were much more often than not ripped from the society pages. No longer are we seeing detectives furtively chasing drug dealers down dingy alleys. From now on it's mostly captains of industry, masters of the universe and, in this case, orchestra conductors.

It's not a bad episode, but I can't help feeling I've seen the same plot before, or maybe a similar plot later in the series. As usual, professional musicians are shown as incredibly vain, venal and occasionally spiteful creatures about whom I can't really generate interest, much less sympathy.

Then there's Dianne Weist. I have no idea why she agreed to do this series. She's introduced two episodes ago as an "interim" DA, meaning the Lewin character wasn't long for L&O. And Weist, who has delivered fine performances on the big screen, seems a bit bored, as if taking the role were a favor to Dick Wolf. Her character has none of the irascible charm of Steven Hill's, nor the folksy bluster of Fred Thompson's. Maybe because the writers knew Weist was just pinch-hitting, they didn't exert themselves on her character's behalf.
9 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Law & Order: Criminal Intent: Love on Ice (2010)
Season 9, Episode 8
9/10
Squeeze play
22 December 2017
Members of a high school clique are bound together over the shared guilt of a classmate's death. We're shown the circumstances in the opening sequence, but only slowly do we understand exactly how it happened, and only near the end do we find out why. Now in their late 30s, the friends find themselves again ensnared in the murder of a friend, this time washed-up baseball star and failed restauranteur Bailey O'Doyle. The remaining three all claim innocence, both to police and each other, but it's just a matter of time before the divide-and-conquer strategy of Detectives Nichols and Stevens splits them apart.

William Mapother, cousin to Tom Cruise, plays the alpha male of the group. Josh Stamberg is a heart surgeon and as such functions as its conscience. Karl Bury is the auto dealer who proves the weak link, and Mapother decides he will be the sacrificial lamb to the detectives. Finally the heart surgeon explains exactly what happened back in the 80s, but the detectives are no closer to solving the O'Doyle murder.

The guest actors are all very effective in their roles, which are somewhat fuller than in the typical CI episode. Jeff Goldblum is in top form, which is to say, um, he plays, um, Jeff Goldblum better ... than ... anyone. Saffron Burrows, once you get past the eye-candy aspect, is a fine actress who, like Kathryn Erbe before her, serves mostly as foil to the male lead. Mary Elizabeth Mastrantonio, best known as Tony Montana's sister in "Scarface" and holds the record for longest name ever for an Oscar-winning actor, only lasted one season on CI. Which is a shame because the captain role, like the DA role, became almost superfluous.

In all, a very good episode with a major plot twist at the end.
12 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Law & Order: Savior (1996)
Season 6, Episode 16
8/10
Compelling and creepy story
19 December 2017
Warning: Spoilers
The Family Annihilator is a well known criminal pathology and has become an increasingly common theme in crime dramas, but this episode was my introduction. Ron Weber (Timothy Landfield) is the alleged annihilator here, accused of murdering his wife for insurance money, in the process killing one daughter and seriously injuring another.

Weber's attorney (Brooke Smith) turns out to be a former schoolmate of Kincaid's, and they have several agreeable scenes together lamenting the state of their chosen profession and later cracking the case. McCoy is in his usual damn-the-torpedoes form, but Schiff has his doubts. He insists the jury be told why a seemingly ordinary businessman with no criminal history would commit such a ghastly act. Olivet, as usual, is pressured to draw conclusions she's not altogether comfortable with, and at a crucial moment realizes she, and the prosecution, were wrong all along.

It is at this point that the story shifts into a higher, even more disturbing, gear. Ellen Pompeo, still years away from "Grey's Anatomy" fame, gives a chilling performance as a calculating, utterly amoral being. I've never considered her a great actress, but she's great as she dispassionately describes the most hideous behavior. It's unclear whether McCoy knows ahead of time that the judge will reject the deal he offers Jenna, but we share her disgust.
10 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Liar Liar (1997)
3/10
You know a movie was made before 9/11
23 June 2017
When a guy can drive to an airport, park right at the curb, head to the terminal without being molested, sneak past security by hiding in the luggage, commandeer a staircase vehicle and cut off a commercial airliner right on the runway. Today he would have been shot at every turn. Which is what I wanted to do with Jim Carrey in each scene of this wafer-thin vehicle for his tired antics. I have no problem with broad, physical comedy, but Carrey's mugging is so incessant that it stops being funny after 10 minutes and is just annoying thereafter.
4 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Concussion (2015)
4/10
Melodrama masquerading as expose
10 June 2017
Warning: Spoilers
This is a well-made film about an important subject. Unfortunately it degenerates into a polemic against the National Football League, elevating its principal character from forensic brain specialist to crusading hero to martyr, all the while taking liberties with basic facts in service of a narrative.

One such basic fact concerns Mike Webster, on whom the first portion of the movie focuses. Webster was the victim of child abuse with mental illness on both sides of the family. He had a history of substance abuse and depression. This was before he ever played a game with the Steelers. And while Landesman encourages us to believe Webster killed himself, he actually died of a heart attack.

Another basic fact involves Cyril Wecht, portrayed superbly by Albert Brooks. A keen-eyed observer may detect the JFK connection; Wecht has been a prominent assassination conspiracy theorist (Landesman's previous film "Parkland" is devoted to the assassination). Here we see Wecht being arrested and are left to assume that it's the NFL retaliating for Omalu's research. In fact Wecht was charged well BEFORE that research was published, or even known to the NFL.d

Central premise of the film: repeated concussions cause CTE. This is asserted throughout, with Omalu expansively blaming football for the players' deaths. The problem is that there is no scientific basis for this claim. According to the British Journal of Sports Medicine, "there are no published epidemiological, crosssectional or prospective studies relating to modern CTE... Owing to the nature of the published studies, being case reports or pathological case series, it is not possible to determine the causality or risk factors with any certainty. As such, the speculation that repeated concussion or subconcussive impacts cause CTE remains unproven." In short, the plural of anecdote is not data. Furthermore, there is ample evidence that NFL players live LONGER than average.

I realize it's too much to ask a Hollywood picture to eschew emotional appeals, narratives and love stories, even when they do harm to the movie's impact. But this movie would have been so much better served by hewing to the truth.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Law & Order: I.D. (1996)
Season 7, Episode 2
10/10
Highly entertaining, well-written episode
30 May 2017
Warning: Spoilers
One of the more ingenious plots, combined with an amusing assortment of minor characters (the officious elevator operator, the harebrained receptionist, the opportunistic New Jersey detective, the scheming CPA) make this as entertaining as L&O ever got.

Now, sexual harassment is not a laughing matter, but it's handled in a way that's subtle yet effective, two traits that later treatments of the subject conspicuously lack. Ross brushes off the judge's remarks with aplomb (to McCoy's bemusement). Only when his handling of the case threatens to derail the trial altogether does Marks receive his comeuppance.

Even the role of defendant, often an afterthought in the "Order" half of the show, gets genuine star treatment. Pamela Gray is excellent in this role, morphing from bewildered, grieving sibling to manipulative defendant and finally to pitiless killer.
9 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Law & Order: Sects (2005)
Season 15, Episode 19
7/10
A good episode of a show seriously spinning its wheels
19 May 2017
This is a compelling story with excellent guest actors. Merritt Wever is always a treat, and I found Annie Parisse's acting superior to Elisabeth Rohm's. The details of the case are extremely sordid, to the point where writers seemed to be competing for how much they could get away with from NBC. While this seems a prescription for cheap sensationalism (a disease the show occasionally succumbs to) it doesn't happen here because the performances are so convincing.

But it's at about this point that I realized L&O had run out of ideas. How many episodes have been devoted to religious fanaticism? How many (especially after 9/11) would rehash the terrorism/Iraq trope? How many would explore corruption among corporate executives? Drug companies? The entertainment industry? Politicians? Police? Not to mention race, the Mafia and the Holocaust...

I realize this was the 15th season and there's only so many scenarios that lent themselves to 44-minute teleplay treatment. Still, I hearken back to the early years, when more-or-less ordinary street killings provided a lot of the material. It seemed more realistic and organic than the later episodes.

John Madden once said that an NFL coach's tenure maxes out at 10 years. At that point every player, coach and reporter has heard every pep talk so many times it no longer registers. This is how I felt watching this episode, and most every episode thereafter.
9 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Columbo: Identity Crisis (1975)
Season 5, Episode 3
9/10
Come for the plot, stay for the mahjongg
7 May 2017
While I agree with those who point out the plot implausibilities, there is no denying the chemistry that exists between Falk and McGoohan. Other installments surely have a tighter plot and stronger story- telling, but McGoohan is hands-down the finest bad guy the series had. Not for nothing was he featured four times. Just the way he intones "mahjongg" make it worth wading through the borderline ludicrous plot twists.
16 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
If this silly movie had been directed
6 May 2017
by someone not named Spielberg, it would have been consigned to the obscurity it so richly deserves. Audience would see it as the totally implausible movie it is. I know, it's based on a true story, but I can't believe this movie is very faithful to the facts of the actual case. It certainly isn't true to the cinematic tenet that a story and its characters must be internally consistent.
10 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

Recently Viewed