Reviews

9 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
humans could be such asshats...
3 October 2015
Warning: Spoilers
Don't get me wrong, it's an enjoyable flick, but it typecasts humans *perfectly*, for the asshats they usually are.

This is the King Kong epic, only with a reptilian "ape" kidnapped from Venus, not some obscure tropical isle. And of course, "humanity" wins by murdering the creature when it proves to be inconvenient.

I'm hoping the purpose of the flick was to be a sort of expose', rather than rooting for the "good guys" to kill the "bad" creature, and if so, this hits the mark dead-on.

The unfortunate creature, Ymir, is taken from his native Venus as an egg, where he later hatches into a cute little lizard-critter. But of course, the "scientists" react by grabbing, capturing, and caging the little critter, to be experimented on, without even wondering what it needs as far as food, water, etc. And the nerve to call it "so ugly"... like it'd think the pink squishy things imprisoning it were paragons of beauty?? Okay, Joan Taylor is seriously hot, but still...

So, when Ymir can *finally* escape, all he does is grunt at his captors and wanders off, never so much as touches them. Only when provoked does he react in anger; they even *say so*! He wants to eat, gets attacked by a dog, and only then gives the dog a beat-down. He gets repeatedly attacked, and only when pitchforked in the back does he attack his attacker. He's electrocuted and recaptured, experimented on some more, and only through human incompetence is able to escape again. But from there, he's met with guns, flamethrowers(!), tanks, all sorts of weaponry. Finally, in his last-ditch effort to escape by just blindly climbing to nowhere in particular, he's howitzered and finally murdered. Yes, murdered.

Yay, "humanity".

So then, finally, can the gorgeous almost-doctor and square-jawed military-dood go have a nice quiet meal in a dark cafe. Gives ya the warm-fuzzies just allllll over.

Again, I'm really hoping that was the intent of the movie, to show humans in the light they've earned throughout history. Maybe it'd be a wake-up call to some. We can only hope.
12 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Law & Order: Special Victims Unit: Clock (2006)
Season 8, Episode 2
9/10
good exposition of a painful dilemma
1 July 2015
Warning: Spoilers
I guess what prompted me to review this ep was the whole idea of "a paedophile's dream" and the user discussion of this ep, which seems to paint it as rather exploitive (reading between the {deleted} lines, presumably the kissing scene towards the end, of the young girl and older guy). Seems to me that everyone just kinda missed the point.

Dunno, but I see it more as a pretty good exposition of a painful dilemma that Janey, a girl with Turner's Syndrome, had. Here's someone in her mid- to upper-teens who has the body of a preteen. Everyone's concentrating on the guy's perspective, having Janey be "the paedophile's dream", and being able to bed down a "preteen" who's perfectly "legal" and of the age of consent.

But what about the girl's dilemma? She has a limited time to conceive if she's ever to get pregnant, presumably has a shorter lifespan than "normal" people (at least that seemed to be implied in the ep), so needs to cram more Life into her life, as her clock's ticking.

And whom can she actually date? Someone her own chronological age? There's that "paedophile's dream" again, and everyone would trash the guy as being a paedophile, even if he's genuinely in love with her for who she is, not for what she looks like.

Someone her *apparent* age as a preteen? Now *she's* the "paedophile", "robbing the cradle" if she's 18 and dates a 12yo-14yo, just so they as a couple would *look* normal.

Wow, she's damned if she does, and damned if she doesn't. She's in her own special limbo, her own never-never land. She just... can't... win.

I'm not really a fan of SVU (I'm a LO:CI guy...), but this episode seemed to me to be pretty well-written, and did a good job exposing the pain and angst someone with Turner's can have, the desperation that goes along with it, and the lengths to which someone so afflicted would go, just trying, perhaps in vain, to have something "normal" that everyone else takes for granted, and quite often doesn't even appreciate.

I guess the world just expects someone with Turner's to just be forever celibate and never date, let alone marry, *anyone*. And B'harni forbid a guy her age would go out with her, or try to marry her! He'd probably get physically attacked just like Dani (Stabler's new partner) did to the guy at the end.

I guess the world which likes things nice and neat would rather that people with Turner's just disappear into the woodwork and not make them uncomfortable by, well, *existing*.

I think SVU hit this one right on the head.
21 out of 25 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
No! No! Not the bees! Not the bees! Aaaauuugh! My eyes!
6 June 2015
Nah, it's not *that* bad.

It's dated. It's got cheesy special effects. It's got questionable science. It's as predictable a plot as if you were given a road-map in advance. But as long as you can shift your brain into neutral, you'll enjoy this fun little 80min romp on Seagull Island.

It's a War Of The Beekeepers, one surly, and the other crazy. Amazingly, the crazy one taunts the cops with threats to unleash his killer bees on people. Now, on a small island with few beekeepers, how silly is that? Proof, perhaps, that the villain *is* in fact crazy. Intelligent, yes, but still crazy.

Granted, this flick probably makes for better watching after having a few pints of stout, but it's not absolutely necessary.

All in all, I'd give it 6/10 for the entertainment value.
5 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Unknown (I) (2006)
9/10
grabs you and doesn't let go
4 April 2015
Warning: Spoilers
(Mild spoilers for this and other movies.).

I just caught this flick on teevee, so it was needlessly censored and butchered for broadcast, but nevertheless it grabbed me by the collar to get my attention, and didn't let go until the end, to the point where my coffeemaker was about 10sec from overflowing because I neglected to put the pot under the basket!.

That said, as soon as I saw Jim Caveziel, I knew I had to watch it, and it didn't disappoint. It was great to also see Kevin Chapman (JC's future castmate in "Person of Interest", too! Add Bridget Moynahan ("Blue Bloods"), Joe Pantoliano ("The Matrix"), Peter Stormare ("Fargo"), Jeremy Sisto ("Suicide Kings"), a genuine who's-who from tres kewl movies and teevee shows, and you have a visual treat from start to end.

Acting was as good as it gets, as no one seemed out of place or out of his element. I also liked the bit of a John Quade / "Total Recall" philosophy that you are who you are *now*, not who you *were* in the past, when your memories are (albeit temporarily) wiped clean.

In general, "Unknown" is one of those "figure it out as you go along" movies, where you begin with a puzzling situation, and gradually pieces of the puzzles are slowly spoon-fed to you to complete the picture. It's not as cryptic as "The Captive", where you have to figure out that different scenes take place in different timelines, and is much more linear, so you're still craving that next piece of the puzzle without being left totally bewildered until halfway through the movie. Bits and pieces of the characters' memories slowly tell the story in a rashomon-esque way.

Although, I do think I need to rewatch this movie in its entirety to make sure creative editing-for-teevee didn't leave out anything critical, and to pay special attention near the end to try to "digest" the twist ending. Reading some of the comments/reviews here, it's clear that the ending was a bit *un*clear, so I need to fully take it in and mull it over. Genius, or slapped together in a rush at the end, I don't know yet. Hopefully it won't be as odd as "Revolver", though (haha).

Anyway, while some people loved the ending and others were left befuddled and even let down, I'd definitely give it a go, and judge for yourself. I found myself completely drawn in immediately, and I wasn't set free until the end-credits rolled.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
a fun spaghetti-western pirate movie!
28 March 2015
I caught this on the "Movies!" channel, was almost going to turn it off, but just got drawn into it. To be honest, I was never into "sandals'n'spears" movies which made Steve Reeves famous, so I never heard of him before, nor any other of the cast.

The flick progressed quickly enough to grab me and get me interested, and it didn't disappoint. It laid out (whether accurately or not, I don't know) Morgan's journey from slave to pirate, coming full-circle to give his former oppressors their comeuppance.

There's plenty of great scenery in the movie as well. Steve Reeves is *very* buff in this flick (no homo! :D ), and it's quite clear he's the square-jawed richly-maned hero of the flick! A bare-midriffed Consuela is also quite a treat, especially doing a slinky seductive dance, with more moving parts than a Swiss watch! With full-sized ships at sea, gorgeous sea shots, and so on, the film doesn't disappoint as far as scenery.

The ending seemed a little abrupt, which was probably the weakest part of the movie. I just expected a little more fleshing-out, or something... *more*. But even so, it was a nice journey to get there.

All in all, I found it quite enjoyable, and again, I'm admittedly not into swashbuckler flicks, so I'd consider that high praise for the movie. Enjoy!
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Miami Vice: Milk Run (1985)
Season 1, Episode 12
10/10
classic Miami Vice
16 March 2015
Warning: Spoilers
*** VERY spoiled *** read only after watching the ep! .

Two yutes think they can make that One Big Score and then live their dreams. They refuse to believe they were getting in way over their heads.

Eventually, they get caught, decide to deal (albeit reluctantly), and end up crossing the Big Bads who were going to kill them anyway. Still, the remaining Big Bads want revenge.

One just wants it to all be over, just wants to rewind and edit out everything that happened, and get on with his life. The other, ever-defiant, thinks it's a joke.

Of course, the repentant one ends up getting killed by the Big Bad, while everyone else can only watch. Crockett realises the promise he made, that the kid will be able to go home once it's over, is broken. Anger, sorrow, the heartbreak of what happened, are very evident on Crockett's face. The defiant kid now has to live with the realisation that his friend is dead because he dragged him into that deal in the first place.

A powerful episode, chock full of tragedy and irony, is not one to be forgotten. The brazen if not reckless one survives, while the cautious and repentant one dies. The diametrically opposite tone from beginning (levity, long legs and miniskirt) and end (tragedy, death), shows sharp contrast, yet still comes full circle at the same airport.

Masterfully done...
8 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Ravenswood (2013–2014)
8/10
I came, I saw, I liked.
25 April 2014
I've barely even heard of PLL, never saw so much as a fragment of a single episode of PLL, so I've got zero "investment" in this series, either positive *or* negative. I'm a blank slate as far as "Ravenswood" is concerned.

That said, I got hooked pretty quickly on it. I was late to the game, hadn't even heard of the show until episode 4-5 was being aired, was curious about it, and viewed several episodes in one sitting. And I liked it, a lot.

I didn't dissect the show and try to make sure it fit neatly into the PLL-universe, I didn't care who's back in PLL-land or what they were doing... I only concerned myself with what was going on in Ravenswood (the town *and* the show).

Maybe the fact that there's "supposed" to be a PLL tie-in is what's polarising people so strongly to either love it or hate it. I don't know, nor do I particularly care. I like *this* show for what it is.

Complaints about "bad acting"? Umm, what kind of acting were you expecting in a show about ghosts and seances and such? We ain't exactly talking "Brian's Song" or even "Gandhi" here.

Things "not making sense" from a PLL perspective? "He wouldn't do that", "She wouldn't do that"... feh. Cut the cord, forget the tie-in, imagine "Ravenswood" as its own series, and rewatch it.

You've got a wonderfully creepy Meg Foster (and I mean that in a good way!), so soft-spoken and genteel but you can't quite guess if she's truly eeee-vil underneath it all and would slip poison in your chamomile tea just for fun. You've also got Steve Cabral playing a taciturn and oh-so-creepy Eddie-Munster-looking undertaker. And of course, you've got a cast of generic good-looking teenagers from pretty much any/every teen-soap-drama-whatever show, all doing their respective things. So what's not to like? I'm disappointed that the show got cancelled, and I hope it's properly wrapped-up within the 10 episodes it has, but even if not, for me it's been a fun ride, at least so far. I might chime in further after I watch the remaining episodes, but I'm hopeful they'll be at least as good as the first few.
8 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Bunnyman (2011)
1/10
painful to watch
16 January 2014
Oh. My. God.

I like bad movies. I really do. Even if they're laughably bad, or have unintentional humor, I can find something to like, that make it worth sitting through the flick to the end. Whether somewhat recent, such as "Aliens vs Avatars" (2011), or ancient history, such as "The Giant Claw" (1957), I could find plenty to like and laugh about in a movie, no matter how bad it might be.

Unfortunately, "Bunnyman" had no such redeeming qualities, except maybe the cute bunny-costume on the title character, and the incredibly hot Cheryl Texiera who's a pleasure to ogle, umm, watch.

From the beginning, "Bunnyman" became almost too painful to watch, and only got worse. I don't think I ever, in any slasher flick, actually HOPED the "good" characters would meet their demise, but in this case, they were just so painfully stoooooopid that I found myself rooting for the Bunnyman, if only to make the movie stop! Their actions throughout the movie were akin to lighting a match in a dark cellar to find where's the leak in the gas main. You're left open-mouthed in utter disbelief. I can't imagine any twentysomethings with more than two brain-cells to rub together, to do what these kids did in the movie.

I don't care about plot-holes that can be explained away reasonably, and I don't pick apart movies because they may have featured a 1972 Datsun, or a radio was playing a top-10 hit from 1971, when the movie would be ostensibly set in 1970, but, oh lordy, without getting into spoilers, these characters could win the Nobel Prize for stupidity.

Watch this movie, if only to experience what might be one of the truly worst movies you'll ever come across. At least you'll appreciate actually GOOD bad-movies!
1 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Red Clover (2012 TV Movie)
8/10
a real treat, IF you "get it"
16 January 2014
I absolutely loved this movie! I'm a fan of "bad" horror flicks and such, but this was a genuinely good and fun flick! It's a perfect mix of horror and comedy, with some genuine startle-moments, some genuine creepiness, and some incredibly good humorous moments.

My biggest gripe was that the ending felt quite rushed and that it ended a bit too abruptly, that there was no final Climactic Showdown as I might've expected, no hand-reaching-up-from-underground-to-grab-the-heroine, no "twist" like that.

Courtney Halverson was a treat to watch, a sort of redheaded Abby Brammell, and showed a fine mix of strength and vulnerability in her character.

William Devane was great as the cantankerous (but right!) grandpa.

Billy Zane was a real treat in all his billyzanian goodness, and delivered some PERFECT humorous lines (especially about his nametag!).

The movie didn't take itself seriously. It was NOT intended to be a straight-up horror flick, but was filled to the brim with self-deprecating humor. Those who poo-pooed "Red Clover" (sorry, but that's the title that flashes on the screen in the movie that I have) obviously didn't "get it". Quips such as "It's like I'm trapped in some bad monster movie and I can't get out." are so up-front and obvious about that, I'm amazed anyone DIDN'T get it.

It's unfortunate that the somewhat abrupt and anticlimactic ending is the last you'll experience of the movie, and what you'll likely remember most, but the rest of the movie, the first 99% of it, is well worth the time spent in giving this little gem a go.

First, take the movie for what it is: a fun horror-comedy that pokes fun of itself with some biting humor. Second, don't expect the antagonist to be the Lucky Charms dood (who's creepy in his own right, granted), but more Pumpkinhead instead. Keep those two points in mind, and you should love and appreciate this flick as much as I do.
9 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed