Reviews

14 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
Midway (2019)
5/10
Kind of a mess
11 November 2019
Roland Emmerich is not a name that inspires much faith for historical accuracy, but hey the Patriot was at least entertaining.

This is not the Patriot.

I noticed they were getting details wrong so I turned my brain off and just tried to enjoy the movie as a movie. That didn't go very well because it's not very good as a movie either.

I don't know who thought it was a good idea to have one movie cover about seven months of history, but they need to be fired. This movie condenses the Attack on Pearl Harbor, the aftermath, the Raid on the Marshal Islands, the Doolittle Raid, the Battle of Coral Sea, and the Battle of Midway into one movie.

I know who these guys are, however the audience must be so confused as characters come and go with maybe a few minutes of screen time. Take the Pearl Harbor scene, we get this officer telling an enlisted sailor to set up deck chairs for the Sunday church service. The enlisted sailor says he's an atheist and I rolled my eyes figuring this kid will be a secondary characters learning about faith and god and stuff.... I was giving the movie too much credit. After the Attack on Pearl Harbor he has one more scene. You see it was the officer that was important because he was close friends with Lt. Cmd Dick Best, our main character and he needed to ask the kid what happened to his friend.

Then the whole second act is basically everything that happened between Pearl Harbor and Midway, (that's December 1941 to June 1942). They have Admiral Halsey in this movie for some reason as a secondary character which was probably not a good idea because Halsey wasn't at Midway so I'm wondering why are we spending time with a character who won't matter in the freaking climax and leaving people don't know this wondering why this Admiral Spruance is joining us this late in the movie.

It just goes on like this for 2 hours.

Things I did like was the sound design and I really enjoyed seeing the CGI renditions of the real ships. I liked that I could look at ships and actually identify them by class. The battles mostly look fine, but I have problems with Pearl Harbor (but that's mostly nitpicking)... though the CGI during that scene did look odd. The acting was also fine, eventually I got used to some of the cheesy 1940s accents the actors were using.

I don't hate this movie but if you know nothing about World War II this movie will not be fun because you'll be very confused. If you do know a lot about World War II you still won't like it because they abridge so many important events and people.

Go see the 1970s version, it was a tighter and more accurate film.
3 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Nice Guys (2016)
9/10
It Was What I Thought It Would Be and Was What I Wanted It To Be
22 May 2016
Warning: Spoilers
I have to say from the trailer I was hoping for a movie that was fun, full of action, funny, and has good dialogue.

This movie was exactly what the trailer promised me.

I'll try not to spoil the movie, but I'm checking it just in case and read at your own risk.

It almost seems odd that Russell Crowe and Ryan Gosling have never worked together before because they were really good together. Gosling plays Holland March, an alcoholic cynical private investigator, and Crowe plays Jackson Healy, a thug for hire.

We don't seem to know much about these characters pasts, but Healy seems driven by a desire to do good and help people. He is far from idealistic though, he's very subdued throughout the movie like life has dragged him to the edge of hopelessness. March, well it's not clear if his wife is dead or they're not together anymore, but he is a cynic and pretty much a loser with a 13 year old daughter who takes care of him and while she loves him, also is hugely frustrated by him.

Both men find themselves involved with a girl named Amelia, March is looking for her because she's connected to a missing person case he's working and Healy is hired by her for protection before disappearing.

This however only proves to be the beginning as the two men find themselves working together, Healy because the mob trashed his home looking for Amelia and March because he needs the money.

All the actors do a great job from Gosling playing a loser drunk who is surprisingly sharp at times to Crowe playing a thug who wants to help a girl who wanted to be safe to Angourie Rice playing Holly the daughter. I'm also impressed by Matt Bomer who plays a hit-man named John Boy. I'm used to Bomer playing Niel Caffrey on White Collar. He doesn't get a lot of speaking lines, but the few he had he seemed charming at first, but something was off in an unnerving way. It was well acted.

This movie also does not shy away from violent or language and I haven't seen this many breasts in a movie in a while, though that might be because I haven't seen an R rated movie that interested me in a while. It is not a kid friendly movie at all... though I would soon recommend taking your kids to this than Angry Birds.

Bottom line, if you liked the trailer you'll enjoy this movie and there is a lot more that I haven't mentioned. Shane Black has made a movie he should be very proud of and frankly I hope to see a sequel some day.
10 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Hilarious Bad and Kind of Amazing to Watch
8 March 2016
I haven't actually played the game, but I have watched a complete let's play done by Noah Antwiler which I strongly recommend.

Phantasmagoria 2: A Puzzle of Flesh is everything that was awful about the FMV era of gaming, but also something you have to see to believe. It's plagued by the issue of old adventure games that it does not give you good (and in some cases any) direction as to what you should be doing or where you're suppose to go in many parts of the game, especially the beginning.

You play as Curtis Craig who works some office job at a pharmaceutical company. He has a girlfriend name Jocelyn, a gay friend named Trevor (who is the best character in the game), office enemy Bob, office whore Therese, hilariously generic evil boss PA Warner (this guy could be a Saturday morning cartoon villain), and Tom your supervisor who is kind of dull but okay.

You are just a normal boring guy with a pet rat and I will give the game credit for starting slow before going off the rails. I won't spoil it for you, but this is a game you would be better off watching Spoony's let play on YouTube than actually play the game since as a game its not well programmed. They did put a lot of work into the FMVs and it has charm as a B movie horror film. If you are interested I think gog.com (Good Old Games) has it for sale for like $5-6.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Heaven's Gate (1980)
3/10
It Has a Really Good Soundtrack... That's about It.
2 July 2015
I really wanted to like Heaven's Gate. I really did. It has a lot of actors I love like Christopher Walken and Sam Watterson. It has one of the best soundtracks and beautiful cinematography. It picked an interesting subject and I love stories that dispel the romance of the old west.

But it fails... oh god. I saw a poster which said the only thing our lead is more passionate about than America is his lover... that is a complete and total lie. Lets put aside that Kris Kristofferson and Isabelle Huppert don't have much chemistry on screen, I never got the feeling this movie about patriotism. In fact the Johnson County War is not an event that made America look good.

We follow the story of Kristofferson's character Avrill who leaves a wealthy life out east to go the newly formed states out west. He runs into an old friend of his played by John Hurt who's character's name I forget but don't worry, he does nothing important and does not worth remember until towards the end when he kind of goes insane. Basically wealthy cattle owners are not happy with the immigrants who they think are stealing their livestock. Movie probably explains this but I was so bored I probably tuned this.

Things don't go well and a lot of people die and disillusioned Avrill goes home.

I wouldn't mind the long run time (though I question a battle scene that was original long enough to be a feature length film on its own). But in so many scenes it feels like nothing is happening that is advancing the plot and the characters are so poorly developed that I kind of don't care what happens to them. I wouldn't have learned any of their names if it wasn't for the fact these are actors I really like (I still can't get over Sam Watterson's mustache). With a movie like this, we really need to see an idealistic youth that the audience really sympathize with just watch his hopes and dreams get destroyed, maybe even violated. Also some scenes seem to happen with no connection between them but that might have something to do with the more than two hours that were cut (from a movie that was nearly 3 hours at release).

It's also hard to ignore that this movie was pretty reckless and several horses were injured or traumatized. One horse was even blown up and that scene was in the original cut of movie... why they thought that was a good idea I have no idea. There are some scenes like where a carriage crashes and flips over that looks so realistic I seriously wonder if that was a real accident and they left it in (since it also feels kind of random).

I will defend David Mansfield's soundtrack to my dying breath. I adore the scene where he rides around on roller skates while playing the Cajon tune Mamou Two-Step.

I can't recommend you watch this movie. It's so close to being a great movie, but just falls into the uncanny valley and I consider that to be the greatest tragedy... after the blown up horse.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Doing Okay Until the End...
4 May 2015
Warning: Spoilers
Maze Runner is accused of being a Hunger Games rip off. Well yes, but is that really that bad?

It is end you do it poorly.

Maze Runner is about a bunch of teenagers trapped in a staging area of some sort and the only way out is through a maze.

I thought Maze Runner would be about finding their way through the nightmarishly complex maze full of traps, dead ends, monsters, and praying you find an end.

*Major Spoiler*

You find out they already mapped it out.

Yeah, by the time Thomas, our hero, arrives he is told by the Asian kid (whose name I'm not sure they ever use) that they already mapped out the whole thing. There are 8 sections and every day one section will open and the other even will close. At the end of each section is a number.

In short, what the movie should have been about, is summed up in two minutes of conversation.

Thomas manages to kill one of the monsters and they get a device of it which unlocks a new area which has the exit. But one of the leaders is convinced Thomas has done nothing but bring danger to them by killing the monster which makes little sense because we don't have the context for it. Douche teen (again, I don't remember his name) says they've always coexisted with the monsters which makes no sense since they seem really dangerous and determined to kill them.

To make matters worse, that night, they're attacked by the monsters and many of the teens killed.

With little to lose, Thomas leads most of the teens (minus douchbag and a handful of his followers) through the maze and it turns out those numbers were exit code. That would have been cool if we were there to see them find the numbers.

They go out of the maze and into some hall and find an exit sign. Which is actually the only funny scene in the movie.

And this is were the movie really flies off the rails. It turns out its Resident Evil.

I'm not kidding. It's not a Resident Evil movie, but the sun scorched the Earth, most of the human race was killed, and then some rage virus broke out. These teens are the only ones immune to the virus and this was some kind of test which raises a million questions like:

1) Why risk killing the few people immune to the virus? 2) Why erase their memories? 3) If you needed to test them and make sure they were ready to take back the world, why not tell them and send them to a military style training facility? 4) Why didn't you tell them the truth? Wouldn't saying "you're seriously our only hope or its the end of the human race" be a pretty good motivation? 5) If you could build a sustainable environment like where the kids were living with these giant walls, why not just move in and live there?

Then are questions like how much they don't climb the vines. Sure they say they don't go all the way to the top, but I can clearly see they do!Why not say there are auto-turrets that will kill you or something? Maybe in the book that its based on the vines really don't go to the top which means the movie added a plot hole.

Also the teens themselves really aren't that interesting. I remember Thomas, girl, douche bag, leader/black kid, Asian teen, teen who seems to be Thomas's other friend, and Chuck/Piggy from Lord of the Flies.

I will say I'm kinda' interested in seeing the sequel so it didn't kill my interest that much, but this movie is really stupid when you get to the twist. And that whole exploring the maze would have made for a more interesting movie. Or a pretty decent video game where you have to explore a maze in a time limit before night comes while dodging traps, monsters, and changing walls, find a number and then put it into a code to get out. That be pretty cool.
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
It's Pretty Good, but..
28 April 2015
I'm gonna' hold off until the end to say what my biggest problem is.

Firstly, I watched Star Wars Rebels and hated it, but most people told me the Clone Wars as really good. Well it's better, but also has its problems.

The animation is pretty good for the most parts.CGI TV shows never look good because they just don't have the time or budget to achieve the kind of animation you'd see in Pixar or Dinsey movies like Tangled, probably the most beautiful CGI I have ever seen. But the Clone Wars do make some things look really good. The ships and vehicles look amazing and I just love seeing them. I'm also really impressed by the fire and smoke animation which, again, is really good. The aliens and droids mostly look good. It's the people where there are problems. Obi-Wan Kenobi is one of the worst looking, his hair and beard looks like plastic or foam rubber. That's pretty normal for lower grade CGI, hair is pretty hard to animate, though considering how well fire, explosions, smoke, fog, and environments look, I can't help but wonder why they couldn't texture a major character's hair a little better. There is a scene where Obi-Wan is talking to Admiral Yulan and Yulan, looks pretty good. It's a trend I notice, if the hair is short like most of the clones, it's harder to see how bad the textures are, if they're longer it's pretty obvious.

The episodes where kinda' "meh" at first, at least until I got to the episode Rookies, which was about a small group of rookie clone troopers must defend their outpost against all odds. It felt as grim and desperate at the Clone Wars were said to be and the dry humor of the clones in the face of devastating loses really set the tone. The show had a decent amount of variety sometimes following major characters or switches to less known characters. Some of my favorites were the episodes that focused on the clones, the poor guys bred to be cannon fodder in what is probably the most unethical military I have seen since Nazi Germany.

Even if the stories don't work, the battles are fun to watch. All the lightsaber battles are fast paced and keep you on the edge of your set. There is a scene of grand scale in the space battles when you see fleets smash into each other with starfighters slugging it out and laser fire dancing all around. I can't felt the show there either.

I have a lot of nice things, but what is my problem? Well it's a prequel... and well, I've heard complaints about there not being a proper end, but there is. It's called Star Wars Episode III: Revenge of the Sith.

And that's the problem. Almost all these characters are doomed! How can I get invested in all these Jedi when I know most of them will die. How can I get invested in Padme when I know she dies in child birth. How can I root for Anakin when I know he will become Darth Vader. How can I be worried about the Republic when I know it will become the Empire.

At least with the clones there is some tragedy there. They will have short life spans like all clones, they are made in a factory for the purpose of dying, and they are left with no choice but to one day kill most of the Jedi they are fighting with.

The Clone Wars is good and on its own merits I would rate it highly, but I can never bring myself to love it knowing the fate of all these guys. The movies despite their major problems at least were geared to show the events that lead to the fall of the Jedi and the origins of Darth Vader. The TV show is just too flawed a concept and I just can't get past that.
6 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Star Wars: Rebels (2014–2018)
4/10
Does nothing bad, but does nothing to stand out
26 April 2015
It's not awful, but it's not good. It probably doesn't help that I just read the Thrawn Trilogy. Star Wars Rebels is officially set between Revenge of the Sith and A New Hope. And since it doesn't involve Mara Jade, Darth Vadar, Gilan Pelleon, or any other character I actually care about, I don't care.

I might be being pretty unfair, I just read one of the greatest things in the Star Wars franchise with amazing characters and interesting stories that treated me like I was an adult and here I am watching Star Wars for kids.

The show is about a teenager named Ezra, who basically is Aladdin if he had the force... actually he looks suspiciously like him and this is owned by Disney now...

Ezra's pretty much lost everything to the newly formed Empire and he finds himself a member of smuggler ship that is part of the rebellion and we see the evil deeds of the Empire and travel around the galaxy never knowing what adventure comes next... unless you actively watch scifi then this is a pretty generic story.

On this ship is Ezra emo streetrat kid who has the force, Kanan a survivor of the purge to be our mentor who has seen and lost too much, Hera to be our motherly/wise advice giving character, Zeb who is the standard tough guy/comedy relief character, an R2D2 knockoff, and Sabine who is Ezra's love interest. She's also arty and shoots things.

I think that's really my problem with this as a whole, it's a pretty generic setting with a generic story with very generic characters. Every scene I think of something I'm reminded of from other Star Wars stories or other scifi from Firefly to Cowboy Bebop to Gundam and even a little Star Trek. I technically watched more than four episodes, but I stopped paying attention and it was all background noise.

My nephews seem to like it, so there's that.

Go read Heir to the Empire.
10 out of 27 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Airport (1970)
8/10
Gleefully Walks the Line of Good and Hilarious Unintentional Comedy
6 March 2015
I should qualify my above statement by saying I'm 25 and my entire experience with Airport before hand was none. I have seen both Airplane movies, I own them and the Naked Gun movies, their my favorite comedies.

So I wondered when this came up on Turner Classic Movies if I could take this movie seriously.

I was not surprised how much unintentional comedy is in this movie. There are so many things in this movie that could only happen not only pre-9/11, but pre-Lockerbie Bombing. Like how a passenger (Helen Hayes) managed to sneak aboard an international flight and it did not caused every federal agency to freak out. Or the captain leaving the flight deck during the flight. Or that the captain smoked a pipe... while flying. Or that George Kennedy is in this movie. I'm know he was a serious actor, but I will always remember him as the man foaming at the mouth in the Naked Gun 2 1/2.

But I was even more surprised how much intentional comedy there is in this movie. There is a scene when the plane is returning because something went horribly wrong (not much of a spoiler in the "original disaster movie") and one of the passengers is freaking out screaming "we're all gonna' die!". On the other side of the aisle is a priest in one fluid movement crosses himself and backhands the guy in the face.

The drama is also pretty good as you see a three or so minor plots all pull together in one major disaster threatening to kill everyone on board this Boeing 707. As someone who watches that air disaster documentary I felt like it was a story done by someone who actually knew a thing or two about airlines. Actually Airport is apparently based off a book written with enough technical details worthy of Tom Clancy... and since Tom Clancy is my favorite author I might read it.

There are some things like slightly stilted acting and some odd editing choices like when characters are talking via phone or radio they insert the person on the other end. It's not a bad idea, but I normally associate this kind of shot with sitcoms and feels out of place in a drama. It was better used in the middle of the movie when a woman disappears and they use the PA to alert security and as they make the announcement it shows security guards in different points in the airport all snapping to attention, I thought it was very effective there.

Also points where I thought when the plane comes in for its inevitable emergency landing that I thought we needed more exterior shots or the people on the ground waiting for the plane, but I assume they just didn't have the budget since in 1970 they would have had to use practical effects. But that is also what I liked, everything was practical. Even seeing the obvious toy airplane gliding on a string through dry ice just made me smile.

Airport is in summary a good movie. It has comedy, it has drama, it has romance, it has interesting cinematography, it has good actors, it has practical effects, and it has the charm of an old movie. I think having seen Airplane first enhanced my enjoyment. It's one of those movies that has something for everyone.
5 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
The Most Enjoyable Bad Movie I have Ever Seen
1 January 2015
Warning: Spoilers
I first heard about this movie from an internet critic Nash who did reviewed some episodes of Classic Doctor Who. You can check it out for yourselves at ChannelAwecome.com, it's a really funny one.

This is the most 60s looking movie I have ever seen complete with a soundtrack out of the late Looney Tunes and the most ridiculous plot I have ever seen.

Basically the Deleks, the most popular Doctor Who villains, have invaded the Earth and Doctor Who (who is called Dr. Who in this movie) and have enslaved the human race that reminds me of the Combine occupation of Earth in Half Life 2. We have people who work with the Deleks and an active resistance and the Doctor played by Peter Cushing is our Morgan Freeman. I will say Peter Cushing does make for a great Doctor and I unironically enjoyed his performance, he smart, charming, fun, and I will defend him to my dying breath.

I don't know how to explain to you the insane plan of the Deleks or how our heroes defeat them without heavy spoilers, but needless to say I wouldn't be surprised to find out everyone involved in writing it had never watched an episode of Doctor Who and was on enough drugs to kill a small army. If you watch Nash's review or read someone else's they'll tell you about the Delek's secret plan for the Earth and why they invaded us... and it's pretty funny if you think about it scientifically.

This movie is cheesy, has a grim apocalyptic setting that clashes badly with moments of slapstick comedy, and makes me wonder if it was written by a team of monkeys instead professional writers. But despite all of it, this movie was a lot of fun and had some pretty good actors which is one of the few areas it didn't screw up.

On a final note, I did have a lot of fun watching this movie and even if you are or aren't a Doctor Who fan (which I'm only a casual fan) you'll probably have fun too.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
One of my two favorite train related movies
12 December 2014
Warning: Spoilers
If your curious the other is Von Ryan's Express.

(Only a mild spoiler) Emperor of the North is an odd film and I'm probably the only one of my friends who likes it because I'm the only one who has heard of it.

Set during the Great Depression, Emperor of the North is about a hobo named A No. 1 (Lee Marvin) along with a loudmouth younger man named Cigaret (Keith Carradine) try to ride a freight train run by the most vicious conductor who will flat out kill you, the Shack (Ernest Borgnine).

I watched this movie with the DVD commentary once, I don't completely agree with the guy but he made some interesting points. He called this an anti-buddy movie because what looks like might turn into a team up doesn't work out in the end.

This movie basically shows an ugly dog-eat-dog world where we see men who really have nothing better to do or anything to live for take whatever small victories they can get. They is no reason that A No. 1 has to ride the Shack's train other than a matter of pride. I get the train's crew's position who don't want hobos (who sabotage multiple trains in the movie and even set fire to a freight car) on their trains. My understanding is that if crews caught a hobo they'd charge him money (at the time $1) so the bo' (the nickname for a hobo) gets to ride and the crew get a little extra cash which in the Depression I imagine they'd want even more.

There is the question in my head why do any of these bo's care. But that is kind of the point. The movie is based on a short novel called Emperor of the North Pole, which is supposedly the title for king of the hobos because to hold that title means you are the rulers of nothing, it is as meaningless if you were the ruler of the frozen wastelands of the North Pole. But who doesn't want to be king, right? It's like a petty victory is all they have to hope for.

In conclusion this movie is like nothing else I have ever watched and is one of my favorite movies. I have no idea who might like this. Maybe rail fans like me.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
You have to see this to believe it, I mean it!
11 December 2014
I'm kinda in charge of my church's youth group. It's because I'm the only guy in their 20s that shows up for church. I don't know how we ended up seeing this movie because none of us wanted to see this. The teens didn't want to see some religious movie, my pastor didn't want to see this because she loathes Kirk Cameron, and I didn't want to see it because I wanted to see a good movie. Apparently one of the parents insisted we see a documentary about making Christmas more about Jesus and less about commercialism.

Well the jokes on them because shockingly this movie is all about justifying the commercialism of Christmas.

I was seriously not expecting that. THis movie throws so much BS at you that it's pretty worrying. It's also really funny. I think I was the only person who enjoyed this movie. I was hoping that Kirk would have a seeing where he's just says insane things like his infamous interview on evolution.

This whole movie is insane. I don't think anyone was expecting it to be like this with the random dance scenes, the stereotyped black guy, the stereotypical atheist, and everything else.

And now here is an example of Cameron's crazy points about Christmas: -The Christmas tree is not Pagen, it is because Adam and Eve stole from the tree of knowledge and to make up for the original sin, Jesus returned the fruit which was part of man by hanging himself on a cross, which is made of wood which naturally comes from a tree. So trees are really crosses and the Christmas tree is a cross.

I did not make that up, that is seriously an argument he makes.

And the whole movie is so insane that you have to see it to believe it. I don't think this movie will harm society because I think most Christians who make a big deal about the "War on Christmas" will be horrified by this and those who actually buy into it were probably lost causes. But if you want to see a man who clearly needs to be institutionalized just be gloriously and honestly insane, then watch this movie. I haven't seen anything this funny since Twilight Breaking Dawn Part II.
48 out of 60 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Agent Aika (1997–1999)
5/10
I can't decide if this is satire or not
6 December 2014
The thing that brought me to Agent Aika was a clip showing Rion yelling at another character.

I have never in my life seen a worst dubbing job. We talk about how the person sounds like they grabbed an intern and just had them read a script, but we're usually exaggerating to make a point. But Rion seriously sounds like she is voiced by someone who has never done this before.

Basically there is a scene where Rion looks like she's freaking out, but the voice actress doesn't sound like she is in an advance state of panic like the animation suggests.

The story is basically is that climate change has flooded the world and man lives on the remaining land masses. Our heroes Aika, Rion, and male lead whose name I forget are hired to do some industrial espionage.

Then they fight sexy ninjas... actually I don't know if they're supposed to be ninjas but enemies who appear out of nowhere in impractically short skirts. I don't think there is a scene where you don't get at least one pantie shot.

The series only get's more insane from there. I won't spoil the bad guy's evil plan... but it is so stupid and environmentally pretentious that I wonder if this was meant to be a parody. This was the same guy who made Projet A-ko, but Project A-ko was originally meant to be a hentai and he did make many others. I'm saying this is either a work of genius or unintentional gold.

I would only recommend for long time otaku because for new comers this series will likely only confirm your suspicions that anime is for perverts.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
One of My Most Beloved Favorites
6 December 2014
When I started watching anime I mostly only saw what was on Toonami or late night Adult Swim (which might tell you how old I am). But I learned that I could watch anime online and so I watched my first series that I found on my own... and it was School Days.

It didn't get better because I watched Green Green and the incredibly boring Tokimeki Love Memorial. I probably should have given up on anime, but I then watched Azumanga Daioh which had just come to the US at the time (again, says how old I am).

Azumanga Daioh was the first series I ever went out and bought. I still own the DVD box set. It's a slice of life genre (which also became a pet favorite of my) which means there is no real plot, just a group of girls going about their normal school lives. The only weird thing is Chiyo, a ten year old super genius who gets to go to high school (which is not actually allowed in Japan school system). We follow Chiyo, Tomo, Sakaki, Osaka, Yomi, Kagura, their teachers Yukari and Nyamo, and a few others throughout their three years in high school (Japan has three years of middle school and three of high school).

I think what made this work for me was that I felt like I knew these people like the ADHD Tomo, the tomboyish Kagura, the spacey Osaka, and Yomi is basically me. And at ending (which is obviously their graduation) almost made me cry because it was like I was watching close friends eventually have to go their separate ways.

This is a series I love to death and it makes me sad that it's starting to fade from the memories of otaku today. Even worse it was licensed by ADV who went bankrupt so DVDs are out of print. But if you can watch it, do it because it will brighten your day.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Terminal (2004)
7/10
Holds ups mostly thanks to Tom Hanks
6 December 2014
The Terminal is a guilty pleasure of mine. It's not a movie I watch often, but it makes me smile when I see it.

The movie is loosely based on a true story about a Iranian guy who lived in a French airport for 3 years. Basically Tom Hanks plays Viktor, a middle age man who came from a small (and fictional) Eastern European country that falls into a state of civil war. Because of a coup by the military the old government has fallen and the United States refuses to recognize the new government. All this happens while Viktor is on a flight to JFK International Airport in New York City. Because of the situation is visa is no longer recognized as valid and the US is not accepting his passport and because of the war he has no way of going home. Viktor is effectively trapped in the international passenger terminal at JFK.

And this is really the best parts of the movie. Viktor doesn't speak English and doesn't understand what he's being told and there is this great scene while he watches in horror news coverage of the war and not understand a word of it; just that war broke out in his country. Viktor literally makes gate 26 (which is out of service because of construction) his home. I enjoyed the movie the most watching him figuring things out like how to get money to eat, how he makes friends with the airport employees, or how he learns English. He's such an earnest and clever man that you can't help like him and that's what makes this movie work.

The cons of this movie is the romantic subplot that is deeply unsatisfying and while does at least have some impact on the plot, leaves me thinking this didn't need to be here. The other thing is the movie is a shameless whore. It's almost funny how much product placement there is. Boss, Discovery Store, Starbucks, Borders, Burger King, etc. are visible at nearly every shot.

Also the antagonist of this movie doesn't make sense. Basically it's this Homeland Security guy who just doesn't like Viktor. I think this might be some commentary on our system, but his superiors tell him he could learn a thing or two from Viktor and it just seems that problem is just with this one guy. He seems to make it personal. They don't take it to over-the-top levels.

Still, Tom Hanks is really good and it holds up for me. If it comes up for rental or on TV it's not a bad sit.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed