Reviews

23 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
5/10
There is less and less hope
25 December 2023
Warning: Spoilers
For many Zack Snyder's fans, just like me, it is hard to admit, but .... his last work "Reel Moon, Pt1" is a lame.

It failed, in many aspects. Lets go one-by-one.

Plot&story: it is nothing new, we are seeing cosmic level version of classical Seven Samurai story feat Star Wars. With villagers who will suffer from evil empire (typical tyranny just like Empire), main protagonist who hiding from her past and now helps villagers by searching warriors for future battle, failed homeless warriors of the past and now looking for revenge and purpose of the life.

I am not going go deeply into the cast and acting performance, lets just said ZS decided to follow with "300" legacy and majority of characters either has shinny oiled muscle hands and well trained ABS, which you can spot from mile away. God,.. I thought such trend has ended with in mid 2000 with Michael Bay movies, but then again, remember what studio behind Rebel Moon, so no surprise.

Visual effects & cinematography. I want to be wrong but it seems the movie had small budget, the way how terrible was visuals at landscapes scenes (Planet views, city views, horizons) this is something you could not expected from ZS, ever. It way either lazy team of trainees or just not enough budget for proper team. The positive from visuals effects, is face animation of individuals. Like animation of old battle robot- Jimmy (voiced by sir Anthony Hopkins), "spider lady", creatures and animals. Visuals for shinning (high-temperature) Nemesis blades looks great. The Director favorite, slow-mo feature is being used way too often and at scenes where it is not needed. Following, that let's go to fight choreography and how it is at the screen. It is not remarkable, no memorable, it is just weak. The slow-mo features in shooting and fight scenes is not focusing at actors, stunts, flying bullets\laser shoots it is just looking somewhere else, at the sand, at the actors back, at the table. This features does not show in details remarkable actions, it just waste of resource.

Music & sound. 12 hours after watching - I don't remember main music score for this movie, and themes its characters... Sounds design and mixing, i'd say not bad, but not a stunning.

Overall, we seeing a product with some raw, cheap, non-finished, materials which is only has interest for audience because of Director name. I really hope for part two creative teams, producers, director, STUDIO(!) takes some time, and work properly with mistakes of first part. But for now, i'd call Rebel Moon Pt1, the worst ZS movie.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
A beautiful picture with rotten content
23 December 2023
The whole point of BES is that revenge may blind your eyes and yet you still should followed it whithout hesitation. Wounds, braked bones, scars, kill as many as you can, all of that just to get revenge.

The all characters in this series are being followed by desires they want to successes. Some wants blood revenge, another by revenge of being dishonored, ones follows the desire to be great, and last - by desire to rule and conquer.

The only thing that this series give to us viewers, is nice graphical animations. With amazing voice acting and some lines.

Last time I saw anything similar to that was Tarantino's "Kill Bill". Nice pictures, with good acting, dialogs, and amazing music. But once again, main topic is revenge at any cost.

Maybe because of that it is hard to get sympathy for main protagonist,... and it is unclear if she is the protagonist at all?
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
when potential meets low quality
24 December 2022
The Story of Lamborghini as a Brand (does not matter tractors or sports cars), it's story, owner and his family life, fighting with Ferrari - require more timing and better directing, not mention writing. Particularly this movie is lack everything of above. It's looks like either studio cut 1-1,5 hours of materials because editing is so lazy and weak OR director + scrip writer just a did not take this project serious enough. Some sub-stories in movie appears and what looks like a challenges for characters are being just resolved in matter of few minutes of screen time. Frank Grillo is great in this movie as well as cast - no questions to them.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
You can not save today, but lets hope you will save the future.
26 December 2020
Warning: Spoilers
This article does have a spoilers, but they will not cover plot details or post credit scene. I will try to focus on other details such as Visuals, Production, Music. The risky decision of WB by let WW84 worldwide in Movie Theaters and HBO Max streaming service at the same time, can be understandable. It is in necessary to show finish product to the public. At time when quarantine was hit every single country, the backside is an a economic crisis - that hits a lot of spheres, but probably the most affected was the entertainment business, which is standing on the knees right now. Releasing Wonder Woman 1984 in December 2020 on streaming, as well as in Theaters - it is not an act of hopeless from studio, it is a new way of doing business in crisis! But lets back to movie itself. First what hit your eyes it is a colors. Yes, first WW(2017) was also brighter then MoS and BvS, but because original was focused on the first World war, the whole film was dark with gray pallet, while only Amazonians and Diana herself brings the light. The sequel takes place In 80's (Duh!) and the color pallets has been changed massively! Now there is less grey and cold colors, everything is bright, shinny and neon. The wardrobe style of every character is great and perfectly represent time period. Additional attention goes to Kristen Wiig wardrobe, as she slowly transforms into predator. We can see how her style is changing, from Nerd to Gym, from classic night dress to leather moto jacket with High Heeled Boots and then, of course, to Cheetah. Speaking of Wonder Woman nemesis, it is important to say that visual effects looks good. Not great, but not a bad. Above average 😉 First part of fight against "golden suit" Diana looks surprisingly amazing! Unfortunately there is a "fly in the ointment". DC and WB still does not have a solutions how to show superspeed for their heroes. We know that Ezra Miller's - Flash has some weird way of running. The same probably with Diana. She is not running, she is doing very wide steps, and in some scenes you can see, that she does not even touch the ground! paradoxical! Visuals is one of minuses of this movie... Music. I bet everyone already knows that WW84 has "Beautiful Lie"(from BvS) music score in the one of most dramatic scenes. But the for me main surprise was the other very iconic score in another, not less dramatic part of film. So you know, every hero in DC has it unique scene which shows to audience superheroes powers. In MoS - it was "First Flight" scene, with another iconic Hans Zimmer theme. In BvS it was - warehouse scene for Batman. in Wonder Woman - "No man's land". In WW84, we finally can see "First flight" from Diana Prince and the scene has been accompaniment "Adagio in D Minor" (Surface of the Sun) theme by John Murphy from 2008 sci-fi "Sunshine". Oh, boy, it was amazing! As I said at the beginning, you will not see huge plot spoilers here. Overall this movie supposed to save superheroes DC industry this year, but unfortunately this will not be happened. Despite great cast and performance, the plot itself very weak. And as well as first movie is full of pacifistic ideas and ideals. Someone can say, that WW is standing For truth, hope, for love, for humanity. But what I have seen few hours ago shows too much of this. Over too much. WW84 is not bad, but it is not great as the first movie. For every positive moment you can easily find negative one. Great cast and performance, but very weak plot. Great music but not great Visuals. it can be continued over and over again. So sorry for disapoint but rating 6.5\10
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Jojo Rabbit (2019)
9/10
A magical fairytale at the time of madness
25 January 2020
***Next test might be perceived in an inappropriate manner, but this was made specifically to bring more understanding*** thank you for understanding.

"JoJo Rabbit" is a great example of historical tragic-comedy genre impregnated with satire and the modern creative way of working. Together with great cast, perfect shots, color palette, costumes, perfectly written story - all of this (and lot of other) creates one of the most amazing and sincere movie of 2019.

Oh... the cast. Scarlett. This year is whole yours. It belong to you and only You. From Natasha to Nicole and then to Rosie. So different characters, so different performances, and all of this in 1 Year!! For your astonishing work - You are deserve an Oscar. The chemistry between young Jojo (Roman Griffin Davis) and Elsa (Thomasin McKenzie) sometimes remind another beautiful cinema couple - Zero & Agatha (The Grand Budapest Hotel). Sam Rockwell, Rebel Wilson, Alfie Allen -you guys are rock, and it doesn't even matter what uniform you are wear! And a young Archie Yates - wow, what a great work from this dude. If in future, there will be adaptation "Up", from Pixar animation to movie, Archie it is the first candidate to play Russell.

Overall "Jojo Rabbit" it a product of love, passion, humanism and antifascist message. It is like Taika Waititi and Wes Anderson had a love, but before conception act, they both were inspired by "Forrest Jump" and "Life Is Beautiful", and both understood what would they future child should look.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
((Hollywood + Music + Cars) / FFetish) *60s = Quentin Child Dream
28 August 2019
Warning: Spoilers
Quentin Tarantino movies in last 10 years became a phenomenon. They are empty inside but has very shine cover. Every time, the world holds its breath and with high expectations wait from maestro new "Pulp Fiction", "Reservoir Dogs" or "Jackie Brown". Poor people.. are so naïve.. This happens now. Music and Commercial on radio, Cars, Night neon street lights of LA clubs, westerns and crime TV shows, hippies on the streets. The whole story, about actor Rick Dalton, his friend-stuntman Cliff Booth, actress Sharon Tate, their problems and chemistry, all of them is only nice distracting cover, while the main character and story, is an era. Era of Hollywood 60th. This is probably only true intention why Mr.Tarantino wanted to film "Once Upon a time....in Hollywood". And you, as an audience, will love it. Yes, to you! Because every time when you seating behind Roman Polanski and Sharon Tate or Rick Dalton and Cliff Booth and listening radio with them, while leaving Cielo Drive, turn to Benedict Canyon Drive and in few moments car is filled with shining light reflections from Sunset Blvd. In such moments your soul literally traveling back in time almost 50 years ago. I am saluting to the Art Department, Production Design, Set Decorators and of course Music Department. All of you guys deserve at least Academy Award nomination. Despite all positive things above movie doesn't have one main thing. Film does not set a main goal. "Friendship?" Perhaps. "Get used to new times and continue career?" Noooo. "Finding your place in life, after leaving screen?" No! If the goal was to show us famous crime 1969 by Manson Family...it also failed. In some way, I understand that it was hard to rebuild shocking kill of Mrs. Tate and her friends, I think because Quentin is kind of romantic inside. As I said, previously he (Writer and Director) is obsessed with Hollywood of middle 20th Century, and for him, as for fan boy, it would have been like spit on his childhood dreams, on that golden age in LA, where he grew up, no matter how hard and nice it was in the same time. However, it is also not the first time when "Master of brutalism" and "King of blood scenes" decided to create his own version of past. Just like in "Inglorious bastards" & "Django", where "good guys" takes above over the evil by smashing and burning it. So when Cliff Booth at the end smokes "very special" cigarette you can understand, everything in final will be way more fantastic as it was in real life. Few words about Characters. Brad Pitt as Cliff Booth (Former military; war Hero; man of his word) best and probably only one friend to Rick Dalton (played by Leo DiCaprio) who is an Actor at the dusk of his career. Years ago, Rick was famous by portraying "good guys" in Westerns and Action movies. But times go by and now at the era of Hippies & Rock'nRoll he can expect only small roles as a typical "bad boy". As an action star, he had a Stunt double, and that is Mr. Cliff Booth. Both of them were work together more than 10 years and after long period, working relations transform into friendship. The whole story is spinning around these two. We became witness of falling and rising Rick Dalton as actor during one filming day, Moments of shame from Cliff where he can't hold his mouth shut and hands clean. Sharon Tate played by Margot Robbie does not bring any important information or action in film. She is just enjoying her life while Cliff and Rick working. That's actually all about this movie.. Overall. "Once upon a time..." glorifies Hollywood of 60th and Bromance inside of it. That what movie about. It is not about hard work in industry or killing beautiful innocent young Actress. No. Unfortunately. Quentin Tarantino continue to live inside of his phantasmagorical 35mm film, full of great music, brilliant dialogs, Nice cars, dirty female feet's in the middle of screen every 15 minutes, and with a story....which does not give anything important to you. 7/10.
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Boys (2019– )
9/10
The Show we needed. Away from DC\Marvel world
28 July 2019
The boys

Without any doubts this is best superhero TV shows right now. DC and Marvel does not have anything like this. Let's wait what HBO Watchmen will shows us, but for the now - we have a winner. Wildstom "The Boys" comic book has seen the world in 2006 and in fall 2012 was ended, with 72 issues total. And thanks God, Amazon has buy right for it screening. Not sure if Netflix would did a better. By compering different shows, as for me, "The Boys" very close to Justice League: Injustice. It no not so brutal like it was in DC and doesn't cover questions of what is the cost of justice and power, but the Show has only first season, so I believe if fans like what the saw in July 2019, Amazon will go deeper and will raise shows brutality. Shortly about plot, in the world where superheroes (Supes) are exist, all of them were legalized and all of them are working for Vought International. Transnational company with HQ in US, which: control, assign a missions, build a marketing strategy, commercialized and later known, develop a new Supes, around the world. Most popular heroes and those who bring more money to company are members of The Seven. Old materials Supes, who does not bring money are sent to 2nd leagues of losers. With great power comes a great responsibility but when your heroes are TV superstars with huge salaries and their actions could not be judged by any country and government, they turned into bunch of self-lovers jerks and jack asses. The first thing which you see it's how superhero team, almost recreate in some ways Justice League. Homelander - copy of Superman. Well, more cocky, narcissistic, with pseudo patriotism ideals. Leader of the team. The most powerful of all team members. Absolutely understructable being. Main antagonist.

Queen Maeve - reference to Wonder Woman. Probably best person who see true Homelander intentions. Previously she was in relations with simple woman, then move to Homelander, now alone. Have a problems with alcohol. From time to time trying to act following her heart and the ideals she was grow on. Almost every time when she's trying act right - encounter a resistance in the Homelander face. The Deep - analogue to Aquaman. And maaaaaaaan, writers together with Chace Crawford did an amazing job. That character has a problems with self confident probably because no one is really takes a seriously a guy, whose only power talk with fish. (Reference to Aquman in Robot Chicken ,maybe?) He has a serious issue with sexual life also. Vought knows that a dude is sexual abuser, but trying to cover this fact(spoil the entire 8 episodes). The Deep needs it's own series, because some of his intension are truly good but his actions are so dumb! A train - link to The Flash. The guy with drug-anabolic addiction. Earlier he was "The fastest man alive" and this title belongs only to him, but now world full of speedsters. And in order to protect his reputation, well, yes, he is usually on anabolic. Black Noir - you want to believe it is a copy of Batman, but No, It's analogue to Snake Eyes from G.I. Joe. We don't know a lot about him, only that he: never speak, good at martial arts & knives , parkour, ............aaaaand he is great piano player. If Susan "Sue" Storm-Richards aka Invisible Girl from Fantastic 4 was a man, he's nickname would be Translucent. One of the famous Seven team members. TV star. Most of the time use his powers to spy on girls in bathroom. Total jerk. Starlight - she is a newbie in the team. Almost at the first day on work she was abused by one of members. She is a light inside the "The Seven" darkness. I think her character has something with Supergirl and Stargirl, because she is also young and sometimes naïve, believe in all good, against all bad etc. One of series protagonists. Of corse there is a Vought International - VC president. But lets leave her story. I don't want to open all cards. Now let's go to our heroes aka simple humans. The Boys are team created by Billy Butcher, CIA agent who hates everything related to Supes. There are also: Hughie Campbell, the guy whose girl was killed by A-Train; Frenchie - specialist in bombs, weaponry and spy tech; Mother's Milk - former CIA agent, probably the voice of logic in the team; Kimiko - girl with inhuman "abilities", but lack of communication skills, previously was test pet of Vought. The show full of blood&meat, nudity, dirt language and this is exactly what you need from modern Superhero genre shows. It is not completely "Deadpool", but it is more combination between DC "Doom patrol" & "Titans" + Marvel "Daredevil". Entire picture of "The Boys" not full of grey paint and pain, even the opposite it is colorful and sunny. But behind bright colors of heroes costumes and perfect Hollywood smiles there is always darkness and dirty world of money, unlimited power and politic manipulations. For Marvel & DC fans this show is MUST WATCH without any doubts, fans of fiction & fantasy would love it too. My respect to Amazon Prime and all crew members who create this show. Overall 8.5\10
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Captain Marvel: When strong female hero meet weak directors\screenwriters.
8 March 2019
Warning: Spoilers
With these few word in title, you can easily explain all problems with a "Captain Marvel". Carol Denvers\Vers\Captain Marvel is obviously the strongest protagonist ever, in MCU. Thor? Iron Man? No way! From the beginning and till the end of picture we see how strong Denvers are. I really do not understand why would we need 3 hours long Avengers:Endgame if Carol can beat Thanos all alone in 3 minutes? MCU made Brie Larson character so strong that often it is way too boring to see how she fight against bad guys. Screenwriters has made her too much powerful. Speaking of screenwriters \ directors: Anna Boden and Ryan Fleck, these are the ones who responsible for movie result. Yes, I am sure rating was "corrected" by trolls. But lets be honest, it is possible worse standalone MCU movie ever made! Because it was failed with its first and most important mission - to bring strong female Marvel character on the big screen! Movie doesn't spend enough time to show Carol Denvers Earth life before 'incident'. From second minute on screen until the last scenes, Denvers all the time a strong, self-confident and some time haughty person. She doesn't faces many walls on her way in order to reach her goal, she doesn't evolve on screen as character (in psychological way), except her costume and super powers. Character didn't explored even at 50 %. Stanislavsky would said :"I don't believe". There few positive moments in the movie are: Ben Mendelsohn, Samuel L Jackson and the Cat. Oh yes, and Marvel intro logo in this time was just an amazing. I do believe Marvel should do this for Endgame also. In nowadays audience wants to see strong female characters on big screen, and me as well not exception. But in order to that, studios shouldn't do copy+paste tries, from some early 80-s movies with bad-ass lady, who kicks everyone butt. Hell no! You need to make your character more human. Human who was fall down, but who will rise, stand up and continue fight. Human who failed many times, but still find powers to reach her\his goal. This is only way! I am sorry fanboys, but this movie is really doesn't deserve good points. 6.5\10
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
The great debut with important message to audience.
10 February 2019
"As the world fell...each of us in our own way was broken. It was hard to know who was more crazy. Me... Or everyone else." This famous quote from Mad Max: Fury Road can be easily applied to the latest Karen Gillan work - "The party is just beginning". Every character(s) in the movie has depression\pain\internal self-destruction process in their own way. It does not matter what gender, age or social status they are. Everyone's - affected. We see, Aliester (played by amazing Matthew Beard ) - guy from Inverness, from bad family, who is astonished by being not understandable by his close friend. But he doesn't even care about those one special person who was always right next to him and support him in every decision he makes. Dale (aka "Ronan the Accuser" aka Lee Pace) - an individual who suffer himself for not being "a man". He can't give his family enough support, therefore he goes to Inverness, to finish his last days. "Happy caller" - is an old man from Inverness, who lost his wife some time ago, and now feels lonely without close person he could talk to. Despite that fact that he has a children's, he is scared to phone them, as for seeing himself as a burden for his family. Everyone from characters above are connected with our main storyteller - Liusaidh (Lucy) played by "Nebula" - Karen Gillan. And I must admit, her performance is stunning. Probably best for all her career. So, we see Inverness through Lucy eyes. Her close friend has abandoned her almost year ago, and now she is on her way of self destruction, although she thinks it is the way how this world works. Actions and decisions she makes are filled with carnal and alcoholic pleasure, caused by helpless of support from her family. As already mentioned, everyone in this movie are victims of depression, and Lucy family aren't exclusion. Both of parents takes mental distance from each other, as the result, their daughter became a victim too. I give a credit to Karen as a Director debut. She has made very meaningful and in the same way sensitive project. Sadly, film represent current situation for many people across the world, who are does not find appropriate support, and trying to run from this world and hide itself down inside of self brain. Anyway, for those who trying to run away from modern pop cultural super heroes and multiverses, please take a look on this one.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Five shades of Red.
9 December 2018
Warning: Spoilers
If you had a fetish on this color, after this movie you will look differently on it. Red brings variety to the kill and to the every scene with it. The author makes a fun of other directors and actors(Actresses to be specific) in 5 episodes of Jack's life. Here, and Uma Thurman, who was supposed to be quite recently in her mission to "Kill Bill". Like in Tarantino movies she has this long and annoying dialogues, when she managed to knows Jack more as a friend and good Samaritan or provoke him to murder. SPOILER ALERT - she managed the second. And there is Sophie Grobel, known for the Danish detective series "Murder", here she is playing a naive mother of two children, whose become a targets for hunter-maniac. In dialogue between Jack and Verge, you can actually hear conversation between director (Lars von Trier) and Public (in face of: critics; journalists, organizations, and audience in cinema). Jack in fact - is Von Trier, but under other lighting. Maniac's photo art performances were made using negative photo method, which is a try to attempt by the Director to show his own works. In general, the film in some form is the director's self-portrait. All of his previous works are collected here, all the criticism of which he has been abused in recent years is also described in each of the 5 stories. The House - which Jack is trying so hard to build, all the time is demolish in the early stages of construction, without completing the job more than 50%. Just as every director new work was smashed to smithereens at film contests, preventing the wide audience from accepting a film without criticism from "white elite people", so Jack sees his house as ideal only on paper and mock up, but when it comes to building - all plans are failing apart. And for the last. Yes, this film does contain scenes of violence not previously seen in films by a Danish director. But these scenes are not so brutal as these we are used to seeing in the news every evening.
2 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Your worst time at the El Royale
21 October 2018
Warning: Spoilers
Worst time for You at the El Royale I do sorry for your time, folks, if you decided to watch latest Drew Goddard - "Bad times at the El Royale". 2 and half hour of absolutely boring and tensionless screening, who tries shows to you meaningless hotel with flat clients. Each one of them has its own story...Well, at least screenwriter tried to write some stories. But they are so primitive and full of black holes that all you can do sitting on front of big screen is just yawning. My lord, how I sad about Jeff Bridges and Jon Hamm. Mr. Bridges. This man, "Dude!" deserves much more than this ..empty movie. Hamm trying his best, but unfortunately his character - SPOILER ALERT - dies after 25 minutes. Dakota and Lewis performance was weak no matter how hard they tried to do best. But worst idea ever was to create from Chris Hemsworth some kind of leader of cruel hippie cult who acting as Joker(DC)+Steinsfield (Leon)+Silva (Skyfall)....anyway this is so dumb. 'Thor Oddinson' looks weak with his ideas and absolutely non scary, but of course female part of audience will be looks at his muscle torso. Overall this movie has very slight antagonist. Cynthia Erivo is the true only one positive side of El Royal. Her acting performance together with vocals is stunning. Darlene Sweet character probably has full portrait. We understand her motives and decisions during film. Well done! Oh yeah, few more things to mentioned. I give my credit to Michael Giacchino for amazing music and Art Department for beautiful hotel design.

Generally, Drew Goddard doesn't show us anything worth. Except nice and shining but empty box, full of Hollywood stars names by it's sides.
4 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Full enjoy of every shot and every musical theme
19 August 2018
"Woman at war" it is a story about strong female who trying to do all she can, at any price, in order to save her homeland ecosystem. She is in partisan war against big technological giant who pollute her land. I give my salute and an applause to Halldóra Geirharðsdótti for her amazing performance both twins sisters Halla and Asa. The way how Halldóra run on Icelandic mounts and survice in wild nature would make to envy every single trail runner in the world together with Bear Grylls. Of course Cinematograph - Bergsteinn Björgúlfsson. The camera of this man shows magnificent landscapes of Iceland. I know it was shown many times ago in many movies. But in "Woman at the war" we don't see warm and green Iceland, as well as cold and snow land of Vikings. No we see foggy and grey tons, but this fact doesn't bring shade to Mr. Björgúlfsson work. Because the weather and colors of nature represent mood of protagonist. If you look at main banner of this film you may find hidden symbol. Treble clef. Because music is playing very important, or even A Key role in the movie. When Halla takes an actions and fights against police, government and spies systems we can hear\see her feelings & mood "in hands" of Icelandic music trio (Drumms\Sousaphone\Pianist &accordion). When, suddenly, in her life appears a hope, that somewhere in Ukraine there is a small girl (Nika) who lost her parents, at the war, from that moment, every single thought of Nika create for Halla a group of three Ukrainian choir singers. During all actions and all circumstances main heroine participate in, we see those 6 musicians represents different sides, and always split. But only at the end, we saw all of them standing together, when Halla and Nika finally met. I think these unity of different music styles together shows that Halla has finally find a peace in her life. This movie have everything. Good Acting performance. Great - cinematography. An Amazing music. Without any doubts - One of the best movies of 2018.
58 out of 67 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Skyscraper (2018)
6/10
Boring salad
17 July 2018
Skyscraper it is typical American project with focus (financial, of course) on Asia market. Movie itself doesn't give us anything new in "lonely hero saves hostages from terrorist in high tower" genre. So here is 7 standard templates are typical for this kind of movie: 1) group of terrorists from Europe with charismatic leader (ok, in this film main villain has lack of charisma); 2) "bad-ass bad girl" also right hand of antagonist; 3) old friend who betray protagonist and you know it after watching on him for 3-4 minutes; 4) main hero-dad who wants only peace after bad experience on previous job, but always ready to beat trash out of bad guys; 5) members of protagonist family, who were taken as a hostages (children's, wife); 6) girls fight at the end; 7) some small McGuffin at the begin which will play important (key !) role at the end of movie. Yes accent in movie was also focused on physical disability of main hero this fact increase empathy to him. But overall, Skyscraper its a combination of different movies. Not need to go far, you may spot similarity with "Die hard" series and "MI: Ghost protocol". Maybe this is why Skyscraper was release almost at the same date when "Die hard 1" was released 30 years ago. For audience this movie is nice way to spend 2 hours of their life, eat some popcorn and watch "salad" of action movies with main Action star of last years in main role.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
More action - less ideas.
8 July 2018
Shortly, without spoilers. Despite critics praises about how good this film is, personally, I feel some disappoint. Overall film is focusing about family members reuniting. From one side we see how Scott Lang trying to return back to her daughter after FBI puts him on home arrest(outcome after Civil War). From another side, Pym family, Hope Van Dyne and Hank Pym who are trying their best to return Hank wife, Hope's - mother, from quantum world, where she was locked for more than 30 years. Obviously the weakest thing in Ant man and the Wasp - it is the scenario. We does not feel any tension and threat to our heroes during their mission. The sequel doesn't have strong and solid villain. We have some short sighted and weak Tech mafia who chasing our heroes fin order to get their tech developments. We have comedy FBI agents who chasing main heroes. Of course, there is Ghost, but the more we understand and learn about this character, the more questions we ask our self, are she really so bad and her actions are? Yes this film is full of action scenes, which show to us more Pym technologies, and it also has more comedy scenes then in first movie, but we can't said it is much funnier as it was "Thor3: Ragnarok". Joke on joke, actions scenes and jokes inside of them, moment of some small tension and jokes again, after a while it really gets boring. Only scenes with Mikael Pena character bring joy every time when we see him on the screen, oh yes and of course Randall Park - everything he say and how he say - is it hilarious. Paul Rudd - absolutely the same, as he were in first movie and Civil War. Evangeline Lily got more screen time, well yes, because she is the WASP(!) and she is one of the main characters, and because about 80% of all actions scenes in this movie, include her character. Hannah John-Kamen as Ghost, i don't know, her personage is mystery for me, empty place, i can't say i like her, but that's probably because of script and not about her acting skills. Once again main villain in ANT MAN and the WASP is screenwriters. Their lack of ideas and maximum interest on actions scenes, instead of dialogs and building new strong characters, poses last Marvel movie as a typical summer blockbuster for people who just wants to came in cinema to eat some popcorn. PS:God, i already want to hear review from CinemaCins.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
The use of a successful project to create an empty franchise.
28 June 2018
I bet, when you first saw Sicario 2 trailer on December 2017, your thoughts was "WTF I just saw!? Why did you even try to do a second part SONY?" Honestly for me first film, directed by Denis Villeneuve, was an amazing work with enough tension and cruel realism of modern days, great music composed by Jóhann Jóhannsson , and freaking awesome cast. But now I am still asking, why for God sake, are you even tried to make sequel, if there is not enough premises for that. Well, I must say all Trailers for Sicario 2: Day of the Soldado looks brilliant. Honestly they look like Mr. Villeneuve work, but at reality, you can felt "his style" only before and during Action scenes. Both characters performed by Josh Brolin and Benisio Del Toro has more screen time and probably this is main positive moment, because we can understood more about how their mind work and what are their beliefs and missions. Female character in Day of the Soldado was seriously downshifted compared to the first movie, and I must said Isabella Reyes role, performed by Isabella Moner, is a little bit not understandable for me. During film she is transforming from "bad-ass self-confident rich school girl" to the "cold blooded poker-face witness of crime", and probably(FAN THEORY - AHEAD) will be recruited by US military in third movie as a new Sicario:)) Music. Jóhann Jóhannsson - may his soul Rest In Peace, did an amazing work together with Hildur Guðnadóttir. Their score is something that keep your eyes always open and increase your heartbeat. Cinematography doesn't give you anything new. Many of shots are completely the same as it was in first movie. No, it looks good, but only if you didn't see 2015 Original. Script. Oh man, it is the same!! Like in the original movie we see 2 lines. Main line - where we meet with our heroes, their goal and what are they doing to reach it. And the second line where we see desperate young men, from the "other side", and his way. While first movie was focused only on Mexico, relationships between DEA and FBI, Cartels and of course Benicio Del Toro character, second film "return" to Mexico theme, but under the prism of terrorist bomb attack in US. Human traffic, Border control, Cartel, US Military, Mexico Federal Police - everything like in the first movie. Maybe Soldado has few more actions scenes. But it doesn't change anything. SONY has decided to create franchise after 1 successful film, with the same style, theme, and almost the same script. Only audience can decide does this newly created franchise has right for a life or this experiment is one big mistake and it's better to stop using same templates and create something new.
13 out of 31 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Anon (I) (2018)
6/10
Correct idea for current time, but realisation.....
9 May 2018
Warning: Spoilers
Last work from Andrew Niccol is probably exactly that thing what you can expect from this kind of Director and Writer. Nearest future in grey anti-utopia tone, where bio-technologies playing key role in society. The whole idea in "ANON" - not new. The same technologies and what it may cause we saw in s1ep3 - of "Black Mirror" and the way how police work in this near fiction future is a little similar like it was in "Minority Report (2002)". Lets start from the beginning. In the nearest future all citizens in big cities has implants in the eyes, which gave them an augmented reality interface(next in text - ARI) together with lot of functions, such as: to record info from eyes \transmit this information \use free hands applications and solution (messaging, calls, money transfer, browsing web and searching etc ). Where technologies like this exists, you understand that Police department playing absolute God-mode role in society. Each crime (robbery, killing, suicide, corruption) can be seen by police department from victim or killer eyes perspective. Which is why every crime finds its justice in few hours. There is no more - unknown persons on the streets. Each citizen has it's name, bio, family information, information from job and so on. Everything is changed when police find dead bodies, where the last recording seconds is display video content only from killer eyes, instead of victim. This brings police to strange situation - integrated eyes chips was hacked by someone (Anon). Main police investigation in face of Sr.Detective - Sal Frieland (performed by Clive Owen), are focusing only (!) on main suspect - Unknown Girl (performed by Amanda Seyfried). Because Detective Sal Frieland saw her at the beginning of movie(!). The next what you will see is standard scheme: Operation 'Undercover' with "F2F meeting" and "In the bed with enemy" stages; Pain from the past; Eyes 'tricks'; "It's a trap ! "; Liars is around us; Nice quote at the end. It is actually all about story line. Now, I want give a credit to a beautiful visual work and operator work, when we see ARI with its algorithms, schematic view of proxy servers, video content played from people memory, video editing. Its truly brilliant! But there is a lot things which makes mark this movie with only 6 stars only . First of all, dialogs is completely cheesy and sounds like 5 year old kid wrote it; in 80% of dialogs - actors aren't acting, they just keep poker faces. And a phrases: "How should we found our killer?", "What to do now if we don't have killer's face?" are completely destroy Clive Owen as an actor. Maybe i demand a lot from an actors and they just acted according a script. But Seriously guys! Maybe you can drawn a picture of your suspect, such tactic worked back in 19 and 20 centuries. Also one thing about ARI, we, as a audience need to understand what is proxy servers? what is algorithm in video editing means? what does mean numbers on each corner of square, when person trying to saw video content from history? Anyway, I felt some disappoint.... No, I am very disappointed from "ANON"! The idea is correct! In term of latest Facebook privacy data breach, USA election hacking, and growing e-technologies market. All of this make timing of this film - correct. But the way how it was directed\ written together with acting performance, doesn't give me a chance to mark this film with higher star.
1 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Laugh at the times of terror
28 January 2018
Let me begin, that this movie is absolutely farcical and absurd is the way of telling history. I completely understand it was based on 'Titan comics', but for people who lived their entire life in Eastern Europe, and whose family's had lose their love one and family members, during Communistic regime in 1922 - 1991, this work from Iannucci is 'Too much'. Because the way how movie shows NKVD(The People's Commissariat for Internal Affairs) with its manager Lavrentiy Beriya and structure and methods of this organization, in some comical and ironical way, I am sorry but this not a case for jokes, you guys. The scenes with people executions and regular night arrests by NKVD doesn't looks like crime, it is more - permanent process on weekdays. Anyway, lets focus more on film itself.

At the ACT 1 and ACT 2 of the movie, director is trying to shows completely weakness of decision making process between characters, after 'mustache leader' gone. Someone's are playing in political poker trying to bring more positive and bright into people lives, after Stalin's years of terror. Someone trying to build a new country with new reforms and laws. Someone wish to leave all like it is and lives by the same rules as it was before. Someone is too weak in taking own decisions and they change, like a water takes the form based on environment. It sounds like everyone from team has some their individuality and strong sides, but when it comes time to vote or take single or group responsibility for some action - each one of them become little kid and afraid to say something. It this way, the next leader should be a person who does not afraid to take a step forward and unite everyone others with his\her ideas. And this is why at the end of ACT 2 we saw two main individuals who would fight against each other for taking golden Kremlin 'throne'. All of this takes place with a lot of humor and irony together with... IDK.. some warm colors, maybe. In ACT 3 we already don't see comedy. Everything become more brutal and cold. We become witnesses of how people takes real power and become leaders. Undercover negotiations. People tragedy that can be used like great change to remove your political opponent. The feeling of self powerless. Brutal unjudged process of execution. And old leader take the same fate as all his previous victims - by clause 'Enemy of USSR people'.

I must say the atmosphere of movie is amazing. Each of character actually playing important role in this project. Dialogs - they are hilarious! The way how personages change their entire idea of the line, in 2 second, just because situation around of him was changed - is truly amazing. Makeup and costumes are also great. Locations - ohh, many of location were filmed in my lovely Kyiv. However if like to look on the details, you can easily find plastic window in old apartment house and also modern fully glazed balcony's on surrounding building. But lets just see on this as a 'Director vision'.

Overall I think this film must be shown to every citizen of post soviet countries in order just to remind people how stupid, brutal and selfish can be politicians when they trying to reach their goals.
1 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
For those who has saved our present and future
16 December 2017
Ok, so to be true, the real mark from me - is about 8.4-.8.5 Before filming every movie, each filmmaker should thought, for what type of audience this film will be. Because, as we all known, in one country movie can be successful, in another - hated. It all depends from history of each country, on its current political, finance and economic situation. Every country has its tragic and dramatic moments. At the end of every such tragic moment: transport incidents with victims, nature cataclysm, political protests, revolutions, terrorist attack or war, people become united and works together. Just to support each other, share their resources with others, or to solve problems which was caused by 'others'. Very often, directors running by their emotions and thus make their work too screwed up, chaotic and difficult to perceive by ordinary viewers. And probably because of that, many of movie filmed right after important events, are becomes quite bad or lets called them, weak. The reason is very simple, authors (writers) do their jobs only following emotions and fillings. They doesn't spend many time for analyzing history before 'drama' was taking the place, they looks at situation from only one point of conflict, for additional materials they use data from Wikipedia or short interviews of victims\friends\real persons who been involved. "Cyborgs: Heroes Never Die" doesn't have any of problems mentioned above. Events, personages, interior and places, some monologues and dialogs, all of this was taken from real peoples who risked their lives and who were killed or was wounded during the Battle of Donetsk airport (real name: Donetsk Sergey Prokofiev International Airport) at autumn 2014 -Winter 2015. Those Ukrainians who served there was named 'Cyborgs'. First time that names were given by pro-russian separatists, because of specific how Ukrainian soldiers fights, how they used this building and non-human conditions where they lived. But lets return back to movie. It doesn't have one main antagonist or group. It is more complicated. We having: pro-russian separatist and Russian military forces from one side who tries to knock out&occupy airport as main strategic object; also Ukrainian general command, who follows only International 'peaceful' plans, his orders brings mess into situation; some of 'Cyborgs' has psychological issues caused, of course, by heavy military actions. These are main factors which create atmosphere, idea and probably this is the main line of the movie. Permanent fight with physical enemy, enemy in face of your command and with 'another yourself'. Director choose not to follow only one protagonist personage, he decided to provide each one of the them enough time to told their story. This is why, you are really understand actions and behaviors of every character and start to sympathize and empathize everyone. Dialogs and lines are clearly the best thing! First of all, this is not fully Ukrainian speaking product. As it was in real life, soldiers are speaking between each others on 2 languages, Ukrainian and Russian. Second, there is many philosophical and social historical speeches between characters. Movie just full of them, it gives the audience (especially international) the answers of what is the cause of this war? Why everything was taking place? What is the main motives of pro-russ separatist? Why so many young and old guys from Ukraine come together at this Airport, and what drives them to do what they are doing? Harsh\strong words are in use very often (like it should be on war!), but I believe, in real, it was way much more . Actions. If you are filming military film please be ready to spend money, a lot of money, for battle scenes. The battle scenes in this movie are very weak. If you go on Youtube and saw by yourself, what was the battles in airport, you will completely agree with me. So this one, is the main minus of the movie. Actors. I can't say anything bad about them. They are good or they normal, depend of characters they playing. And I believe there is more problem with script and lines. Probably this is very small minus, also. Overall "Cyborgs: Heroes Never Die" is the best Ukrainian movie of last years. Seriously. If you check previous movies made in Ukraine you will find that all products can be split on 3 category: historical dramas, modern comedy's, modern documentary, and some art-house projects made special for festivals. 'Cyborgs' it is like #MustSee for every citizen. The reason is to not to forget, about those heroes who has spent 242 days in strategic ruins, those who has lived, defend and died in non-human conditions, in order to save our present, our way of living and protect the country from 'lovely older brother'.
40 out of 77 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Justice Comedy central
16 November 2017
Warning: Spoilers
First of all, forget the dark tone of MoS and BvS, new Zack Snyder movie Justice League it is a comedy! And I think this could be one of problems of this movie. SO here is 3 main problems. PLS beware of spoilers below!!

Lets start with obvious problem which we saw in BvS and Suicide Squad – montage and editing. Warner seems like didn't learn they bad lesson at all. JL is a great example of terrible editing. All 2 Hours of movie you see different scenes hard cut one-by-one . Such switching between locations, Time and characters, may look like you was napping for few minutes and then suddenly wake up in the middle of some action scene. Time on screen for such characters like: Comm. Gordon, Mera, Martha Kent, Alfred - overall takes 5-6 minutes of screen time. Together! Some scenes which you was able to see and enjoy in Trailers are cutted. Well, probably fifth part of all scenes in all trailers - are NOT in the movie! SO, editing I think is the main and the biggest minus.

Second, it the tone and genre. By looking on colors you see that studio already leave gray tones like were in first movies, now we see more warm colors like it was in WW Themiscira world. That definitely positive moment. But changing genre by 180 degrees, from dark drama to colorful comedy, even for good purposes, it is completely stupid decision by Warner and DC. Some of action\fight scenes looks completely not dynamic. They are boring and you don't empathize to protagonist. Remember Bat fight in warehouse in BvS? You won't see this in again. Instead of this, we saw in opening scene, battle choreography like in Batman 1989, Michael Keaton level. I know that Danny Elfman was happy to bring 1989 Bat-theme to this movie, but create movie in 2017 and makes it style like it was from earlier 90-s, that is damn shame.

Third, characters and their chemistry. Main Antagonist. Forget about Steppenwolf from trailers and his lines "no protectors here .bla bla bla this world will fall..bla bla bla" and etc. and - Nope. Our guy spoke simple and annoying things so often that maybe this is main reason why JL need to stop him. The colors used for Stepenwolf - cold-gray pallet. Which is, I think, too insensibly for such character. Superman. Yes he is in the League. Yes he was returned from the dead. I will left details of this process. But the emotion that we saw on Clark face after his 'returning', and emotions after a day in hugs with Lois, changed his view on things. From brutal and cold Bizzaro to 'Your best friend neighbor Superman, from Kansas' only few hours in corn field with Lois and Mom, and you are ready for saving world and joking together with your new teammates.

Details, Mistakes, Mismatches all of this could by only 2 reason. On my opinion those were caused by: changing director + reshooting and hard cut. Just few quick examples. SPOILER below!! After Clark has been returned to his memory and mood, he flight to help his new friend. We saw him in in new suit where this suit come from? Who made it? We doesn't have answer. Another, very personal mistake. On first scenes somewhere close to abandoned nuclear plant, we saw old building with letters on the top – ОТЕЛ, - which translates as HOTEL – from Russian. In the scenes of final battle we see, another (or even the same building) with letters ГОТЕЛЬ – which also means HOTEL – but from Ukrainian. Yes maybe for many of you it is just small details, but believe me for Slavic people, in modern world, this is huge error. And it is based on disrespect from movie makers who just don't gives a sh*t on such things. I want to believe that this is Joss Whedon feature. He always put into his movies some empty civilian personages who are suffer during battles. And from Avengers time he didn't learn nothing about alphabets of other countries.

Positive moment(s). Chemistry of the Heroes. Relationships between Diana and Bruce, Victor and Barry,Arthur and all others members, it is great examples of how teams should look like. The Flash and Aquman are main positive moments and only because of them rating are higher than 5 stars. As a conclusion, my verdict 6.5\10. I really want to believe that we will see Ultimate version, and this will bring rating growth. But for now – I can stop expecting any positive moments from DC and Warner. They must to sit down, calm down, clear their minds and heard and find a final decision, what are they want to see more. Only money from fiction movies or movies with ideas and souls.
56 out of 106 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Mother! (2017)
8/10
Bible looping
17 September 2017
Warning: Spoilers
Last Darren Aronofsky drama "mother!" it is good (not great) masterpiece of adaptation of Bible Old and New Testament. For me it is good product (not a masterpiece), way much better then Noah. The main thing you need to understand- it is an adaptation in modern way, with some modern art features and new technologies. It is like, Bible was re-written\copied by Darren Aronofsky, used genre method of R. Polanski "Rosemarie's Baby" and 'suspence' feel from Alfred Hitchcock and all of this were filmed by lenses of Emmanuel Lubezki In order do not share many spoilers, below will be describe only few things.

In first part in the movie we meet with couple, where Husband(He) is a famous writer, probably in crisis now, and his young wife(She), who is trying to build nice home for both of them. But from a moment when He (Javier Bardem) & She (J. Lawrence) open a door to Man (Ed Harris) and his Woman (Michelle Pfeiffer) it is start point where we see how mess and chaos come into the quiet and lovely life. He is very love all newcomers and share their pain and love as his own. She is very quiet but trying to act as a owner of house despite that everyone just smile in her face and ignore and everything she said.

From Adam and Eve "crime", till moment of Jesus Christ Crucifixion…and its results. Movie shows great distant, between His and Her goals and moral principles. He is love all people no matter what they do and how they act. She is love only her Husband, their house and baby. We can't judge her, moreover J.Lawrence character is a main in movie. Most of the time you hate Him for his lack of responsibility and moral weakness, not only these things but others - create situations which we see on screen.

I am sure many of you will hate this movie, some of you because you more love pop-corn style films, some of you because it hurt Christian feelings. However every person has right to tell how he\she see situation\history\myth, and we see only Mr. Aronofsky view, every person can see it from another angle. That is why please do not judge this work, as a spit in the face.
4 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Atomic Blonde (2017)
7/10
Blonde Wick
28 July 2017
For me David Leitch is first of all director of action movies. His well-known 'John Wick' gave a new look to fight and actions scenes for whole industry. Also David known for his stuntman's\coordinator jobs years ago. In these few sentences I am trying to acquit minuses of Atomic Blonde. OK, so 'Atomic Blonde' return us to 1989 in a time of cold war and the period when Berlin Wall lives last days. Spy games are still running between Commies, US, UK,French. We see the story from UK agent eyes, told by agent Lorraine (C. Theron). I will not give you any SPOILER about all scenario aspects. Let's just say scenario is normal,have interesting intrigues. It is not masterpiece from spy detective stories and novels, but for such movies it is OK. The story itself interesting, but at the end, when all cards are being open, you still did not understand what happened 'who is who', ' how he\she did everything' etc. I believe that director and editor did not showed, all explanations and all moments in order to finalize story. Let's say 7\10.

Now lets talk about cast and their acting. You shouldn't expect many dramatic acting in movies genres like this. But in nowadays every blockbuster\Action\Fantasy\sci-fi has these moment in scenario where protagonist has some dreams or love\lover and in some part of movie it's all ruining. And this is a moment when acting skills should be using. However, in Atomic Blond main character ('Atomic Blonde'\Lorraine) always wears pocker face. We are talking about Oscar winner C. Theron! I don't know maybe she was acting like this according to scenario or narrations from Director. Her previous role where she played strong female queen Furiosa (Mad Max:Fury Road) and that was really amazing, powerful, charismatic, and deep personage. In 'Atomic' she is only strong and confident, and that all! Truly, J.McAvoy (UK spy\ 'Percival') character is way much more charismatic, interesting and emotionally deeper then 'Blonde'. Once again, maybe this way of acting from James and Charlize, were requirements from director … We have also additional characters, like J. Goodman, T. Jones, E. Marsann, S. Boutella and some guys who portray stupid Commies KGB agents (like always Hollywood does). From these persons, 3 persons has about 15 min on screen, from these three only 2 give you some important information regarding all aspects of story, from these 2 only 1 has direct connection with Charlize Theron character, another one has only physical connection (guess who :) ). There is 2 antagonists in movies, KGB agents and double spy agent, whose identity is very interesting for UK and French side only. About Commies as a villains, they are absolutely stupid and useless in shooting, like Storm troopers against Jedi's. All explanation above will cost 5\10, where 5 – is only because of Hollywood names. Stunt job. Here is where David Leitch can beat some asses. And he beat them using amazing C. Theron. What did Ms Theron is very very impressive and everyone should applause her. And each stunt person did a great work during this project. In John Wick most of action scenes from Keanu Reeves was based on 'gun fight' sometimes with using hand2had fights, in 'Atomic blonde' everything is reverse. But, in the same time here is difference between John and Blond. First personage was beaten and sometimes crawling saving his live, female character win all fights, and even after 100 kilo man throw her twice at the floor she can beat him (without breaking any of her bones) and in few minutes later take a deep breath and swim 50m underwater in cold water. What I mean, if David Leitch want to bring some realism and brutality in his movie fights scenes, he shouldn't make his main character - unbeaten. That is why -9\10

Cinematography is very important and very different during film. 3\4 part of movie use short shots for scenes, in the last quarter, when we saw adrenaline action scenes one by one - cinematography takes a long shots.Production Design, Music, Costumes are awesome you feel yourself back at end of 80 s. Overall, without no more comments and no more explanation. 7.5\10
4 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Live by Night (2016)
7/10
Something from with Ben
23 February 2017
Warning: Spoilers
OK, title may sound like provocation but we all knows Afflec's previous works and "Live by night" it a work that

stands out from all of them. Because, as Ben said earlier, this is project of his life. He dreamed about it, spend time for script, directing, producing, for casting, negotiations with studio etc. The whole story, as it is, may have potential, it is interesting, dynamic, sometimes dramatic....But i believe the main reason of such low rating level is scenario. Especially dialogs - they sound like 8 years schoolboy write some essay about how he spend summer, siting in home and gaming in 'Mafia'. Dialogs and 'author parts' are sound so simple and so primitively, you can spot such in B class movies in late 30th. Some of movie parts look like incomplete. We have not met widely with main 'colleague' of Joe Coughlin - Dion Bartolo. The personage played by Elle Faning should have more time and her relationships with father and his suffering requires more time. 'Thomas Coughlin' personage played by Brendan Gleeson, should have more then 4-5 scenes in movie, giving such little time to this actor - shame for director!

From technical point of view, thing like cinematography, music&sound, visuals, costumes an etc. looks very nice and creates picture of really big and serious project.

Other words, Ben Affleck as Director have success and i am sure he will have more progress in this role, but as a Script writer he needs help. I don't know, maybe he needs cooperating together with professional writers, or take not so big projects in order to have some practice in writing scripts.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
'non glorious hero'
2 January 2017
Warning: Spoilers
I really do not want tell you all script from "the Birth of Nation" but in order to describe, what are you going to be seen, pls be ready for spoilers and critic. For your better understanding i will use comparing with other movies. So, you probably know that almost every year film-industry give us historical movies based on slavery-racism-segregation problems in US. It is a standard situation, it always was and always will.

Some of the movies gave us deep dramatic stories with good directing and

brilliant acting like in "12 years of Slavery"(2013), "Selma"(2014) and " The Help"(2011), and some films was just a blood- action like "Jango"(2012) although it was tried to hide under the mask of "historically fair" drama. What are you going to see in "The Birth of the Nation" is a mix of all mentioned movies + one more iconic 'brave' guest. Nat Turner from his earlier years knew that he was not typical child that he has special role in this life, this idea was predicted by slave-African shaman. Children years, brought double values into Nat life, one side he saw brutal life-lesson from head hunters on other side he was deeply integrated into Turner family (with help of Elizabeth Turner)

where he learned to read and to carry word of God to the people. When his master (Samuel Turner) wanted get money on his preacher-slave by renting 'abilities', Nat saw hidden true life of that time. Anyway, we get product based on historical true events, but looking deeply on it - you can see only mix of different movies for each part; part where we see slave-live, based on - "12 years of slave", revenge from priest-rebel, based on "Jango", ...result of this revenge-revolution - "Brave Heart". Maybe Director (on behalf Writer) aka Nat Turner - Nate Parker used old rule: "Good Artists Copy; Great Artists Steal", when he made first debut film? But if to be very true, you will not feel any sorry for Priest-rebel at the end of movie. Because what he did, and the result what he received - can not be called - "The Birth of Nation"
2 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed