Reviews

3 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
Cheatin' (2013)
8/10
The latest evolution of a master animator
25 August 2014
Director/animator Bill Plympton became famous for his detailed, surreal colored pencil animations that became something of a trademark, but his feature-length films have bounced between different processes and styles, and have, at times, lost some of the impressionistic charm of his shorts and early work. For his last feature, Idiots & Angels, he combined pencil-drawn frames with digital coloring, and in so doing managed to preserve the beautiful sketchy style that he's best known for.

Cheatin' continues Bill's tradition of experimentation and evolution, with some truly stunning results. While it seems to use a similar technical process to Idiots & Angels, it's about as far from that film's dingy noir as you can get. Every frame of Cheatin' is filled with vibrant colors, for a pastel watercolor look. Long, exaggerated shadows dance across scenes that always seem to take place at dawn or sunset. The character designs themselves are likewise a bit of a departure, with exaggerated anatomy that borders on grotesque. Whether by virtue of new technology, or just experience, this seems to be Bill's most fluid animation to date, as well. It certainly doesn't approach the liquid-smooth 24 frames per second of Disney animation, it's the closest Bill has ever come.

Cheatin' also provides further evidence that Plympton has matured -- and yes, perhaps mellowed -- in recent years. While not without its surreal twists and turns, Cheatin' is more grounded in reality and has a stronger human component that any of Plympton's earlier films. We're introduced to Ella, a beautiful woman who has closed her heart, preferring the solitude of books to the company of others. When the muscular, handsome Jake rescues her from a perilous bumper car accident, she opens her heart at last and falls madly in love. The two marry and move in together, but others jealous of their love seek to tear them apart, beginning a spiral of self-destruction, infidelity, and revenge.

This story is told visually, without any dialog, but it seems less concerned with the sight gags and slapstick violence that drive Bill's earlier works. The net result is a movie that seems more focused on its story, if perhaps not as laugh out loud funny. Some might see this as a toning down, but it's equally apparent that this is still not a movie for kids. There may not be as much blood and guts, but there's still plenty of sex and adult themes.

It's great to see someone as established as Bill moving out of his comfort zone and exploring new territory, both artistically, thematically, and technically, and the result is one of his strongest works yet.
6 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Badly made, even for a farce
22 March 2011
The only defense of this film I've read is that it's intended as a hoax or a mockumentary, but even that doesn't excuse the horrendous acting and completely lack of any attempt to fit within its own premise (that we are listening to some kind of confessional microcassette recorded by George Harrison in a hospital bed after his attack). In actuality, this audio is a precisely scripted, studio-recorded narration of a completely horrendous impression by a person who struggles to even maintain a plausible Liverpool accent and is obviously not even British. None of these choices help enhance any "comedy" that might be there, it's just bad filmmaking.

I'm not sure if this movie is going for hoax or joke, but it fails on both accounts. Forget any hope that there's an interesting contribution to the conspiracy theories around Paul McCartney's supposed death, there's not even any humor to be found. It's just a dumb, pointless film that you'd have to be profoundly retarded to fall for.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Searchers 2.0 (2007)
9/10
Entertaining, funny comedy on a shoestring budget
9 March 2008
Despite the threadbare production values, Searchers 2.0 boasts a great script, a distinct style, and a capable cast of low-profile actors that handily step into the starring roles.

It's clear to see that Searchers 2.0 is an inexpensive film. Shot on digital video with generally modest equipment, it has a somewhat homemade feel despite capable direction, camera-work, and framing. It's obvious that this was a hurried, slightly unpolished production, but it's just as obvious that its creators were having a lot of fun making it.

Searchers 2.0 is a clever and occasionally bizarre revenge tale that lets the sense of humor that launched Cox's career with Repo Man take center stage. Like Repo Man it all escalates in a crazy, unexpected ending that was clearly tacked on late in production, and it works as well here as it did there.

Recommended viewing for all Alex Cox fans and film nerds everywhere.
10 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed