Reviews

13 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
War Machine (2017)
9/10
Fallen Empire (slight spoilers)
1 July 2017
Warning: Spoilers
With a similar tone to films like Lord of War, Wolf of Wall St and the Big Short, War Machine can only really be appreciated by those who like enjoy their narrative messages delivered clinically dry. Though the story is centred around the final push of a somewhat egotistical US general (played by Pitt) it's commentary stretches further into criticism of the entire Western establishment and managerial class.

There is a single line in the film referencing the fall of Rome and other more recent Empires. I think history will judge this film as being an interesting internal reflection on the collapse of the US Empire as it was happening - it is somewhat ahead of it's time.

Particularly poignant is the Marine who can't reconcile fighting an enemy you get medals to avoid killing, made all the more impactful by the issue that neither his sergeant nor his general can provide him with anything more than managerial catchphrases. This is how the world is organised now, around the Dunning-Kruger effect, as War Machine shows.

The acting is great, the script tight enough and the dialogue snappy - there is a lot to enjoy about War Machine - just don't expect to feel positive about the state of the world at the end. For anyone who enjoys films and finds that Hollywood has become too brain-dead to enjoy - Netflix is your answer.
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
If you like horror, see this
20 December 2016
Warning: Spoilers
I'm a big horror fan and this is the best little horror yarn I've seen in ages.

Well acted, with some recognisable faces. Brian Cox is great as the small town coroner that leads the autopsy on the titular body, in one scene he even managed to give me a sad lump in the throat which was an unexpected feeling during an unnerving horror flick. Emile Hirsch plays his son and assistant and though he's good doesn't have as much impact as Cox. Roose Bolton (Michael McElhatton) makes an appearance as the town sheriff.

Where this film really succeeds is in doing something a lot of modern horror has forgotten about - it toys with the viewers imagination, creating an uneasy feeling out of the narrative, half light, sound and shadow. This is not to say you don't get to see anything grotesque or unsettling, as certain scenes are not for the squeamish.

I don't want to spoil the story but will say this, the resolution is not quite as good as the build up. It's very hard for a horror film, especially one that plays on fear and the imagination, to deliver a conclusion that is suitably unsettling - this one half succeeds. But the ride is more than worth it and the ending is far from a failure.

If you like horror, watch this.
408 out of 472 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Sausage Party (2016)
8/10
Funnier than you think it will be (slight spoilers)
28 August 2016
I thought it would be entirely juvenile and drug humour - and a lot is - but there is more. The laughs span the entire irreverent joke spectrum and everything (including reality itself) get's the micky taken out of it.

Do you find the idea of a used condom complaining about what the human gods made it do funny? Is the idea of a Jewish bagel and Palestinian Yemeni bread (or something) developing romantic interests over halal kosha to you? If so, you'll love this flick. If not, your sense of humour is too precious.

It's inventive, funny and doesn't pick sides. If you are looking for a laugh, check it out.
4 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
OK but flat
27 August 2016
Warning: Spoilers
So, this film was interesting - the story was intriguing in a 'what the hell is going on?' type of way.

Lloyd is genuinely creepy and works well in the role. The kid who plays the story's (sociopathic?) protagonist is suitably distant and introverted. None of the actors are bad. It's just all kind of flat and lifeless.

As flat as it was, it kept me watching, to find out exactly what was going on, what it meant and how it was all going to wrap up. And, though it resolved, it didn't really wrap up and left a lot to interpretation.

Thematically the film seems to deal with a lot - alienation, empathy, death and love. Yet, for all it alludes to the film kind of says nothing. Similar to the William Blake poem the film references (The Tyger) - the film asks questions about symmetry and duality without answering them.

It's not the lack of narrative clarity that really hurts the film though - it is the flatness. The film meanders and not beautifully, just slowly. Worst of all the final reveal is corny, which subtracts from the overall effect and build up.

You could watch worse - but you could also watch heaps better.
13 out of 27 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Imperium (I) (2016)
7/10
Victimhood - a little spoliery
19 August 2016
This film should have been a bit better than it is - it's not bad, not bad at all - but it's just not quite as impact-full as it should be.

Some of the dialogue is quite deep and the films message is pertinent - hint, it's not really about neo nazi skinheads, well it is, but it's not really. It's about the true heart of fascism, beyond the history, myths and conspiracy.

What is interesting is that it makes you realise that victims are more likely fascists than bullies - that any group that claims to be the 'victim' is probably nurturing some level of fascism.

It's interesting food for thought but, as I mentioned, isn't quite as powerful as it could have been - just needed that little bit more.
26 out of 57 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Before I Wake (2016)
8/10
Somewhat original and quite enjoyable
12 August 2016
I liked it. It was a little bit creepy, a little bit fantastic and a little bit lump in the throat(y).

You can kind of guess how it will resolve and what the different dream elements are before the story get's there but it still managed to be engrossing and feel fresh along the way.

As other reviews mention, the story is about how the mind deals with loss via death. The seemingly odd combination elements in the film do fit together when you consider the perspective they are revealed to represent at the end.

The kid in the film is pretty cute and manages to make you feel protective of and sympathetic towards him without saying that much, which is an achievement in itself. The effects are OK - sometimes they look really good and sometimes a bit quirky but that kind of makes sense by the end also.

All in all, quite enjoyable if you are in the mood for slightly scary film with a warm heart.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Did no one get this? (Spoilers)
18 January 2016
Warning: Spoilers
Just have to say, I've read a few reviews and it seems like people missed the point of this film entirely.

Now, I'm not saying it's Pixar's best - far from it. But when you have animated flicks like Nemo, Toy Story 3 and Inside Out under your belt, it's hard to keep topping yourself. Yet the Good Dinosaur is not all bad and does tell a story, with a message, which I think has been overlooked.

This film is about being the better person by forgiving and reaching out to the enemy. The little dino's dad said he was him and then some - the some was being able to befriend the human even though they had nothing in common.

The dinosaurs were supposed to be us - and the humans were supposed to be either those humans we don't trust, or animals we don't trust, it doesn't really matter. The point was to give small children the moral message of bravery through understanding, forgiveness and being able to let go - perhaps a little deep but it is what it is.

The other thing this film is is an awards tech demo. The scenery graphics were probably the best rendered on a computer yet.

I won't deny that this was an uneven Pixar entry but I don't think it's as bad as some of the negativity applied to it.

It was no more scary or violent than Lion King. Dad killed by nature - check. Wounded protagonist - check. Eating bugs - check. The difference is that the natural effects, like dangerous weather, were so well rendered that a child could find them disturbing.
6 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Best since Pulp Fiction
5 January 2016
I was starting to lose faith in Tarantino - he was trying to say too much, or got too big for his story telling boots or something - but this is a return to form.

Gripping crime narrative with some great but simple dialogue and interesting characters well portrayed. It felt a lot like a Western Reservoir Dogs to me and Reservoir Dogs is still my favorite Tarantino film.

It's a definite departure from films like Inglorious Basterds and Django Unchained, which are a more epic in scope and I think suffer for it. I find Tarantino's style is better confined to the type of film with smaller scope and limited scenes, that gets gritty with the story and characters.

So, if you liked his earlier films, or character driven Westerns I'd recommend this film wholeheartedly. If you prefer Tarantino's later films, you may not enjoy this one as much - though it still has all his trademarks and is an enjoyable ride nonetheless.
3 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Star Wars is back, minus it's heart.
18 December 2015
I saw this flick days ago and it's taken me a while to write the review because I had to work out how I really felt the Force Awakens. Now I know.

As Ebert said - the original trilogy happened and it happened to me.

This film, like the prequel trilogy, just happened in front of me. It was more product than emotionally engaging narrative and I couldn't connect. Like fake boobs vs real one's, or my wife's hamburgers vs MacDonalds - some things feel and taste manufactured, lacking heart and soul.

This isn't about the PT vs the OT vs the NT. For me, only the OT has heart. Only the OT can connect and resonate on an emotional level.

Star Wars may be back but only in that way it came back in the 90s.
7 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Predictable fun, no spoilers.
11 June 2015
Warning: Spoilers
It's probably the second best JP film. 7.5/10 for fans of the series, 6.5/10 for non fans - it has a heap of little homages to the other films.

Extremely predictable - there is probably nothing in it that will surprise anyone who has seen the trailers and has any imagination but it holds together as solid entertainment from start to finish. No surprises with the characters either - they are exactly what you think they'll be. Dialogue is OK - a couple of clever bits which don't go anywhere and don't seem as connected to the overall narrative as the original JP and a couple of really dumb, disjointed bits to balance it out.

Dino effects - that's what everyone sees these for anyway - are good but more about wow than accuracy. You may even notice some scale variations, just to keep things intense but nothing too bad. No, they don't have the awe factor of JP but what can now?

It's an entertaining dinosaur move, which is exactly what it is meant to be.
0 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Conjuring (2013)
4/10
Horrific references
8 October 2013
The Conjuring Half of the Brady Bunch moves into the house from Amityville Horror, where, trapped in the color pallet from The Texas Chainsaw Massacre, The Entity does a poor emulation of The Exorcist, after receiving piano lessons from Insidious. The TV from Poltergeist was there and, oh yea, apparently it was real too.

It should have been PG/10 - I almost jumped... once.

Look, I appreciate that Wan cares about his horror films, bothers to develop reasonably relatable characters and can generally time jump scares. When you have seen more than a few horror movies (including Wan's), certain elements can begin to feel tried and tested.

Unfortunately, this film is rife with the tried and tested. There is nothing wrong with it - people who haven't seen any of the horror films I mentioned will probably get a fresh kick out of it. For seasoned horror watches it is just OK - another one in a long line.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Bay (II) (2012)
8/10
Good environmental horror flick
4 November 2012
I watch a lot of horror flicks and this one is pretty darn good.

I thought it was going to be silly found footage thing that I stopped playing around half way through because I got bored. It isn't. It's genuinely engrossing.

It plays like a conspiracy documentary but it is a horror/thriller flick. It just uses the format to build tension.

There are 2 or 3 solid jump scares and 1 or 2 disturbing scenes which are disturbing by what they don't show.

Didn't even know it was Levinson until I got to the end credits and was glad I did.
6 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Prometheus (I) (2012)
5/10
Spoiler laden review for Alien fans
7 June 2012
Prometheus is an entertaining, adult Sci-Fi epic with some dark overtones. It is not a horror film crafted for scares. It's not a last stand of against the space bugs crowd pleaser. It is not a bleak, sombre portrayal of a heroine's death. Nor is it a gory, tongue in cheek space adventure on the perils of cloning. It is Science Fiction action for the thinking audience and, considering how diverse the group of films it is a part of is, how anyone can suggest it doesn't fit is beyond me.

I had a lot of information going into my first viewing of Prometheus and I enjoyed it way more than I thought I would. The 2hr run time flew by. I knew the plot and I still had fun. I was afraid I'd cringe at certain scenes and they ended up playing fine. The film is so dense with story and visual stimuli that you can easily be swept up in it.

It actually made me happy, when the film ended, that I'd seen a film that had been designed with adult science fiction fans in mind. It is beautifully refreshing alongside Transformers, Battleships and all the dumb super hero films that muscle opposition out of the cinema nowadays.

Noomi Rapace plays Shaw, a scientist of spiritual faith, whose backstory is revealed as the plot advances. The character is complex and well-acted, to a level I'm afraid many viewers will overlook. Her strength is on the inside, she is not aggressive or assertive in a standard movie heroin way. Her partner is Holloway, played by Logan Marshall Green. In contrast, he is aggressive and assertive, which ends up working against him and Shaw. Though this couple shares a similar dream – to meet our makers – their reasons for believing that our makers exist is different. Further, though this couple's dream and their discoveries act as a catalyst for the plot in the film, their actions do not drive the events.

Events in the film are driven by David, a synthetic human played by Michael Fassbender. David is by far the most engaging character in the film. Much like his and his father's source of inspiration – TE Lawrence – David is torn between covertly serving his creators and understanding the technology of his creator's creators.

Charlize Theron's character Vickers' icy exterior is played in contrast to Idris Elba's Janek, whose relaxed, boyish exterior hides a dominant, determined strength. I could buy it entirely when Janek sacrificed himself to save human kind. I could also buy that his flight crew would stand by him. He was that kind of guy, a likable Alpha male. His charms were enough to win Vickers over, a woman his flight crew were enamoured by, so it made perfect sense that they saw Janek as 'da man'.

Sean Harris' Fifield and Rafe Spall's Milburn humanise early scenes with humour, becoming more 'people' in a mentally overwhelming situation than attempting to do their jobs. This brings me to something I appreciated in the film, the actors play people and not a believer, scientist, doctor, geologist, biologist and so on. Were Spock and Bones engaging because they were a scientist and doctor or because they were characters that reacted to situations in their own way?

Main Characters aside, I'll move onto the story. You can't get more epic in scope than who made us and why are we here. It's also a question you can't really answer because that answer is likely going to be different for each individual. Prometheus does not answer the question, well not fully, anyway. It answers with ideas.

Who made us? Statuesque blue humanoids from space called the engineers. Do we see them explicitly make us? No. Is it implied? Heavily. Why did the engineers make us? It's not entirely clear, what is clear is that the planet they 'invited' us to became a weapons installation around 2000 years ago. Did they plan to destroy us? The implication is yes. Why didn't they? Something went wrong. What? The implication is their weapon got out of control. What is their weapon? The creature from Alien is definitely related to it, if not the ultimate form of it.

If this plot seems too obscure for you, you will likely be annoyed by Prometheus. But ask yourself, what did you really love about Alien? Did you ever know exactly what the creature was as Ridley presented it? No, you didn't, Cameron turned it into a bug with a life cycle. Where did that creature come from? An egg, on a ship, with another alien thing. That is all you ever knew.

After Prometheus you know that the other alien thing is humanoid and related to a race that likely made us. You also know that the humanoid thing may have made the alien to destroy our race. It's actually a fairly neat closure. Explains why the xenomorph is so anthropomorphic. Explains why the SJ had such sad humanoid eyes. Explains why Weyland corp was so interested in the life form as a weapon – it's the weapon that our gods made!

In some ways, Prometheus is closer to Alien than any other film in the franchise. In other ways, it is totally different. By itself, it is an intelligent Sci Fi adventure that is fun to watch.

Was some of it cut? Most likely. It seems some gore was trimmed for a PG rating it never achieved. This just makes me want the Blu-Ray more.

My rating for it increases the more I think about it. I'd give it 85% now and I can't wait to see it again to find out if that rating increases. One of the mates who saw it with me has already expressed they are keen for another viewing and, considering I have no doubt it is the best thing showing ATM, why the hell not?
6 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed