I just completed watching the tenth and final episode of "Star Trek: Picard" on CBS All Access. The series is created by Kirsten Beyer, Akiva Goldsman, Michael Chabon, and Alex Kurtzman. Patrick Stewart is the executive producer and stars as Jean-Luc Picard along with Santiago Cabrera (Cristóbal Rios), Michelle Hurd (Raffi Musiker), Evan Evagora (Elnor), Alison Pill (Dr. Agnes Jurati), Harry Treadaway (Narek), and Isa Briones (Soji/ Dahj). We also get to see some familiar faces such as; Jeri Ryan (Seven of Nine) Jonathan Del Arco (Hugh) Brent Spiner (Data) Jonathan Frakes (Will Riker) and Marina Sirtis (Deanna Troi).
In the March 27th issue of The Guardian, Stephen Kelly's review of Star Trek: Picard, says this in part, "Trek used to be a vision of an optimistic future. . ." Kelly goes on, as he sets the scene of a speech made by Captain Picard to some folks just revived from suspended animation, "A lot has changed in the past 300 years. People are no longer obsessed with the accumulation of things. We've eliminated hunger, want, the need for possessions. We've grown out of our infancy." In these couple of sentences, Kelly paraphrased exactly what Star Trek creator Gene Roddenberry, had in mind when he envisioned the futuristic world of Star Trek in the 1960s. Throughout the numerous television series and films those ideals were held true. Although I loved revisiting old "friends" and learning what became of them after 26 years, I was disappointed that the original Roddenberry vision was jeopardized in this latest Star Trek outing.
One thing "Star Trek: Picard" does have is plenty of action. Plenty of dynamic visual effects. Plenty of stories. Plenty of history. And plenty of new faces; such Isa Briones who does double-duty playing a mysterious young woman, Dahj, in need of help from an old friend she does not know, Jean-Luc Picard. Dahj, unfortunately, survived two episodes when she was murdered by a secret society of Romulans. But she has a twin, Soji, who oversees a Borg reclamation project deep in Romulan space aboard an old Borg Cube they call the Artifact.
There are other new faces such as Dr. Agnes Jurati (Alison Pill ) a doctor working at the Daystrom Institute of Advance Synthetics Research lab in Okinawa. The Daystrom Institute, if you recall, is where Data's creator Dr. Noonien Soong, was a professor of cybernetics. Then there are two former Starfleet officers each with their own demons. One close to Admiral Jean-Luc Picard, Rafaella "Raffi" Musiker (Michelle Hurd) was a Starfleet intelligence officer who served as Picard's first officer during the Romulan evacuation. Cristóbal Rios (Santiago Cabrera) is captain, pilot, and owner of a starship for hire called La Sirena. And lastly, there is Elnor (Evan Evagora) who is a Romulan refugee rescued as a child by Picard during the Romulan evacuation.
A lot has happened in the 2 decades since Star Trek: Nemesis 2002. Of course, we all know that Data sacrificed himself saving the lives of his captain and shipmates. The crew of the Enterprise all went their separate ways with their own commands and assignments. After a short marriage to Jean-Luc, Dr. Beverly Crusher commands her own starship (USS Pasteur) providing medical assistance where needed. There were also two huge events that impacted Picard in the worst way possible.
Ambassador Spock approaches Picard about his concerns over a star near the Romulan Republic that is about to go supernova. The Federation agrees to help their former enemy evacuate Romulus and orders a fleet of starships ready to transport the billions of Romulans to a new world. Here is where Nero the Romulan time traveling villain from the Star Trek 2009 reboot gets involved, creating the alternative (Kelvin) timeline from the original Star Trek franchise.
Meanwhile, in the Picard timeline, Admiral Picard, being the true humanitarian that he is, prepares plans to move billions of Romulans from their home-worlds before the Hobus Star goes supernova. When the Utopia Planitia shipyard on Mars is attacked by a group of rogue A.I.s called "Synths" on what would have been the 323rd anniversary of "First Contact Day" leaving over 3000 dead and the Federation to band all synthetics.
Due to the lack of resources because of the attack on Mars, the Federation had to renege on their promise to help Romulus, leaving Admiral Picard and his first officer Rafaella "Raffi" Musiker in a precarious position with the Romulans. As result planets, Romulus and Remus were destroyed. Being of strong character, Admiral Picard resigns his commission in protest of the Federation's decision to abandon Romulus.
Now enough with the history lesson, my thoughts on Picard is mixed. Yes, I loved all ten episodes. And the new characters especially Santiago Cabrera as Captain Rios and Michelle Hurd as Raffi Musiker. The chemistry between all three characters is dynamic. Did I happen to mention Cabrera's other five characters? They are all emergency holographs and provide a little bit of humor along the way. There are plenty of protagonists onboard. Newcomer Harry Treadaway as Narek who is Soji's on-again, off-again boyfriend, Peyton List as Narissa Narek's sister, a member of the Zhat Vash and Tamlyn Tomita as Commodore Oh a half-Romulan and operative of the Tal Shiar are wonderful as the Romulan villains. Another character to keep an eye on is Elnor played brilliantly by Evan Evagora, the Romulan refugee, who does not know either to hate or love his old mentor Picard for abandoning him when he was a child.
There is plenty that I do like about "Star Trek: Picard". I will recommend this as a MUST SEE. But there is one point of contention. The same point that Stephen Kelly brought up in his article in The Guardian. When Gene Roddenberry created the Star Trek universe, he envisioned a world free of hunger, vices, wants, and the need for possessions. Throughout any of the series and movies for the exception of the Ferengi, there was hardly any mention of the need for money and personal profit. Perhaps, in the end, Roddenberry was envisioning some sort of a Socialist culture. He was defiantly promoting humanity.
With every reiteration of any television or movie franchise that comes along, the new producers and writers feel the need to "modernize" the story. Keep in mind Star Trek happens in the future, what is there that needs to be modernized? I appreciate the "grittiness" of Picard. I appreciate the dark pessimism in the Federation. I even appreciate the morally bleak outlook for humanity. I appreciate that the producers maintained a lot of the visual history of cities such as Boston, San Francisco, Paris, and Okinawa. Who knows how these cities will look like in three or four hundred years?
In the effort to modernize "Star Trek: Picard" here is what I do not appreciate; the foul language, the vaping, the divisiveness, and the needless use of pain and suffering. This is not the Star Trek that Gene Roddenberry had in mind. A lot of what we saw in past Star Trek stories had nothing to do with television broadcast standards of yesteryear. We saw how Roddenberry pushed the envelope when Kirk and Uhura shared that kiss on broadcast TV. We saw it because Roddenberry truly believed the kiss would not be an issue, in three hundred years. So why now are we seeing Star Trek characters vaping, suffering from addiction, cursing at one another, randomly chopping heads off, androids having sex, and treating others badly? Yes, all this is real, it happens today in 2020. But not in Roddenberry's futuristic vision.
Michael Chabon, defended "Star Trek: Picard" new direction in an Instagram post; saying that "shadow defines light", that "if nothing can rock the Federation's perfection, then it's just a magical land". While I can agree with rocking the Federation's perfection, I cannot agree with how we get there. To enjoy the next two seasons of "Star Trek: Picard" we must lose the language, the smoking, the gratuitous sex, the vaping and addictions. I get the need to "modernize" a classic to include the vices of TODAY, but Star Trek happens in the world of TOMORROW where all of these have been solved or eliminated.
One more pet peeve, if androids, synthetics, or A.I.s are all as sophisticated in the future world of Star Trek's future, why the need for retina scans or any kind of security to unlock a door? Aren't these synthetics already connected to a network of some kind, and all they must do to unlock a door is just command it through the Positronic Brain's neural network? Just wondering.
12 out of 33 found this helpful.
Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Tell Your Friends