Reviews

18 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
Emergency!: Family Ties (1977)
Season 6, Episode 16
7/10
STOKER SPEAKS!
23 March 2018
This episode is ABSOLUTELY REMARKABLE because the actual L.A. Firefighter, Mike Stoker, (who is an Engineer, meaning he drives the pumper and operates the pump equipment once at the incident) SPEAKS! In almost EVERY episode, he's on camera, but has NO lines. This episode features him actually speaking with his own voice! Will wonders never cease!

There is much blah blah blah in this episode, but I don't want to give anything away.

I will say, sadly so, there is no hemp! Holy rolickers! L.A. Firefighters fighting a fire in a 3 story Amityville Horror house (rather than a 2 story like in the movie), never using any hemp? How is this possible?

Marco decides to make enchiladas. No, not racist...

Chet loses his badge...

Henry...well, he does his Henry thing.

A little dash of cold-warism...there is an appearance of an Estes Rocket, a Pershing Nuclear Short to Medium range missile model. Complete with launching pad and non-regulated engine! Chet get the worst of this!

All in all, a decent episode.
6 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Quincy M.E.: Slow Boat to Madness: Part 2 (1981)
Season 7, Episode 4
7/10
Jesus Quincy, SuperCoroner, takes Scientology's greatest mammaries to dinner
19 March 2018
So... the premise of the entire series of Quincy, M.E., is that Quincy is basically the Jesus Christ, Superstar of coroners. Right. And this gives him jurisdiction to do anything, anywhere, anytime, for whatever reason. This episode is no different than the premise. Laughably so.

I won't go into the plotline of the show so I don't have to click the spoilers radio button, but I will say, this plot is beyond believable. Like usual. And as usual, if it weren't for Quincy, the world would end. Or at least this episode would have a bad ending. Not that this ending was good, just that not TOO many people died.

A note needs to be made of the Russian couple, with their TERRIBLE accents. Please hire a voice coach next time, and we as an audience thank you in advance for your thoughtfulness.

Why did I just totally bag on this show yet still rate it a 7?

Mimi Rogers, owner of the largest pair of Hollywood Scientology mammaries. She appears in this episode and at a relatively young age. Mimi, however, bends to TV code and doesn't show us those massive milk generators. Watch "Full Body Massage" for that. (Whoo hoo! for that movie!)
4 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Emergency!: Fair Fight (1976)
Season 6, Episode 5
6/10
Send Hemp! Alf's mom is in trouble!
8 March 2018
Warning: Spoilers
Anne Schedeen, most notable for being the wife/mom of the family who hosted Alf while he was here on Earth, appears as an arguing wife in this episode.

Also interestingly enough, Dixie answers the phone as, "Miss McCall." Unbelievable. That woman is a 9 or 10, even at the age she appears on the show. She surely would be married. (In real life, she is.)

Again, hemp makes it's appearance in this episode. If it weren't for hemp, at least half of all Emergency! episodes would feature quite a few trapped folks. Maybe this is why cannabis is now fully legal in California.

Score: 2 episodes reviewed; 2 feature use of hemp.

Wonderful mid-seventies fashions in this show including a glossy chocolate colored leather jacket worn by a doctor about to head home.

Oh, and a basset hound (Henry) makes an appearance, giving the episode a touch of warmth and friendliness. Those firefighters and their dogs. Gee whiz!

Would I recommend this episode? If you're ironing or cooking or baking a long recipe, have this on. Watch it directly? I wouldn't.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Emergency!: That Time of Year (1976)
Season 6, Episode 4
9/10
Send Hemp! And a Pacer!
7 March 2018
Warning: Spoilers
There are several amazing aspects to this episode of Emergency!

1. PAMELA SUSAN SHOOP. One word. GOLLY! (Perhaps fitting she appears on a show with an exclamation point in the name.)

2. She appears in the show as a BLONDE (perhaps her only appearance as one) and arrives at the emergency entrance of the hospital with her fiance...

3. ...IN A PACER! I'm not aware of this revolutionary vehicle (I believe it was the first American front wheel drive car with a transverse mounted engine) appearing in anything, so seeing it for the first time ever in a prominent TV show blew me away! A Pacer! Painted in bright gloss red, it seemed fitting for Pamela's ride with her small braless top, short shorts, long legs and blonde hair. Sassy, perhaps even sexy. Who knew a Pacer could be sexy?

If you know anything about Pamela, she's beautiful, built like a brick house, all real and willing to show it to the greatest extent possible on TV. (See her appearance on Buck Rogers in an underwearless dress imitating a disco ball. One of TV's finest moments.) Almost always appearing as a real redhead. Made one appearance topless in Halloween II.

Oh, yes, the hemp. Like MANY Emergency! episodes, there is a complicated rescue the paramedics and firefighters must perform and to do so, they need to use their hemp ropes. I would guess that 70 percent of Emergency! episodes feature woven cannabis.

I firmly believe a tongue in cheek reboot of Emergency! could be called Send Hemp! and could focus on the many rescues where the paramedics and firefighters use their thousands of feet of hemp rope.

All in all, a darn good episode. My thanks to the casting department on choosing Pamela.
1 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Do you have a thing for Teri Hatcher? I do. At least when she was this young.
26 February 2018
Warning: Spoilers
So. Teri Hatcher. She's been in this and that, even been a Bond Girl.

But this is perhaps her youngest most revealing role.

She's talking to Apollo at the pool, (Richard Hatch will forever be Apollo to me) and she bends over in her bikini. Her bottom swallows her bikini bottom to the point where no other part of the show seems to matter. Not even Gopher and Julie becoming lovers.

But then, after a show, Teri is talking to her room mate and finds out her past in Vegas has been revealed. She starts packing, while in her nightie. The TV network it aired on in 2018 blurred her bottom as she opened the closet and got her suitcase. Because her wonderful bottom exposes itself a little too much for Network daytime TV.

Throughout the episode, Teri wears hot outfits and so forth.

Definitely worth watching. Definitely.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Uhhhh....Not believable...
25 February 2018
Warning: Spoilers
Three women in their mid 20's to 30's playing college freshmen (Carrell Myers, Toni Hudson and Christie Claridge) all wish to lose their virginity. Somehow they become mistaken for hookers. Um, considering they're no where near 18, the casting was terrible. But also, the obvious. Since when, for whatever reason, regardless of circumstances, regardless of age, has any woman had trouble getting into a sexual encounter?

Please.

Unbelievable.

These three women would leave their virginity behind within hours if on a cruise ship. Or anywhere else for that matter.

Then, at least one of the women desires to have sex based on a relationship. If that was how she felt, why did she go on the cruise with her two hot blooded friends?

Unbelievable.

Then, there is a middle aged dude who develops Diabetes out of the blue. He's been a triathlete, a health book author and married. Yet somehow only on board a cruise ship does his Diabetes show and become diagnosed.

Unbelievable.

Then there's Betty White hanging out with Carol Channing. Betty is having trouble getting work and is finally able to meet with a guy who might cast her in something if she sleeps with him.

Unbelievable.

Betty White has and will work whenever she wants doing pretty much whatever she wants.

Overall, a great soft-core episode with plenty of hot babes in bikinis. The only really believable part.
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Quincy M.E.: Welcome to Paradise Palms (1980)
Season 6, Episode 6
3/10
Pure Fiction Aspects of "Causey, M.E." (Massive Exhortations)
23 February 2018
Warning: Spoilers
If the Bubonic Plague is EVER diagnosed, the Health Department is IMMEDIATELY notified. This is because of the possibility of it becoming Pneumonic Plague. In this episode, FIVE cases happen. The State as well as the County health Departments along with the CDC would be involved if there were probably even THREE cases.

The pure fiction of this episode is the stupid meeting where "Causey" exhorts about the plague to a small town and a resort owner. NEVER WOULDA HAPPENED. The State would have shut EVERYTHING down and quarantined the region until the cause was found, isolated and destroyed.

Nobody plays around with the plague, not even when forced to by TV writers and anti-development producers.

This episode, once the first case of plague is discovered, goes off to fantasy land led by "Causey the Exhorter." It returns to reality when near the end the county health department in suits is moving around the resort killing every rodent in sight.
2 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Lap Dancing (1995)
8/10
Not for Epileptics, Nor those in search of anything other than "Inspirational Viewing"
13 January 2018
Warning: Spoilers
This is a soft porn production.

There are therefore none of the following: 1) Plot. Not one that matters anyway. Those that argue this point are delusional. See the first sentence of this. 2) Names. No one in this film is a notable figure in society. In it's seamy underbelly, these people are Kings and Queens. The PORN underbelly. 3) Real sex scenes. No actual sex is allowed in movies unless they are rated X and that means your distribution is severely limited. So, lots of simulated sex is possible and all kinds of nudity, including full frontal female nudity. Having said that, this genre is intended for distribution via Showtime, HBO, the like, and direct video. Therefore, full frontal nudity is frowned upon and quite rare. 4) Sexy chicks who are wildly beautiful and have great bodies and are obviously not moms. That's soft porn code. 5) Good editing, sound, production values, good budget and use of it.

Here's where this movie bucks the norm.

1) There's a statement of plot. It's truly irrelevant, because the events that happen don't logically follow with the plot or reality. 2) The movie has a big nudie girl name, Lorissa McComas. Any other names, uh, I guess, but who cares? The late Lorissa is one of the sexiest and most beautiful women there has been. Which is what's really important in a soft porn movie anyway. 3) Some snippets of hair, but no real full frontal nudity. It should appear on Cinemax. 4) Lorissa McComas. Watch, see her, and you'll understand. She was made for porn and at least here we see her nearly there. Totally bucking soft porn code. 5) All true. A high school drama class could have done better. This is because their potential epilepsy hasn't manifested yet. Therefore the editing won't be like this. We'll come back to this.

The movie, in the end is great. Because we get to see Lorissa McComas, almost entirely nude and almost having sex.

This movie would have been perfect had the camera actually gotten within 20 feet of the action, but perfection is hard to achieve. WAAAYYYYY too many long shots.

BUT...

The EDITING! This is the most horribly edited film I've ever seen! Most nudity scenes are a half a second long, then a fade or a snap to another angle. An epileptic would seize if they watched this. Liberal use of the remote is necessary to actually watch this movie. I'm thinking the producer was gay and his lover is the one who wrote and performed all those lame songs droning in the background. Again, use the remote to mute this and play some good music from your stereo while viewing Lorissa.

It's an absolute shame this woman has passed away, but through movies such as this, she's never really gone.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Double Impact (1991)
6/10
Double Bubble or Double Ham and Cheese on Rye (With Extra Extra Cheese)
9 January 2018
Okay.

This is a Van Damme movie. Let's go over the recipe.

1/2 Pint of Napoleonic dude overcompensating by not just wearing lift shoes, but by gettin' all Kung Phooey and such.

58 Gallons of Violence and Kung Phooey Stuff.

1 Ton of Hypocrisy.

0 ounces Star Material (Names, A-listers, B-listers, C-listers or even D-listers.)

45 unknowns.

1 renowned skin flick chick, who doesn't get nude.

1 unknown chick who does get nude and later goes on to skin flick fame. Preferred would be she has a huge bosom, entirely fake, and when her clothes are off, it's completely apparent. Make sure her hair is dyed, preferably from something really dark to blonde, so that her eyebrows are severely apparent.

1 Cornucopia of guns and weapons with absolutely unlimited ammunition.

1 Foreign setting, depicted with as much racism as possible.

1 Teeny Weeny Tiny Budget

Preheat oven to "on." In a separate bowl, mix all dry ingredients together. Slowly stir in unknown chick, mixing in just enough nudity to achieve an "R" rating. Hype with all available tenacity. Put in oven and let this turkey get nice and botulism-ed. Serves all who can stomach.

The only non-Hong Kong Phooey aspect of this film worth watching is Alonna Shaw, and just one second or so of Julie Strain. Keep your remote handy and watch Julie Strain stretch at the start. Pause here. Keep this image on your TV for at least a half hour. Then fast forward until you see Alonna Shaw topless. Pause, rewind, frame advance at your leisure. Take your time. An hour or so will do. These scenes are the only reason the movie rates a six.

When finished, eject movie and replace with anything else out of Hollywood.
0 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
We first meet Taz
9 January 2018
Just as Coyote was introduced opposing Bugs, we get to meet Taz opposing Bugs. Just like in the Coyote meeting, Taz talks too. I am not personally aware of any other Looney Tunes where either Coyote nor Taz talks. Sure, here and elsewhere we get a lot of "OOH EH AH UH UH!" But if you listen, Taz actually says some words. The one where the savage beast is soothed by music and Bugs has to use this to get the Taz back to the zoo...watch that one and listen for any lines by Taz. But here, he has the classic line, "And rabbits." Bottom line, they rarely get as good as this. A Looney Tune keeper all the way.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
L'escot (1987)
3/10
An Italian lesson.
6 January 2018
Warning: Spoilers
The copy I bought of this movie was in Italian with English subtitles. But the title was in English.

So...Laura Conti. From the back of the package, "Sexy Radio is an erotic stomper from Spain that features the superb playmate Laura Conti...the film is a frenzied erotic comedy as sexy as hell." Uh, no. Laura Conti is a petite woman who is pretty and young with great hair and a great tan and a great butt. She never would have been a playmate in the U.S. Playboy because she is somewhere between an A and a B cup. Maybe Hustler material, but not Playboy.

So, what is a stomper?

If this is from Spain, why is it in Italian?

Frenzied? By this do they mean, "Hard to Follow?"

So, Laura goes around and behaves like a pretty woman who knows it and likes heterosexual sex as well. That's the movie. (She's a bitchy slut, basically.)

I never laughed once. I was not erotically entranced, ever. The simulated sex and partial nudity was never very sexy either. There is a creepy scene where a roommate of one of her lovers watches her and the roommate get busy. This guy has such a creepy look....no...not sexy.

The copy I bought looks like it was originally filmed in 16mm, perhaps even 8mm and the original was never taken care of. Just terrible. The transfer was at least from film, but as I say, it was a terrible original. This was made in 1987?

If you know who Laura Conti is and you actually care, watch this movie. Perhaps even buy it.

If you don't know who Laura is, forget we had this conversation and watch some movie with a U.S. playmate. One with a chest big enough to need to wear a bra.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
The 700 Club's Eurotrash version of girls who bite.
4 January 2018
All I heard about this movie was how sexy and great it was. So sexy. So vampire-ry. Ooh.

(Let the fake news sink in.)

So I bought the Blu-ray.

It was all hype. That's why this movie get's a 1 for a rating. A bad movie is a bad movie, but a movie that's 'all this and all that' which fails to live up gets an even lower rating than usual in my book. (A 3 would be generous.)

No, this movie wasn't a Harlequin romance novel. Those are sexier. Far sexier than this movie are the 'Sleeping Beauty' novels of Anne Rice. That's how tame this movie is, BOOKS are sexier than it is. I have submitted edits to the 'parental guide' section, detailing the extent of the 'adultness' of this movie. Just about ANY T&A movie from the 80's has far more skin, in usually far sexier ways. "Ski School," "Bikini Carwash Company" and especially "Virgin Hunters" a.k.a. "Test Tube Teens from the Year 2000" come to mind, just to name three.

There are 3 'lovemaking' scenes in this movie and only the smallest amount of actual nudity happens. I believe this was done to achieve an "R" rating, so the movie would seem sexy and therefore sell. Truthfully, this isn't team Edward or Jacob, but it isn't "Tarzan" (the one with Bo Derek) either. The irony is, there's as much male nudity as there is female. All without exposing the man's private parts, of course.

Let's face it, the vampire-ry thing is getting old and lame as well. There are many plot holes in this movie regarding vampire-ism and how it's shown here. I'll name a few. 1. The heroine states in a narration (red flag of a lame movie) that a vampire can be harmed by sunlight. Yet her house is an older mansion, built to take advantage of the sunlight for lighting the building. Like the "Farmer Old McDonald" song. "Here a window, there a window, everywhere a window window." And she sleeps in a bed in this house. Uh, huh? 2. There is another vampire woman who has sex with a dude to get him into a vulnerable position to bite him. She bites the dickens out of his neck, then dribbles lots of blood (the whole point of the exercise?), then leaves his corpse sitting right out in the open to be found at the start of the next "Law & Order" episode. (Lenny didn't die, he's undead and he's gonna track down these female vampire killers.) I can see it now.

This movie is fairly well done, but low budget and you can tell because the effects are kept to a minimum because the killings are so low. Most of the effects are simply physical ones literally done on camera. I saw ONE CG scene. The rest of the budget must have been spent on the "stars," Josephine and Roxane. Michael Rapaport and Riley Keough never were stars, and now you have proof with this movie. Oh, and I guess it counts for 'nudity' when we see a three-inch square of Riley's tummy due to her torn blouse. I can just hear Pat Robertson, "Give that naughty movie an 'R', because we can see Riley's tum-tum for a second!"

So, if you were a girl who liked the "Twilight" series and are now grown up and want to spice up your late Friday night with your husband after you put the kids to bed, this movie is for you!

For the rest of humanity, Try "Virgin Hunters." It even has an outdoor scene stolen directly from the "Buck Rogers in the 25th Century" series.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Robin Hood (1991)
1/10
Why Quentin Tarantino wanted to cast Uma Thurman
24 November 2017
Quentin Tarantino cast Uma Thurman in his Kill Bill movies to give her the shot he thought she deserved. This was due to her getting panned for movies like this less than High School play caught on film perhaps by a proud parent and mistakenly published by ANY movie studio.

This movie sucked.

Uma Thurman looks ridiculous in drag while faking an English accent. But the male lead doesn't even try to fake an accent, so kudos to Uma I guess.

That's just the beginning.

The campy hokey music playing during every fight scene makes me believe this was intended as a comedy. But the rest of the movie is an attempt at drama, with dramatic music while horses speed by. Dramatic music while people jump in rivers. Dramatic music while plans are being made and even presented. (But not during any fight.)

The Baron's court scenes include no furniture, none. No throne. (No budget, no prop master who knew how to make furniture? Both? Is the King on a budget? Allergic to wood and fabric?)

Jurgen Prochnow overacts tremendously, irritatingly so. Das Boot this is not. Das Bomb? Yes.

The whole movie is just, bad.

Every copy should be bought up and stockpiled to become required purchase and viewing by all theater and performing arts students. A lesson in exactly how not to make a movie.

That is the only thing I can think of which might redeem this drivel.
7 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Au Pair Girls (1972)
8/10
Three Reasons to see this Movie:
9 March 2017
Reason 1: Boobs. Due to the vintage of this movie, you are seeing all REAL boobs. All other reviews aside, this is a soft core movie. Plot, blah, blah...this is a great boob movie, period. There are many scenes of toplessness and more. Some of the best real, natural boobs ever caught on film. A must have on blu-ray or better for any boob lover.

Reason 2: Bush. Again, the date of this movie dictates forested naughty bits. You do see this, many times. Awesome.

Reason 3: Aviation history. Watch the opening credits to accurately see how people flew before the 747 and other wide-bodies. There's even a Russian airliner shown. Also shown are old terminals and many bygone airlines.

Remember, this is first, foremost and lastly a boob movie. If you love clothed women, watch something else.
8 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Coma (1978)
9/10
Golly!
7 October 2016
Topless extras hanging out! Joanna Kerns in a leotard! Dr. Goodhead getting an abortion! The trampy nubile French mom from Earthquake!, not wearing bras, drinkin' scotch and all naked and stuff! And Elizabeth Ashley, a black marketeer who smokes! Who said the women's lib stuff filmed for the movie hit the cutting room floor? I have to quote Gomer Pyle, "Well Ghaaalleee!" If you regularly watch the 700 Club, you'll see this as a pornfest of loose, amoral whores, gallivanting around, snooping where they aren't supposed to, being voyeurs in the men's showers and breaking things. That commie pinko Douglas breaks stuff too! That French tart must have corrupted him being all naked outta wedlock. What's with all the hussies, hangin' out with just fussy britches on! So many tramps, not doing what they're told, not even dying when the man wants 'em dead, then getting good men killed! My word! A 1978 PG movie, those were the days! It's another great Michael Crichton film.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Stash (I) (2007)
1/10
So bad...oh, it's just bad.
4 October 2016
Warning: Spoilers
Normally one watches movies which are less than $10 for the depravity, the nudity, or to just laugh at a bad bit of cinema. This provides you with campily over acted depravity, a few (less than 2 min. total probably) nude scenes, and some attempts to attempt to make bad cinema. I don't think that a fraternity watching this on movie night would enjoy it, not even to laugh at it. If someone breaks into your place and at gunpoint forces you to watch this, save yourself and watch it. Seriously. If your personal jeopardy isn't involved, use whatever means necessary to not watch it. Go visit your mother, help someone move, or volunteer as a bed pan changer at your local senior home. Do ANYTHING else with your time other than watch this movie. Seriously. You're welcome in advance for saving you from this cinematic pestilence.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Nudity. It's about the nudity.
4 October 2016
Warning: Spoilers
So...do you want to see some nudity? Watch this movie. Also watch the deleted scenes in the extras. Spoiler Alert! 3 guesses as to what i'm gonna say and the first 2 don't count. There is no other reason to watch this movie. It's a vehicle to see desperate moms bare all. (All the nude women are obviously moms. Every one. A cavalcade.) Having said that, it's some good nudity, thus the rating. There is no thrill or suspense. I was never frightened or horrified. I could care less who the killer was. This movie could have been nothing but nudes doing nudish stuff and it would have given me exactly the same level of satisfaction. The beheading scene was almost laughable, except that a high school drama club could've done better special effects, so it was just cinematically sad. Sad emoji. But moments later there's more nudity, so things get better. I recall one of my favorite lines from "Erin Brockovich." "They're called boobs, Ed." I would've given the movie ten stars, but you never see a frontal of the African European woman.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Prime Cut (1972)
9/10
Biz as usual from Lee and Gene, prevalent nudity
4 October 2016
Warning: Spoilers
You're aware Lee Marin was typecast as the tough, intelligent, classy and sensitive leading good guy, right? You're aware Gene Hackman is typecast as a psychopathic, intelligent, tough, slimy, sometimes super slimy bad guy, right? Spoiler alert! Lee and Gene follow their history. Since they are the primary cast, what's the point of watching? Watch any other Marvin or Hackman movie, perhaps even one featuring them both, and you've seen this movie. Another Spoiler Alert! Social Commentary Alert! THE reason to watch this movie is to see a young, nubile Sissy Spacek and Janit Baldwin nude. Why else is this movie being constantly purchased and watched? The views of farmland? Lots of nudity, the rest of it is yawn, seen something like this before stuff.
1 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed