Reviews

Spoiler: This movie is just bad.

First, can we stop pretending that Dakota Johnson has ANY acting skills. She must have made some kind of deal for starring in the fifty shades of awful movies.

Her emotionless, wooden performance is only one problem with this mess of a movie. The countless plot holes, awful dubbing, and just ridiculous premise far overshadow Johnson's incompetence.

How did a woman driving around in a stolen taxi for weeks on end (they have trackers), wanted for abducting three teen girls and assaulting several cops just catch a quick flight to and from Peru? And then when she gets back a week later, still have the same stolen taxi?

When in Peru, she just wanders into the woods with a drawing and finds the lost tribe without even breaking a sweat.

The villian looked like he wasn't even moving his lips when he talked, and the cost was just laughable.

If you're looking for a completely ridiculous movie to laugh at, this one will fit the bill.

I wanted to like this, I really did. But Snyder made that impossible. It was a disaster.

The story was shallow and poorly told. The entire concept was just laughably dumb (why does this powerful, highly advanced govt need 200 bags of flour so bad? And how are they still farming like its 1850?), the "special effects" were anything BUT special, and the acting was just bad.

The worst thing, however, was the inexcusable overuse of slow motion. I fell like this movie would've been 45 minutes without it (and even that would've been too long).

The good. Some of the costumes were great. Really about it.

I watched this when it came out and enjoyed it. I recently read the book and wanted to rewatch it since it's been so long. Wow, was I disappointed. The story is so far off from the book it seems a shame to even put Bram's name on it.

Where to start? The reincarnated wife bit was completely unnecessary and unconvincing. Dracula wasn't a werewolf. Renfield wasn't a lawyer. The acting and accents were awful.

Big fan of Oldman, and he was better as the older Dracula. The younger version with the bad wig was just hard to watch.

Not sure why they had to change the story so much, it's a book that has held up for over 100 years.

Huge disappointment.

I watch most of Tarantino's movies, but only enjoy a few. I find them quite pretentious and filled with inane dialouge and campy effects that turns a decent movie into a bloated snooze fest.

I started this movie not really knowing what it was about, and I'm glad I did. I feel like if I'd read all of the articles and reviews, it would've taken the element of surprise out of it.

I really enjoyed how this film intertwined real characters/events with the fictional characters. I loved seeing the portrayals of Tate, McQueen, Phillips, Lee and others. There was a sense of dread knowing what happened to Sharon, so the twist at the end was great. I do think this movie would be better with about 30 minutes shaved off, would be easy to do. But still enjoyed it more than I thought I would.

Movie started out great, and the more involved it got, the more ridiculous it got. This movie relied on the reputation of "Get Out" and failed over and over again.

Seriously, what was with the red suits? Why didn't they just kill the family like the other doppelgangers did? Where the hell did they get all those scissors? What was the point of the hands across America? Where did all the rabbits come from? Why wasn't there rabbit droppings everywhere? Instead of being on edge, we just laughed at the complete ridiculousness of it. Was so glad when it ended.