Reviews

3 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
10/10
A truly unique experience for anime lovers and haters alike
7 August 2017
I'll tell you right now that I don't like anime. I never got into it and of the anime I've been exposed to, I felt the horrible overacting and ridiculous plots robbed the medium of anything worth watching. Now that I've seen The Tatami Galaxy, I'm forced to eat my words and consider it one of the greatest television shows of all time. It's an artistic powerhouse with great characters, clever writing, and an unmistakable artistic style.

The art itself is admittedly what attracted me to the series. I've always been interested in avant-garde animation and this is one of the most beautifully animated shows of them all. I won't bore you with describing the style itself but needless to say it's incredibly unique and satisfying. Even if the writing was atrocious this would be a show worth watching on the animation alone. Luckily enough, it isn't the only great thing about the series. The story keeps reeling you back in time and time again until before you know it, it's all over.

The plot is simple -- an unnamed protagonist recollects his previous two years at university and, like most people, asks whether or not doing something different would lead him to a better position for his 3rd year. For the protagonist, this is often culminated in joining a different club or choosing to pursue a different girl than he previously had, and the series explores what alternative possibilities arise when these choices are made. Imagine "Groundhog Day" or "Lola Rennt" with the wonders and curiosity of a misfit underclassmen.

The show presents itself as an outstanding stand-alone project with a clear story structure. Even though each episode is essentially revisiting the same kind of conflict and resolution, the differences are fresh enough to surprise you every time. Every episode starts with the protagonist complaining about how he came as a freshmen looking for that "rose coloured" (romantic, idealized) campus life complete with a raven-haired maiden, and every episode ends with him asking himself if he had only done something different, wouldn't he have gotten what he'd came to university in search of? This formula allows for seemingly minute details and background characters to re-appear in genuinely novel and surprising ways throughout the duration of the series. The writing is astounding to say the least and you'll find yourself watching the series again and again noticing every time a couple of new things which either foreshadow or reference that which you hadn't seen before. It's not usual that such a limited run series can offer so much on repeated viewings.

The ending is one of the best finales of all time. It ties every loose end up in a way that I would have never expected and feels incredibly satisfying. The last episode answers every question you have about the series, has a very clever twist, and leaves the protagonist with some proper insight and feeling when it's all said and done. It even choked me up a bit, which was probably the last thing I'd expect from a show that doesn't seem to take itself so seriously. The sentimentality and philosophy at the end really strikes a chord and leaves the viewer with insight on their own life decisions and how to come to grips with them.

The most telling part about the show is that you don't end the series wishing there were more, rather, it's a perfectly self-contained package that covers all the ground it needs to without an inch too little or too much. Shows that are this well thought out from start to finish are so rare and few and far between I'm at a loss to even think of a comparable example.

So all this excellence and nothing bad? The only thing negative to say is that the narrative is EXTREMELY fast in every episode so reading subtitles is pretty much as hard as it gets. The worst part about that being how hard it is to enjoy the art style without missing out on key dialogue and narration at the bottom of the screen. If you're patient, you can pause it when you need to or slow down the playback speed, but bear in mind the rapid pace plays very well into the animation style, and serves to "cram" a lot of content into each 22 minute episode. But if the pace were slower and each episode an hour long, the show would definitely lose its magic.

In the end, I guess all I can say is to watch The Tatami Galaxy and see if you like it yourself. Give it at least a few episodes before you make a decision and believe me you'll be hooked. I cannot recommend it highly enough for those who like artsy animation, poignant but never overbearing themes, and the foibles of truly unique characters experiencing college life. Simply put, anime fan or not, this is one of the best shows you'll ever see.
18 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Excellent expose of a truly effective political genius
14 May 2017
This documentary is a thrilling history lesson that paints Roger Stone for the persona he has created for himself -- a deviling political provocateur whose ruthless appetite for controversy and infamy influences all things he touches, for better or worse.

Whether or not you're a Roger Stone fan, Trump supporter, liberal, conservative, American or otherwise, this documentary is fascinating to watch because Stone is such a unique character in an otherwise boring and mundane facet of society, the American political system.

"Get Me Roger Stone" is essentially a history lesson and mythical propaganda machine at the same time. Is Stone really to blame for all the political scandals he has a hand in? Or is he merely a larger than life figure who happens to revel in his own sense of political clout? The documentary does a pretty good job of letting the viewer come to that conclusion, albeit through an expectantly liberal lens. The editing, production, and musical score always play against (or with, depending on how you look at Stone's persona) the protagonist and while it does not overtly disparage the man, it certainly pulls no punches either.

The only truly atrocious bias in the film comes from the brief clips of Alex Jones's expectedly erratic behavior which aims to align the "racist" "conspiracy theorist" and overall "unstable madman" with Stone's persona. I felt it was a very cheap shot, and while I'm not an Alex Jones supporter in the least, the footage they use is definitely cherry picked to make Stone's association with InfoWars to paint him as a fringe lunatic.

If you watch the documentary carefully, you'll see that Roger Stone is anything but an irrational, crazy, or otherwise unruly brute who has a hand in nearly every political campaign in the past forty years. Instead, he's merely an ingenious machiavellian who will always play the political game as if he has nothing to lose.

As a documentary I'd give it 6.5/10 As a character piece, I'd give it 9/10 Altogether it's a strong 7.
33 out of 49 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Atlanta (2016–2022)
6/10
Atlanta (S1) - not at all what I expected.
28 April 2017
Warning: Spoilers
I really hate hype and I really hate big claims. This show, when it aired the fall of 2016, was pretty much hyped to death and regarded itself as "Twin Peaks for rappers". So like any sensible person, I waited until things cooled off before I decided to dive into it. The distance really helped me watch the show for what it, at least from the first season, is - a very offbeat show that deals less with plot and more with the mundanities of life than I would have expected from it, nor would I have ever wanted.

The flurry of 10 star ratings is no doubt coming from Donald Glover super-fans, and I really don't think this show would be successful if he had nothing to do with it. When watching it I had to ask myself that question, "Would I even be sitting through this is if it weren't for Glover?" The answer, was leaning on the "No" side, and I know I am not alone.

The show has is a simple enough premise but really leaves a lot to be desired regarding plot and character development. The tagline states it's a show about "Two cousins, with different views on art versus commerce, on their way up through the Atlanta rap scene." Nothing of the sort ever occurs. They don't talk about art vs. commerce at all. It boils down to Donald Glover's character playing the manager of his "gangsta rap" cousin Alfred "Paper Boy" Miles, and on occasion Glover's "Earn" will tell Paper Boy they need to make more money. That's it.

I was really expecting some kind of struggle between the two artistically, I was expecting some kind of discussion over what type of sound is appropriate, what type of promotion is lucrative, and whether or not taking such routes were worth the trouble -- regular musical-biopic-style concerns. But Glover, for better or worse, just cannot ever play it mainstream so he chooses to chase around vague ideas of poorly written parenthood (For two parents of a toddler, Earn and Vanessa seem to be incredibly available to live their lives without their child), ham-fisted "deep" ideas about violence (the scene at the shooting range where one of the protagonists decides to shoot at a target of a dog as some kind of social commentary on shooting targets that look like people.... I have to ask, have any of the writers ever even been to a shooting range? People don't just take their ear-protection off and start arguments, nor would a range owner ever take a shotgun and point it at an alleged troublemaker to scare them out of the store. The audience deserves better writing than this), and surreal just to be surreal moments (A mysterious man giving contrived, overly cryptic pseudo-philosophical advice to Glover, a showy rapper who literally drives an invisible car, black Justin Bieber, etc)

What you get out of this amalgamation of attempts at a David Lynch-esque TV series is a show that doesn't exactly know what to make of itself and doesn't seem too concerned with any fluid style or plot. A very strange attempt at a TV series, but not necessarily a miss either.

For instance, one episode will be about Vanessa losing her job as a school teacher because she smoked weed the night before with an almost overbearingly shallow Instagram whore (yeah, incredibly deep characterizations at play again), only to have the next episode be a series of fake commercials and segments for a parody of the BET network (which, as you'll see from the ratings, is easily the most favourable in the first season). The chaotic shift in tone happens all throughout the show and leaves the viewer with a disorienting lack of reference. With a show that has this much disregard for structure, you wonder if Donald Glover & co should have just made a sketch series where they can try out many different ideas at a faster pace than a drawn out dramedy that really at the end of the day goes from "Earn is Paper Boy's manager" to "Paper Boy might have a gig somewhere outside Atlanta" with absolutely nothing in-between.

It almost makes the show frustrating to watch. While I don't fault "Atlanta" for taking risks and trying to be experimental, it absolutely does not live up to "Joel and Ethan Coen make a show about hip-hop".

When "Atlanta" works, it's very much a quirky piece of unexpected mundanity and when it doesn't, it just comes across as half-baked and needlessly vague. It's the kind of show that probably wouldn't have this high a rating, never would be given a second season, and wouldn't ever have been given a chance to begin with if it weren't for Donald Glover's existing success and very big claims from the beginning. Users who rate shows based on seeing only one episode really do other potential viewers a disservice. Rate it episode per episode, then rate the show once the season is done. It's that kind of patience that helps kill the misleading energy of hype.

However, it's also the kind of show that will definitely get better in the following seasons as it develops more of a distinct personality and flavor for the viewer to appreciate. Unfortunately that's not going to happen until 2018 so here's for hoping it comes back and actually starts to live up to its promises and claims by auteur Donald Glover. As much as I thought it could use improvement after the first season, I certainly would love to see it succeed in the years following.
34 out of 73 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed