7 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
2/10
Sycophantic drivel
13 March 2024
That a load of sycophantic drivel. The acting is at best - poor but it's still far more convincing than the script.

Her school was nothing like the school described in the film. But that's true of so many other things in the film too. How on earth did any of the actors or crew keep a straight face when they pretended that British Rail trains had a sweet trolly? Some did have a sandwich trolley - but very few people were ever brave enough to try to eat one of the dreaded sandwiches. As for tripe sweets? What? More like a load of tripe fim.

Whoever did the research for this film really needs to look at a different career.

My daughter was a huge Happy Potter fan when she was younger and even she thought this film was about as entertaining as a headache. This waste of peoples time is just a crass attempt to make money from someone else's fame. Why work hard to achieve anything yourself when you can just make a film about some who did?
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Black Adam (2022)
2/10
Bland Adam
20 August 2023
Warning: Spoilers
Blah Adam is just poor. The scriptwriting is utterly atrocious. The dialogue just lurches clumsily from one cliché to another and the plot line is predictable. The moment they say something is unbreakable, you know know it's going to get broken - and sure enough, it does. The biggest weakness is that the characters just have no depth. As a result, you just don't care if they live or die.

The CGI is good. It works really well. It's such a shame to see such good visuals wasted on such a bad film.

Of the main characters, you hardly even see two of them. Embarrassingly enough for them, they seem to pop up in fights with no discernable effect. One can control wind. Even trapped wind after a bean supper would be more dangerous.

As always, the rock is almost adequate. He's not terrible, he's just not very good.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Ted 2 (2015)
1/10
Terrible. This just shouldn't have been made.
27 June 2023
This film is just lazy. The first film made a profit so as always, Hollywood rushes to churn out a sequel in the hope of making more money. Unfortunately, making money was obviously more important than making a good film. They took a very weak storyline concept and somehow managed to drag it out for two hours! It could have been done in ten minutes with time to spare. There's just no substitute for good writers. If you have a poor writing team, just saying f&&k as often as possible doesn't make it better. This film is probably aimed at a young teenage market. An audience who are young enough to think that just hearing a rude word is funny and that the more there are, the funnier it is. If on the other hand you have an IQ slightly higher than a plant, the novelty wears off very quickly and you're left with two hours of the poor writing, reasonable acting and lazy directing.
0 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Disapointingly below average.
23 February 2023
Warning: Spoilers
Perhaps the novelty of a younger sister to Sherlock Holmes has worn off? The basic premise has so much potential. That may have been part of the reason I preferred the first film. Sadly, this second outing was a dissapointment.

The main character talks directly to the audience through the camera. That's the key to these films. Enola Holmes talks directly to you and takes you into her confidence as if she were talking to a friend. But that's also the problem. You have to like the character for this to work. I didn't. At times, she just seemed to prattle on..... and on. She never stops. All the way through the film she drones on about something or other. The overall effect was that I just got fed up with the incessant sound of her voice. Coupled with that, she just wasn't convincing. For someone who claimed to know Jujitsu, she seemed to be remarkably inept. In general, the fight scenes were frankly awful. Nobody would accuse the actor playing Lord Tewkesbury of being a bodybuilder. He gives a decent performance in the film, but in a strong wind, the poor lad needs to be tied to the ground in case he blows away. Yet, somehow he manages to win a fight against a larger, stronger and far more experienced fighter. The guy was twice his size and we know that the reality would have been - one punch - lights out for Lord T.

It felt like Henry Cavel struggled with a weak script. There are only so many ways in which you can frown at someone. He managed them all with great aplomb. But, he was underutilised.

In the ultimate cliche, at the end of the film, the 'villain' even stopped to explain the evil plan. Short of accusing some meddling kids and a Great Dane of interfering, it verged on becoming a Scooby Do ending.

The main problem with the film.... the constant repetition of the women's rights theme. Yes! We know! Things were dreadful then and they're still not right now. Few would disagree. But to be constantly reminded actually got in the way of the story on several occasions. Even the villain took time while outlining her evil plans to tell us about the inequalities in the world. To then link the match factory in the film to the real factory where a group of very brave women made history by standing up for their rights.... felt like they were trying to steal some of the credit.
5 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Drivel. It looked like
22 February 2023
This is a little like watching a western that was sponsored by a laundry detergent company. Everyone looked clean and shiny. That was the only clean thing about it though. The 'humour' was just terrible. Every laugh was all but signposted and I half expected the cast to shout 'ba-da-boom' and smile at the camera after every attempt at a joke. Most of the time it just seemed like the writers just couldn't be bothered to come up with anything original or funny. They relied on bad language and bad jokes.

Maybe the second half of the film was better. I'll never know. I couldn't bring myself to carry on watching.
1 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Great scenery..... but what dull series.
21 December 2022
The scenery is excellent. The CGI scenes merge almost seamlessly into each other. Even the costumes are good. It's the plot that let this down. In all honesty, this entire series could have been redone as a sub-2hr film with half an hour to spare. In the end, the pace throughout the series seemed to be so slow that when I got bored of it and missed an episode, it turned out that nothing much had happened and I hadn't missed anything.

The acting was 'fair' to 'good'. With the exception of a few of the elven characters. I'm not sure if they'd seen too many Star Trek films but they seemed more Vulcan than Elven. On several occasions I was expecting to hear them telling each other to 'live long and prosper'.
25 out of 33 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Elf (2003)
1/10
Terrible. Typically moronic American film with awful acting.
16 December 2018
Will Ferrel overacting as always and spoon feeding moronic lines. Tip for Will Ferrell: conveying a different emotion doesn't just mean shout louder!
3 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed