Reviews

What a waste of space in this film.

Actually came to make a review just to express my confusion of why she's in this movie.

Also 40 minutes in and her scenes have me believe that's exactly what she's like in real life too.

SMDH.

I threw this movie on for some background noise but it was fantastic! The characters were brilliant and Hadley Robinson brings forth badass 90's Kirsten Dunst vibes in the best way possible and she carries this movie brilliantly. It has similarities to 13 reasons why, and any chance to open up these kinds of conversations to young girls is nothing short of revolutionary.

Literally here just to comment on Daniel Radcliffe's scene about 1hr 15mins in. The man just gets better and better in each acting performance he does.

The movie itself is filmed beautifully and the cinematography is brilliant, the other actors do a comparable performance but Radcliffe carries the bulk of the movie amidst a very green backdrop and not much else.

If it weren't for his performance, I probably would not be writing this review.

I'm a huge WWI buff and had to rate this 10/10. Everything about this movie was spot on, even the filming setting, looked remarkably like the landscape of the Somme. Stunning cinematography and could not fault the actors in the slightest. Barely touched my popcorn in the cinema as I was on the edge of my seat the entire film. Absolutely Brilliant.

This movie is awful. Not going to lie, I fast forwarded through most of it thanks to the beauty of Netflix. Teenagers are nothing like this and the acting is shoclibg. Not only that but the casting? It seems like they tried to find cheap actresses and actors who mildly resembled people from other strong sitcoms and movies, New Girl, I'm looking at you. Madelaine Petsch is the only redeeming quality and she should run far far away from whoever put her in this movie.

The choice to put a young youtuber as a teacher a d dress her in old clothes? Does not make them old. It makes for a bad cameo.

Don't waste your time.