Look, it's difficult for "sci-fi" to be wrong, but this movie somehow does it by contradicting itself frequently. More specifically, it makes the classic amateur sci-fi/fantasy blunder where someone (a scriptwriter presumably) says, "We want X technology to be in the story" but then doesn't consider the wider consequences of including that element in their story. For example, in a magic setting it's like giving wizards the ability to shoot fire but somehow nobody realizes they can use their magic to also cook food, heat homes, or do anything other than fight with. Similarly, the scriptwriters seemingly said "we want an indistinguishable-from-human android" and "we want storm-trooper-like combat robots" which are completely incompatible ideas.
Now, maybe this just bugs me more than the average person because I've got personal experience with robotics and software development but even the non-technical people I watched this movie found it odd that on the one hand you have Leo, the android, shooting perfect headshots with a pistol while moving (only when convenient) and on the other you have literal walking combat platforms that are unable to hit the broad side of an insurgent with from their stabilized weapons system. It's ridiculous. If you have the capability to program fully capable AGI (artificial general intelligence), making a robot shoot headshots consistently is a preschool level Sunday school arts and crafts project difficulty-wise. Almost any postgraduate computer science major could do it today.
The most offensive scene was the hostage situation in front of the bank. Realistically, the bad guys shouldn't have had a chance--they (squishy humans) were caught outflanked and out of cover surrounded by 12+ combat robots. Sure, they had hostages, but even today's military systems can electronically synchronize themselves for coordinated fire. The robots would've just lined up headshots, then simultaneously executed all the baddies in one fell swoop before they can even think to shoot the hostages.
Now, maybe this just bugs me more than the average person because I've got personal experience with robotics and software development but even the non-technical people I watched this movie found it odd that on the one hand you have Leo, the android, shooting perfect headshots with a pistol while moving (only when convenient) and on the other you have literal walking combat platforms that are unable to hit the broad side of an insurgent with from their stabilized weapons system. It's ridiculous. If you have the capability to program fully capable AGI (artificial general intelligence), making a robot shoot headshots consistently is a preschool level Sunday school arts and crafts project difficulty-wise. Almost any postgraduate computer science major could do it today.
The most offensive scene was the hostage situation in front of the bank. Realistically, the bad guys shouldn't have had a chance--they (squishy humans) were caught outflanked and out of cover surrounded by 12+ combat robots. Sure, they had hostages, but even today's military systems can electronically synchronize themselves for coordinated fire. The robots would've just lined up headshots, then simultaneously executed all the baddies in one fell swoop before they can even think to shoot the hostages.
Tell Your Friends