*I know what Nolan was trying to do, make a war film with as little cgi as possible. He wanted everything to be in front of the screen. We have to applaud him.
Execution wise, this movie is boring, slow, and even at less than 2 hours it feels 30 minutes too long.
*There is no story, no characters, and Dunkirk looks very very bare. Just watch that "Dunkirk-scene" from the movie "Atonement" and you will see that it is done way better in "Atonement."
*This movie is just boring but Nolan can't help but add his "magic" to it. He just can't make a straight forward film anymore, he has to make different timelines, he has to try to make everything "Memento-like." Not everything needs that back and forth thing, just make a straight up story.
5/10 Good directing and acting, but boring film, action scenes are boring, no story, no characters, and Nolan really needed to add come CGI for his Dunkirk films to show more troops. It just looks so bare.
Execution wise, this movie is boring, slow, and even at less than 2 hours it feels 30 minutes too long.
*There is no story, no characters, and Dunkirk looks very very bare. Just watch that "Dunkirk-scene" from the movie "Atonement" and you will see that it is done way better in "Atonement."
*This movie is just boring but Nolan can't help but add his "magic" to it. He just can't make a straight forward film anymore, he has to make different timelines, he has to try to make everything "Memento-like." Not everything needs that back and forth thing, just make a straight up story.
5/10 Good directing and acting, but boring film, action scenes are boring, no story, no characters, and Nolan really needed to add come CGI for his Dunkirk films to show more troops. It just looks so bare.
Tell Your Friends