Reviews

4 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
Maestro(s) (2022)
6/10
Makes me very curious about the original
28 August 2022
Warning: Spoilers
I saw this at the Film Festival of Angoulême. Although I have not seen the original - I had heard good things about it - I decided to give this a chance. The starting point is very original and promising. Father and son, both acclaimed orchestra conductors, have always had a bad relationship and when the father is invited to conduct the Scala in Milan, he becomes insufferable. Except that a mistake was made by an assistant and it was not the father who has been given this prestigious task but the son. There is no way the son can look his father in the eye and tell him this. So he lets him believe for a while that he is still going to Milan. This will lead to a painful confrontation when the father finds out.

Unfortunately, the film doesn't manage to fully explore the relationship between father and son. The film is too short; a good half an hour extra would have done the story good. Now it feels rushed.

Pierre Arditi is formidable as the father, but Yvan Attal is not of the same caliber. He has a lot of close ups while his facial expression is very limited.

All in all, while I can criticize some choices in directing and also cinematography, the film is not bad and worth while giving it a chance.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Nos frangins (2022)
7/10
Important subject but could have been executed a bit better
28 August 2022
I saw this at the Film Festival of Angoulême. The film was also screened in Cannes out of competition. The reputation of the director made me choose this for the first screening I attended at the festival. The film takes place in 1986 and starts with the murder of two young Algerian men by the French police in Paris. I am too young to have heard of this affair, but it was something that shook the whole society and led to big student protests. The terrible thing is that the police tried to cover it up and almost succeeded were it not for witnesses and the determination of one of the families to prosecute the responsible officers.

The problem of the film is that it's out of balance. One of the families is given a lot of screen time, and the other very little. The structure is meant to make the events hit us extra hard, but unfortunately Bouchareb is not able to fulfill his ambitions. The actors are excellent, but they don't have much to do. For instance the police inspector is just wandering around looking serious.

Not a bad film, but I expected more.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Line (I) (2022)
2/10
Unforgivable that the director doesn't give an explanation for the behaviour of the daughter
28 August 2022
Warning: Spoilers
Saw this at the Film Festival of Angoulême. The beginning scene is a baroque outburst of violence filmed in slow-mo. We see a woman attacking her mother while two men are trying to contain her. Of course you expect to discover later on why this person did that, but no, it is never explained in the film which is absolutely unforgivable. We don't have a crystal ball. What on earth happened? You don't attack someone violently like that for no reason. Unfortunately, it's exactly what the film is telling us. The woman has a violent temper and the reason why the film was made in the first place is to show that women can be violent as well, and I'm quoting the director here. Well, if this is the way, you want to show it, then maybe you should think twice. And maybe, just maybe, write a proper script first. There is zero psychology, hence zero character development.

The actors weren't bad, except for Bruni-Tedeschi. She has been playing the same role for the last 10 years. Can't see her anymore.

The only good thing about this film is the technical achievement, that's why the two stars were given. Good camera work and good editing. But of course that is not enough. How this got funding in the first place and made it to the official competition in Berlin is beyond me. Ursula Meier is a very overestimated director.
8 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Abhorrent kitch like you have never seen before
28 August 2022
Saw this at the Film Festival in Angoulême and was absolutely shocked by how Jewish suffering during the WW2 was portrayed. The actresses didn't act; they were dolls with too much make-up on and too good of a hairstyle to provoke any sympathy. The structure of the film is pretentious and doesn't work at all. One scene we're seeing images of men in camps in war torn Bosnia, and next scene we're sitting under a moonlit sky in the Mediterranean enjoying a romantic talk. How is this possible? Camera work is ugly; too much steady cam, too many close ups. And don't get me started on the music! Was there even one second when the spectator can catch a breath from the never ending score? No. This director should be banned from making films for life.
13 out of 66 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed