Huan hua xi jian (1982) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
3 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
5/10
Lesser, later work from Chor Yuen
Leofwine_draca27 July 2021
Warning: Spoilers
One of Chor Yuen's last 'martial world' stories for Shaw. A far cry from the quality of the ones he was making 6-7 years previously and there's a cheat at the beginning with clips of Ti Lung, David Chiang and Alexander Fu Sheng making you think this is going to be an all-star collaboration. Instead we're stuck with Tony Liu in a story about the quest for an antidote and the usual betrayal and plotting that takes place en route.

Yuen appears to have been smoking a fair bit of opium during production because that's the only reason I can find for the drug-inducted garish visuals and quirky FX work. The colour scheme is spot on but the film is let down by awful costumes and generally lacklustre fight choreography, although Yuen Wah is always welcome. Some reliable actors in support including Lo Lieh and Sun Chien, but everyone present has done better work and it only springs into life right at the end.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Anticipated highlights can't overcome glaring problems
I_Ailurophile30 April 2024
While they are hardly alone, no one in Hong Kong cinema carries a reputation quite like The Shaw Brothers. With rare exception one can rely on their features for outstanding martial arts action and gorgeous visuals, and a standard of high quality in all other regards is just a common bonus. Rest assured that with fluid, fast-paced, artistic fight choreography and stunts that first expectation is fulfilled; as we're treated to phenomenal, heavily detailed sets, costume design, hair and makeup, and some swell practical effects, the second expectation is also well met. In those ways that we anticipate most from the famed production company, 'The spirit of the sword' delivers just what we came for. Unfortunately, however, in other critical capacities this picture is far less impressive, and to be frank the viewing experience is troubled, if not also aggravating, and genuinely exhausting. I can't believe I'm saying this, but in all honesty, this is the first Shaw Brothers title I've seen that outright disappointed me.

Between the editing and even more so the direction, the pacing in these ninety minutes is untenably swift from moment to moment even in individual scenes, diminishing all possible impact of action and story alike. On paper that story has some value, yet it hamstrings itself for the fact that the antagonist to be revealed in the third act turns out to be a figure whose villainy had been indicated within the first few minutes. It's the aching dullness of kids' cartoons: "Gosh golly, who could the bad guy be behind the nefarious plot this week? The same bad guy as every other week?! Wow, no way!" Furthermore, in execution that story suffers not only from the forced pacing, but from dialogue and scene writing that poorly communicate plot development, and any details, while squashing the narrative into a length of film that is too small for it. As a result, the whole narrative just feels terribly unwieldy, reduced from suitable potential to a gawky, clumsy mess. Moreover, there are times when the dialogue and scene writing share baffling traits with too many instances of the direction and cinematography, and some practical effects: there is a flummoxing, childish simplicity, lack of sophistication, and extremely on the nose approach taken toward some odds and ends that is plainly off-putting. Despite the finesse that the movie illustrates at its best, there is an unpolished sloppiness to wide swaths of the length that almost suggests the uncareful artificiality we suppose of low-budget family-friendly fare.

How could there be such a glaring disparity between the fight choreography, and the aesthetics and visuals at large, set against woefully sloppy construction in numerous essential ways? What happened here, as compared to most anything else the company churned out? I don't think it's literally true but there comes a point where it feels like there is less action than there is dubious plot development; there definitely comes a point where the best strengths of the production no longer compensate for its weaknesses. Admittedly I couldn't pinpoint when that was, but I can say that the minutes drag by, and in all sincerity 'The spirit of the sword' feels about twice as long as it is. It's not 100% rotten, but for all the terrific features that The Shaw Brothers made, boasting the same worth this does but without its flaws, why would we want to spend time here in the first place? No doubt other folks will watch this and find it highly enjoyable; I'm sad that I sat to watch assuming the greatness I always do of so storied a production company, and step away wishing I had chosen something else to watch. Check it out if you want, I won't stop you, but as far as I'm concerned you should skip right past this and keep browsing.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
One of the best Yuen Chor Movies
crabarr10 July 2005
In this film, there are 5 main clans ruling the martial world, each representing one of the 5 elements - fire, metal, water, wood and earth. Each year they hold a martial arts competition to decide which one of the 5 clans will rule the world. The story is centered around one of these tournaments, as a catastrophe arises when an evil samurai killer shows up 49 days before the start and tries to assassinate the current leader who happens to be from the Water clan.

This movie ranks up there with all the other excellent Yuen Chor adaptations of Ku Long novels, such as "Killer Clans" and "Magic Blade". I don't think I have ever seen a Shaw Brothers movie with the word "Sword" in the title, that wasn't great. If you are a wuxia fan, this is a must watch. It has all the elements that make a good wuxia film: superb fight choreography and fantastic techniques; engaging storyline and plot; great sets, wardrobe and photography. You won't be disappointed.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed